Here’s the Fox statement:
Last week Fox announced that it would support the vending machine business starting 30 days following our initial home video release date. Fox believes this would provide the consumer with high value, broad title choice and quality access to Fox movies. We invest enormous amounts of money, creativity and effort to make entertaining, high quality Fox movies available throughout the world. In the home entertainment business, Fox offers its movies through brick and mortar retail outlets and online retailers, including both national and regional chains and small mom-and-pop stores, offering consumers a wide selection of new releases and catalog for both rental and purchase. Fox’s various business models have elaborate infrastructures and employ significant numbers of people to provide quality customer service and the best consumer experience. Our desire is to maintain for Fox movies a thriving network of distribution serving all types of consumer preferences, on reasonable business terms for Fox as well as our distribution partners.
Fox spent several weeks trying to negotiate a deal with Redbox that offered Redbox varying terms that gave Redbox the option of purchasing DVDs either on the initial DVD release date or with a 30 day window. Unfortunately, Fox and Redbox could not reach an agreement. Redbox has now filed a lawsuit challenging Fox’s ability to make business decisions that Fox believes are in its best interest as well those of consumers. This lawsuit aims to limit Fox’s ability to make legitimate business decisions, and Fox believes it will prevail in defeating Redbox’s meritless claims.
8:50AM: Redbox earlier today announced that it has sued News Corp.’s 20th Century Fox following Fox’s decision last week instructing its DVD distributors (VPD and Ingram) to stop selling DVDs to Redbox as of October 27th. That’s just before Ice Age 3 is set to be released on DVD. This comes after Redbox refused to agree to a 30-day window before renting Fox DVDs in their kiosks. The lawsuit against Fox appears to be nearly identical to the Universal lawsuit with Redbox and focuses on the same three issues: copyright misuse, anti-trust, and tortious interference with Redbox’s supply contracts. MORE






I predict this will go over as well for FOX as NBC-Universal pulling its content from iTunes a few years back went for NBCU.
There were pissed off NBC TV Show Season Pass holders to contend with (Apple gave them refunds plus bonus iTunes credit which they spent on other companies TV shows), they had a nightmare of a time with Amazon Unboxed (for the few people who figured out that NBC content had migrated there, they found that initially Unboxed’s video format was incompatible with Apple devices like the iPod) and then eventually NBCU quietly returned the content to iTunes because frankly GE can’t afford to turn down a single revenue stream (they’ve spent a lot on ‘iTunes killer’ Hulu and oh yeah something like $200 million fighting off an SEC investigation for accounting fraud which they lost & now have to cough up $50 million more in fines)
By the way did you see the Time magazine piece yesterday (Will Rupert Murdoch Be the Pied Piper of Paid Content?) in which the author mentions the following:
“Internet experts say that almost everybody who has ever tried charging for content has failed. Murdoch is out of touch, they suggest. Michael Wolff, whose book on Murdoch, The Man Who Owns the News, came out in December, says he was shocked to learn that [Rupert] Murdoch didn’t have an e-mail address, could barely use his cell phone and had not been on the Internet unaided. “Technology,” writes Wolff, “has always been regarded as one of those things, like fancy hotels, or long-form writing, that are not part of [News Corp.'s] culture.” ”
Oh yeah this will end well for FOX…NOT!
In the meantime if it’s in my local library on DVD, Fox, I might watch it. There’s plenty of other ways to see FOX stuff, but that’s the cheapest & most convenient for me & thankfully unless the congloms jury-rig copyright law further in their favor it’s still legal under the 1st sale doctrine.
Why should Redbox be treated any differently than Netflix or Blockbuster (or what’s left of Hollywood Video?)
Redbox shouldn’t have made deals with Sony or Liongate – now everyone will want deals, or restrict product.
I think the studios are more affraid of a glut of used disc!
I’ve blogged on this a lot. VDOVault you are spot on regarding the futility of Murdoch’s “pay” model — it works for the WSJ because it’s an alternative to Bloomberg terminals, but that’s the investor market who will pay premium for information about markets.
Redbox is a great model — cheap, convenient, at the grocery store, Friday night shopping and a movie. It ought to be embraced, not fought. Agreed VDOVault that NBCU’s move with Itunes was all kinds of stupid.
I think eventually all content will be “free” but with product placement ads “plus” (i.e. the product is a critical component of the storyline, and positive) for consumers to view on Ipods/phones, computers, and DVDs (nominal burning charge). That will change Hollywood from niche to mass, few films like Milk, many like Ice Age 3. Paradoxically, the internet makes mass more not less possible.
Oh the humanity! A service that allows the consumer to rent a DVD for 1$ instead of 5! We must punish these companies which serve to offer cheap entertainment in a down economy and unite until we can finally offer the Holy Grail: The 10 dollar rental!
Soon you will kill the goose that laid the golden egg. With studios, if there is no profit in it, like wall mart they stop carrying it, or they cut back. So have your $1 DVD’s now, but with no one buying them at Wal Mart guess what, less and less will be released, the studios will find another way to make money. One that won’t cost a buck.
So by all means gorge yourself on the $1 Redbox now, because in the future they might be Coinstar stations instead. A vending machine is just a vending machine, it can spew out anything.
Redbox is a great choice for those who want to watch the movie that night and are good at remembering to bring it back the next day. These companies just continue to make the same mistakes over and over again. The music industry will never recover from the damage done by not managing file-sharing better when it was first exploding at the beginning of the decade and