Robert King is on the WGAW’s Board of Directors and co-founded Writers United.
Dear Fellow WGA Member,
I’m one of the proud founding members of Writers United; I am a strong supporter of our Executive Director, David Young; I was a fervent proponent of the 2007-8 strike; and I’m urging you to vote for John Wells for President, Howard Gould for Vice-President, and Christopher Keyser for Secretary-Treasurer. To my mind, this is the only way—and I do mean the only way—we can build on the gains of the 2007-8 strike. I have three arguments that can be summed up as follows…
1. EST.
2. 1.2.
3. DGA.1. Let’s start with EST. My take on the 2007-8 negotiations is this: we won the strike and lost the contract.
We all made amazing sacrifices; we walked more miles than Lewis and Clark; we pulled together in a way the Guild never has before; and we did this for one shared and very important reason…
To make improvements in our contract.
And one of the key ways we did this was in EST—Electronic Sell-Through—or in laymen’s terms: itunes. When a show of ours is sold on itunes (or other services), the companies wanted us to accept the old hated DVD rate—a horribly low percentage—and we fought for something superior. And…
…We won.
We doubled the DVD rate on itunes sales for all features going back to 1971 and all TV episodes going back to 1977. That’s pretty darn good. It made all those days turning circles in front of Fox worth it. The only problem is that that win never made it into our contract—at least not in the way that we on the Board and Negotiating Committee were told it would.
It appears we only got double the rate on shows produced after February 13, 2008. Every show before that—every feature you and I wrote, every episode of TV—would be paid at the old DVD rate.
This is an amazing loss. A stunning loss. A loss probably in the hundreds of millions of dollars. It’s a gift to management: almost 40 years of our shows at half-price.
Now, I’m usually sympathetic to arguments that the companies cheated us. Hey, we’ve all been cheated. But if there were any moment in the history of the Guild the officers and staff should have been attuned to being cheated, it was on the heels of the most devastating strike in our history.
If you’re sensing my anger here, you would be right. Our leaders asked us to strike, to take amazing financial hits, and then, at the last minute, in the contractual sweep-up, when members have no voice, our leaders got played.
So why does that mean we should vote out Elias Davis and vote in John Wells?
Because David Young is fantastic, but his strengths are also his weaknesses. He is not someone we hired from within the industry (as we did with our last two Executive Directors). This makes him truly independent — a good thing. But it also puts him in a position of playing catch-up on our business. That’s why we need John Wells as President: to offer business savvy and personal knowledge where David Young and Jeff Hermanson lack it. We need a member to balance our staff.
Elias Davis is a good person. I’ve served with him on the Board of Directors for almost eight years. But his breadth of recent industry experience and his contact with the business is minimal. It is no match for John’s. This is an important point. It’s not about writing. It’s not about career. It’s about what a Presidential candidate has to offer the Guild. It’s about someone having first-hand knowledge about constant changes in the business. John Wells offers this; Elias Davis does not.
And with this Executive Director, we need that experience more than ever.
2. Having served on the 2004 and 2008 negotiating committee, there was one number in our contract held up as the gold standard in New Media: 1.2 percent in Internet rentals. When your show is rented on the internet, the company must pay you DOUBLE our greatest win in the 2008 negotiations. This is, I’m sure you’ll agree, great, and hopefully will result in hundreds of millions of dollars in additional residual money for our members.
This percentage was won by the 2001 negotiating committee—with some tough brinksmanship and without a strike. I think both John Wells’ supporters and detractors would agree, this gold standard was achieved through the efforts of one man: John Wells.
How do we improve on the hard-won gains of 2008? Go with the person who got the best deal on New Media we’ve ever achieved. Vote for John Wells.
3. Unlike 2007, our next contract is up for renegotiation at the same time as two other creative guilds: the Directors Guild and the Screen Actors Guild. Due to pattern bargaining, once management makes a deal with one guild, that routinely becomes the pattern for the other two.
