This hugely surprising and dramatic change for the 82nd Academy Awards is the direct result of intense lobbying by the major studios of the “Acadummy” Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences.
And outgoing president Sid Ganis, himself a former Sony/Columbia top executive, was especially vulnerable to the studio pressure because of his personality penchant for kowtowing to power and influence. I’ve learned he personally helped the studios impose their agenda on what is supposed to be the independent AMPAS board (but really isn’t). Let’s face it: this is great development for the studios who can now make their more successful releases even bigger cash cows with an Oscar nomination. But this is a terrible idea. It is nothing short of nonsensical for such an extreme departure from the Academy Awards’ recent past to be taking place. So what if, from 1932 to 1943, the Academy members nominated 10 films for Best Picture? (Embarrassing how AMPAS trotted out all those posters from 1939 to make their point without acknowledging that the major studios started a new picture once or twice a week in their heyday. Bette Davis alone starred in 4 to 6 pictures a year: that’s why Academy members could nominate 10 great movies for Best Picture.) That was then and this is now. And today it devalues the rarity of an Oscar nomination and belittles the judging process. (The Academy Awards now resembles the Golden Globes…) It’s no secret that the studios have grown increasingly frustrated that their mainstream fare — the four-quadrant films, the family-oriented toons, the superhero actioners, and the high-octane thrillers — have not been able to garner enough Best Picture nods in recent years while the art house offerings of the rapidly dwindling specialty divisions and indie prods dominate the process. That, in turn, has hurt the Oscar broadcast ratings as little seen and often little known films compete with one another while blockbuster hits are left out of the Academy Awards show. AMPAS buckled for reasons of self-preservation. Understandable, to be sure. But today’s announcement cheapens the entire nominating process. Why not 10 Best Actor or Best Actress or Best Director or Best Foreign Film nominations as well? The studios got what they wanted at the expense of the Academy’s integrity.
Beverly Hills, CA (June 24, 2009) — The 82nd Academy Awards, which will be presented on March 7, 2010, will have 10 feature films vying in the Best Picture category, Academy Motion Picture Arts and Sciences President Sid Ganis announced today (June 24) at a press conference in Beverly Hills.
“After more than six decades, the Academy is returning to some of its earlier roots, when a wider field competed for the top award of the year,” said Ganis. “The final outcome, of course, will be the same – one Best Picture winner – but the race to the finish line will feature 10, not just five, great movies from 2009.”
For more than a decade during the Academy’s earlier years, the Best Picture category welcomed more than five films; for nine years there were 10 nominees. The 16th Academy Awards (1943) was the last year to include a field of that size; “Casablanca” was named Best Picture. (In 1931/32, there were eight nominees and in 1934 and 1935 there were 12 nominees.)
Currently, the Academy is presenting a bicoastal screening series showcasing the 10 Best Picture nominees of 1939, arguably one of Hollywood’s greatest film years. Best Picture nominees of that year include such diverse classics as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” “Stagecoach,” “The Wizard of Oz” and Best Picture winner “Gone with the Wind.”
“Having 10 Best Picture nominees is going allow Academy voters to recognize and include some of the fantastic movies that often show up in the other Oscar categories, but have been squeezed out of the race for the top prize,” commented Ganis. “I can’t wait to see what that list of ten looks like when the nominees are announced in February.”
The 82nd Academy Awards nominations will be announced on Tuesday, February 2. The Oscar® ceremony honoring films for 2009 will again take place at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, and will be televised live by the ABC Television Network.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







oh silly Academy, did you forget that this industry is all about exclusion not inclusion? make everyone special and no one is special… take that away and the majority of these people have no identity.
not to mention this will qualify a whole lot of random people to Academy membership… yeah, i bet you did not think of that, did ya?
This means that more likely than not Transformers 2 will be nominated.
“Best” doesn’t actually mean good …
What has more credibility, a best picture nomination or an Iranian election?
Shame on Sid Ganis.It cheapens the Academy nominations and the Academy itself.
…And the steady march towards devaluing and cheapening every inch of our culture continues in the name of squeezing out every bottom line penny, and enslavement to the dysfunctional stock market. This is a corporate dictate.
Re: the masses. Every other awards show caters to “the masses.” Must everything be “MTV’d” ? Look what’s happening to them. Ha.
May the Oscar broadcast nosedive to teach a lesson. It’s more than likely.
“I’ve got a bad feeling about this.” – Luke Skywalker
Yes, this is a very, very, very bad idea, Luke.
If we had another year like 1939, then 10 nominees would make sense. This year it means The Hangover has a shot.
Gotta love the comments planted by the studios cheering this on.
I would have preferred splitting the category off into best drama and best ????? film you pick the name either comedy,adventure feature. They did add the best animated category so how about giving the regular folks movies a shot. You may deride and chortle at the box office money makers but those are the films that keep the studios open so you can make you’re depressing movies that film snobs love.
They should eliminate the Best Animated Feature category now. It’s not needed anymore.
