Pete Antico is running for the National Board of SAG as an independent:
I am running for the board to attempt to change the internal structure of
the Screen Actors Guild to run it like a productive business to create more effective policy’s going forward that would better enable us to even the playing field with the producers (AMPTP).
The Guild board must be unified or it will be the death of SAG as we know it and all of what our brothers and sisters fought for in the past will be history and our union will be broken apart with no future security. The Guild’s board was publicly divided, conquered, and buried in the last contract negotiation by the producers (AMPTP).
I am committed that doesn’t happen again. That is a tough task with the egos currently on our board. In my opinion the reason this abortion of a contract passed is one third of our board members don’t work in our business. Another third don’t have a clue about running a corporation (when you include the first third who don’t work in our business the figure climbs to two thirds) and fight like children in a schoolyard publicly so the entire world, especially their enemies (AMPTP) can see their positions. That transparency made SAG sitting ducks for the opposition.
SAG needs to operate like a stealth submarine, silent and deadly, never showing its hand, under the radar. Your opponent should never know what you are thinking, or how much power is in your missiles. The Art of War would be mandatory reading if I were president. I would initiate a Guild rule that infighting amongst the Board Members must stay in the board room and not allowed in the press. WHAT YOU DO HERE, WHAT YOU SAY HERE, WHEN YOU LEAVE HERE, STAYS HERE.
All public statements will be given to the press by the President’s office. Any leaks to the press would be “organized”. In my opinion, the hiring of interim National Executive Director, David White was based on an illegal coup against President Allan Rosenberg by a fiscally uneducated irresponsible board faction. (It’s interesting that when Doug Allan was National Executive Director our residuals were processed in 30 days but after David White became NED our residuals are now processed in 60 to 90 days. Whose account is our money (millions) sitting in collecting interest for the extra sixty days? The producers?).
That very same board cost SAG millions in raises by dividing the national and regional boards which resulted in the ratifying of the worst contract in SAG history with UNACCEPTABLE rollbacks that eliminates residuals for all shows pre 1971. I am appalled that the older members who fought so hard to get us residuals were sold out and thrown under the bus in their golden years. I didn’t know some of the board members practiced eugenics. That is why I am running for office. I intend to do something about it.
We need new blood with fresh ideas. It cost SAG members $400,000 dollars to hire David White, not to mention paying Doug Allan’s contract out. That is financial stupidity based on emotion and a lack of forward thinking. Did that move put SAG in a stronger position or a weaker one? FOLLOW THE MONEY. The millions SAG members lost in raises from a year of no decision on a potential strike vote due to infighting by a faction of the board that is supposed to be looking out for our best interests? That board faction led by a guy named Ned Vaugn said if we voted yes on this abomination of a contract that we would all go straight back to work. That never happened, Ned. You mislead the membership and it cost our Guild millions of dollars in future earnings because of the residual giveaways which irreparably damage contributions to our pension and health plans.
You and your blind followers should be proud of providing more Non Union actor work than any other group in Screen Actors Guild History. Thanks for taking jobs, food and health care away from thousands of rank and file performers. SAG members should be furious about that!
I am saddened to learn it was that same board faction who illegally kept our Guild President out of the negotiating room (which has never happened in the history of our union) in the middle of the most important negotiation in Guild history! That is absolute blasphemy. Love or hate President Rosenberg, no business in their right mind in the world would ever negotiate a major deal without the CEO. That was a brilliant strategic move on that same board factions part (they must have read, “The Art of Negotiating by Bending Over”).
My question to the membership is, “ are you going to sit idle and complain or are you going to vote those inept board members (united for strength) who were responsible out of office?”
These same members voted to spend one hundred and twenty thousand dollars of SAG dues money on stuffing member’s residual envelopes with “vote yes” propaganda. (Wasting our dues money.) I am strongly opposed to any Guild dues being spent on political agendas. That money should have be used to hire lawyers and business analysts (like Meredith Whitney of Oppenheimer fame) to work on a plan to merge all performers under the same roof, hire accountants and auditors to go over film companies books to make sure we are getting our fare share of residuals, and track new media on the net.
United we stand, divided we fall… and we fell. I must inform the membership that the only reason this contract was recommended by our national board was that most of the THIRTY OF OUR REGIONAL AND NATIONAL BOARD MEMBERS who got elected and voted yes on this “give away” everything SAG forefathers worked for contract have less than FIVE CREDITS AND DO NOT MAKE A LIVING IN OUR BUSINESS. A list of their names and credits can be found on Guild member Frank Lloyd’s website (www.stuntfacts.org) and at the end of this letter.
