I am shocked and dismayed that the Los Angeles Times is so lacking in original content reported by its scores of entertainment beat journalists that it would post a list of liked and disliked Hollywood figures compiled by an anonymous snarker who runs a temp website. I'm not kidding so it bears repeating: the author of "The Brown List" runs a website for temporary workers and is self admittedly neither a Hollywood insider nor responsible journalist. And this poll received just 1,200 responses from people who could vote for as many names as they wanted, and as many times as they wanted. So the LA Times' Patrick Goldstein should apologize to readers, and also to Hollywood, for lending credence to a list that is the definition of meaningless.
Just How Pathetic Is LA Times Coverage Of Hollywood? Well, THIS Pathetic!
Comments (10)
|
Post a Comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, don't get your facts wrong, and don't bore me.
Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
finally agree with something you say. don’t forget to mention that the voting is anonymous and you can vote as many times as you want. Somebody had it in for Emmett.
Also if you look at the list, very few people actually voted. Many people with as few as 5 votes, which could obviously all be from one disgruntled person, ended up on there, so the whole thing is incredibly inaccurate and irresponsible.
Don’t know about the brown list, but do know that the LA times is so behind, that last week when they reported on the crisis of employment in show business, I felt better. As if to say, well this must be old news if the la times is reporting on it.
This list is as much BS as any list that Hollywood creates from the blacklist to the 100 most powerful people in town
THANK YOU for not reposting the list and giving it any kind of validation. It is absolutely a load of shit.
At least the Black List has some semblance of statistical accuracy since it’s compiled from the opinions of a pool of pre-selected agents, managers, executives and producers that are chosen to represent the gamut of the town.
The 100 Most Powerful People lists are created by professional entertainment journalists that quantify hard data (like box office numbers) as well as polling those people’s direct peers and rivals.
This brown list is compiled from the opinions of a bunch of catty junior executives and assistants with nothing better to do than to shit talk people they’re jealous of. It’s also completely statistically unsound since there’s no way to monitor the votes. The fact that five votes can get you into the top ten list of people hated in town is pretty indicative of how crap this list is.
Hey, that’s how American Idol’s voting system works and it’s the number one show on television.
Anon,
While the blacklist might have been what you claim it to be a few years ago, it has turned into a list a projects that agents, producers,managers, and executives use to promote their writers or their projects. Of the 20 or so scripts on that list, a handful might be some of the more popular scripts around town, but the majority of them are on that list for another reason. Hollywood is obsessed with lists. The ten best to watch, the 20 most this, the 50 most important that, etc, and each and everyone of them is some type of smoke and mirrors self promotion of some kind.
While I agree that this list is a new low and quite frankly, fails and even being catty or a fun trashy tabloid read, it is still nonetheless a meaningless hollywood list. If any good can come from it, maybe the people who are on this list could realize how silly and inaccurate any hollywood list is and spend less time concerning themselves with making list or trying to get on a list and more time doing their jobs.
Come on people, the Brown List was a joke. The writer even said it meant nothing. The whole thing was just for a laugh. If you took it seriously, that is your own problem.
Also, they probably didn’t even come across the list firsthand. They probably saw the Gawker story on it and then decided to follow Gawker’s lead. How sad.
Patrick Goldstein should apologize for his own existence in general. The guy thinks who he is. I remember working as an assistant in my early days and working a special screening just for him and his family on Thanksgiving and the guy never even made eye contact with me or thanked me for hanging around just so he could watch some film. Critics are a joke and the LA Times et al are no exception.