Hey, Hollywood, don’t get suckered by this week’s earnings reports of doom and gloom at the Big Media companies. In fact, the entertainment sides of some of these companies are doing — dare I say it — better. Now why this isn’t translating into more projects, and more jobs, is the fault of all the newly Nervous Nellies (who used to be Macho Moguls) atop the entertainment units. But there are definitely green shoots in the earnings reports.
Take Time Warner, where profits slid 34%. But the cable and Pay TV networks’ revenue rose by 5%, thanks to Turner Broadcasting and HBO (where subscription revenue rose 8%). Sure, publishing and AOL still stink. (And TW topper Jeff Bewkes reminded analysts that AOL will be spun off to shareholders before the end of 2009.) True, the film unit revenue declined 9% because of the usual “soft DVD sales” mantra. But film profit led by The Hangover surged 52% because of lower overhead and marketing costs.
However, it’s ridiculous that Bewkes has restarted Time Warner’s stock buyback program this quarter when now is exactly the moment Time Warner should be aggressively pursuing mergers and acquisitions. After all, so many mediacentric stock plays will never be this cheap. Bewkes has indicated before he wants to kick the tires of lots of companies. That’s how he should spend every penny of that Time Warner Cable bankroll.
—
DreamWorks Animation beat The Street even though the company didn’t release any movies in its 2nd-quarter where revenue and profit dipped 7% But sales exceeded Wall Street estimates because of a reworked video game agreement with Activision Blizzard that boosted revenue. We all know that CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg plans to increase DA’s film production by adding live shows and producing TV series to expand the company which still has only irregular revenues based on its small product output. But get this: Katzenberg in a conference call with analysts predicted DreamWorks Animation will have “the biggest year in the history of the company” in 2010. That’s because the company is releasing three toons next year (as opposed to just one in 2009, Monsters v Aliens, which didn’t perform overseas to Katzenberg’s consternation, prompting him to shore up foreign marketing and distribution before 2010). The films are How To Train Your Dragon in March, yet another Shrek sequel in May, and Oobermind in November. Next year, too, DA will ramp up its TV production, adding to the Nickelodeon hit Penguins Of Madagascar with series spinoffs of Kung Fu Panda and Monsters v. Aliens.
Katzenberg also fired a warning shot aimed at Paramount’s bow with the news that he’ll seek to lower the 8% distribution fee DA currently pays the Viacom film studio under a contract through 2012. Jeffrey can say all he wants it’s no longer a competitive rate, but Paramount will certainly push back.
—
And, speaking of Paramount, parent company Viacom earnings stumbled by 32%. But there, too, was a glimmer of hope as advertising at its media networks recovered 3 points compared to last quarter. While foreign ad sales tanked (-8%), domestic ad sales at MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon, BET, Comedy Central, etc dropped 6% compared to last year. Media networks saw total revenue declined 8%. But execs think the creative changes (hirings and firings) have put the TV side on the right track.
The year-to-year figures for filmed entertainment look bad, but that’s because in 2008 Paramount had Iron Man and Indiana Jones 4 while in 2009 Paramount could include Star Trek but only the first 7 days of mega-hit Transformers 2. When the rest of Michael Bay’s blockbuster, and G.I. Joe (if it does business, and that’s a big “if” in Hollywood’s view) shows up in next quarter’s earnings, that may be a very different story. So filmed entertainment revenue at Paramount fell an ugly 22% on lower theatrical and home entertainment sales. Again, Viacom cited weak DVD sales.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


You know what they say in Hollywood:
“If you don’t like those number’s I’ve got another set of books right here….”
Nikki, you’re just dead wrong on this, and you frankly have not been reading the WSJ, which would quickly disabuse you of any optimism. You’re too short-term oriented, and buying the hype.
The networks (WSJ reported Monday) gave back between 3% (and for NBC 7%, which is doubtless the real reason Silverman got canned) to ad buyers versus last year (that is, the amount of discount vs. last year). New reports out show even McDonalds finding earnings pressure, supermarkets report consumers purchasing sale items mainly (and reduced earnings because of it — today’s WSJ) and there are forecasts for reduced DVD sales volume and pricing. Meanwhile foreign sales are under increasing pressure from piracy, with no real solution in sight for China/Russia/Brazil/India (the BRIC nations being the few showing economic growth globally).
