UPDATE: Hmm. SAG’s National Board received presentations from representatives of the Motion Picture & Television Fund (MPTF) and the activist group Saving the Lives of Our Own. “After thorough discussion of both sides of the issue, the Board voted 51.74% to 48.26% to publicly oppose the closing of the MPTF’s Long Term Care facility, SAG said in its news release Saturday night. So who on the SAG Board wouldn’t declare their opposition to the eviction of the facility’s elderly residents because of the closure? No one’s saying.
But this is who the grass-roots organization Saving the Lives of Our Own, which has been tirelessly protesting the closure and which maintains it is “completely neutral” in the election politics of SAG, thanked Saturday night on its website:
SAG NATIONAL BOARD ENDORSES MPTF LONG TERM CARE!
July 25, 2009 – Los Angeles, CA:Thanks to the efforts of President Alan Rosenberg and spear-headed by First Vice President and Madame Chair Anne-Marie Johnson,
with support from SAG Board Members Elliott Gould and SAG Senior Committee member Bill Smitrovich, and SAG Senior Committee / SAG Healthcare Safety Net Committee, the Screen Actor’s Guild National Board has voted to support Saving The Lives Of Our Own in their mission to keep Long Term Care open now and for the future, and to restore Motion Picture and Television Fund’s commitment of “Taking Care of Our Own”, adding their muscle in stopping the closure of the MPTF Long Term Care facility, and the eviction of the elderly Residents who helped build the motion picture and television industry.
Led by SAG actor and Saving the Lives of Our Own activist Daniel Quinn, whose compelling presentation to the National Board eclipsed that of Ken Scherer of the MPTF Foundation – the promise of the continuum of care that was founded by Mary Pickford, Charlie Chaplin and D.W. Griffith will be a continued tradition for decades to come. With Daniel on the dais was Saving the Lives of Our Own activist Nancy Biederman and legal counsel James O’Callahan from Girardi and Keese.
As the reasons for the turmoil within the MPTF leading to the evictions start to see the light of day, it is evident that the days are numbered for those in the heirarchy of MPTF management.
SAG has spoken, and their will and determination bolsters and strengthens the resolve of the Residents and their families to keep the LTC doors open. More to come on this huge win for motion picture and television industry healthcare, and the elderly and infirm who are yet to be displaced.
Additonal thank you’s to Diane Ladd, Alan Ruck, Esai Morales, Frances Fisher, Nancy Sinatra, Connie Stevens, Kent McCord, Anne DeSalvo among others. The pioneering efforts of John Schneider and David Carradine will not be forgotten.
SAG’s news release tonight contained this quote:
“I think the extremely close vote is evidence of the difficult decision we wrestled with today,” said Screen Actors Guild National President Alan Rosenberg. “The MPTF’s significant financial and operational concerns were absolutely heard, but after hearing the presentations from both sides of the issue, our board voted to oppose the closing and did so to try and preserve the legacy of the Motion Picture & Television Fund’s Long Term Care historic commitment, in honor of the screen actors who founded it – Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks and Charlie Chaplin,” Rosenberg added.
It also said the full text of the SAG Board motion is as follows:
It was moved and seconded to approve that the SAG National Board publicly state the Guild’s opposition to the closing of the Motion Picture and Television Fund Long Term Care Facility.
Approved 51.74% – 48.26%
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
with support from SAG Board Members Elliott Gould and SAG Senior Committee member Bill Smitrovich, and SAG Senior Committee / SAG Healthcare Safety Net Committee, the Screen Actor’s Guild National Board has voted to support Saving The Lives Of Our Own in their mission to keep Long Term Care open now and for the future, and to restore Motion Picture and Television Fund’s commitment of “Taking Care of Our Own”, adding their muscle in stopping the closure of the MPTF Long Term Care facility, and the eviction of the elderly Residents who helped build the motion picture and television industry.

this is pointless, since what SAG thinks has no impact on the fact that there is a 20 million dollar shortfall and that the facility WILL close.
Uh, no. It didn’t close and won’t close.
“After thorough discussion of both sides of the issue, the Board voted 51.74% to 48.26%”
What moron split their vote by 74% & 26%?
Whoever the vote splitters were, you’re idiots.
Pick a side bitches.
At last! A Union joining the effort for the benefit of EVERYONE in the business. Yes, this affects our elderly residents, but just as importantly, it affects everyone’s future healthcare. Please believe that there is corruption and another agenda going on now at MPTF. The truth will be told, and if it takes a law suit, bring it on!
I think it would be of interest to know who the people were that voted in that 48% to close the Motion Picture Home where our pioneers and elderly are. Would that be possible? Also, maybe there are some areas that many of us could volunteer so many hours a month and help out to offset some of the cost of the work such as Receptionist, errands, etc. Of course you need the Qualified Nurses, Doctors, RNs, etc. Hopefully, someone will agree that it’s worth exploring. This is where you put your money where your mouth is. We say we love our own and although things are tight, when it comes to any of our elderly the love and open heart has to demonstrate itself.
May I add that it would be my pleasure to volunteer to help out at the home if needed. Just let me know.
@Raz and JulieW, I’ve got news for you. I happen to know of two donors that were each willing to make significant donations toward keeping the MPTF hospital and LTC open. Both were told that their donation could not be accepted for that purpose as the hospital and LTC were not part of the Administration/Boards vision for the future of the Fund…
Wow! If anyone wondered how far up the AMPTP’s *ss the U4S’s are, now you know! After the bill of goods they sold us in form of our latest contract I really thought that this was an issue we could all get behind, especially with the elections coming up. Are they that politically tone deaf? (Maybe, they were running on a qualified voting platform the last time around.) Or are they just that deep in the AMPTP’s pocket? And I guess New York’s answer to the issue was “we don’t work there and we won’t have to live there. It’s your problem, you deal with it.” WTF! What ever happened to fraternal charity? Is that how you say “Brotherhood” with a NY accent, FU?! I know we’re all actors in the same union but FU Hollywood? If MF doesn’t make a huge issue of this in the upcoming elections then they should watch more CSPAN and see how it’s done in Washington.
It’s my understanding that this motion to oppose the closure of the MPTF passed the Hollywood division with a unanimous vote… That, and the vote total percentages suggest that some if not all of the UFS’s that supported this measure on the first go around abstained once it did become a political vote. At what point does kicking our elderly and infirm to the curb become a political issue for the UFS and NY?!? UNBELIEVABLE! What, because Hollywood votes for it, it has to be voted against?
Two word solution:
Soylent Green
I wonder if the “scumbag union”=AFTRAm will weight in on the issue. Doubt it. AFTRA is a corporate tool.
Explain the 20 million dollar shortfall to the forensic account that will present the truth, should the MPTF still maintain their financial lies. That YOU can on.
The 48.26% NO vote was New York and the Regional Branches. Most UFS Hollywood voted for the motion but there were a couple who didn’t.
The percentages are because there is weighted voting.
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/sag-board-votes-to-overwhelmingly-oppose-mptf-long-term-care-closure/
http://savingthelivesofourown.org/
Gee, Tom, your logic and spin is twisted.
“Villians”?
Who are/would be the “VICTIMS”? –THAT is what MANY–including myself are concerned about.
Watch THIS and LOOK at THEM:
http://savingthelivesofourown.org/