If you, like me, think Big Media will eventually just consist of Disney, Time Warner, and News Corp as MGM, Viacom/Paramount, and NBC Universal get gobbled up because of consolidation, here’s more evidence: Time Warner Inc, already flush with extra cable cash, will eventually sell the Time Inc magazine unit and could use the bigger bounty to buy holdings in its core entertainment category. That’s according to Gordy Crawford, the managing director of its largest shareholder, The Capital Group. Crawford said at a presentation September 24 at USC’s Annenberg School for Communication about media. “Time Warner just spun off their cable division, they are going to sell their print division, they are going to spin off AOL and they’re just going to be Warner Brothers, HBO and the Turner Networks. “Now, they will make acquisitions … but they’re probably going to buy just stuff in their wheel house of those businesses. They’re not going to, I don’t think, go very far afield from their core competency.” While Crawford did not name specific acquisition targets, he did say there would be a “winnowing process” during which weaker companies in the sector would be gobbled up. I’ve already reported about rumors that Time Warner and GE are in talks about NBCU. Meanwhile, former News Corp No. 2 Peter Chernin said at the conference he expected there to be a “great consolidation” down the road, as the weaker companies among the larger players decide to sell rather than continue to lose market share. “The ones that will get destroyed first are the under-performers and these will be large companies,” said Chernin, without naming them.
- Zucker Orders NBCU: Get Ready For IPO
- As Rumors Swirl & GE Probes, Vivendi See IPO Possibility For 20% NBCU
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Any predictions? Will Time Warner, Fox or Disney pick up MGM?
Diller (IAC) is also sitting on some cash ($1.6 billion), although has stated no plans to use for major media acquisitions. That could change if a deal looks too good to pass up.
Great, just what we need. Why not just weed out everyone and then they can create a bunch of sh*t movies from the minds of those blockheads that see only statistics and don’t care about art.
Aren’t we already…there?
sidebar. .
Nice shout-out on Ur fav [not] show last night.
A couple words come to mind “monopoly” and “antitrust law”
Don’t we, I mean The United States of America, have laws against monopolies? Or was that just for the pre-Regan/Bush years?
You know, I don’t think Time Warner thought out the potential NBC Universal purchase through. I mean, one thing that could halt the sale is CNN, which Time Warner owns, and MSNBC, which NBC Universal owns. Then again, HLN could be sacrificed for it to be approved, so, it could happen.
I don’t think Sony’s going anywhere, either…
So where does Sony/Columbia fit into this?
My wish is that the only damage to consolidation is that Jeff Zucker would be out of a job. He has run NBCU into the ground. He is an egotistical micro manager without the smarts to do it. Vindictiveness must run through his veins. I remember seeing him
interviewed about the writers strike and he was so excited it was giving him the opportunity to purge. Hello Jay Leno. Name one accomplishment at Universal that can directly be credited to him? Couldnt come up with the money to keep Spielberg from going to Disney, but yet went into the vault getting the MILLIONS to first read the script and then make the movie “Land of the Lost.”
One could go on about this man, but who wants to. My date when
the conglomerates started to go south and stupidity became an asset is when Jerry Levin of Time Warner Fame fired Mo Ostin, then
head of the Warner Music Group. You can chart it. Robert
Fascinating to hear that Time, Inc. is no longer “core” – that magazines themselves are truly a sideline biz. Does that mean the company loses the “Time” moniker too? If it were to become a trioploy (Dis War News) does that leave room for major studios? Why bother with a WBros and a Universal? Or are studios heading the way of DreamWorks – a glorified and expensive label to truly be owned by others? Once it all starts coming out of the same giant tube – TV is Internet, books are digital, film is the Internet with a bunch of people in the room – can the class system of content finally emerge? I.e. the big kingdoms – the Trilateral Entertainment Commission – on the one side vs. the mom & pop of YouTube-Google-Yahoo content networks.
Time Warner buying MGM is more a case of ‘when’ rather than ‘if’ if you ask me. I can see Warner Bros just ‘absorbing’ MGM and all it’s projects occasionally using the MGM logo for the WB produced Bond films.
I could maybe see them snap up Dreamworks Animation but when was the last time Time Warner paid a premium for an acquisition? And DWA would almost certainly fetch a high price.
As for Universal Studios, I just can’t see what Time Warner would do with a second movie studio. They wouldn’t really keep it as an ongoing concern…would they?
Would the world (financial or otherwise) really benefit from the iconic Universal Studios becoming a ‘label’ within WB that does nothing but relentlessly make Fast&Furious sequels?
I shudder at the thought.
But the irony of the whole thing is when Time Warner go on the acquisition spending spree (MGM, NBC-U or whoever)the very first thing they will do is turn around and ask someone else to come in and co-finance their projects.
I think if Time Warner wants NBCU they want it for NBC and the cable channels like SyFy, USA Networks etc. not for the studio. I think they would sell off the Studio and theme parks. After all they already own a studio. With MGM it’s the library not the studio, it could just become another label, like DreamWorks.
TW might bite but they’d be buying into an industry – broadcast tv- that is on the decline. Catching a falling knife as it were. If there is any cache left to owning this line of biz it is internal perception ONLY. It’s certainly not in the biz model.And one can only imagine which talentless sicophant Bewkes would install atop the new TW-NBCU– some other egomaniac out of his own stable? Please.Content not distribution is the future.These clowns can acquire each other into the next century. It won’t prevent the inevitable- too big to function.
Hi,
Accepting that they messed up MGM (though with the nouse of being a minority investor) isn’t Sony the most logical buyer of a purchase of NBC Universal if it becomes available. It’s the only one of the conglomerates that lacks Television assets, and if it can bypass traditional access/provision rules for DSL distribution, It would really allow the PS3 to pack even more of a punch – which has been outselling the Wii since its price-cut.
With such a complete asset, and already a strategic partner, you also can’t count out Microsoft. Not having had to purchase Yahoo! it’s now just sitting on all that cash, with the XBox having shown its potential and gained traction as a media platform.
Of course, Vivendi would be better served if it disn’t sell it yet, or if NBCU was independently ipo’d.
Kind regards,
Shakir Razak
The only thing preventing Sony from buying NBC Universal is the fact that Sony is still a foreign company, and no foreign company can own more than 15% of an American broadcast or cable network. Of course ol’ Rupe got around that little obstacle when he became an American citizen before launching the Fox Broadcasting Company.