UPDATES WHAAAAAT? Tom Sherak New AMPAS Prez
EXCLUSIVE: I’ve learned the Board Of Governors for the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences wanted Tom Hanks to serve as president for the new term. And that he was nominated by Tom Sherak who thought Hanks could be a “Gregory Peck-type” AMPAS leader. But insiders tell me Hanks declined, saying he “didn’t feel he could put the time in”. So his name was withdrawn, and that’s when Sherak got the gig. At least it’s comforting to know that AMPAS’ and Sherak’s heads were in the right place by wanting an actor instead of two back-to-back studio shills.
Here’s more AMPAS news: Larry Marks and Bill Condon have told the Academy they’re not available to produce and direct the Academy Awards broadcast again because they’re both working. I understand the AMPAS board wanted them back. Now the panel has to come up with a new producer within 30 days. The Academy wants to build on the last telecast’s small ratings gains and find a motion picture veteran with broadcast experience. (Any suggestions?) And because singer-dancer Hugh Jackman worked out so well as host, AMPAS wants another multi-talented big name this time around, too. (No more TV comedians and that awful standup.) Even better, how about two big names, preferably a man and a woman, to host together? (Any suggestions?)
Finally, Hollywood will know as soon as the AMPAS executive committee votes on September 10th who’ll be honored at the 1st annual “rubber chicken” black-tie dinner to present its testimonial awards – the Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award, the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award, and the Honorary Award. Previously, these honorees were voted at the Board’s December meeting. And now winners will only be acknowledged at the Oscars, not accoladed on air. But it’s a way for the Academy to work through the blacklog of Hollywood legends who want an award to cap their careers. And, since those legends are all pals of the AMPAS bigwigs, it became more personally embarrassing with every passing year that their friends weren’t awarded. In fact, the last time the Thalberg was bestowed, it was 2001, and the recipient was Dino De Laurentiis.
Some tell me that Brian Grazer is near the top of the list being considered for the Thalberg. But others say some worthy geezers may be moved ahead of him. Too bad that, back in 2004 which was the year that Joe Roth produced the Oscars, Grazer didn’t get his Thalberg even though everything was set. That is, until the plan was run past Roth who immediately nixed the idea to the AMPAS board. The reason, Roth told the bigwigs, was no time in the broadcast to include the Thalberg award ceremony. And the way it works at AMPAS, the producer has final say over what’s in and out of the Academy Awards show. But those in the know are convinced that Roth was jealous of Grazer and didn’t want a rival producer to one-up him. I’ll be curious to see if this will be Grazer’s year.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6


Martin Short would be an awesome host for the Oscars. He’s quick, he’s funny, he sings, he dances and he is sweet.
And since you ask for a woman partner why not pair him with another multi-talent: Bette Midler who is also all of the above.
brian more than deserves the thalberg (he could always produce the show and then give it to himself). rob and andy could produce, or maybe mike medavoy or chuck roven. all good folks.
I thought Neal Patrick Harris had been deigned as the ‘Host For All Award Shows’ forever. Didn’t you get the memo?
Seriously, they need someone bright, original and interesting, and the only name I can come up with is Robert Downey, Jr. Works for me.
Jinks/Cohen would be perfect to produce the Oscars.
That SUCKS about no return for Condon and Mark. Last year’s Oscar telecast was one of the best ever (IMHO – I know there were definitely critics) and Jackman was a scream. Oh, well – no more wacky Anne Hathaway jokes about Frank Langella being seated “right there.”
Brian Grazer does great work, but please someone tell him to ditch the Stan Laurel hairdo.
So Hugh won’t be hosting again this year? I really can’t remember enjoying the show as much as I did last year. He did a terrific job.
The appeal of being in the Academy – at least to me – was that it was primarily made up of people who actually had vocations and who had performed professionally at a high level. It was always interesting to me to know what the writers, actors, directors, cinematographers and designers thought of their peers work. Ideally, an “academy” of such professionals would value artistic accomplishments and aesthetic considerations.
