Pali Research media analyst Rich Greenfield says today that Warner Bros throwing the next punch at Redbox -- and hitting Netflix, too -- now means 3 studios with over 55% of major studio DVD product will no longer be available to Redbox via traditional distribution sources. (VPD and Ingram.) "Given that Redbox has sued Universal (45 days) and Fox (30 days) over their windowing strategies, we would expect Redbox to sue Warner Bros (28 days) in short order, Greenfield predicts -- maybe as soon as next week. "While Sony, Lionsgate, Disney (and likely Paramount) appear to be happy working with Redbox directly or via distributors, we have a hard time understanding how a studio would not feel threatened by Redbox’s current business model, as it sets an ultra-low price point for movie content that will impact consumers’ decision-making process about all forms of movie-related commerce (theater-going, DVD purchase, Video-on-Demand, electronic/online rental/sell-thru, etc…)."
Greenfield notes that the movie studios are increasingly concerned that the buy vs. rent pendulum is swinging far too quickly back to rental after over a decade of explosive retail sales growth, with the resurgence of rental led by mail-order subscription (Netflix) and kiosks (Redbox). "Studio profits are heavily weighted toward sales vs. rental, exacerbating the problem with a sales/rental mix shift. What makes the Warner Bros statement so intriguing is that it goes well beyond windowing Redbox. Warner Bros is looking to change its relationship with Netflix as well, by offering mail-order companies a choice of how they gain access to Warner Bros DVDs."
He points out that Netflix will be allowed to have day-and-date DVD availability, if it agrees to revenue sharing terms that are far lengthier than what it has done before. (Netflix typically strikes six-month revenue sharing deals with studios). "We believe Warner is trying to limit Netflix’s impact on retail sales (by windowing Netflix), which primarily occur during the first several weeks after a DVD’s release or capture a far greater share of an individual DVD’s lifetime rental revenue via Netflix. (Netflix’s subscription service skews heavily towards catalog, with over 66% of its revenues from catalog DVDs in a given quarter, yet current studios revenue sharing deals do not enable them to participate in the revenues generated by catalog DVDs)."
Greenfield goes on, "We are fairly certain Redbox will sue Warner, but the bigger question is will Netflix sue Warner Bros over the windowing issue? Either choice offered to Netflix by Warner Bros, would appear to negatively impact Netflix’s profits to the benefit of Warner Bros."
Warner Bros also informed its new-release DVD distributors (VPD and Ingram, Greenfield presumes) that they can no longer repurchase previously viewed WB DVDs to sell-off to other retailers that stock low-priced previously-viewed discs. "We suspect Redbox will find alternative distributors to off-load its previously viewed product, but we find it surprising that other studios did not utilize this tactic in dealing with the growing threat of previously viewed DVDs vs. acquiescing and striking formal agreements with Redbox."
As for what to expect next in the escalating Redbox/Hollywood "Rental Industry Battle", Greenfield predicts:
- -- Formal agreement between Redbox and Disney in the near-future (Disney currently has an agreement with Redbox’s distributors only).
- -- Formal agreement between Redbox and Paramount (Viacom) in the near-future
- -- Redbox will sue Warner Bros within the next week.
- -- Netflix must decide how it will deal with Warner Bros (choose one of the two options offered) or following Redbox’s strategy of suing.
Why don’t the movie companies ever innovate on their own? I love the RedBox and love the fact that I can rent a movie that I have never seen and am not sure I will enjoy for $1. But if Warner and Fox etc… are worried about the revenue sharing and their products being devalued why don’t they partner with wal-mart or some other large Brick and Mortar store to put out an MPAA vending machine that the movie houses control all the revenue etc… Coinstar Inc. has been making a ton of money on the RedBox so there is money to be made at the $1 price point now the movie companies just need to figure out how to cut out the middle man.
I think the bigger question has been why did so much of 2009’s movies suck so badly when 2008 had one good film after the next.
If studios made more good movies, they wouldn’t have to worry about the pendulum swinging back to rental. Many folks I know buy movies when they really like them. No one I know will buy a movie they haven’t seen yet.
Maybe it was a 2009 thing, but since Summer 2008, motion pictures realeased by studios have been quite sucky with a couple of exceptions. There hasn’t been anything released this year so far, that I see as purchase worthy, when last year I bought over 20 titles.
Of course, I’m no industry guy. That has been my personal experience.
This is a no-win situation for the studios in my opinion. It doesn’t stand to reason that the denial of DVD’s day and date to Redbox will in any way bolster retail sales. “OH, I can’t rent the movie so I’ll just buy it”? Not in this economy. It’s not Redbox’s fault that retail sales are slipping. The studios should lower the price point on DVDs or eat it until the economy improves.
Redbox’s business will only grow because it’s so affordable like McDonalds.
Now if we could only get the cable companies to lower the price of their on demand services to match those of Redbox.
All the studios being sued be Redbox should get together than launch a kiosk company renting out DVDs for 99c.
And then it becomes an all out media war amongst these huge corporations literally over pennies!!!!
————————————————-
“I think the bigger question has been why did so much of 2009’s movies suck so badly when 2008 had one good film after the next.”
Movies thrown together by the studios before and after an industry wide strike tend to not be of great quality.
Why don’t the studios go back to their old VHS model, of issuing a movie at a higher price aimed at the rental market (100 bucks) and then 6 months or so later issue the mass market version?
Karma at work. The Studios wouldn’t pay actors a fair share of the DVD sales, and now the DVD market is collapsing. Don’t you love it? I do.
Stop making movies that suck or are only moderately good. And lower the price of all new releases to $12 like a movie ticket. Then maybe people will buy your DVDs.
If something didn’t get my attention when it came out why would I want to do anything but rent it from Netflix. I wouldn’t even spend an in store $3-something cost. And if I see something and want to own it I will wait a long time for it to go on sale before spending $25. Maybe if studios accepted less profit margin on each DVD they would have more overall sales.
The studios need to issue more movies on multiple disks loaded with extra content, that could screw up Red Box because in order to see the whole movie they would have to rent multiple disks, stock multiple disks, those red boxes only hold so much stock. Or like Disney offer packs with one DVD in blu ray and one regular only.
Or get together with Wal Mart the largest DVD retailer and give them the exclusive for 30 days on every movie, then release it to every one else.
the pendulum will back to rental becuz all of those dvd purchases, just like many things in the last few years, was all funded by all those credit cards that the banks passed out feverishly!!! they should grateful the business didn’t collapse like the car guys did!!! make good movies, everything else follows!!
someone needs to look into the environmental impact of Redbox destroying all those use discs and putting them in landfills…. the studios are insisting on this to protect themselves from the secondhand market. Disney tries to present themselves as an environmentally-minded company, but they are putting hundreds of thousands of used DVDs in landfills somewhere near chicago