“Every year, when the nominees are announced for Best Picture, Movie buffs will rush to the theatres to see the nominated films BEFORE the awards actually air.”
Except that when you look at the actual BO numbers, it’s obvious that this is happening to a VERY small degree. If at all.
Nominations and awards give a boost to ticket sales, but it seems like the movies that need it the most get the smallest boost.
What a stupid STUPID idea! I agree with Nicki – it cheaps the nomination, makes the whole thing less meaningful, and will make the broadcast even more tedious to watch. I’m sure it will also cause ratings to go down. I’m guessing by next year they’ll be back to five nominees for Best Picture.
Probably similar to what previous Nobel Prize Awardees felt when Gore was handed the award for a complete farce.
So, with ten nominees, a film can be awarded as Best Picture of the year with 10.1% of the vote? So a few fanatics can control the outcome like that? Wow that would be horrific!
The Academy needs to re-work it’s balloting system then to reflect 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices to make sure that a film really is considered worthy by more than just 1/10 of the members.
This is shocking news alright, but I really don’t believe it
“cheapens” the one statuette that one film(or producer) will take
home. The wonner, as always, is the wniner and no one remembers the
also-rans by next year, be they absurd or stately.
AMPAS has made a clever decision: certain films that are perceived as
less “tony” will finally get their due (as they should) but it also
follows that many more of the so-called arthouse/indie titles will
also get a decent chance. There have been many years where a
wonderful smaller film with impeccable reviews has been left out
because there are only five slots.
On the other hand it’s doubtful this will result in a Jonas Brothers
movie among the best picture contenders. In other words: not the end
of the world and perhaps a more exciting competition.
What I’d really like to know is-what was behind the change to only 5
nominees down from 10 back in 1944 in the first place? I wonder what
the pressure was there, if any? It couldn’t have been a mandate to
shorten the (untelevised) ceremony, nor was there a dearth of good
films to draw from.
The quantity and genre variety of films produced nowadays is far greater than when the Oscars began. It seems fair to expand the category to include the larger, more diverse contestant pool.
How are they going to come up with 10 films for best picture? This is a joke.
James Maszczak you are a MORON. Go suck some studio teats please.
Only plus from this is more screeners for the video wall.
Oh great, and who’s gonna count the votes, Diebold?
What would make more sense is if the rules could be applied to allow UP TO ten nominees, establishing a threshhold of X percent of first ballot votes to qualify. If they can do it for funding for political candidates in a crowded field, they can do it for movies. It would also be nice if the Academy would announce the vote tally the world would know who came close (I know, I know: close only counts in hand grenades, horeseshoes, and net profits).
Well I’m ‘the masses’ and it doesn’t appease me one little bit. They might as well just stick a gold star on all the movies and praise them for trying hard, it would have just about as much meaning.
They should eliminate the Best Animated Feature category now. It’s not necessary anymore.
At least they haven’t decided that the top two vote-getting pictures will both be awarded the Oscar for “Best Picture.”
Okay, seriously? “…The race to the finish line will feature 10, not just five, great movies from 2009.” What are the odds of there being FIVE great movies from 2009, let alone TEN? Have there even been ten great movies since 2000? Yeah, 1939 was a banner year that we can all wax nostalgic for — I know I do — but it was a fucking long ago! If this would somehow inspire studios to greenlight more movies that actually have compelling stories instead of banal franchises, lowest common denominator comedies and CGI crap-fests, then awesome, I’m totally behind it. But somehow I don’t think all those execs and big box agency douchewads who are in dick measuring contests with each other about opening weekends are sitting around going, “Gee, if we actually greenlit something worthwhile, we might get NOMINATED for an OSCAR!” If only!!!
Why not look back to the very first Academy Awards ceremony where pictures were presented in two categories. “Best Productions” were given to studio tentpoles and the blockbuster “Wings” won, for Paramount incidentally. A second category for “Artistic Quality” awarded Murnau’s “Sunrise” (Fox) the Oscar. That 2-category scenario could accommodate a universe where “Dark Knight” co-exists with “Milk,” “Doubt” or even “Benjamin Button.” Of course then you have to argue over whether a film is Artistic or Commercial.
AWESOME!! this means they get to nominate TEN movies that NO ONE WATCHES instead of five!
like every dumbfuck idea–this thing will backfire..I can see the studio/academy confab now: “let’s see, what else can we fuck up…I KNOW…let’s tarnish the luster of the oscars by nominating ten movies for best picture every year”
and they all jerk each other off…
what little cultural cache the Oscars used to have was just obliterated
I’ve sensed this all along…Hollywood, going the way of Broadway
the self absorbed out of touch motherfuckers that run this town haven’t got a damn clue
soon every movie will either be unwatchable shit like terminator salvation
OR
unwatchable shit like the reader
that fat fuck harvey weinstein did in fact ruin the oscars..and in the immortal words of christian bale
GOOD FOR YOU!!!!