A few weeks ago, Sony Pictures added a button to its Angels & Demons website linking to The Vatican Secret Archives. Not a fictional one, but the real Vatican site that’s the repository of centuries worth of documents pertaining to the Holy See. These Archives figure prominently in the storyline of the Dan Brown book and this weekend’s movie. Since then, 71,000 people have used the link to visit the Archives. Go figure. The appeal is that they can, for example, find the trial proceedings against Galileo (another topic touched on by the book/movie) or the letter requesting the annulment of Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon that split England from the Church of Rome. Clearly, the Dan Brown books/movies have been a catalyst for millions of people to learn about early Christian history.
Back when The Da Vinci Code was released in 2006, Sony was surprised when thousands of pastors embraced the controversial story by using it as a teaching tool. Now, with the release of Angels & Demons, Sony didn’t bat an eye when Cardinal Sean O’Malley, who’s in charge of one of the churches where some of the action in the book/movie takes place, was supportive of the film in a recent interview. “If it brings people to see the church, hopefully, being in a holy place will be a religious experience for them.” And to think that, at the start of the hype over the Da Vinci Code pic, The Vatican condemned Hollywood. Now, L’Osservatore, the official newspaper of The Vatican, called Angels & Demons “gripping”. Nevertheless, the Catholic League is denouncing the 2nd pic just like it did the first, accusing Ron Howard and Dan Brown of “smearing” the Catholic Church with fabulously bogus tales. As for Sony, all the studio cares about is making money off those stories.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Well, lets see. From what I read the Catholic Bishops and others are saying the film is “historical and religious poppycock” and the film critics consensus seem to agree this is just a ludicrous boring film. Our Local film critic gave it a ONE star rating out of four. The early consensus from those that have seen it seem to agree. So maybe that is why the church is now trying to get some positive traction out of the negative film which many will still go out and spend $10 bucks on. I wonder though, the Hollywood industry seemed outraged at the “Passion of the Christ” film as being anti-Jewish when it came out but seem quiet and pleased at this current anti-Catholic outing. Its evident, Hypocrisy doesn’t seems to bother those in the Hollywood industry.
I’m a catholic and I don’t take offense to that movie. I haven’t see the first one yet either.
The “Catholic League’ consists of one guy (Donohue), a letterhead and probably a fax machine. Yet he manages to get quoted and cited everywhere as if he spoke for the Church itself. I wish the media and bloggers alike would be more critical of Donohue’s self-appointed spokesthingy status. Who cares what he thinks?
I’m also Catholic but these new type of movies don’t bother me in the least it’s like “wateva” . What I do like is the renewed interest in Catholocism and early Christian history. I’ve always found it facinating.
About 10 years ago I went on my own personal fun mission inside the Vatican. Man I tell you I snuck into places there that is on no tour guides’ itinerary. I broke away from my tour group and when about all those doors you are not supposed to go thru. FUN!!!!!! I was never scared cuz I knew I could scream anytime and with the type of acoustics you have in a church..well I was not worried. I encountered Cardinals, Vatican administrators, restoration people, Swiss guards, the Pope’s private apartment, etc.. But this was pre 9/11. I don’t think people can just wander off like I did anymore.
Donahue is just one person and he does not speak for all Catholics. A “league” should consist of many people. I understand where he’s coming from but still.