I’ve collected several knowledgeable accounts of what happened during yesterday’s multi-hour contentious MGM conference call with bondholders who were “very loud and very upset”. Here’s why:
The call was for the benefit of the lenders, and MGM management made the presentation along with Stephen F Cooper, that Zolfo Cooper restructure specialist. MGM made a desperate plea for money because the studio had missed its numbers and was going to be out of funds very soon. “The implication was that it’s teetering on bankruptcy,” one source told me. MGM said it needed $20M in short-term cash flow to cover overhead, and an additional $150 million to get through the end of year and continue funding its projects, and to start Peter Jackson’s Hobbit.
Some say the call lasted 6 1/2 hours. Others said it lasted 2 1/2 hours with lenders, and then the lenders themselves had a conference call that lasted another 2 hours. After the MGM presentation, several bondholders spoke, “and they were irate”, an insider tells me. True, this regularly happens on bad news calls like this. But in this case the creditors who hold MGM’s term loan debt blame Harry Sloan for MGM overpromising and then missing its numbers, which was discussed during the summer and why he was removed as CEO. “They’re not happy that Sloan let the company go in this direction but they understand what’s going on. It’s unfortunate, but they get it that the company is in a distressed situation, and they have to figure out an action plan moving forward,” a source explains to me.
The conference call was planned to present the creditors with a request, or forebearance, to waive interest payments on MGM’s $3.5 billion killer debt until February 2010. Because if MGM doesn’t have to make those interest payments, then the studio can afford to use that money instead to fund the production slate. The bondholders couldn’t understand why the equity holders wouldn’t fork over the dough. But the equity holders aren’t interested in writing a check because they understand that their equity is way under water already, and there’s no upside for them. So, in essence, the equity holders have already written off their investment in MGM. But the bondholders have that $3.7 billion of nominal debt currently trading in the secondary market at about $.55–$.57 cents on the dollar. It’s been trading in this low $.50s range for a while, so the marketplace is saying that the company is not worth more than $.56 times $3.7 billion. (And that’s probably high.)
As a result, the bondholders are not in a great situation and therefore not feeling generous. On the other hand, if MGM were sold off today, most investment bankers don’t think it would fetch more than $1.5 billion to $1.75 billion at auction. This would mean that bondholders would recover less than $.50 on the dollar. This would be an even worse outcome.
So the bondhholders said to MGM, in essence, that they were going to let the studio go bankrupt and collect their money since they’d be first in line to get paid. But Cooper explained that this would be the worst possible outcome for the creditors and the company. Because if MGM were forced into bankruptcy, then it would lose James Bond and the studio doesn’t think it can stay alive without 007. Also, a lot of other issues would surface that would tremendously hurt MGM.
Also, if MGM goes through bankruptcy, that’s a very expensive prospect (where only the lawyers get rich), and extremely disruptive (since who would do business with MGM in the interim) and won’t get the creditors what they want which is their money back. It’s more than simply MGM losing Bond. The studio could lose a lot of other franchises.
I can’t tell you whether the bondholders will agree to the forebearance or not. It requires a 51% approval vote. But some of the smart people I’ve contacted do think the creditors will eventually realize that a restructuring of MGM outside of the bankruptcy process is probably the best course right now.
So what’s next? MGM now has to formally ask for forbearance, and the bondholders formally respond.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







To be fair, they DO have the “Red Dawn” remake in production somewhere out there. May be ass, but there’s at least one film being made. Did the “Poltergeist” reboot ever go? I’m thinking “no,” but they came close a few times with Vadim Perelman, I believe.
A possible revenue stream for MGM/Sony would be to reboot the PINK PANTHER series with Sacha Baron Cohen as Clouseau–and treat the material as something other than POLICE ACADEMY sequels.
Were you being ironic or didn’t you notice they did reboot it with Steve Martin. I mean both films were pretty unwatchable, but they did do just that.
it sure was considerate of the MGM/UA management team to hold off this call until they had spent the full marketing campaign on FAME—
otherwise, someone might actually have suggested cutting back or postponing the release–can’t allow common sense to prevail — it’s the movies
Bond, though capable of saving the earth on celluloid, cannot save this mismanaged and run library in the real world…
“Gotta Go, gotta go!” roars the lion…
ps thanx to Paula Wagner & cruise who did nothing despite large cache o’ cash to stop this impending nightmare… What is it with execs who have the money and use it on Beemers and brunches at The Ivy wooing filmmakers and the like – yes, I’ve been one at those meals! – but then never have the confidence or conviction to actually make movies? We miss you, Bob Evans!!
We’re living in scary times where everything is ridiculously expensive in the movie business. I wonder what C.B. DeMille, Louis B.Mayer, Darryl F. Zanuck and Harry Cohn would say if they looked at the studio balance sheets these days – where every film costs over $100 million with marketing costs. And although a certain amont of risk is being taken out of the major theatrical business by green-lighting remakes, sequels and comic books which have decent track records (although the quality dips considerably),you wonder how any of the companies stay afloat with the amount of money they’re spending. Considering how amazing Paramount did this summer, how do they not have enough money in the till to release a Scorcese thriller? What does that say about the business. If you’re going to stay alive in the studio business today, you have to have deep, deep, corporate profits and MGM, being a stand-alone, doesn’t have them. The Warner Bros acquisition idea makes good sense, but I have a feeling once they acquire the library, the MGM of old will be, excuse the expression, gone with the wind.
I thought it was a good bit of info. thanks
Louie B. Mayer is crying right now.