If you worked 2 years at a hospital you would not qualify for their board of directors as you would not have the tenure and the experience to make informed and educated decisions. (People’s lives could be at stake based on your decisions) Do you want people who work in other professions to be able to vote for your future? I don’t. SAG member’s careers and pensions were at stake and people that do not make a living in our business had the power to vote on our future and they sold us out. I want members who live it, breathe it, and honor it to vote on it.
I will fight to change the Guild’s bylaws to mandate that every board member must be vested for a pension to qualify to be a board member. That means 10 years making approximately fifteen thousand dollars a year. My definition of new blood would be a member who is educated not only in our contract, but in the needs and the issues of rank and file actors, STUNT PEOPLE, dancers, singers, performers with disabilities and background performers.
Any member who sits idle is a part of the problem. You must get involved if we are to have a chance at survival. Guild business should never be personal. We must be 100% committed and 100% unattached to see clearly as there is a long road ahead. We must have unity to survive.
I have been informed that Guild Presidential nominee Ann-Marie Johnson has been challenged to a debate by Ken Howard. Mr. Howard requested an emailed questionnaire with several days for each candidate to respond so they can pick and choose which questions they would respond to. That is not a debate by definition. Mr. Howard, if you don’t have the balls to debate with a moderator in front of a live audience, televised, to be played nationally on SAG’s website, I suggest you are unqualified and should respectfully with draw your request, and I would ask you withdraw your candidacy for the simple reason than any person wishing to be the President of the Screen Actors Guild should have a commanding knowledge of its governance and issues while standing alone on your own two feet.
What would America say to a Presidential candidate who would only debate by email so a team of puppet masters can answer pre chosen questions? Step up to the plate Mr. Howard. I believe you have no choice at this point. If you step up, the membership will know the truth about your abilities and those of Miss Johnson. If you stand down, the truth will be self evident.
We need 100 percent support from the acting community if we want to have a shot at effecting a change. TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW TO READ THE ISSUES AND GET INFORMED AND VOTE!
Board Member Credits
In a business that revolves around credits it’s a crime that these people are making decisions in regard to our pension & health when it will never involve them to take part in either.
Since, the only credits pertinent are the TV/Theatrical credits, those are the only ones that count. The following list of names are those who fired SAG’s NED Doug Allen for standing up to the AMPTP, eliminated the negotiating team — which SAG Hollywood controlled and they replaced it with a, so-called taskforce, which New York & the branch board members have control of — even though many on the board have little if no IMDB TV/Theatrical credits.
It looks like only 8 of the 41 that are on the NY side have a pension.
Check out these who made the decision to disallow members to vote on a strike authorization, break up the negotiation team behind the backs of the LA based National board 52 % to 48% with a letter of assent. Unless stipulated, they are New York or Branch Board Directors.
Richard Masur (Established actor, former SAG President and the real leader of this group and their current action. HE IS THE SAG PRESIDENT WHO TOLD THE STUNT COMMUNITY TO TAKE WHAT THE PRODUCERS OFFERED US IN ’94 AND HE WOULD FIX IT LATER. WHEN LATER CAME HE SAID THAT THERE WEREN’T ENOUGH TV COORDINATORS FOR SAG TO CARE ABOUT.)
Adam Arkin (Hollywood Board established actor).
Molly Ballard (5 credits in 12 years)
Mark Blum (actor/producer 50 credits in 12 years)
Amy Brenneman (Hollywood Board established actress)
John Carter Brown (5 credits)
Suzanne Burkhead (1 credit in 1983)
Tom Chantler (6 credits in 12 years)
Paul Christie (mostly cartoon voice, worked a few related to the TV/Theatrical contract)
Dave Corey (37 credits 21 years)
Roy Costley (3 credits 4 years)
Rebecca Damon(2 credits)
Maureen Donnelly (no credits)
Cece DuBois (no credits)
Nancy Duerr (23 credits in 24 years)
Abby Dylan (4 credits)
Morgan Fairchild (Hollywood Board established actress)
Sam Freed (37 credits in 31 years)
Steve Fried (none)
Nancy Giles (44 credits since 1986)
Traci Godfrey (1 credit)
David Hartley-Margolin (none)
Todd Hissong (none)
Liz Lazzi (1992, 2 credits as an actress, 1 credit as herself.)
