This hugely surprising and dramatic change for the 82nd Academy Awards is the direct result of intense lobbying by the major studios of the “Acadummy” Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences.
And outgoing president Sid Ganis, himself a former Sony/Columbia top executive, was especially vulnerable to the studio pressure because of his personality penchant for kowtowing to power and influence. I’ve learned he personally helped the studios impose their agenda on what is supposed to be the independent AMPAS board (but really isn’t). Let’s face it: this is great development for the studios who can now make their more successful releases even bigger cash cows with an Oscar nomination. But this is a terrible idea. It is nothing short of nonsensical for such an extreme departure from the Academy Awards’ recent past to be taking place. So what if, from 1932 to 1943, the Academy members nominated 10 films for Best Picture? (Embarrassing how AMPAS trotted out all those posters from 1939 to make their point without acknowledging that the major studios started a new picture once or twice a week in their heyday. Bette Davis alone starred in 4 to 6 pictures a year: that’s why Academy members could nominate 10 great movies for Best Picture.) That was then and this is now. And today it devalues the rarity of an Oscar nomination and belittles the judging process. (The Academy Awards now resembles the Golden Globes…) It’s no secret that the studios have grown increasingly frustrated that their mainstream fare — the four-quadrant films, the family-oriented toons, the superhero actioners, and the high-octane thrillers — have not been able to garner enough Best Picture nods in recent years while the art house offerings of the rapidly dwindling specialty divisions and indie prods dominate the process. That, in turn, has hurt the Oscar broadcast ratings as little seen and often little known films compete with one another while blockbuster hits are left out of the Academy Awards show. AMPAS buckled for reasons of self-preservation. Understandable, to be sure. But today’s announcement cheapens the entire nominating process. Why not 10 Best Actor or Best Actress or Best Director or Best Foreign Film nominations as well? The studios got what they wanted at the expense of the Academy’s integrity.
Beverly Hills, CA (June 24, 2009) — The 82nd Academy Awards, which will be presented on March 7, 2010, will have 10 feature films vying in the Best Picture category, Academy Motion Picture Arts and Sciences President Sid Ganis announced today (June 24) at a press conference in Beverly Hills.
“After more than six decades, the Academy is returning to some of its earlier roots, when a wider field competed for the top award of the year,” said Ganis. “The final outcome, of course, will be the same – one Best Picture winner – but the race to the finish line will feature 10, not just five, great movies from 2009.”
For more than a decade during the Academy’s earlier years, the Best Picture category welcomed more than five films; for nine years there were 10 nominees. The 16th Academy Awards (1943) was the last year to include a field of that size; “Casablanca” was named Best Picture. (In 1931/32, there were eight nominees and in 1934 and 1935 there were 12 nominees.)
Currently, the Academy is presenting a bicoastal screening series showcasing the 10 Best Picture nominees of 1939, arguably one of Hollywood’s greatest film years. Best Picture nominees of that year include such diverse classics as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” “Stagecoach,” “The Wizard of Oz” and Best Picture winner “Gone with the Wind.”
“Having 10 Best Picture nominees is going allow Academy voters to recognize and include some of the fantastic movies that often show up in the other Oscar categories, but have been squeezed out of the race for the top prize,” commented Ganis. “I can’t wait to see what that list of ten looks like when the nominees are announced in February.”
The 82nd Academy Awards nominations will be announced on Tuesday, February 2. The Oscar® ceremony honoring films for 2009 will again take place at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, and will be televised live by the ABC Television Network.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


The nominees should be:
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
Wall-E (for last year’s snub)
Sound like a way to appease the masses to me, however maybe not such a bad idea. I have always felt that mass market pictures lucked out in this category to the smaller art house pictures.
But I think the studios are kidding themselves if they think it is going to work. More choices does not always equal better outcomes!
I guess you can thank all those fools who were complaining that The Dark Knight didn’t get nominated last year. Regardless- it will still only be a two movie race ( it always is )…
Or mabe this was done for Harvey- Since he’s broke now- he can make one movie a year and concentrate on that flick to steal the Oscar next year ( hey..it worked for him in the past )
Sound like a way to appease the masses to me, however maybe not such a bad idea. I have always felt that mass market pictures lucked out in this category to the smaller art house pictures.
But, I think the studios are kidding themselves if they think it is going to work. More choices does not always equal better outcomes!
Amen Nikki, Amen. Twilight 2 for best picture?!?
Others may have said this already but hard to believe ten films could ever be deemed Best Picture quality when five seem a stretch sometimes. The whole thing smells.
At least it wasn’t ten songs we’d have to sit through and while I’m at it, if broadcast time is always an issue with the Oscar show, why do they allow the presenters to take that lengthy “perp walk” to the microphone. I’ve never understood that. There really aren’t enough genuine movie stars to ogle these days anyway.
Next they’ll be thumping for ten Best Actor nominees, ten Best Actress nominees, ten Best Screenplay nominees…
Why is this bad? Doesn’t this just mean more DVD screeners?
Now movies like MEET DAVE can finally be recognized by the Academy.
This is like the bar owner who watered down his drinks so much even the alcoholics won’t go there anymore.
The Academy is now the bar that movie fans will avoid.
Remember when it used to a honor just to be nominated?
Now there is plenty of room for every studio to get one of their major releases a nomination if they spend enough money. Like an automatic berth in the NCAA 64 tourney.
