I was gone all day and just saw this in my email. Isn’t Tom Hanks in No. 1 position, given his relationship with DreamWorks, Fox, and he’s the Jimmy Stewart Of Hollywood? An insider tells me, “This literally all happened last week, so no discussions of casting yet. But it’s expected that’s who Spielberg will approach first. But he could go younger.”
Los Angeles, CA (August 2, 2009) — Steven Spielberg will direct as his next film a contemporary adaptation of Mary Chase’s Pulitzer Prize winning play “Harvey,” a co-production between Twentieth Century Fox and DreamWorks Studios. The announcement was made today by Fox Chairmen Jim Gianopulos and Tom Rothman and DreamWorks partners Stacey Snider and Spielberg.
“Harvey” is the first screenplay by the best-selling novelist Jonathan Tropper.
The film will be produced by Spielberg and Don Gregory, with Elizabeth Gabler and Carla Hacken overseeing the project for Fox 2000, which acquired the rights to the original play in 2008.
“I am very happy to be working again with my friend Tom Rothman who shepherded us through ‘Minority Report,’ and with Elizabeth and Carla, who I’m looking forward to collaborating with,” said Spielberg. “DreamWorks has experienced a creative and profitable relationship with Twentieth Century Fox in the past, and I look forward to renewing that time together.”
“Don Gregory entrusted us with these precious rights, Beth Gabler and Carla Hacken developed an exceptional screenplay and Jim and I had the easy part: Deciding to go first, before anyone else, to a filmmaker who combines the mastery of craft, tone, wit and insight that ‘Harvey’ embodies,” said Rothman. “Steven Spielberg is film’s greatest humanist. And we feel blessed as Elwood himself to be collaborating with him, Stacey, and everyone at DreamWorks.”
“Harvey” is the story of an amiable eccentric, Elwood P. Dowd, and his friendship with a six and a half feet tall invisible rabbit and how this affects every member of his family and his community. It won the Pulitzer Prize in 1944, and played on Broadway for 1,775 performances between 1944 and 1949. It later was adapted for the 1950 Universal film that starred Jimmy Stewart and Josephine Hull.
Added Stacey Snider: “This is a story relevant for all times, perhaps more so than ever before. We are so pleased to be able, with Fox, to be bringing this to today’s audiences.”
Casting and pre-production will begin immediately with cameras turning right after the first of the year as a joint venture between the two studios.






I’m thinking 6-foot CGI rabbit with twitching whiskers and sniffing nose. Hopping.
Shoot. Me. Now.
I know people are gonna go nuts about who would ever fill Stewart’s shoes, but the real question is when is Dreamworks going to have a sustainable slate? If DW 2.0 is going to be more than Amblin, they’re gonna need to figure out a way to develop.
Why is Steven wasting his time with another remake? He should do something original. Or do that musical comedy he’s been talking about doing forever. An original one not a remake. If this has to be remade I think Jim Carrey should be allowed to star in this he was going to play Elwood long ago but Steven will probably go with Hanks. I’d rather see Spielberg direct Matt Helm what happened with that script?
@ m:
What better way for Dreamworks to develop than by sharing co-financing and co-producing credits with rival studios? Paramount and Sony did the same thing when Spielberg directed the first “Tintin” movie.
If the movie is a success, they get 50% of the share and if it bombs, they haven’t lost as much money than if they had financed it themselves.
ten bucks Tom Hanks gets in on this
Is there an untapped market for movies based on plays written a half century ago? What would make the 14-35 year old crowds come see it? I’ll bet now on a flop.
What next? Remake “To Kill A Mockingbird”?
They say casting to begin mmediately? My money is on Spielberg buddy Tom Hanks to play Dowd. Like we all don’t see that one coming?
Don Gregory is the father of Meet the Press’ David Gregory.
Sweet Jesus.
I’ll believe it when I see it. The beard is attached to everything.
Hopefully this time, the budget will be big enough that they can afford to show us the rabbit.
Imagine the size of the rabbit poop this one will leave behind.
Really Steven? That the best you can do? First Tintin, now Harvey? Just get Jonah Nolan to finish Interstellar for God sakes. I shudder to think what “sweet dessert” will come after a Harvey remake. Oh, wait, Indy 5 starring Shia The Beef. Kill me.
Matt C: I’m not sure if you understood what I meant by “develop” — which in here in Hollywood we use to describe the process of taking a story through the scripting process.
My point is that going 50-50 with another studio on another studio’s project by using Spielberg as bait isn’t a way to create a viable movie studio. At some point DW 2.0 is going to need to go into production on their own movies, and frankly I don’t see how they’re doing 6-8 movies a year since they only seem to be developing tentpoles.
1. WTF, is this going to be Tom Hanks first animation movie?
2. Aren’t the audience demographics for Harvey resting in Forest Lawn and the next demographic at the nursing home?
3. Is Steven preparing this film for his social security retirement in six years to show to his IN CROWD?
4. Harvey, the only Harvey they should be making a movie about is Harvey Korman and to make that funny it should be an Aptow script, showing the background filming of Blazing Saddles on and off set.
5. And finally the only invisible thing that makes money is the INVISIBLE MAN and the profits Universal makes for that film will be offset by this Spielberg disaster because an invisible rabbit won’t sale worldwide in China, India or Europe.
I wish the press release had gotten this right:
Harvey is not a rabbit. He’s a pooka.
Wow! Fox actually hires a real director! Does this mean Tom Rothman will actually have to sit back and run a studio rather than shadow direct?
What is Spielberg doing to his career? Are we witnessing the start of the inevitable decline?
Fear. It’s fear. Whenever great directors fear they’re in the doldrums of their careers, or worry that they’ve lost their touch, they tread water as well as the Boards. Frank Capra found safe harbor in “Arsenic and Old Lace,” “State of the Union” and “You Can’t Take It With You.” Hitchcock fled to “Dial M For Murder.” Wilder hid under “Stalag 17″ and “Witness for the Prosecution.” Huston did “Annie,” Mankiewicz did “Sleuth,” and Wyler, Wise, Cukor, and Stevens likewise took shelter with presold plays. It’s hard to turn down a presold property (even if the demographics of Broadway and Hollywood no longer overlap). But when Spielberg — who expands cinema with every film — sets his eyes on a Pookah, it says a lot about the state of the business. And him.
Another remake. Spielberg, don’t you have enough MONEY??? JEEEZUS, take some risks with your career, you have nothing to lose!
You are all wrong! The “going younger” is a hint that Spielberg’s remake will star Shia LaBeefcake, who he has been grooming as the NEW Tom Hanks/Jimmy Stewart Everyman for the 20yo set.
I predict Spielberg will draw from the comedy well. We know he had his eye on Sacha Baron Cohen for Chicago 7, so I’d say his name will come up (surely as he’s currently transitioning to more scripted fare.) I’d also assume Spielberg might go the neurotic route, but not with Hanks, rather with Stiller or Carell.
hahahhahhhahahhaahhahahhhahhahahahhahaha
Quit sucking Stephen.
I’d prefer Indy 5 to this. What a horrible idea. Just when I tell everyone to stop bashing fox, they decide to do this.
Come on Steve! It’s not like you have years to wait on another Indy!
This has got ‘Will Smith vehicle’ written all over it.