Remember back in May when a blog (not DHD) claimed Relativity was making a move on MGM? And the truth turned out to be that hedge fund Elliott Capital (the funding source behind Relativity) was simply buying some MGM term loan debt? I knew the “Relativity aiming to take control of MGM” was bullshit and so did my sources. Now it’s clear Elliott Capital had no strategic interest in MGM and was simply buying the debt to hopefully sell it later at a higher price (which is no different then buying stock at $X and hoping to sell it at $Y for a short-term profit). Elliott Capital bought the distressed MGM debt for about $400M at less than 50 cents on the dollar. Now my financial sources on Wall Street tell me that Elliott Capital has recently laid off much of its position in MGM debt. This transaction had nothing to do with Relativity, by the way. (Ryan Kavanaugh has his own problems: his Relativity was a 50% financier of Universal’s big bomb Land Of The Lost, and its upcoming The Perfect Getaway isn’t tracking.) Oh, and that’s the same error-filled blog that kept telling readers there’d be no William Morris/Endeavor merger, or mistook old merger talks pre-Twilight for a new Summit/Lionsgate deal, or claimed an Avatar trailer would debut with Transformers 2, or thought Peter Chernin working for Bob Iger at Disney sounded plausible, or insisted DHD was selling to The Huffington Post, and more.
- EXCLUSIVE UPDATE: Studio Library Valued At $5.5B
- TOLDJA! MGM Audit Shows Full Compliance With All Debt Covenants
- GOOD NEWS FOR MGM: Audit Will Show Struggling Studio Is A “Going Concern”
- MGM FIGHTS TO SURVIVE: Desperate To Restructure Crushing Debt Due In 2012
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


and what about that other bomb he financed, Taking of Pelham 1 2 3. Huge disappointment and embarassment to all involved I would think. Dunno if he financed Year One? I still don’t think that effects his business model. His money just continues to flow towards the studios regardless of the box office.
According to Anonymous, The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 is a
homage to the 1974 United Artists (UA) film version of John Godey’s sentimental suspense thriller… and I am
impressed with the duo of John Travolta and Denzel Washington in for Shaw and Matthau.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer is also coming out with new big-screen versions of the biggest boxoffice hits of 1980s cinema, among Fame, out in theaters 2-and-a-half months from now, Valley Girl and Orion Pictures’ legendary sci-fi troubleshooter Robocop.
And at what price did Elliot sold this debt?
You’re obviously referencing Ms. Sharon Waxman and The Wrap. You’re so right in your post.
1. She confuses Relativity and Elliott. Elliott is a noted and respected NY based hedge fund. It has invested in a lot of Relativity deals but each individual transaction with Relativity has been a separate transaction with defined deal structure, risk/rewards/, and contribution. But the 2 are not interchangeable. To let us know that Ryan Kavanaugh has a hard on for the MGM assets is nothing new. Duh. Half of Hollywood would like to have those assets. To say that Relativity came up with an idea of how to seek to play a major role in an MGM bankruptcy is accurate. BUT RELATIVITY’S IDEA WAS NEVER ACTED UPON. Elliott only bought $400 million of the debt (at prices in the mid to high 40s). GE Capital didn’t buy shit. Universal never signed any agreements. This is no where close to $1.2 billion of the debt that is suggested in the proposal. Elliott bought the debt in late 2008 when the overall market was depressed and sold it recently when the markets have come back.
2. Waxman’s headline is “RELATIVITY MEDIA SEEKS CONTROLLING STAKE IN MGM”. The Relativity proposal (which was obviously leaked to her by Relativity) doesn’t even suggest this. The proposal says that in concert with GE Capital they should buy $1.2 billion of the debt so they have a “blocking right”. A “blocking right” is not an attempt to control MGM. Anyways, it never happened.
3. Waxman’s article says that Relativity was trying to buy “a portion of the studio from the studio’s major investors, including Highland Capital, the Carlyle Group or Sequoia Group. The major investors in MGM are: Providence Capital, TPG, Donaldson Lufkin Jenrette, Sony, Comcast, and Quadrangle Group. Nobody ever purchased any stake in the studio – not Relativity, not Elliott.
4. Waxman claims that Relativity bought the debt cheaply but after her article came out the price became too high and they stopped. First, Relativity never bought shit. Elliott bought the debt. Second, on May 14th the debt was trading in a range of 58 – 60. Ms. Waxman’s article came out on May 17th. THE DEBT DID NOT TRADE UP FROM THERE. It, in fact, stabilized and has been trading the mid 50′s ever since. Ms. Waxman thinks she is Ben Bernanke and can make the debt markets go up or down with her ridiculous posts.
Relativity’s “Proposal” is dated 12/2008. Waxman’s article is dated 5/17/2009. What she fails to understand is that she was “played”.