
UPDATES SAG Board Narrowly Votes To Oppose MPTF’s LTC Unit Closure
MPTF Reaction below
2ND UPDATE: I’m now being told that almost all of SAG’s Regional Branches and New York Division and a few of Hollywood’s Unite For Strength members DID NOT oppose the MPTF long term care facility closure. Shameful.
Here’s what I’ve found out about the SAG vote: The Hollywood Division board dominated by Membership First met a few weeks ago and passed a resolution to recommend that the National Board take a stand opposing the MPTF long-term care facility closure. The Hollywood Division actually passed a back-up motion that if the
Unit For Strength/ NY Division/ Regional Branches majority National Board chose not to act, then the Hollywood Division would come out with a statement of its own opposing the closure. After all, the MPTF is in their backyard and lots of their members depend on it. The protest group Saving The Lives Of Our Own, which is trying to be neutral in SAG’s rough-and-tumble internal politics, claims it had supporters from both SAG factions and hoped this was an issue that would bring everyone together. But the vote turned out to be shockingly closer than expected. I’m still trying to get the names of those who voted against opposing the MPTF long term care unit’s closure. Those people should be exposed.
SAG is the first of the showbiz guilds to publicly criticize the MPTF decision led by Chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, Frank Mancuso and other Hollywood bigwigs to shutter the unit. But Saving The Lives Of Our Own is frustrated that the other unions — WGA, DGA, Teamsters and IATSE — haven’t gotten off their butts and expressed their support. True, prominent members of other Guilds, including the WGA like Larry Gelbart, have personally expressed opposition to the closure. But the WGA, whose Board Of Directors apparently meets tomorrow, has not. I know that organizers of Saving The Lives Of Our Own along with several WGA members, made presentations to WGAW President Patric Verrone and the Board months ago. But, for some reason, they chose not to take a public stand. Saving The Lives Of Our Own has been trying to rally grassroots support to pressure the WGA to do so ever since. Nor has there been any support from John Wells’ slate on this issue.
The MPTF’s long-term care facility in Woodland Hills is presently home to 84 elderly and other residents needing round-the-clock nursing care, many of whom have been suffering daily under threat of eviction, and 26 Alzheimer’s patients in the “Harry’s Haven” unit. The MPTF charity, established in 1921, was specifically founded to aid Industry members in tough economic times. Given that the MPTF was born out of the Depression to help its members receive medical care and survive in difficult times, the real question is whether Hollywood’s current generation is going to be the one to let that mission fail. Are things really worse now than they were in the 1930s? The MPTF should let the entertainment community come together and raise this money. It’s unconscionable that the powers-that-be there are not allowing donations earmarked for the long term care facility.
UPDATE: Here is the MPTF’s reaction from chairman of the board of directors Frank Mancuso:
WOODLAND HILLS, CA, July 26, 2009 – “We are disappointed by the action taken by the SAG Board but appreciate their willingness to hear our presentation and the support we received from the 48.26 percent of its members who voted against this resolution. We also appreciate SAG National Board of Directors’ President Alan Rosenberg’s acknowledgement of our ‘significant financial and operational concerns.’
“If MPTF does not close its long term care unit, which is losing nearly $1 million each month and transfer the 84 residents who currently reside there to highly qualified community nursing homes, the fund will go bankrupt within five years and all of our operations will be forced to close. We would no longer be able to provide services to SAG members who made 23,000 visits to our health centers and social workers last year or any of the 60,000 other industry members who rely on us for care. Nor would we be able to continue providing financial assistance to the entertainment industry, including the 214 SAG members who received financial aid from the Fund in 2008.
“The Board struggled to find a solution that would ensure the future stability of the Fund while allowing us to keep the long term care facility open. Sadly, after years of exploring alternatives, we came to the inescapable conclusion that the long term care unit had to close to protect the rest of the institution. It would be a disservice to our community to force into bankruptcy this indispensable organization simply because family members of the 84 people living in the facility prefer to have them remain there. We wish they could too. And were it financially feasible, the Board would insist on having them stay. But it is not.
