UPDATES AFTRA Re-Elects Prez Readon And OKs $300 Initiation Fee Hike
… It’s not supporting the effort to stop the closure of the long term and intensive care facilities at the Motion Picture And Television Fund. Today’s official AFTRA statement declared, “Convention delegates also expressed deep concern over the closure of the Motion Picture Television Fund’s long-term care and ICU facilities in Woodland Hills, Calif., and referred a resolution stating that concern to the AFTRA HRIC committee to investigate the circumstances of the closure.” But there is no timetable attached to that resolution. And AFTRA is under no obligation to expedite the issue. But that’s just part of the story. I’m told by insiders that in Chicago, the AFTRA leaders claimed they don’t know all of the facts and can’t really rely on SAG’s national position joining the protest. Also, AFTRA ignored the tens of thousands of AFTRA-SAG dual cardholders who rely on the home.
Amazingly, the AFTRA leaders expressed the opinion that the home didn’t really impact them since they have never been invited to have a seat at the board. They even questioned if there have been any AFTRA members who have ever lived at the facility. One board member stood up in front of the meeting and stated that the MPF didn’t add the “T” until “15 years ago and that AFTRA members had been ignored”. Well, research shows that the MPF was referred to as the MPTF since 1967 — and some research states that it was referred to by its current name MPTF even before 1967. And the qualifications to be eligible to live at the facility is 20 years of showbiz work as a union member of talent unions and/or guilds, or a family member of a union member or employee, of AFTRA, Teamsters, IATSE, SAG, WGA, DGA. So AFTRA will remain quiet in this battle. Shameful.
…It’s not doing anything publicly to oppose the shuttering, relocating, or future shortening of daytime dramas whose actors and crews make up an important part of AFTRA membership. Unfortunately, AFTRA has claimed exclusive jurisdiction over soap opera actors, which is why the Guild’s inactivity on these matters is so bewildering. The final episode of TV’s longest running scripted series Guiding Light will be shown on CBS September 18th after 72 years on the air. Nor has AFTRA organized any efforts to find another home for Procter & Gamble’s Guiding Light, despite such a rich history on radio and then TV and such loyal fans. Here is the only public statement AFTRA has made on the GL shuttering, and it is a weak one: “AFTRA applauds the cast and crew of Guiding Light — from our longtime star performers to the hundreds of stunt persons, dancers, and many background actors — who delighted radio and television audiences for more than 70 years and made Guiding Light the successful and beloved series it is. AFTRA is disappointed the program will no longer appear on CBS in its current format, but pleased to hear that there is ongoing consideration for continuing Guiding Light in other media. Over the decades, members from Guiding Light casts have been among the stalwart union leaders to serve on various AFTRA committees — including Wages and Working Conditions and negotiations —to improve the lives of their fellow daytime drama performers as the genre has evolved. AFTRA is working to ensure every Guiding Light actor receives all the protections of their union contract, both now and after the show concludes its run on CBS. To the extent this program is produced in other media, we look forward to continuing to provide AFTRA contract protections to actors in the next incarnation of Guiding Light.”
…AFTRA also remained inactive this past week when ABC Entertainment, after multiple denials, finally announced that All My Children is moving from NY to LA which will idloscate many actors and other workers on the show. Meanwhile, ABC also is denying rumors that, if it adds The Aisha Tyler Show (already okayed for a pilot) to its daytime line-up, the network may trim two of its daytime soaps to a half-hour each. AFTRA has provided no public updates on any of these soap developments.
… And, finally, it’s mucking up the issue of merger with SAG. Roberta Reardon stated, “It’s either all of us or none of us”, thus setting up her opposition to any attempts to put all actors under the same union roof. During leadership meetings this weekend, Kim Roberts made a bizarre comparison to those who want to join up actors as ”segregationists living with an apartied[sic] like attitude” like refusing to integrate neighborhoods, forcing “people who look like me” [she is an African American] to live in substandard neighborhoods, and supporting the Jim Crow South. Playing the race card like that on this actors’ issue is truly crazy talk!