This ain’t rocket science: consumers globally are tapped out, those that aren’t can get stuff cheaper pirated (in nations beyond rule of law), advertisers are adjusting to a Wal-Mart not Neiman-Marcus world, and nobody in Hollywood has a clue on how to consistently create broadly appealing, Depression-friendly fare that can make money. In the meantime, costs are out of control and runaway production is more evidence of an industry failing to meet a changing economic climate.
I would not be shocked if New Zealand, Canada, or Australia started subsidizing production even more in an attempt to lure jobs and wealth out of Hollywood. That’s the downside of a global market. Or if “national champions” started challenging the Media companies like say Viacom or Time-Warner with more nimbly executed broad content. Writers, producers, and actors can work anywhere.
If earnings are really on an upswing, why are nearly all production companies that can moving to Vancouver, or Toronto, or Montreal chasing cheaper costs at the expense of executive control?
BTW, did you see the WSJ article today about mobile/phone video? Nielsen estimates 13 million people watched video on their cellphones, out of a total of 270 million. The first “full-video” friendly phone that’s cheap and easy to upload and play videos on, to me is a game-changer like the Ipod and Itunes. Making movies and “serial entertainment” more like the music business.
Mr. P-P (Philippe de Paramount) made about 23-mil last year. Not a bad insider’s joke on the backs of Par’s survivors and the recently departed.
Read Viacom’s 2008 Proxy filing — says outright that Sumner (NAI) is expected to have to pony up most or all of Viacom as collateral. Wonder who the next king will be. Might Barry get Par after all….?
What should help the media companies is that most movies should be allowed to stay in theaters for about four to five months. After that, the cable companies get a three month monopoly for their on-demand pay-per-view services. This is where we are headed anyway except the cable companies make a bit more money, and the consumer gets to enjoy the movie in his home without the DVD disk. If Joe Blow or Jane Doe love the movie just enough to buy the DVD, they will wait to do so.
“Whisky”…
You say that “…costs are out of control…”
Where specifically are costs out of control? As an example, I have worked in post production for over 20 years, and have never seen costs cut for below the line people like I have in the last year. Severe cuts. Many are leaving the industry as a result. I certainly haven’t seen much in the “cutting department” for the above the line “folks.”
As a matter of fact, as each year goes by, I find I am adding 2-3 MORE above the line credits for each show I work on. Good for that “mailbox money!”
The real reason for HBO’s subscription rise is because of the popularity of True Blood. Blood hit another milestone on HBO recently, when its ratings went up to 4 million viewers! It’s HBO’s highest rated program since The Sopranos and HBO has done a magnificent job of marketing the show. I happen to think that it’s well written and well acted. It however got robbed of an Emmy nomination.
Everyone has been chatting up a storm about Time Warner’s possible acquisition targets now that Bewkes has all this cash to play with, but who exactly are they going to ‘swallow up’?
Dreamworks Animation would be a great fit for Warner Bros and MGM (reuniting the MGM library and giving WB The Hobbit and Bond) would be a smart move providing Bewkes can snap it up at a fire sale price.
But I don’t understand all this talk of a Time Warner/NBC-Universal merger. Of all the big media companies to merge these two seem like a terrible fit. While Time Warner could turn around a Zuckermanless NBC what would happen to MSNBC and Universal?
I hardly think Time Warner would want to maintain two cable news networks and I don’t see Universal surviving the way New Line clings to life within the Time Warner Death Star.
Also the Paramount theatrical numbers may not be as big as 2008 but at least they actually own Star Trek unlike Iron Man, Indiana Jones 4 and Kung Fu Panda.
Nikki..I think your second paragraph is ludicrous….these companies need to pay attention to greenlighting more films to generate revenue rather than taking on more debt..they’re supposed to be in the business of creating product….
Could the cable increases be a result of the death of the analog signal and folks who do not have HD hardware getting cable for the first time?