“MPTF is not abandoning the 84 residents who remain in the long term care facility but we cannot and will not compromise the best interests of SAG’s membership and the rest of the 60,000 people we serve every year by keeping it open. This is the correct and only decision the Board could make. The long term care facility must close.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Katzenberg could fund it HIMSELF — if such donations were allowed.
At a SAG meeting that I attended in June, it was reported that some of the patients that had already been moved (due to closure announcement) had died. That the move was too stressful for them, they are very fragile.
Go Nikki! Go Nikki! Oo, Oo, Oo! -I really don’t understand these board members who either voted no or abstained. We as humans get so few chances in our short lives to do anything that would make a real difference or to take a stand for something bigger then our own miserable lives. Here we have something going on that amounts to not just a travesty but real life and death for other human beings. Not just for those living at the MPTF now but for all of us that will ever need this last place of refuge! The MPTF has been around “Taking Care of Our Own” for 89 years! And now “Dr. Katzenberg” who has only been on the Board for 5 years and the rest of this administration, none of which has been around for more then 10 years that I know of, are destroying it all! For what? Some master plan that they see as the future of the new and improved MPTF… I’m just almost mean enough to hope that everyone of those SAG board members who did not support this vote finds themselves, in their old age on the street, with no one to care, but that their minds are still sharp enough to remember when they chose not to support the one place that would have taken them in… Does that sound harsh? For what ever their reasons were, that is just what they’ve wished on us. I can’t wait to find out who voted how. -I am a member of SAG, and I will be voting in this next election.
Still no audits! Still no investigations!
This article does not surprise me anymore. I just read the following and am very concerned for the future treatment of our loved ones.
If the current advisor on health care issues to Pres. Obama has his way, all elderly and disabled will be considered too expensive for society to keep alive.Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (good old Ari and Rahm’s brother)who is currently serving the President in Washington DC, is quoted as stating as a policy position for providing funding for national health care: “An obvious example (for saving money and preventing waste)is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. A less obvious example is not guaranteeing neuropsychological services to ensure children with learning disabilities can read and learn to reason.”
(1996 Hastings Center article)
I am sorry, but this sounds like something out of “the final solution” approach to social engineering. I am horrified that a man who calls himself a doctor and believes he is an expert on ethics thinks doctors are practicing the Hippocratic Oath too much!!
So, not surprised that there is little interest in helping out the helpless at this medical facility. I am not a raging conservative, but this philosophy should shame anyone who believes in it. Have we forgotten the lessons of history? A nation should be judged based on its treatment of the most vulnerable in its society!!
easy to be hard,easy to be cruel
What about the Bernie Madoff investment connection?
I, for one, am ready to “kick to the curb” ANY board member who voted against this. The elections are coming up and to me the bigger issue is this. Not just the SAG-AFTRA wars, but do we take care of our own?
This is our Katrina.
Peggy Lane O’Rourke
What a load of CRAP for the powers that be. They NEVER even tryed to raise money in Hollywood.
Less then 1% of income from movies would provide the income needed to maintain the LTU. The unions worthless also in stepping up to help.
If i had a stroke next week i would be shit out of luck!
The Administrators and MPTF Board must be FIRED!
Closing the hospital and long term care IS NOT a cost-cutting option. IF the Fund is as close to bankruptcy as Mancuso’s preposterous statement would have you believe, SLASH over $2,000,000 from that budget IMMEDIATELY! ELIMINATE the salaries of ‘Doctor’ Tillman, ‘Nurse’ Ellis, ‘Accountant’ Guerrera and ‘Fundraiser’ Scherer.
