From: Justine Bateman
Date: July 1, 2009
To: Karen Borell
Subject: Board ResignationTo All,
I am resigning my position as SAG National Board member and withdrawing my bid for re-election effective immediately.
I initially ran for the Board 3 years ago to affect a change in three areas: the almost non-functioning web-site, the poor agent-relations, and the seeming absence of jurisdictional lines between SAG and AFTRA.
I am happy to have been able to effect the change in the web-site with the help of that committee, Doug Allan, and Pamela Greenwald, but the other goals have alluded me and have just become worse.
Agents are now not only owned in part by organizations that would create conflict of interest, but acting as the production company themselves and nobody saw fit to stop that. Now, though, we’re very far on the other side of that and I suppose actors have not really given thought to to the concept of being represented by an advocate with no conflicting alliances.
AFTRA has just basically, after years of trying to get SAG’s attention by lighting the newspapers on the porch on fire, have finally succeeded in partially burning the place down. And all we dual-card members be damned.We should have bought that scumbag organization years ago and shut that duplicitous leadership up instead of submitting to this “non-disparagement agreement” by which I am, happily, no longer bound.
And our own SAG leadership gagging Alan Rosenberg and Connie Stevens? What is this? Communist China or tumultuous Iran? I can’t [be] a part of a union leadership that strips it’s elected leadership of its voice. If we can’t speak up about injustices in union matters, how are we being effective at all in office? No, better to not be a part of it and to be able to speak freely against what I see as irresponsibility, fear, greed, and ego-driven decision-making.
And then there is the membership itself. They rarely expressed the correct anger at AFTRA low-balling contracts over the years that affected their ability to provide for themselves. They then ignored, seemingly, ALL the news about the migration from Old Media to New Media and recently took from the AMPTP the worst deal I have ever seen. For nothing.
This is not the make up of membership that could have gotten us Health and Pension or Residuals like our older members struck and fought for years ago. We have all enjoyed those benefits, but when it was our turn to protect them, we blew it. AFTRA blew it. And then we blew it by not expressing absolute outrage over their tactic of GREATLY encouraging their newscasters and weathermen to vote up that AFTRA TV/Theatrical contract “even if you do not work this contract and never will”. Yeah, that was in an e-mail that went around. Some of these weathermen even made YouTube videos celebrating their vote, thumbing their noses at us. CLASSY.
SAG’s members themselves have now voted up a contract that will cause about 50% of the WORKING members to leave the business, but now that you’re all “back to work” you’re probably too busy to read this. Congratulations.
Thank you for allowing me to serve and to represent the membership. I hope I honored the sacrifices of past Board Members who created such wonderful benefits for me and my family like Pension & Health, Basic Minimums, and Residuals. To those members I am truly, truly grateful. Words cannot express my appreciation of your sacrifices for future generations of actors.
Thank You,
Justine Bateman






Another excellent example of good intentions backed up by a total lack of how the industry works and the current economic situations coupled with total ignorance of the “new media’s” true situation AT THIS TIME. There was nothing to gain NOW. Maybe later. Not now.
As long as you have some free time now, Ms. Bateman, get a business degree.
Good for Bateman. I couldn’t agree more about what’s gone down. AFTRA started screwing us years ago and they continue to do so. Sadly, the membership is too scared to do anything about it.
Much of this is spot on, and it highlights why both sides in the bitter dispute (UFS and MF) were wrong and to blame. But we played into the producers’ hands by dividing ourselves. I should also point out that elude and allude are entirely different verbs.
The new agreement that SAG has agreed to took back to zero the open new ‘frontier’ that is broadband digital distribution. Most programs will be rebroadcast with no residuals to actors in the near future. The idea that this will be renegotiated in pattern bargaining is absurd: the DGA has always gone first and cut a deal that benefits their members (as well they should) and when SAG’s turn comes , we are asked not to rock the boat for the ‘sake of everybody’. It’s time this union looked out for one group and one group alone: the actors and their futures. Or the profession, as a means of support for families, will simply disappear. The wild west of digital distribution is upon us now.
Well said Justine!! Best of luck in the future, thanks for standing up for us!
Justine,
I’d like to know what Alan Rosenberg has NOT been allowed to say. He seems to have said everything he wanted to. He recently told everyone at the last town hall that those who was there rooting for him were the true union members. That would be about 1%. If that’s all he thinks are the true union than he hasn’t been listening.
