SATURDAY PM/SUNDAY AM: Early overall numbers show it was this summer’s first soft weekend at the domestic box office. Moviegoers puzzled whether Universal’s Funny People was a comedy or dramedy (more the latter) as Adam Sandler continued his cold streak playing serious and Judd Apatow stretched beyond his usual raunchy laffers. The studio all along tried to lower expectations by predicting an opening weekend of $25 million. But the pic couldn’t get there and settled for a disappointing $23.4M. It’s one of the lowest results for Sandler, who has a great record opening comedies in the $30sM and $40sM. Playing in 3,008 North American theaters, Funny People comfortably debuted #1 but with low results: $8.6 million Friday and then dropping 17% to $7.4 million Saturday. Universal execs begged wanted director Apatow to shorten the 2-hour, 25-minute movie — especially the last half-hour starring his wife Leslie Mann. (See Behind-The-Scenes Of Apatow & Universal) But Judd has made so much money for so many studios, and especially Universal, as a writer, director and producer that he’d earned the right to take more creative license than just make another big commercial hit which the suits would have liked better. (Indeed, top critics gave the film only 47% positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.) No matter: Apatow will direct his next 3 films at Universal. But Funny People, like the studio’s Bruno, didn’t live up to its tracking, which showed big and broad 4-quadrant appeal, and the most interest coming from young men and even older females. Based on that, rival studios thought the pic could get into the $30sM and even hit $40M. Nope. Given the studio’s troubles at the box office this summer, Funny People must make at least $100M domestic and will be hard pressed to get there.
Its cost is estimated at $70M-$100M. (Relativity co-financed this film behind Universal’s distribution fee. Sony has a piece of it because Sandler, who has a deal there, insisted on it.) It won’t get near Apatow’s other two directorial efforts, The 40-Year Old Virgin which made over $177M worldwide and Knocked Up over $219M globally.
Jerry Bruckheimer’s first 3-D foray, Disney’s G-Force about secret agent guinea pigs — hey, the studio just sells them, not smells them — made $5.7M Friday and $6.4M Saturday for #2, or -40% from its 1st play finish last weekend. The pic scored a $17.2M weekend for a new cume of $66.6M. Helped by $3.2M generated by 166 IMAX screens, Warner Bros’ Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince was #3 earning $5.2M Friday and $6.6M Saturday for a $17.2M weekend and cume of $254.9M. Sony’s Ugly Truth was #4, taking in $4.4M Friday and $4.7 Saturday for a $12.8M weekend (-51% from last weekend’s) and $54.2M cume. And New Regency/Fox’s blatant E.T. rip-off Aliens In The Attic eked out only $2.8M Friday and $2.8M Saturday from 3,106 venues for an expectedly weak $7.8M opening weekend. Overall, the weekend was around $120M, down 20% from last year when The Dark Knight dominated.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Not surprising. The trailer was uninspiring to say the least.
I didn’t predict Funny People but I knew people were overpredicting it. 40 million my butt but even I didn’t think that it would come in this low.
The trailers were pretty lame, the Die Hard joke did make me laugh though. I think this failure is going to hurt Seth Rogen (who had bomb this year with Observe and Report)and Apatow more than Sandler.
Not surprising… “Funny People” was marketed as another stoner comedy when in reality it’s a personal, ambitious character study of a comedian that doesn’t quite succeed.
What is surprising is that it cost $70 million to make. Unless that includes marketing costs, Judd must have payed his buddies a fortune.
let’s hope the nightmare is over… apatow’s “humor” is played… and sandler is about as interesting as a box of hair…
SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! So Sandler lives in the movie, but the movie has died. Saw this tonight. Long, self-indulgent and the audience disconnect during the third hour of this rambling mess was palpable. A noble effort, but not what this studio needed right now.
Just returned from seeing this and I’m STILL feelin’ it. Great film. Funny. Sad. Memorable. I’m only mildly surprised by the numbers. I mean, you can’t exactly expect this to open to normal Apatow numbers as this is not your normal Apatow film. My friends dug it, the rest of the crowd seemed to enjoy it as well. I suspect word of mouth will take this thing to the century mark.
Why am I not surprised? It was playing on at least 3 screens in one of the area’s better theaters, and virtually no one showed up for it. I counted less than 10 people at the screening I was at.
Probably because that last half hour sank the movie like an anchor. Make with the funny Judd, I could give a crap about your families home videos.
Funny People was cost $75 million to make. Adam Sandler and Eric Bana have box office draw in overseas. So Funny People would still be a moneymaker afterall.
“hey, the studio sells them, not smells them” (re: G-Force critters)
Nikki…this is so beneath you. Seriously.
