Quentin’s already much maligned Weinstein Company/Universal pic is getting 50s in “‘definite interest” from men. And women are stronger on Inglorious Basterds than on District 9, even though the Sony pic opens a week earlier. (That movie’s “looking really good, too,” a rival studio exec tells me. “It’s gotten some movement over the last few days.”) The only competing movie tracking higher with young guys right now is G.I. Joe. Yes, that much maligned Paramount pic coming out August 7th. It is 86 overall, with males in the 90s (just to give you a relative comparison). For weeks, Paramount’s claims that the movie works have fallen on deaf ears. But now a rival studio even tells me, “Paramount is doing a good job ignoring the sniping and snarking. It’s come on tracking really strong. It’s looking to open at $50M-$60M — which is a great result.”
Now for the bad news: Since most marketing say “unaided awareness” is a more important data point (that’s when you tell the pollster that you are aware of a certain film coming out without being given the title), Basterds‘ aided awareness is very low (“1″ overall, with a “2″ for males). The unaided awareness numbers for District 9 are good but not great (“4″ overall, with “7″ for younger males, and “5″ for older males).
Meanwhile, I’ve confirmed that Inglorious Basterds, to be released August 21st, is still the same length it was when it screened at the Cannes Film Festival. (Well, technically, it’s 1 minute longer now.) This was also confirmed last night when Basterds screened as the closing film at Montreal’s Fantasia Film Festival.

Tickets sold out in under an hour. Cliphones and cameras were collected, and metal wands passed to make sure no recording devices were brought into the 700-seat venue. Eli Roth presented the film and explained that Quentin was in Berlin on the press tour. Roth addressed the various rumors about Tarantino’s edit, saying that Quentin had re-cut the version shown at Cannes. But during the six weeks he’d also added various scenes for the version that Montreal saw. Other scenes were tweaked based on Cannes reactions.
Roth told the crowd it was a difficult film, a ballsy film, but a great film: “If you like it, tell your friends, blog about it, Twitter about it, write about it on Facebook and IMDB. If you don’t like it, shut the fuck up!” (That got a big laugh.)
By the way, playing the film in Montreal, an international city where practically the entire audience speaks French and many also speak German, really helps in a film that features a lot of spoken French and German. There were certainly jokes that the Montreal audience got that few other audiences would even notice. (Like a really dirty pun about the French dairy farmer’s three daughters.) The filmgoers cheered for the Basterds and booed the Nazis. At the end, the audience gave the film a thunderous ovation, and about half the crowd made it a standing ovation.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


you used maligned twice in the first paragraph. Thesaurus please.
Kill Bill was so fuckin’ long and so stupid. Complete misfire in trying to capture the coolness and suspense Pulp Fiction had. His movies have sucked for a while now. Like he shares a brain with M. Night.
And for fuck’s sake stop putting yourself in your movies, you’re NOT an actor. It comes across as so god damn forced and contrived and you look and act so fucking goofy.
Y’know, insofar as blatantly derivative celluloid entertainment goes, I really enjoyed Larry Bishop’s “Hell Ride” so I’m betting that I’m really going to enjoy this one, too.
One of these days, QT is going to have to make a movie that isn’t an homage to an exploitation flick he checked out while clerking at that video store. He’s like a guy with an enormous record collection who thinks he’s a musician.
Other filmmakers from the mid to late 90′s boom like PT Anderson, Chris Nolan, Danny Boyle, Peter Jackson, and David Fincher have demonstrated remarkable artistic growth and have developed a real body of work. All QT has done is play spot the homage.
Two more yawners in an otherwise sleepy summer.
Were all the good summer movie directors out of town this year?
When Michael Bay makes the most money in a given summer, you know the pickins are indeed slim. Tongues across the nation dry out in the mouth-breataher schlock fest he assembled. I don’t see Stephen Sommers easing this year’s quality deficit either. Hollywood should be ashamed for this year. Revenues may be up but only because prices were raised.
At least JJ Abrams made a good film.
I don’t know what it is about GI JOE…the trailer looks moronic, the special effects look sloppy and the dialogue sounds silly. And as if that’s not bad enough, it’s got a Wayans in it to boot.
But then they cut to the scene between Storm Shadow and Snake Eyes duking it out and the other scene where the two Joes are running and ducking missiles in slow motion and my inner geek comes out and I can’t wait to see it!
I suspect that the interest of males is probably centered around the 30 somethings who had the toys, the cartoon, and the comic book as kids, and feel a little nostalgia.