Thank you to the SAG Board. Mr. Mancuso would have you believe that “after years of exploring alternatives, they came to the inescapable conclusion that the long term care unit had to close to protect the rest of the institution”. Yet, in January after we were notified that our family members would be evicted, we met with members of the MPTF Board and asked why, if they had struggled with this for years, were we just hearing about it now. We pointed out that our industry is the most creative and generous on the planet and could undoubtedly raise the additional funds to keep the LTC facility open and why weren’t we being given a chance to do. We were told, “no amount of money could change the decision of the board”. In fact, the MPTF Board has made NO attempt to reach out to the community to help save the LTC facility or even inform them that there was an existing financial problem. Instead, what you get is fear and intimidation from Mr. Mancuso with a veiled threat that if they don’t close the LTC facility the entire industry health care system will go bankrupt.
Not only did the administration not try to raise the money, but once they went public with the anouncement, some key players in the industry and SAG stepped up with some very large donations to save the hospital and LTC and their donations were refused. They were told the desision was a done deal!
AGAIN! WHERE THE HELL IS THE INVESTIGATION?!
California Bar Review Question
If Board members who run the Fund conspired and fraudulently proceeded to close the Motion Picture Home, and as a direct result of their actions innocent elderly residents died, discuss the legal issues.
Mancuso is an old Studio war horse who is a step away from needing the Home but his millions will keep him at his estate with his screening room, far away from you and me.
As an actor, I am proud that SAG voted to oppose closure of the Home even though it’s like voting to oppose a genocide [sounds too much like members of the UN finally agreeing on the "proper"language to oppose the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur].
Who the hell are Mancuso and Katzenberg and this old hack hatchetman for MCA Joe Fisher to belittle the lives of 84 of the sickest and most needy residents of the Home. Let me guess, if their mommy and daddy or wife or husband were there things would be different.
Then again, if you had millions or billions as the Board members who made this decision do, you wouldn’t need the place. Mancuso looking to blame 84 human beings for the mess he and his boys created to justify getting rid of the most sick and handicapped on the Campus is a farce and an insult to these people and the intelligence of the tens of thousands of Industry workers the place is meant for.
He’s trying to divert attention away from the importance of the Home to every one in the Industry – he’s making fools out of us actors and our friends and colleagues at WGA, DGA, IA, etc. Let’s all wake up and fight this now. Take a look at the shit holes called nursing homes in the valley and other parts of LA. Then check out the Motion Picture Home and you will realize that if you don’t fight this with all you’ve got, you are giving up on your life and the lives of your family members. It’s not worth giving up for some health clinic that can be gotten elsewhere, or a $200 grant if we are on strike or day care.
Beyond comprehension why any union member would not vote to ensure that “we take care of our own“.
What does that tell you about how they will vote when it is time to take care of there own SAG members. So shameful!
For those so inclined there is an ongoing petition to ask for the closure to be reversed. Please add your name.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/keeptheMPTFhomeopen
I’ve been a SAG member since 1960. When I was asked to sign up for the automatic MPRF payroll deduction, I did so…gladly! I assumed that the home would be there for deserving members of the industry who might need it – including me, should it come to that. I also assumed that the MPRF was run by competent, dedicated individuals… That was 49 years and hundreds of TV episodes/Films/Series ago. I want my money back! ALL OF IT!
DO THE MATH STUPID
The Studio Heads don’t give a damn about those of us in unions, they don’t care about our lives – look how they’re treating those 84 people – like dirt, worse than animals. They are treating us like we are morons; I may have to take it at work but not on the outside – How’d they take charge of this Home? Wasn’t it start by working actors as a safety net for us. Do the math – How can 100 or 84 old people at the Home cause a loss of one million a month at the same time they bring in over 10 thousand a head for each bed? It’s impossible. I’ve seen the rooms there and they have a bed and a socket and man that’s about it – oh yeah one doctor that 500 people share, there are some low paid aids and one nurse whose not a registered nurse. Either the management is grossly incompetent or else something funny bad is going on there. Where’s all the money going? They keep telling us about this loss but they don’t show any books. Wow, what a concept, studio Heads talking about a loss and not showing the books. How freaking stupid are we to give up the Home that we or family might need because they are telling us we will?