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


The Motion Picture and Television Home is the one place where everyone who works in the entertainment industry is part of the same community. To destroy the Home will leave a Legacy of Shame.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/keeptheMPTFhomeopen
Well that’s a no-brainer. Why would Reardon let the lucrative part of her Union go be represented by a Union who sees them as more then cash cows?
Reardon and the rest of the AFTRA leadership need actors. They can’t organize to save their souls. They’ve allowed non-union broadcast work to flourish in environments where unionization should be easy. Actors are the only game in town for them, because it is the only way they can open new areas without working at it. They saw an opportunity to underbid a more expensive competitive union and thus acquire operating capitol by selling out their own members offering them for less.
As for actually supporting their membership and retirees by fighting for them, either through continuation of shows or of homes, well that would mean they might actually have to get off their duffs and do something that doesn’t offer them any immediate compensation. Forget that.
I thought my national union leadership was lame when it came to actually supporting its membership, but Reardon makes them look hardworking and honorable.
Kim Roberts just made an ass of herself. She has no business in a leadership role at AFTRA. Playing the race card when race has nothing to do with the topic. SAG and AFTRA are performers unions, not ethnic groups. What a cheap shot.
Actors should be united under one roof (Screen Actors Guild). The one performers union that will step up to the plate and do the right thing. Such as, speaking out against the closure of the long term and intensive care facilities at the Motion Picture And Television Fund. SAG wouldn’t turn it’s back on it’s members like AFTRA is doing with regards to the Soaps….
On the closure of the MPTF Home and merger with SAG and many other issues, AFTRA president Roberta Reardon’s official statements do not reflect this 28-year AFTRA member’s opinion.
When I think of Kim Roberts remarks, the word “stupidly” comes to mind.
If it’s not doing all these things, then what exactly is the AFTRA leadership doing to justify their existence, let alone their re-election?
WOW. This is truly amazing. So, they have to now “discuss” this further. While people have died and more may die because of these evictions and AFTRA needs to take some time to investigate this! What is there to think about? All the people are asking for is a little help with getting the word out that our “people” are not being cared for the way they were promised. No one is asking the unions to join in a class action lawsuit! No one is asking the guilds to pull out of any kind of support for the Fund. Although in my opinion there needs to be a well orchestrated boycott of any facilities affiliated with the Fund until this nightmare is fairly resolved. All they are asking for is public pressure. Pressure from the unions who have contributed to the Fund since it’s conception. Creating enough public pressure and ridicule to make other members of the MPTF look in the mirror and ask if they are doing the right thing. Public pressure is how things get changed. Why is AFTRA so afraid? What is in it for them? They were so brave and bold when they publicly walked out of Phase 1 because SAG met with the cast members of “Bold And Beautiful”, publicly accusing SAG of raiding. And if what I’m reading is true, Roberta Reardon is so brave and bold enough to announce at her convention that merger must be “All of us, or none of us!” That’ pretty bold and brave. But regarding this life or death issue, which many consider truly a no brainer issue, they drag their feet?! AFTRA continues to demonstrate to its members why we no longer want to be members.
“idloscate” Nikki?
An agent once tried to idloscate me
but no one at a union.
What a peevish little post this is.
Politicizing the dilemma of the disadvantaged.
How big of you.
Do you have many friends running for Hollywood Board?
What’s the point of this?
To make Membership First – the greatest disaster to ever hit SAG – look good somehow?
I heard people run unopposed. Someone stands up and announces a candidate, someone seconds, then often sings a song or does a little comedy routine.
Holter Graham, when he was reelected VP AFTRA NY, did a somersault across the stage, tore off his jacket, and, bare chested, gave Roberta Reardon a bear hug. I’m not kidding.
It took four days to accomplish what SAG does in 5 hours.
We want to merge with that? Seriously?
SAG will begin to decide if it wants to continue down the road of weakness and compliance, or, strength and solidarity, in the September elections.
Members are seeing residuals in a free fall, and they have UFS, NY, RBD and USAN to thank. Instead of falling in behind the previous leadership to confront the AMPTP’s attempt to neuter the union, these factions within SAG, on the one hand voted unanimously or near unanimously to support the previous leadership, then, on the other hand, undercut their own politically ass-covering votes, and began to undermine the leadership until an exhausted membership voted 78 to 22 percent to ratify this shit deal.
