Tomorrow, GLAAD’s 14th annual “Where We Are on TV” report, which measures the quantity of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people on primetime and cable television for the the 2009-2010 TV season. I’ve learned some of the key stats will show:
– Quantity of gay and lesbian characters on primetime broadcast is up for the second year in a row. GLAAD counted the total number as well as the percentage compared to the total number of series regulars. Last year characters made up 2.6% of series regulars.
– There is only one lesbian and very few gay people of color among series regular characters.
–While the quantity is up, the storylines are also “becoming more realistic,” GLAAD says. “Americans now see teens coming out on Fox’s Glee, couples getting married on ABC’s Brothers & Sisters and gay couples adopting on ABC’s Modern Family.”
– The number of gay characters on cable is down.
More as I get it…
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


No, there are fewer.
I’m gay and I really dislike GLAAD and the gay movement. I remember watching MILK how proudly I would have fought for my rights then and now it’s like something happened and the movement was neutered and the balls were removed. What happened, seriously?
The numbers of gay characters are improving, but the gay people of color really sucks. Beyond The Wire and Six Feet Under, I am hard pressed to think of any good shows with strong gay people of color on the show. I can think of several bad shows. But, not many good ones. Still, I am happy to see the slow trickle of quality characters on TV.
what about the lack of latinos on network television. –15% of the population vs. 1%
As a dedicated and loyal Will and Grace supporter of the show and cast as well as a “straighty”, I think that the GLAAD organization is a valid and viable organization, overall.
Yes, there needs to be some better lesbian representation and those of color too.
I love Queer As Folk and that was the best show from the cable side of the house, per se. I would like to see another show of its capacity and realness.
There have been improvements but both the nets and cable need to continue to strengthen their shows with inclusion to all races, ethic origins, and the GLBT population also.
lol “but what about gays of color????”
this mentality has made so many shows suck hard: fill out the cast with an affirmative action checklist and let “ethnicity” fill in for character…see Dexter and a zillion other hack dramas
anyone keeping track of how many gays are regular characters on television should hang themselves from an attic rafter
The better question is anyone keeping track of how many white straight actors fill roles considering that is the bulk, and, indeed, increasingly do not represent the break down of the greater society. No one asks this question because people like you think that any variation from this theme is a special treatment, but any unnatural support is not. It is like when the show Friends used to show New York City without any people of color. Have you ever been to NYC? Good luck on having an old white environment that way. But hey, it is good to let’s play pretend so long as it is your own biases.
TV networks still need to get up to that 10% in order to be totally realistic. It’s so important for LGBT youth to see themselves positively reflected in the media!
Kudos to GLAAD for publishing this information. That do that great behind the scenes work of relationship building that wins over hearts and minds. Awesome job, GLAAD! (P.S.: angry people just create more anger and unhappiness).