This is good news for VARIETY and THR’s ad revenue though.
Any pretense of Acadummy “integrity” went out the window with Crash winning Best Picture…
..or Denzel over D.D. Lewis for Bill in Gangs. Is Don King a member of the Acad?
While they’re making changes can they just make it Best Acting in a Film? And Best Acting in a Supporting Role in a Film? Get rid of the separation of male and female performances. They don’t have best male director and best female director, nor best male editor/writer/costume designer and then best female editor/writer/costume desginer and so on. So many actresses refer to themselves as “an actor” these days, anyway, why is the academy still discriminating by gender? It’s sexist.
As a member of the Academy I have to ask WTF? There was a line in “The Incredibles” a few years back that basically said (I’m paraphrasing here): If everyone is special then nobody’s special. This decision kind of reminds me of that line.
There are some years when even the Best Picture winner is undeserving of a nomination and there are certainly many years when some of the nominated films are undeserving of a Best Picture Nomination. By doubling the number of nominees for this category we’re basically giving credibility and legitimacy to a bunch of films that don’t deserve it and are thereby marginalizing the award and our organization in the process. For what? So that the studios can put “Academy Award Best Picture Nominated” or some other such tripe on movie ads and DVD packaging? I wish the Board of Governors had put this up to a general membership vote. Sad.
That is one stupid, lame ass ego driven idea! So now the award show will DRAG on even longer. I could understand if this was the 30′s 40′s or 50′s at least they made great films to chose from. What’s next? 10 nominees for the actors (oh god I sense that will be in their next contract negotiation). Have two winners? Good timing since the studios are scaling back on production which means less film competition too! (eveyrone a winner) Plus Gold is going up! (the Oscar trophy will be worth more too) god help the help the film industry.
There’s usually not even five movies worth nominating in a year. And when there are, the Academy goes out of the way to avoid anything most people have heard of and nominate mediocre films that are either ultra-depressing or about Nazi Germany.
So stupid movies that make a lot of money will get a nom (but don’t win), and their producers and studio execs and directory get to call themselves nominees? And cream all over themselves? Priceless.
It actually IS a GREAT idea, economically speaking.
This move will bring more cash to the studios in these financially strapped times, which will hopefully allow more (aka BETTER) motion pictures to come from Hollywood, and, help with California’s struggling economy.
Here’s how. Every year, when the nominees are announced for Best Picture, Movie buffs will rush to the theatres to see the nominated films BEFORE the awards actually air. (Creating more revenue) Also, when these films are released on DVD, MORE DVD’s will be sold to movie buffs. (Again, creating MORE revenue for Hollywood.)
Then, hopefully, this will allow Hollywood to produce more product, which in turn will create more work in the industry, which spurs more spending, creates more jobs outside the industry for California and this ripple effect goes on and on.
We should EMBRACE this decision, and remember that in fact, REGARDLESS how many nominees there are, that there in fact can only be ONE WINNER.
And besides all this increased revenue, job creation and kick-starting of the economy, It will increase the length of the Academy Awards show itself. (Which, by the way, we all can agree is too SHORT in it’s current content.)
I know what this will mean.
Even more tedious “gimme an Oscar” vanity projects.
Excellent idea! Long overdue.
The Academy Awards used to mean something. After 1998 it became clear that the Best Picture category was decided by studio marketing and publicity departments. Now Harvey Weinstein will have more movies to pimp as “Best Picture Nominees”. ANother meaningless, yet overly sold, designation.
It supports the industry Nikki. It doubles marketing revenue to legal to restaurants… More money for all of us.
Obviouly, the intention is to get some “popular” films (aka “blockbusters”) onto the final ballot- but I think it’ll backfire, and you’ll just end up with even MORE obscure “critical darlings” nominated, and Oscar will seem more elitist than ever.(There was a time when the most commercially successful film of the year was almost always a film with geniune merit- a GODFATHER or STAR WARS or some such- but this year’s biggest hit looks to be TRANSFORMERS 2… good luck with that…)
Double the playing field? Really? After last year’s show??? Who was the host again? Did they even have a host? You can’t please all of the people all of the time and every year someone’s inevitably disappointed by the five pics that get the nod. But ten??? At a time when the show already seems weighted down by its own self-importance?? Maybe it’d be a better idea to reconnect with the (dwindling) audience and rediscover the fun of the awards. Ten best picture nominees…I guess we all better brace an even more bloated 4 1/2 hr show…..
Please please please reverse this, this is depressingly misguided and defaces what little integrity we continue to hold dear in the Academy Awards.
Studio heads, the profits incurred from this will be at best minor, and the outrage long-term. Unless all categories are expanded to 10 nominations, the irregularity will be staggering year after year.
Academy, I beg you, please retract this. Just say you drunk-texted Nikki and awkward it out for a day or two.
Now Hollywood just needs to produce ten movies that warrant a Best Picture nom.
Can you say five-hour Oscarcast next year?
I wonder how many other non-mainstream categories will be jettisoned off the air to accommodate all these extra clip packages? We may never see a documentary or short subject mentioned again…
One would think that this will force the producers to finally get rid of silly song/dance routines and pointless themed montages, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
Get ready for “Savion Glover’s Tapping Tribute to Trek” somewhere in hour 5.