So unlike 2007, the companies will immediately turn to the Directors Guild — mostly because it is seen as the most compliant creative guild. It is essential — and it’s hard to emphasize this enough — that we create greater dialogue with the DGA on our shared interests; and New Media offers a chance to do this.
Unfortunately, from my experience, the last four years have been some of the worst for DGA and WGA relations. The easiest thing to do would be to blame the DGA for this, and there is certainly truth in that. But Writers United, and I’m damning myself with these words too, has ignored the difficult task of bonding with DGA in order to create a greater and easier bond with SAG.
We need a President and officers who can put aside old tensions. Very simply, John Wells, Howard Gould, and Chris Keyser can do this. Elias Davis, Tom Schulman, and David Weiss can not.
Here’s the bottom line: the losses in 2008 were a failure of leadership, not membership. That leadership is now asking for your vote again.
At the same time, we have one of our savviest members—a member who has negotiated our best deal in New Media—running for President; and this is happening at a moment when we need to find common ground with a sister guild for the most pragmatic of reasons.
That is why I, a founding member of Writers United, can’t support the Writers United candidates for officer positions this year. And that is why I urge you to vote for John Wells, Howard Gould, and Christopher Keyser.
Thank you,
Robert King
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
I’m one of the proud founding members of Writers United; I am a strong supporter of our Executive Director, David Young; I was a fervent proponent of the 2007-8 strike; and I’m urging you to vote for John Wells for President, Howard Gould for Vice-President, and Christopher Keyser for Secretary-Treasurer. To my mind, this is the only way—and I do mean the only way—we can build on the gains of the 2007-8 strike. I have three arguments that can be summed up as follows…

Thank you, Robert. Your informed opinion is very much appreciated.
It would be easier supporting someone who at a minimum, lives by the contracts that ARE in effect and honor good working conditions and laws for everyone.
That would disqualify JOHN WELLS who has a nasty habit of ignoring and blatantly violating State labor laws, ignores collective bargaining agreements and forces his crews to accept less than their union contracts provide.
Supporting John Wells is a slap in the face of everything the Guild stands for and the hypocrisy would cause problems regarding our integrity.
There are many more honorable people to consider. John Wells doesn’t even come close.
Tired, tired, misdirected argument to vote for the wrong candidate. Some of your fundamental points are very good, Robert. But it’s amazing that you think John Wells, who is responsible for his PUBLIC (Oops, accidentally leaked) embrace of the DGA contract–which SHORT CHANGED THE WGA IN IMPORTANT WAYS–and sabotaged the leadership (including David Young, whom you purport to support)–is the man to move the Guild forward. Because he acts like “Father Knows Best?!!!”
Elias Davis is trustworthy, he’s far more in touch with the membership and with the arc of a writer’s career than you ascribe, and he can be counted upon to listen to the membership and act accordingly. He has my vote.
Robert, you say “with this Executive Director, we need that experience more than ever” – That sounds like a dig at David Young unless I misunderstand you.
Most people seem to think David Young is the best executive director we’ve had in a long long time. John Wells seems to have said as much lately as well. That’s why I encourage everyone to read John Bowman’s statement of support for Elias Davis (he believes it’s important that our president and exec director have a good working relationship – and he says Davis is the man for that and NOT Wells). I have enormous respect for Bowman and his work during the strike. His endorsement for Davis speaks volumes.
Mr. King–
I too am voting for Wells, but I find your talking point that “we won the strike and lost the contract” to be absurd. We LOST the strike, which may be one reason Verrone et al forced a vote before membership was allowed to read the full terms. But even the summary of terms made clear how devastating our loss was….a loss only compounded by what you correctly refer to as the botching of the contract terms. Why you continue to support David Young in light of the above is truly puzzling. We need a big fucking broom.
So we should vote for the guy who came out and heartily endorsed the contract you now say we got hosed on? Huh?
Respect, Robert, for your steady hand, great mind, and everything you’ve done for your fellow-writers.