Does 78% of the SAG membership think this is even a fair deal, let alone a good one? Of course not. They were fried by the stalemate, caused by UFS, NY, RBD and USAN.
I ask SAG membership to take note of the signature goals of the so called “moderates” – merger with AFTRA, and qualified voting, aka, taking the vote away from thousands of SAG members.
I ask SAG members to consider whether they want to support people whose primary goal is the destruction of SAG – the practical result of merger with AFTRA – into a third entity, where SAG’s autonomy will be lost forever, it’s ability to strike if it needs to open to question, it’s P&H system subsidizing AFTRA’s weaker one, and finally, the so called “strength in numbers” argument:
Until this philosophical divide within SAG is settled, there will be no “strength in numbers” – either merging with AFTRA, or, weakly negotiating as SAG, a shell of its former self.
In 2011, SAG members will take a look in their wallets, and vote. As mostly anti-MF entertainment attorney, and expert on both unions and the negotiations of the past year, Jonathan Handel, has himself (finally) said, the residual system is hard-wired into the psyche of the actor, residuals are falling like a stone due to move over and other ramifications of the new media portion of the contract – where all content is headed, and the actor is hurting badly as a result.
If the weakness within SAG continues to allow the AMPTP to bleed us dry, and residuals move more and more into the new media terms, thus disappearing, Hollywood will shoot itself in the foot, and lose a sizable portion of the people who make their product: the SAG middle-class actor.
Handel’s suggestion of a 21st century upgrade to a percentage of distributors gross across ALL platforms, is a suggestion SAG members and SAG governance needs to take to heart.
Looking at the numbers for residuals in 2008, SAG needs to secure a new system that insures parity with that number, and achieves cost of living increases going forward.
How do we do that? Well, number one, we solidify and strengthen ourselves by becoming one union – SAG – all TV and film actors under one roof. The merger-heads say that’s un-do-able, and foam at the mouth at the suggestion, but blithely bring up – YET AGAIN – merger with AFTRA, which has been officially introduced into SAG discussion and/or voted on 20 TIMES, and voted down every single time for decades, as if THIS is what we should to to achieve “strength in numbers.”
Strength in numbers will only be achieved when this weakness is overcome and we have one actors union for film and television actors – SAG.
Actors should really be aware of what AFTRA is NOT doing for you – in fact, doing things in direct contradiction of what actors do/need.
For instance, I just found out that AFTRA has a special deal with Disney (nobody told anyone about this – and for how long?) where BG performers no longer get “under-fives”. That is, when a background performer gets the opportunity to actually speak on camera it usually means an “upgrade” (contract) and all that contract entails. Not any more. You don’t get a nickel. As if Disney isn’t already one of the cheapest contracts out there (for all of their wildly successful TV shows). And AFTRA’s okay with that.
The ridiculous “WB Contract” still exists. It’s been what, eight-something years now since WB first got a special cut-rate deal from AFTRA for their (then) new cable network. WB doesn’t even exist anymore, and AFTRA still won’t put it to rest. “It’s a negotiation”, the AFTRA reps tell me. Bullshit. This isn’t negotiation – it’s called “spineless”.
This is the direction that AFTRA is pushing actors. Is this what we really want? Need? I’m sure the game show hosts and weathergirls are doing fine, but what about the 40thousand-plus actors within AFTRA? Are you actors even paying attention to the river you’re being shoved down?
Canoe. They took your paddle away. Rapids ahead. Get it?
“Idloscate?” That’s what happens when you make a typo at 70 wpm.
And yeah, the AMPTP must absolutely love having AFTRA in the game.
Regarding the soaps – why is it AFTRA’s responsibility to manage the marketplace? If shows are losing in ratings overall, why are they supposed to go in and fight to keep it on the air? The shows are old and their audiences are dying. That’s how the business works.
Unless I’m missing something – is the network killing the shows just to spite someone? Seems to me like the shows are just done.
Interesting isn’t it how outraged everyone was and how quickly the Guilds put aside their petty bickering to unite in protest over the Emmy changes, while an issue that truly is a scandalous matter of life or death and affects everyone in the industry is relegated to the sidelines to be investigated at some indeterminable time in the future.
Where is your conscience?