Also, the main criticism about Funny People is dead-on: the third act completely torpedoes it. As soon as Apatow’s wife and children take center stage for almost forty minutes, all of the narrative goodwill that had been established up until that point with a fine balancing of comedy and drama is squandered. It’s a shame because there’s lots of funny and touching moments that occur before it totally collapses. It’ll likely go on to be a middling success at best by dint of equally alienating fans of raunch with the third act and fans of tenderness with much of the prior two acts. Hopefully within JA’s next three pictures he’ll be able to firmly decide if he wants to provide entertainment for frat boys or grandmas, because either route will yield more user-friendly results than here where the primary audience is ultimately revealed to be himself and his immediate family. At the end of the day the film boils down to being a 70-million-dollar home movie. I doubt he’ll ever be granted such carte blanche again. I’m sure the concluding segments were a blast to film for the cast and crew but the audience is kept at arm’s length from partaking in the revelry.
“Jerry Bruckheimer’s first 3-D foray, Disney’s G-Force about secret agent guinea pigs — hey, the studio just sells them, not smells them…”
Thank you for this wonderful Saturday morning laughter.
Eric Bana is a box office draw overseas?
I don’t think Eric Bana is a box office draw anywhere. Maybe in Australia is one?
From day one people knew this film was going to be more expensive than it looked. There is no way this film cost a penny less than $100m.
Everyone got their quotes and the film had a luxurious shoot in LA. Personally I’m looking forward to it, but let’s be real here people. At least Universal co-financed it with Sony.
Everyone’s tracking numbers seem out of whack recently. I’ve heard numbers ranging from $25-30m all the way to $50m for GI Joe’s opening next weekend.
They can’t both be right!
This is saddening. I saw a test screening of the film and I thought it was incredible. This is coming from someone who hates Apatow’s work. I was really hoping it would do better but, o-well.
Honestly, it should have only cost $30mm to make, i don’t see how in the name of hell it cost 70
This was one of the most self indulgent, overly long and painfully drawn out movies I have seen in a long time. It felt so contrived, uninspiring and some parts just did not make sense or fit in to the movie. Apatow’s collegaite jokes get old fast and it almost felt like the movie’s sole purpose was to show case his not so talented wife. Sorry Judd, the jig is up!
Saw FUNNY PEOPLE last night and liked it. An entertaining look at the whole success/failure in LA/showbiz world, while taking on a bigger, more important issue. I’ve known people like Sandler and Rogen’s characters, as well as Schwartzman and Hill’s. Accurate. Try it. Although ther neanderthal teen fanboys next to me “didn’t get it”. Won’t do $100 million.
Also liked 500 DAYS OF SUMMER. Stylish, funny, and in the end, true. Nice to see Levitt as a romantic leading man and Zooey D. is as quirky/cute as ever. A very good debut for the director. Another winner for Fox Searchlight and makes up for MY LIFE IN RUINS.
Both get Thumbs Up.
As I’ve said before, watching a Judd Apatow film is like watching a dog lick his own nuts. I can’t believe people are actually comparing him to John Hughes. Hughes knew how to be funny without being vulgar. His films are classics, while Apatow’s will collect dust in the 99 cent bin at Target. And now we can look forward to three more films from him at Universal. Wait, I’ve already got the titles for you, Judd…Bong Boy, I Love Seth Rogen, and #%@#$%*&!! Lap It Up, Useful Idiots!
Someone has to grow a pair and tell Apatow to keep the next one around 100 minutes if not less. Nobody wants to see a comedy (or dramedy or whatever) over two hours long. Longer even than Broadcast News, which was the nadir of the overlong dramedy.
@Robert Kallio: Not that I’m shocked by your reveal, but wouldn’t your point been just as well served without spoiling the movie for those (like me) who are going to see the movie today–like, on the second of its f*cking release? Please edit yourself next time.
The movie is deep and emotional. This morning I woke up and am still thinking about it and feeling it. It might have been a little long for those expecting a straight-up comedy. Something that makes you think like that might not have as broad an appeal, but it doesn’t mean it’s not a great movie. In fact,this is a really,really great movie that will stand the test of time.
I thought the movie was brave, funny and sad and my husband and I really enjoyed it. Seth Rogen is hilarious. However, fans of Adam Sandler don’t want to see him in more serious roles–remember that Paul T. Anderson film? He’s not exactly an “actor.”
“Funny People was cost $75 million to make. Adam Sandler and Eric Bana have box office draw in overseas. So Funny People would still be a moneymaker afterall.
Comment by maria”
Yes, but Sony has it overseas whihch doesn’t help Universal there.
Love how many haters there are on this blog… see the goddamn movie and then write back, Lil’ Suzy. It’s okay — you D-Men/Women don’t have to HATE EVERYTHING. Your jobs were never secure — so what if a smart film does well… you were NEVER gonna develop one anyways.
Now get to work on World War Robot — as far as I can tell, that thing isn’t even a comic, it’s a 23 page sketch book. Am busy drawing “ideas” on a roll of toilet paper myself … “Dizzy — get me Jerry Bruckheimer!”
Two problems:
1) It’s called Funny People yet there’s not one laugh in the trailer. Ooops.
2) What the hell is it about? Funny People? Sure. But what’s the story? 40 Year Old Virgin, got it. Knocked Up, got it. But Funny People? Is this going to be a “Tears of the clown” story? No thanks.
Your dose of reality from the heartland.
MANY audience walkouts during the last hour of Funny People last night.