When nearly 80% of your union is telling your something, it’s time to listen.
You just wrote:
“SAG’s members themselves have now voted up a contract that will cause about 50% of the WORKING members to leave the business.”
That is a typical of countless unsubstantiated rhetorical flares that sunk you and your friends this last go around.
Now that you no longer represent anyone but yourself, I can breath easier. I believe your passion, though admirable, was entirely misplaced and ultimately destructive.
While I am “back to work,” I’m not too busy to read this because now I can pay for my Internet service, the computer I’m reading it on, in the house whose payment I can finally make again, and on a weekend I don’t have to worry about waiting tables to survive while SAG shuts down a whole industry. I wish Justine Bateman and Alan Rosenberg in their new careers serving drinks in hell.
good for her.
My question is to all the uninformed SAG members who voted for the contract:
Now that the appalling SAG contract has been ratified; how’s that big flood of new work the studios were holding back treating you?
*crickets*
Everybody happy?
*crickets*
As a WGA member, I want to thank Justine for her steadfast support and encouragement when we walked out, and wish her the best in the future. There are a lot of writers and actors grateful for your courage and dedication and it’s a shame it came to this for you.
All the best.
Sorry to see Justine resign. Glad to see she hasn’t lost her fire. Looking forward to hearing more from her now that she’s free(r) to speak her mind.
I would like to add that Justine’s analysis of new media posted at the old United Hollywood website during the Writer’s Strike was both cogent and prescient. She helped a lot of folks get up to speed on new (now) media. Justine’s service in this area was invaluable to both writers and actors.
The union died when our current board took over, so no worries. Thanks for trying, but this union only represents producer/actors now.
Is it just me or does Justine not have an assistant or publicist to proofread her statements? This is just another obvious example of why the unions should be run by lawyers and accountants with the input of the creative individuals who populate these organizations. If I were a member of a union I would not want someone who is hypersensitive, melodramatic or high-strung in a leadership position involved in any part of the negotiating process. But it is exactly those types of individuals who get elected by the membership. I believe the unions need individuals who can remain objective, see the bigger picture and barter the best deal. The unions don’t need individuals like Justine Bateman leading them. Hopefully SAG can use her resignation for a good use.
No matter how good it feels to stick it to those you disagree with our union and future would be better served if everyone didn’t feel the need to be so right so publicly.
A simple resignation would have been classy.
Unfortunately this letter is in keeping with what Ms. Bateman has shown us in the past–finger pointing and name calling and now her ultimate underlying hope that the union will fail to show how right she was.
I’m not saying some of her ideas aren’t right. And I appreciate her want to serve the union and the membership and her heart is in the right place, but her lack of maturity was hurting us more than helping.
I did like the analogy about lighting the newspapers on the porch and succeeding in burning the house down. Was that her own, or is that an old analogy?
There are certainly problems within our union and finger-pointing and alliances to this party or that party within the union are what will cause the union to fail.
A union will survive only with unity. This two party system will be our undoing.
I admire those who have worked for what is best for the union and have done it without name-calling. And I’m not saying I believe anyone who belongs to this party or that is all wrong. Only that in belonging to a party within our union undermines our unity.
A house divided, which is what a two-party union is, is a house that falls.
All the “rightness” in the world can’t change that.
I agree with Justine that we have really done it this time. Why was it legal to silence our elected leadership? It was appalling. And now according to a recent court ruling, not only will viewers be able to Tivo upcoming shows, they will be able to Tivo shows that have ALREADY run – so much for first run network residuals. Why will anyone wait to buy the season of a show if they can just Tivo any episodes they missed?
It seems clear that the AFTRA terms for TV Shows are so much better (read cheaper) for production that SAG will eventually become irrelevant. More and more shows are shooting hi def and circumventing SAG altogether.
I recently spoke with a producer who has been asked to create content for the web – he had no idea about the recent contract – he told me that the production company is telling its content creators that they must make sure to budget no more than 15K per minute. He didn’t know why (or care) – but I sure do. They have no intention of paying actors for new media production or residuals any more.
I’ve had health insurance under SAG since I was 14 years old – I didn’t qualify this year. I just got back from the hospital and have a huge pile of bills I can’t pay to look forward to.
If we had any balls at all we would draw a line in the sand and make it either/or: you are either a SAG member or an AFTRA member – you can’t be both. Then, I think, SAG might have a fighting chance of survival – but it would have to happen soon, before its clout was completely eroded.