To borrow a recent phrase… AFTRA handles things “stupidly!”
Why is it so many from a profession and region known for their liberal views on inclusiveness and diversity are so quick to want to throw those different than themselves to the wolves that are chasing the sled? AFTRA seems to have it right: Alliances provide more power.
And if Membership First really wants to have “only the actors” under its roof, when will they throw out those damned stunt men and singers and voice people and background people and loopers and puppeteers and so forth? You can’t have professional purity if you let the mongrel performers in, now can you?
“First they came for the extras but I was not an extra so I did not speak out. Then they came for the stuntpersons but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the V.O. people but I was not one of them so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”
To Robespierre,
Please stay off the comment page if you can not express yourself with clear and intelligent thoughts. AFTRA has sat on their hands over critical issues time and time again. It’s not about alliances with AFTRA, it’s about being angry for not being the powerhouse of talent they would like to think they are, and in so, selling every actor out as far as benefits. AFTRA is now going to investigate the Long Term Care closure at the Motion Picture & Television Home, really, how many more days and how many more lives will be lost in their investigation? It sounds like more two faced lip service to cover their irresponsible butts. By the way, the fact that you took an honorable quote from Martin Niemöller a German pastor and theologian born in Lippstadt, Germany, in 1892, and Holocaust surviver, and applied into your idiotic statement, is more than despicable.
AFTRA is a sweetheart union interested only in raisng dues and fees from members. And, of course, the leadership’s job one is hiring their friends and relatives for well-paying do-nothing union jobs. A good union gig if you can get it and don’t have to worry about members who act pussy whipped.
I hope to see AFTRA focus some serious resources on organizing in the national cable television sphere. There is quite a bit of opportunity there. All of these cable news networks have an unfortunate habit of tossing female on-camera talent (and a good percentage of the male talent as well) directly upon their expiration date. Seems to me a good percentage of the on-camera types should welcome the protection of a strong union.
Which brings me to my second point. Where’s the line between the news and entertainment departments these days, anyway? Brian Williams is expected to be doing a bit of cutting up on Leno’s 10 p.m. show. Various anchors and reporters pop up fairly regularly these days on late-night shows from Letterman to Maher, warming seats next to actors, musicians, and so-called “reality” stars shilling their latest wares. And don’t these on-air personalities deserve the same fine union protections as actors?
Obviously I wish AFTRA would grow a pair and actually offer more aggressive protection. Actors who fear a merger with all of AFTRA are legitimately concerned that the new entity that comes out of such a deal will be an invertebrate. The devil is in the details, after all.
So, while shipping off the issue of the closure of the MPTF’s medical facilities to a committee is rather unfortunate, AFTRA has yet another opportunity to find itself as a union and use that additional organizing money on opportunities other than digital scripted television. If Reardon is actually sincere about a whole-AFTRA/SAG merger, organizing cable news would be a great way to demonstrate that.
What’s going on with actor’s salaries and contracts is this: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Foremski/?p=556&tag=nl.e539
The only way to stop it is if downloaders who illegally download product are stopped… if that is even possible. The entertainment industry is shrinking. How do you make money in music? Only by doing concerts. Why? Because even though technology changes people don’t & people want to gather and be sociable they way we have been doing for thousands of years.
How do you make money in film? Only through the B.O. Because, once again people want to go out and this is a very general friendly social outling people like to go out to. You can’t download the concert or theatre experience.
DVD’s and CD’s are done. This is the BIGGER ISSUE of why actor’s salaries are going down. The corporation is getting squeezed and so they in turn squeeze the talent. The internet will go down in history as having destroyed Hollywood. It will still take some time and there will still be big salaries for the top, top, talent. But nothing like the salaries medium to semi A-list talent enjoy today.
PS. I’m not happy about this trend. You think movies suck now wait another 5 years. TV already sucks and music too. Technology got Hollywood in this mess and only technology will get it out of it. Google and VI Labs can track downloaders. This should have been done a long time ago circa 1999-2000. While the studio’s still have the financial means they should really go after downloaders and make it a socially unacceptable thing to download content illegally. Just like the “Just say no” to drugs and the anti-smoking movements, illegally downloading content can be curbed to a certain extent.