But from all the negative buzz I’ve heard about the movie, a lot of them would be greatly disappointed by the final product.
I think a lot of people are going to be surprised when they discover Inglorious Basterds is actually a talkfest. The current marketing is trying to make it look like “Kill Bill meets The Dirty Dozen”.
It wouldn’t surprise me if word-of-mouth turns on this film even before the second weekend.
Hahahahahahaha if Tarantino is a record collector thinking he’s a musician, then eli roth is the snot-nosed, tag-a-long, loud-mouth, pain in the ass neighbor that alphabetizes those records.
Oh and Stephen Sommers IS a quality deficit…
Stupid civilian here, but: I seriously thought “Basterds” had come and gone, I feel like I’ve been seeing/hearing/reading of it for five years already. I have no desire to see it opening weekend.
Not buying it. “Basterds” is running one of the most deceptive trailers in recent history. Strong fanboy opening, then drops like Obama’s approval ratings the second week. “District 9″ and “The Collector” will be the sleepers of the summer.
Showing in Montreal it wasn’t a given that they’d be booing the nazis. Strong fascist ties in la belle province, even our former Prime Minister spent WW2 riding around the city on his motorcycle wearing a German helmet.
After Death Proof I officially have no expectations for anything Tarantino does. His last few have been so godawful they’ve ruined my ability to enjoy his older, good films.
Surprisingly the initial buzz for GI Joe is positive.
Could it be the expectations for it were so low to begin with, it has no problem exceeding them?
Don’t tell the teen boys, but “The Rise of Cobra” sounds vaguely homoerotic.
Wow! It’s unanimous. Everyone here knows how to say derivative! Congratulations to you all. Looking forword to this film’s opening.
After the indulgent Kill Bill and the abortion that was Death Proof, I’ve been turned off seeing another Tarantino movie again. Ever. Wake me up when he starts to include original scenes in his “movies” instead of homaging himself. Talk about masturbation!
Johnny Marshall,
Can you name a single Republican with a 55% to 60% approval rating like Barrack Obama? I suppose his numbers have come back down to Earth a bit given the partisan fight over health care, but I doubt there is a single politician who wouldn’t trade their wife for Obama’s approval rating.
Now that health care is sure to pass, you’ll see Obama’s numbers climb up again (or SURGE as you might consider it) and another Republican pity party will soon commence thereafter.
Nice try though.
The Kill Bills were truly terrible, but I thought the script for Inglorious was great. They’re making a mistake with the trailer though, that ain’t what the movie’s about.
I predict Joe will open in the medium range of expectations, prompting a sequel that will bomb.
Does every crappy studio action film have to have bimbos in black leather showing their asses? A sure sign this movie is a turd.
And what would you rather have jefcostello, a crappy film with no bimbos in black leather showing their asses? You probably are offended by that.
I know G.I. Joe is going to suck. I know it. Yet I will go see it the first night so this way when I rip it, I’ll have paid for the right to do so. If nothing else, I’ll get to see that sweet piece in the leather outfit, something that never gets old.
Just screened GI JOE last night and it’s the biggest piece of shit I have ever seen. With that being said, it’ll probably be a huge hit. It has great loud noises and lots of shit flying through the air and crashing but other than special and visual effects, the story (which is what movies really are) is complete dog shit! They establish in beginning the “bad guys” (not cobra yet) are indestructible yet throughout the movie they contradict themselves on that premises. And the worst part is that the Real GI JOES do nothing while the ‘FAKE’ JOES sit back and watch. If you have to have a good story to enjoy the movie, then don’t bother watching this. Julia and Julie will be 5000x better then JOE. If you need spfx and vfx to enjoy a movie, then by all means go waste you money on this piece of shit. All I know is that this is not what I grew up on and to anyone who thinks this movie is good, you do not know what you’re talking about. Take a writing class, and then watch again.
Sorry, meant to say the ‘FAKE’ JOES save the day.
I thought the first trailers that were put out for G I Joe were awesome and had put it on the list of potential movies to see this summer at the theater. But, then Monday morning on the Today show they had a new clip and on Regis & Kelly they had a new clip and both clips were so phenomenal G I Joe went from a will see to a must see film. The new trailers look so hype and so spectacular I believe this film is going to open in the 60 million range or more. The action sequences, the special effects, the cinematic views all seem on point with the world of G I Joe.
Being from Montreal, I have to correct you on your incorrect assumption on our language capabilities. While the majority of people in Montreal are French or speak French, I was surprised by your claim ‘many also speak German’ I do not know anyone in this city that speaks German (unless they are of German decent).