Mike Hodge (69 credits since 1984)
Ken Howard (Hollywood Board established actor)
James Huston (14 credits since 1984)
Jim Hutchison (6 credits since 1974)
Ed Kelly (1 credit)
Art Lynch (none)
Mary McDonald-Lewis (no TV/Theatrical credits, worked a lot of animation prior to 1995)
Helen McNutt (3 credits)
Bill Mootos (6 credits since 1999)
Sue-Anne Morrow (5 credits since 1999)
Debra Nelson (8 credits since 1992 )
Pamela Reed (Hollywood Board established actress)
Sam Robards (established actor impressive credits)
Stephen F. Schmidt (5 credits since 1986)
Matt Servitto (working actor lots of credits)
Kate Walsh (Hollywood Board established actress)
Sharon Washington (30 credits since 1989)
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
the Screen Actors Guild to run it like a productive business to create more effective policy’s going forward that would better enable us to even the playing field with the producers (AMPTP).

What I still don’t get is why having a career, as an actor is bad, and being to bad to have one, is good. That is what the credits after the names implies, isn’t it?
Before the election, the board was filled with people with less than 5 credits, and with the last one in the 70′s, because those people are really in touch with the reality, and needs of today’s actors. Yet nobody ever pointed that out.
PURE IGNORANCE.
The Pre-1971 TV residuals formula was fully NEGOTIATED BACK THEN – NOT IN THIS CONTRACT.
Name ONE “rollback” in the present contract, Mr Business.
Mr Qualified Service should start by criticizing the non-contract working bevy of MEMBERSHIP FIRST Board members. Angel Tompkins? David Jolliffe?
Knee-jerk crapola, Mr Antico. Go fish.
I like this guy. Shows character, drive, passion and determination. He’s got my vote!!
Amy better check IMDB, David has over 40 years as a actor with 2 sihows as a regular. Same with Angel.
I would just point out that since Alan Rosenberg, Doug Allen and their Membership First group (this gentlemen included) have been running SAG, they have run it into the ground. Never before have so many pilots, TV movies, and new shows on the networks, cable networks, etc used the AFTRA contract instead of the SAG contract. They all are preferring to use the AFTRA contract for obvious reasons. This is the unintended consequence of failing to negotiate together with our sister union and by instituting turmoil and the threat of a strike within our industry for most of a year. They have brought about the end of an era, and almost the end of our union.
We need and demand a new direction! Let us have some unemotional adults who can help the “trains run on time”. Throw more of these Membership First bums out. They are living in their heads, or in The Art of War, or in some fairy land.
Is my math correct… the cost of living allowance (cola) has increased %11.4 during this current contract and this new contract is giving us a %3.2 increase?…the Force Majaeure “amendment” is a rollback… New Media Residuals- after a 13/26 week free window, $25.00 for every 26 week period for the first year and then dropping to %6 of distributors gross… not the mention we lost right to role… and we are forced to advertise any product while under the TV contract…weather we like it or not(which kills the commercial business for the rank and file actor)…oh and I almost forgot with rollover from television and cable to “New Media” according to our new contract (the one you voted yes on) our members get virtually nothing! Not to mention NO RESIDUALS for pre 1971 film and television which is one of the biggest ROLLBACKS in Guild History. Either you really that ignorant or you are a plant…
AMY seems like you are the misinformed fishbate.
Hey Amy;
Get your facts straight. Both Angel Tompkins and David Jolliffe work. And I’d bet your house that both qualify for both pension and health plans in both unions. Can you say that? I’m fortunate enough to be a member of one of the most respected ADR groups in this industry. And so is David Jolliffee. He’s been at it a lot longer than I and I think it’s safe to say that he easily earns over six figures just in that area of SAG work alone!!! You have a problem with that?! Oh by the way.. why don’t you provide us with your real name so we can look you up. Have you starred in an iconic sitcom lately? I hope you are not Amy Aquino.
You’re pathetic!
“Amy better check IMDB, David has over 40 years as a actor with 2 sihows as a regular. Same with Angel.”
Yes, both with sihows about 40 years ago. Give us a break.
Amy -
“PURE IGNORANCE”, indeed!
The TV residuals formula never gave management the ability to re-use actors’ work in new media for free, until this last contract. That’s more than just a rollback. That’s one of the biggest give away’s of all time.
Pre ’74 (not ’71 as you state) TV residuals have a limit of 4/6/10 uses on TELEVISION.
The AMPTP didn’t have the right to rerun these shows in new media without a residual until this last giveaway contract.
If you think the AMPTP had the right to reuse these pre ’74 shows in new media because it was “negotiated back then”; Why then did the AMPTP need new contract provisions giving those residuals away?