Befuddled–
Yeah, Wells endorsed the shitty deal. But if you look at his entire career, you see a guy who is smart, successful, nuanced in his thinking, and a formidable presence. Now look at David Young.
Sticking,
He did more than enforce it. He did everything he could to ram it down our throats.
No, Wells endorsed the DGA deal. The one that didn’t give away half of our residuals. The WGA managed to fumble away a victory.
Writers United touted the deal as the best in decades of WGA history, and maybe it would have been if they had gotten the final contract language correct. Part of the problem was that Writers United had fired WGA employees that would’ve pointed out the contractual errors: legal counsel, assistant executive director, etc. It’s disingenuous to blame Wells for endorsing the deal that Writers United negotiated and vocally claimed as the best in decades.
WU fumbled the ball at the one-yard-line, and the AMPTP recovered it and ran it back to their own end zone. Let the blame fall squarely where it belongs — on Writers United.
When some who was genuinely on the inside decides that what he saw diminishes those who he supported, it is smart to listen. This isn’t national politics so I won’t make the obviously comparisons.
Don’t vote with your emotions, vote with what makes sense. Our relationship with the DGA is toxic because of current leadership When the studios make a deal with the DGA, that is it. No matter how tough people talk about “the DGA not representing us, thank you very much”, we JUST FUCKING SAW THAT in our last strike. The DGA’s deal was the deal. It doesn’t matter how long we stay on strike, the reality is what it is. If the studios had allowed us to take a different DGA deal after our last strike they’d have set themselves up for every union to go out, one after the other, each improving on the other’s deal.
The WU camp has no real substantial relationship with the DGA, that is just a fact. If the DGA does not work with us, if they make a deal that we cannot live with, that means we MUST go on strike. And that means the studios MUST outlast us.
This only sucks if Elais and Co’, who have no real relationship with the DGA, are running our guild.
In 14 years of WGA membership, I got used to this union’s leadership being petty, timid and ineffective. When Writers United finally emerged, I had to reassess everything — I was finally proud of my union.
I didn’t spend 100 days pounding pavement and packing vans so that the WGA can go back to being the joke of the town. (Both the directors and actors are making it clear that they’re ready to take on that role.) Electing John Wells means a return to the same old low-self-esteem infighting, compulsive second-guessing, and vintage ‘please sir, may I have another’ style of negotiations with the AMPTP.
We’ve made a strong first step — but this is a marathon, not a sprint. I’m disappointed that a smart guy like Robert King is sliding back into the old nonsense — but I’m not going with him. I’ll be voting for Elias Davis and the WU ticket because I value what I do professionally and want a union that feels the same.
Elias is leading us off a cliff. This is not a joke, people. Become informed.
And while you’re at it, inform yourself about Wells and the refuse who are supporting and running his campaign.
Yes. Become informed about all of it. Not the rumors. Not the lies. Not the hype. But what they’ve actually accomplished.
Robert King has a new, safe, middle of the road show on the air, so he’s got his eye on those everlasting CBS dollars and retirement. He always has, and always will be, a pedantic elitist.
Guys, the “Guild Unity” we prize isn’t the property of one political party.
The mudslinging hurts us all.
And no, Writers United does not own this union.
Thank you, Robert Kallio, for demonstrating the type of petty personal attacks and general thuggery that have replaced factual, thoughtful debate from certain corners of the WGA that support the WU slate.
The personal attacks were made by Robert King himself on another candidate, as well as breaching protocol with information he had no business sharing publicly. King is like an ice cream parlor offering only self serve and his wares are just as soft. Having a man run the WGA who is primarily a producer, John Wells, and no longer truly a writer isn’t what the Guild needs at the moment. We also don’t need Robert King. If judged by his own standards, I contend he’s a pedantic elitist that’s as hopelessly out of touch as those he’s championing, just less successful. He plays it safe which is the move he’s made here.
We struck for 100 days and got a garbage contract. I want John Wells because being President of the Union is not the defining moment in his career. Verrone screwed up and Elias will too because it is.