The “face” of this Academy for the past 4 years was someone from the “public relations” branch; now the “face” is a member of the “executive” branch – and a member of the infinitesimal sub-committee of AMPAS that decided to change 7 decades of tradition without consulting the members who make up the Academy.
I never wanted to belong to an association of public relations people or marketing executives; I wanted to belong to an organization made up of working professional artists. People with vocations as well as careers. It seems like the same old story – many people in Hollywood want not only power and money and positions; they want to appropriate the language and values of the artist, while operating like a businessman.
A non-profit “academy” should consider, but certainly not be defined by, the ratings of a TV show. It certainly should not be about non-artists trying to define what is award worthy.
Any Board member who thinks that a policy of nominating 10 films, without the approval of the members, is what they should be doing, should really step down.
They should bring in the team that does “American Idol.” They’re used to producing rigged contests.
Will Bob Evans ever get the Thalberg award he so richly deserves? I say he should get one while he’s still lucid enough to hit on the presenter.
Jinks Cohen would be great to produce this show. They are supremely talented and respected. They have terrific taste. Nice and smart. A miracle in this town.
Grazer should actually produce the show – he’s very creative and would do a good job.
Thank God that Laurence Mark and Bill Condon are not returning – the show last year was a train wreck – Hugh Jackman looked like he was performing at a gay cabaret club (and probably lost some potential “Wolverine” audience in the process) and those inane tributes to the acting nominees were way over the top. Listening to Taraji P. Henson, Richard Jenkins, and others getting praised like they just discovered electricity was embarrassing.
Tom Hanks is a studio shill pretending to be an actor. I will boycott anything he is part of for the rest of his life.
If they really want a show to remember, then get Mickey Rourke to host and let him rip!
I think Joe Roth should produce, then he can give the award to himself for having the best studio deal known to man and then blowing it with bombs like Gigli, Tomcats, and Hollywood Homicide. They should have a producer’s razzie don’t you think?
Steve Martin and Tina Fey were terrific together last year. The Academy could do a lot worse. (Personally, I’d like to see Lewis Black but lotsa luck to that.)
I’d go with Amy Adams or Anne Hathaway and George Clooney, or Jamie Foxx.
You want two incredibly talented hosts for the Oscars? I nominate Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick. They have smarts, glamor, are masters at live performance and manage to have both a youthful personae and Old Hollywood cred.
Although I like the idea of a male/female duo, I’d prefer a trio of multi-talented women. It doesn’t seem like females host big ceremonies very often. Maybe they could be different styles or ages so they attracted different demographics (i.e. Beyonce/Zooey Deschanel) Oprah would be another fun option.
George Clooney & Julia Roberts — glamor and great chemistry
Ditto Simon. Tom Hanks IS a studio shill. Let’s feed him and Sarah Palin to the wolves.
how about some diverse names on the list, i am so sick of all these white people. yawn. yawn.
My pick would be for Ziskin producing again (shortest recent show with best ratings) with either Steve Martin or Ellen Degeneres hosting. The show needs “funny.” Hugh Jackman was not. Reportedly, his performance was sponsored by the cardboard manufacturers association.
These guys – Grazer and Howard – quietly just do it.
They serve the material and not the other way around. Workmanlike professionals like the last of the last – people like George Roy Hill, Sydney Pollack, Norman Jewison – filmmakers who made it a point of being versatile, worked hard at this, were good at it.
We trip all over ourselves to sing the praises of the auteurist Tarantinos of the world; he wouldn’t know where to begin how to make “A Beautiful Mind.” (I’m not sure that auteurism has been good for the “business” side of the business at all.)
Grazer is a unique Hollywood classicist.
He deserves it. Give him the Thalberg for “Apollo 13″ let alone everything else. “24″ (television I know) is the best weekly cliffhanger serial ever.