- Ben
Mr. Antico,
There are more ways of earning a living as a SAG actor than as a dayplayer in TV and Movies…You know, the things they post on IMDB. I’ll make about 70-80k this year in commercials and voice over which is how I usually make my cash with some peppered in dayplayer stuff. But other actors do background, some do cartoon, industrials, etc…
To count people’s imbd credits is petty. To list them in your estimation as “ESTABLISHED ACTOR/ACTRESS” is ridiculous — What does one need to do to be established in your book? How do you know how many and what kind of contracts some of these people have worked? You are rash. It’s petty and distracting from the real issues.
For instance, I know Paul Christie — You sleight him cuz that guy works all the time. I wish I had his career. In regards to the others you deem unworthy how do you know they don’t earn livings as actors?
I hope your attitudes die off in this next election — they are killing our solidarity.
Dear Tim Matheson;
Work AFTRA much?! Producers didn’t go to AFTRA because SAG didn’t have a contract. If that were true, being that SAG is now the most affordable contract of the two unions, why aren’t producers running to SAG? I’ll tell you why. Because in basic cable, producers don’t have to pay residuals to actors if it’s an AFTRA show. And in prime time… AFTRA is a producers union. More compliant than any other union in this industry. Have you ever filed a claim on an AFTRA show? I have. And it’s been a year and still nothing. I had to have AFTRA do the claim again 6 months ago because they “misplaced” the first filing. And this is typical. Also, AFTRA a few years ago made a deal with the ATA. In return for AFTRA allowing agents to purchase more percentages in productions companies, the ATA paid AFTRA $500,000.00. Let’s do some research and find out how many AFTRA shows are produced by agencies. AFTRA also has a ton of basic cable shows being shot out of the country. Didn’t they claim that the reasons they made their contracts more “flexible” was to keep work here in the USA?
The “obvious reasons” why producers went with AFTRA? Because AFTRA is a producers union and blatantly undercut SAG’s contracts. Question; did you qualify for AFTRA’s health coverage? Or SAG’s? Do you like your heath coverage at SAG? Do you like the fact that you can earn over $250K with multiple employers with regard to SAG coverage, but are only allowed to earn a total of $60K PER YEAR over at AFTRA? Did you know that it takes you almost twice the amount of time to earn pension points with AFTRA than SAG? Did you know that you only have to pay less than $200 in premiums per quarter for health coverage at SAG but almost 3 times that for the same kind of coverage from AFTRA? Are you ok with that? And let’s say we did merge, who do you think will get hurt? SAG or AFTRA. Believe me, it’ll be SAG members.
“Throw the bumps out.” IF you know how to do it better, why didn’t you run?
In a business that revolves around credits it’s a crime that these people are making decisions in regard to our pension & health when it will never involve them to take part in either.”
“Since, the only credits pertinent are the TV/Theatrical credits, those are the only ones that count.”
This is simply, astonishingly, utterly, wrong.
Thanks for posting, Mr. Antico. You’ve eliminated the possibility that any SAG voter reading this might overlook your limitations.
Kevin, cartoons, industrials and Voice over work are all valid income streams. If our unions were unified I would demand there be Voice over artists representing themselves and cartoon and background artists. All factions should have a voice on the board. I agree IMDB is not perfect. Alot of the board members mentioned in my article are regional members and some NYC members. The credits are pretty accurate.If you primarily work your AFTRA card I would suggest running for the AFTRA board.We need experienced members in film, television, dancers, puppeteers, background performers etc on the SAG National Board so all groups can have a voice to deal with their own specific groups issues. Let me clarify I am running as an independant, not a ticket. As far a killing your solidarity, Unite for strength did that by disregarding California business code 72.11 B which states in order to call an assenting vote you MUST have 100% of the entire boards approval. UFS disregarded that fact, never got the 100% approval, divided our boards and we ended up with the worst contract in the history of our Guild. Thanks for your comment. I am for unification when we have a proper vetted out business and financial plan that makes sense. That Includes the same aformentioned guide lines for pension and health.
Plain and simple, if you do not work our contracts you don’t have the experience and the knowledge to vote on the future of people that do and you shouldn’t be representing us on any SAG board period. Inexperience on the current SAG board has resulted in the worst contract in Guild history. Mr. “don’t let the facts bother you” have the courage to post your name so we may look up your credits. Kindly remove your ego at the door. Look up the board of directors on any major corp and you will find prestigious extensive backgrounds in that particular business. This is a business my friend.To run a successful business you need a qualified board.