
UPDATE: The paper just announced that Nancie Clare was promoted from deputy editor to editor of the Los Angeles Times Magazine. I learned the bomb was dropped this afternoon on experienced editor Annie Gilbar, who made the Los Angeles Times Magazine wonderfully readable and visual and vital to the city again, as well as to Hollywood, something that publication hasn’t been for a long long time. Problem is, there’s no advertising for it no matter if it’s good or not. So now the newpaper’s editor Russ Stanton and publisher Eddy Hartenstein have decided, stupidly, to give back the magazine to editorial. Also fired is the head of production responsible for the incredible look of the magazine, Marc Barrington. “It was a business decision. Annie was making $300,000 a year, Marc $200,000, so that’s half a million which they wanted to save,” an insider tells me. (Yikes, imagine if the newsroom knew salaries like that were being paid!) Now the paper will be edited and produced from inside the LA Times, and it will be crappy all over again.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


I have had the pleasure of working for Annie on a number of occasions over the years and I can honestly say that she is one of the best bosses I have ever had. She creates a tough but positive work environment and she makes people strive to do their best work.
The LAT Mag was nothing before Annie took it over. I wish the remaining creative staff the best, but I can’t imagine the tone or quality of the magazine will hold up without Annie or Marc there.
Just when LA was finally getting something great…
Reading Annie’s pretentious, snobbish comments in her monthly Letter from the Editor made me dislike her from the start. I don’t need to be told in each issue that she was doing the readers a favor by editing a magazine. I wondered how long it would take to get her comeuppance. Good riddance.
When Annie Gilbar took over the LAT Mag. it was easy to see her sense of – I am WAY cool, aren’t I?? However, having said that and having read the magazine faithfully since she’s been there, it definitely has been much more interesting and just plain *different* (in a good way) than the previous versions. Then I opened this Sunday’s LAT magazine. Mezcal, a lost doggy in Laurel Canyon, and an actress – are you serious? This is supposed to be creative and interesting? Bring Annie back, attitude and all, cause one thing she was never and that was boring!!
In my opinion, Annie Gilbar was worth every penny of her salary. The proof is in the writing and content! Read Annie Gilbar’s “Letter from the Editor” and compare any or all of them to Nancie Clare’s.
No comparison. Annie is sharp, witty, enlightening, accessible.
The magazine is typical under Clare’s helm; full on advertising, short on content. Annie Gilbar’s LA was different. I enjoyed every issue, cover to cover.
My biggest mistake was not writing to thank Annie. She’ll land on her feet and I’ll be anxious to see where. THANK YOU, ANNIE. GREAT READ!!!
What is it with the Times?!?! Do they really think that they are going to gain readership by getting rid of their best people? Bad call on letting Annie G go, Powers that Be… ever heard the saying “Penny Wise and Pound Foolish”? There you are..
Who was responsible for the “incredible look” of the magazine? I beg to differ….. Rip Georges is the Creative Director.