When the AMTPT met and anointed Katzenberg to head the MPTF, one of the trades quoted one of the producers as saying something like…’You do it Jeffery, no one likes you anyway…’
Quite prophetic, as it turns out.
“MPTF is not abandoning the 84 residents who remain in the long term care facility …”
Of course not. MPTF is abandoning many more than 84, like the 26 in Harry’s Haven, the couple hundred in the Cottages, Lodge and Stark Villas,and the who knows how many who have been denied admission to long term care this year. MPTF is abandoning anyone who is counting on MPTF to be there now and in the future. MPTF is abandoning its continuum of care which used to be a possible option for to all of us who are eligible. MPTF is abandoning tens of thousands of us by bringing the natural cycle of life at the Home to an abrupt halt.
MPTF is abandoning its mission.
We’re not stupid Mr. Mancuso. MPTF has been functioning in its own selfish interest, not in the interest of SAG members and we know it. The MPTF Board members were handled. They were fed lies and manipulated facts to get them to do the deed. I’m proud of our guild, and our Board for not going along with your game. If embarrassment and shame doesn’t stop you and the MPTF in your arrogance, the lawsuits will. In that case, do not resuscitate.
AGAIN and AGAIN!!! WHERE ARE THE GODDAMNED INVESTIGATIONS?!!! HOW COME ALL THE SO-CALLED INDUSTRY PHILANTHROPISTS ARE SO EERILY QUIET? WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID OF?!
Sadly, Hollywood doesn’t cherish those before them. Have any of you who read this ever seen an elderly man or woman crossing the street in Hollwood and WONDER “could they have been in “THE WIZARD OF OZ?” or “SHANE?” or one of the grand feature films from MGM, Warner’s, Universal?” I do. I always wish I could stop them and tell them how they changed my life…made me want to be an actress. Made my life bearable in the 60′s and drab 70′s when I was a kid.
Hollywood only cares about a quick buck and that’s really what this is all about money, not people. What has happened to us? Why isn’t SAG and AFTRA protecting these valuable people? It breaks my heart.
I think it’s important to consider that the MPTF deliberately reduced the patient census to ensure that they would be in a loss situation – but they have many sources of funds when they are at capacity, including Medicare reimbursements, managed care reimbursements and Medi-Cal at $351.26 per diem, and private pay. MPTF is not a facility that just relies on Medi-Cal. Publicly available records support this finding.
A lot of not for profit community based facilities operate at an annual loss – that is the nature of non-profit based hospital and skilled nursing care. These facilities, like the Jewish Home in San Francisco, and the JHA of Los Angeles also have concerted fundraising campaigns and make up their deficits through grants and donations. The rationale that the Motion Picture board is using to justify closing this facility – because they are “losing” $10 million a year – simply does not make sense and flies in the face of Motion Picture’s historical mission.
MPTF Board leaders apparently do not want to take care of old or disabled non-productive people, and do not want to raise funds for that purpose. As commented above, it’s a form of social engineering. I think a false choice (long-term vs. the entire fund) was created to convince the well-intentioned among board members to go along with it. Unless they are stopped, MPTF will continue to dump its Medi-Cal patients on other facilities. Private pay patients have already been skimmed off on a preferential basis, several with board connections.
What the CEO told the families, and what the COO described as $165 MM in construction projects, is Plan A, turning the MPTF campus into an assisted living community where it is all private pay, where the profits are almost guaranteed, and where MPTF development staff would have a captive audience. It’s a sexier image, and not as much work or government oversight as a hospital. MPTF is behind the eight-ball in that arena, not a leader. MPTF could have had it all – instead they chose to redefine their mission and break their promises.
MPTF is suffering from a self-inflicted wound. Saving it will take a new direction, and new management.