Indie film's Mark Lipsky has petitioned the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences to change one of the qualifying rules -- specifically, Rule Twelve, Paragraph III, Section A, #9, which prohibits Internet transmission of a documentary feature vying for an Oscar for 60 days following its New York and Los Angeles runs. This rule ignores if not worsens the ongoing crisis in the independent film distribution business. While Lipsky clear has self-interest in mind (his Gigantic Releasing is the first company ever to open an indie day-and-date in theaters and online, with others in the pipeline), indie film's ability to release on the Internet is critical to reach national audiences today and in the future. AMPAS needs to retool for reality.
Lipsky sent a letter to Sid Ganis last week, and has since followed up, but has received had no reply:
July 6, 2009
Mr. Sid Ganis
President
Academy of Motion Picture Arts & SciencesDear Mr. Ganis,
As you know, your brethren in the independent film branch of our industry have been facing increasing challenges over the past several years. Without going into my own personal theories about how we got here, the bottom line is that we’re experiencing an extreme contraction on the exhibition front today – most particularly for truly independent films from emerging filmmakers. While it’s still feasible to secure screens for such films, it’s no longer possible to hold them longer than a week or perhaps two. Even with excellent reviews, these films come and go so quickly that most filmgoers have little or no chance to catch up to them. The concept of a film ‘finding’ it audience, of building word-of-mouth over time, is nearly extinct in the traditional theatrical environment.
One devastating result of this for independent producers and filmmakers has been the shuttering of a significant number of independent distributors and specialty studio divisions. As you might expect, those that remain are far less adventurous in their acquisitions and far more conservative in the breadth and scope of their release strategies.
Over the past eighteen months, Gigantic has developed and continues to improve upon a means for both orphaned films and those with traditional distribution to reach and grow their audiences. By taking advantage of the latest digital technology, and with great appreciation for and a decades-long understanding of the inner workings of the film business, we’ve devised a unique approach to independent film distribution for the new century.
Unfortunately, AMPAS has yet to fully embrace the digital age and one particularly antiquated and troubling rule is the reason that I’m writing to you today.
Rule Twelve, Paragraph III, Section A, #9 states “No type of television or Internet transmission of a contending documentary feature may occur anywhere in the world until 60 days after the completion of the New York and Los Angeles seven-day qualifying runs.” Not surprisingly, the foundation of our approach for addressing the problems described above rests in the very ‘internet transmission’ specified above. If this provision of Rule Twelve is allowed to stand – a provision that applies exclusively to documentaries by the way – at least one of the best received films of 2009 will be disqualified from Oscar consideration, and desperately needed innovation in our industry will be dealt a serious blow.
You can imagine our distress.
Gigantic Digital Cinema was very carefully developed by film professionals for film professionals and is presently the only digital delivery system designed specifically to supplement rather than replace or compete with traditional theatrical distribution. Films exhibited via Gigantic Digital Cinema are vetted no less aggressively than those exhibited in bricks and mortar cinemas, and we’ve taken great pains to ensure that they are presented at the very highest quality and commercial-free. In markets where theatrical engagements exist or are planned, exhibition via Gigantic Digital Cinema is withheld until after the conclusion of those engagements. Gigantic Digital Cinema makes it possible for any first-run film – with or without traditional distribution – to have a dramatically increased chance to reach its audience. In addition, we provide the kind of local market, professional PR and marketing services that art house cinemas have traditionally provided for decades. In other words, there is virtually nothing to distinguish Gigantic Digital Cinema from a bricks and mortar cinema aside from the manner in which the film reaches the screen.
Morgan Dews’s award-winning and highly acclaimed documentary, “Must Read After My Death,” was the first film to take advantage of the power and promise of Gigantic Digital Cinema. The film completed qualifying New York and LA theatrical runs this past February and enjoyed a first-run national release, day and date, via Gigantic Digital Cinema. Scores of media outlets across the country both large and small covered the release and issued mostly rave reviews of “Must Read…” in spite of the fact that the film did not open in bricks and mortar cinemas in 98% of those markets.
It is with these facts in mind that I request that the Academy amend Rule Twelve, effective for the 82nd Academy Awards, to allow “Must Read…” to qualify and as an acknowledgement of fast-evolving industry innovations that must be encouraged and nurtured rather than constrained. I realize that such a rule change in mid stream would be unusual, but we were not made aware of the ‘internet transmission’ provision until last week while preparing the submission paperwork for “Must Read…” However, as it was only late last month that you announced five additional slots in the Best Picture category, it’s clearly not too late to amend Rule Twelve.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional information or answer any questions that would assist in the Academy making a prompt, hopefully positive, determination in this matter.
Most sincerely,
Mark Lipsky
Hmm I guess I agree with the Academy – it seems today with all the digital technology – that we are forgetting that theatrical exhibition and seeing a film in a theatre makes it a shared human experience. Shared human experience – something we see less of today with digital technology that provides individual delivery of a movie to one person.
Independent films should have to FIND and attract people to theatres to see their works. I have ALWAYS been upset the Academy does not DO MORE to encourage people to go out to the movie whether they are 1st run major studio releases OR independent films.
Mark Lipsky – if your independent films can’t find a theatrical audience – and create some sort of commercial critcal mass – then they really should not be considered for an Academy Award – which is supposed to promote THEATRICAL EXHIBITION of said film. Go create you own “award” for digital transmission of your works. A former theatre owner and currently a member of the management team of an independent Theatrical Film Theatre………….which strives to exhibit indepent films and recently exhibited one that was well received WITHOUT the help of any studio major or minor………or even a newspaper add – how did they do it? With an email blast via digital delivery of said email blast – that they had a screening coming to a theatre NEAR YOU.
Mark Brack
Dallas, Texas
I couldn’t have said it better myself. It’s a new day and a new time for cinema (especially indie’s). Give us indie makers some time, THE ACADEMY AND DISTRIBUTION WORLD WILL RESPECT THE INDIE MIND. Bottom Line.
Dear, Mark Lipsky, you should make a documentary in the form of “Roger & Me”, by, “Michael Moore”, about you trying to get the attention of AMPAS’, “Sid Ganis”. I would not go as far as to call it, “Sid & Me”, but perhaps something like, “Marked Man”. He will definitely pay you some attention.
You expect a reply? Everybody knows the only way to get a reply out of AMPAS is to let Bruce Davis respond with his snappy and condescending prose, all while completely ignoring the issue. Expect a form letter with a forged Sid Ganis signature just in time for Oscar nominations.
Lipsky is right, of course. God forbid anybody should be allowed to see a documentary online while the publicity from its theatrical release is still warm. It was only a couple of years ago that the Academy acknowledged docs that were produced on video. In their estimable efforts to ensure that ice truckers, car chases, Big Brother, and other TV trash don’t qualify for Oscar consideration, they risk strangling the good stuff. The irony is that the members of the Academy’s documentary division are, for the most part, dedicated all-around filmmakers who have been in the trenches, and even dug some of them. They can tell the wheat from the crap without the Board of Governors contriving double secret probation. Let them.
His request seems reasonable. It’s strange that the rule should only apply to documentaries.
It doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to break the rule and then ask them to change it retroactively.