I believe Ms. Bateman’s rhetoric is symptomatic of a kind of outlook that people can fall into when they take up an overly polarized view of their surroundings.
She demonizes her opponents and lionizes her allies to a point at which the ‘rightness’ her position screens out any ideas that might run counter to her assumptions. So she winds up looking around for confirmation instead of information.
This is a dangerous state of affairs in anyone charged with representing the entirely of, say, a union. The fallout is a kind of siege mentality, where all is deemed suitable if it’s ‘for the cause’. So out goes civility, listening, the humanity of others not on your side and ultimately any sense of balance.
So like Sarah Palin, Justine Bateman finds herself so at odds with a system that is designed to promote alternative voices, that she must leave the public stage with the requisite stamping of her feet and snarky digs at her imaginary enemies.
Bateman conveniently forgets that her own Doug Allen refused to address jurisdictional matters between SAG and AFTRA and instead launched an all-out war against the sister union in which he figured he could beat it out of them. Oops.
Thank goodness for Justine Bateman. This shitty deal will only get shittier in the years to come and no amount of perfume will make it smell any better.
Quitter.
That’s what we’re calling people who resign before their term is up, right?
I think she resigned due to a rumor I have heard that there is a witch hunt going on right now. A number of board and committee members are being brought up on charges by the probable cause committee. The deck is stacked because the probable cause committee is all UFS.
I hope Nikkie can find out if this rumor is true.
Let’s get real. We need to stop with this “the current economic situation” While the Economy struggles, Hollywood… films.. are doing business better then ever. This year at the Box Office alone, we’re ahead of all previous years.. and this June netted slightly over $1.04 BILLION in theater revenue, the highest revenue stream ever for studios.
As of June 30, $5.2 BILLION in revenue has come into the studios through the movie screens alone, a year to year increase of 8.3% over last year.
That’s not a joke, that’s a fact. For film and entertainment work, the studios are doing quite well, and resale media continues to click away.
Studios and others have suffered in the past year based on bad secondary deals (attempts to get into publishing, cable distribution, etc.)
But the unification of some media formats have turned into incredible “woe is me” economics… studios selling product to themselves and then saying how “little” money they had to take.. it’s papershifting economy.
Bateman’s key assertion with regards to agents and the industry is only one example of the kind of virtual collusion that is happening within the industry.
Love her or hate her, every so often you need someone to yell the obvious: a spade is a spade.
this is never going to stop is it? For the millionth time (and I feel justified pointing this a millionth time because people keep forgetting it each successive time) THIS IS THE AGREEMENT WHICH THE WGA STRUCK TO GET. Why do SAG members keep forgetting that? And, more importantly, when will the members of the WGA (and DGA and IA and …) tire of being called morons by SAG members (which is, ironically, the union with the lowest entry requirements). Enough already.
Scott Barry,
You have taken great pains to reinforce the general perception that you’re an idiot. How “new” do you think new media is? Ms. Bateman raises several correct grievances and to those who fail to see why, I wish you the best of luck in your new endeavours. The game’s changing fast and most of us haven’t kept up (Scott). If you think I’m wrong, then watch for the hardware line that’s coming in 2010 and ask yourself why you’re not making a dime. Note to selves: read what you sign next time, like 2011.
Justine, be free, be outspoken and know you’ve been heard.
It ain’t over…
Iran? Really? What a truly offensive analogy. Talk about CLASSY…
To SCOTT BARRY (comment #1 above)…
Your jackass thinking is exactly what
brought us the recent disastrous Yes vote. I suppose
you were convinced by the likes of Tom Hanks,George
Clooney,Danny DeVito and their group-a vote for Yes
keeps your (actor’s) hand out of their production
pocket. “Unite for $trength of Producer$”. That’s
intelligent, Scott..”maybe later..not now”.Let’s see
if this Internet thing takes off. The best hope SAG
has right now is that Alan Rosenberg stays on as
President to fight the good fight for the 2011
contracts with the hope that, in the meantime,
uninformed (and scary) mindsets like yours can be
opened and educated to the realities and financial
impacts of the Internet Industry
Welcome to the 21st century, Scott.
ps. no need to get that business degree-try reading
the stats on current box office, internet
advertising dollars and network internet
production. And kiss your residuals goodbye
with your Yes vote. xox
You were on the board. This is how you decided to make a difference? By giving up? Weak and misguided. Stick to your guns at least.
What were we always taught about “burning bridges”?
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out…good riddance.