When movies became all about the deal, well it always was about the deal, but at least once some people in the business were also interested in the story, glamour and tinsel too, the people in charge forgot how to make movies. Only deals. Now they don’t even know how to make deals. How sad. The Bond films may still be money makers. But as movies they stopped being entertaining long ago.
MGM’s production division, with the exception of Bond, has been hemoraging long before the last major buyout mangle four years ago. I think they’re better off using their only intrinsic value, their brand, to play silent partner/distributor to smaller production houses or maintain a minority stake in exchange for co-opting with a real major on projects bigger than they can chew like Hobbit and Bond, oh wait that’s all they’ve managed to do for the last four years anyway. Why not rely on their greatest asset, the remaining catalogue for revenue and let David Bishop take the healm while MGM production can go into hybernation (or burn in hell, whichever is more cost effective)? Can anyone really justify keeping MGM in the biz of movie production? With the entry of new digital distribution formats, MGM home entertainment can once again lead the pack as DVD goes the way of the VHS loon. Without production, maybe investors will have a harder time getting laid bragging about ownership rights in 80′s & 90′s MGM and Orion titles but as a shareholder I’ll take real cash for worthless cache. Uninformed historians may think such a skeleton would make MGM a shadow of it’s former self but anyone who’s walked around the block in Hollywood should know its been nothing more than that since Kerkorian first got his hands on it and that anniversary is now going on 40 years. MAYBE if they scale down like the rest of this country, they’ll be in better shape than others when the dust of the current economic sh*tstorm finally settles. In the mean time, the lion’s roar may be reduced to a purr but at least it won’t be reduced to a logo hung on a wall at a small division in the midst of the vast WB lot or worse.
Yeah, I thought MGM was doomed. Then another commenter mentioned they had “HOT TUB TIME MACHINE” waiting in the wings. Gentlemen Debtors, your worries are over!
By the way, why is Cusack stumbling around with failing outfits like MGM, Weinsteins, Nu Image, etc.
He “a moviegoer”, why do you think that the media outlets are going to get paid for the fame campaign
Can we not do better than hinging the survival of studio on the remake of Red Dawn????? Am I the only one who finds that incredibly tragic?
Have been going to MGM releases since the 1940′s. The films genres ranged from “b” releases and serials, (that would put my young butt into a theater seat every Saturday), to blockbuster musicals that put the parents’ butts into a theater seat once or twice a week. We lived for the MGM movies and idolized every one we saw up on the screen. We lived the thrills, love affairs and tragedies of each and every actor and actress. Backlots in that era would make Disneyland pale by comparison. The prop and wardrobe departments would make any museum envious, as each studio had its own time capsule of priceless props. The set builders, the effects artists and staff directors made it all happen week after week and kept the releases in the pipeline! They took us places, around the world or back to the future, or a blast to the past, and made us laugh, love, cry or give serious thought to issues of the day. There were rough times for all, even the studios. We would always comment, whenever a studio had a stage or back lot fire, that “business is so bad, you could see the fire coming for months!” Then the accountants took over the studios and sold off the assets, the back lots, the wardrobe and props and scattered the crafts people and artists to the wind. When that was not enough for their style of film making (bottom line above all else), the accountants exported the production work to any country willing to “kick back fees” to the studio to do business in their country. Studios became “ladies of the night” and the accountants became their “pimps.” Now that the “ladies” have grown too old to work on the streets, the pimps have taken a “get tough” approach with their “Johns,” the money providers. It is a page right out of the Sopranos. “Give us your money, or you are going to get hurt, really bad!” This is what it has all come down to, Hollywood movies, farmed out to the world, never to be “made in Hollywood USA” again. The bean counters have taken the “show” out of Show Business. At long last we can all see that in the end, the accountants possess no soul, no savvy, nor a capacity for shame. The craftsmen, artists and traditions that were “Hollywood” have all Gone With The Wind.
MGM – RIP.
I’ve got only two words to say about MGM: Pan Am.
Mr. Kerkorian, HELP!
Who in this town ever thought Mary Parent knows how to make successful films ??? Talentless !
seems like mgm’s latest problems started with harry sloan. whoever invested in a studio run by someone who doesn’t have the requisite experience deserves to lose their shirts. wall st should do a bit more homework on who they allow to squander their investors money.
As long as someone makes and finishes The Hobbit (with Peter Jackson making all the decisions) I could care less about MGM or any other greedy horrible movie making studio. JUST MAKE THE DANG HOBBIT!!!!
Yes Harry Sloan is finally rightfully being blamed but these guys shouldn’t have hired him in the first place and then stupidly renewed his contract. They should direct some of their anger back at themselves.
How would United Artists fare through this issue?
Ever since it went to Tom Cruise that MGM kept a heavy hand in its production woes (projects that didn’t get off the ground as fast as MGM desired).
Truth be told, unless Bond really pulls a number with its 23rd film (Quantum of Solace wasn’t exactly a critical success), I see it going back to Sony’s hands, even though they don’t really deserve it. And Warner would gain too much power with The Hobbit in its hands (as if the Disney/Marvel merger wasn’t worrisome enough). I hope MGM pulls through and reshapes its management.
Nikki didn’t put my other post up. So we shall see if this one makes the light of day.
In Pontiac today, The Red Dawn movie looks promising. They were taking multiple shots of a Russian/Chinese arresting one of the red dawn gang.
They had plenty of sets around city. Cars’ blowing up tonight etc.
They were setting up Mikes for some massive rally and the rain appeared to be holding off.
Cannot wait to see this remake especially the shots by Judge Waterman’s bldg.
Perhaps this movie and the subsequent TV series will save the Lion.