I've learned that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences board of governors wanted a complete do-over of last year's Oscar broadcast that broke a string of low, lower, lowest TV ratings. I've already reported that AMPAS went to Larry Mark and Bill Condon and asked them to respectively produce and direct again. But Mark is producing Jim Brook's next movie, and Condon is prepping his Richard Pryor biopic. So they turned down the always prestigious offer. Now I'm told that AMPAS is about to check on the availability of Hugh Jackman to host for the 2nd year in a row. What an honor for the Aussie actor, who recently helped the show win the Emmy. But I've learned people around Jackman are going to privately recommend against him doing it twice. "He's a movie star, not a song and dance man," one rep told me, especially since Hugh also hosted the Tony's. So it looks as if new AMPAS president Tom Sherak is back at square one. Meanwhile, I hear that Hawk Koch and Joel Silver separately offered to produce the Academy Awards last year. And Sherak could always go to his longtime business intimate Joe Roth who produced the 76th Oscars in 2004. Ah, but getting a host is always the hardest part. I've learned none will be announced until AMPAS pins down the producer who has final say over everything to do with the telecast.
Oscar Can't Always Get What He Wants
Comments (57)
|
Post a Comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, don't get your facts wrong, and don't bore me.
Why not NPH? His Emmys were great and the ratings rose.
I just bought the Triple feature with Billy Crystal. Running Scared, wow Greg Hines, was so funny back in the day. Danny Devito in Throw Momma from the train. The late great Jack Palance in City Slickers.
1991, those were the days. Hell if Oscar wants ratings like that bring back Billie with Whoopi, we need some fun in these times. Don’t like that one, well.
How about Tina Fey and Adam Sandler as co-hosts. Adam singing and Tina dancing in a go go girl cage. Sock it to me. No good, then for comedy with a bang. If they really want to be daring and ensure high ratings use David Letterman and Jay Leno. I can see Uma and Oprah’s jaw dropping when Dave comes back on stage with a couple of long legged chorus girls with Jay sitting at his desk taking notes.
Letterman & Leno would be the greatest telecast of all-time
Here’s some non-Jackman names who would be good and unpredictable and might provide more ratings growth globally:
Kevin Spacey
Anglelina Jolie
Stephen Colbert
Dave Chappelle
Tom Hanks
Will Farrell
David Letterman (his last effort was the most memorable Oscar emceeing job in 25 years)
Woody Allen (has said he’d do it if asked)
George Clooney
Anne Hathaway
Craig Ferguson
Jack Nicholson (c’mon, hosting this must be on his bucket list)
Steve Carrell
Adam Sandler (funny wigs and production numbers)
Howard Stern
Jaime Foxx
Alec Baldwin
But please NOT:
Wanda Sykes
Jay Leno
Chris Rock
Ellen Degeneres
Conan O’Brien
NPH
Ryan Seacrest
Steve Martin
That said, I bet the job goes to Tina Fey. If you look back at the comments last year I predicted Jackman!
Wanda Sykes
Ellen Degeneres
Neil Patrick Harris
Ryan Seacrest
What do you have against LGBT hosts?
Their LGBT-ness isn’t the issue so much as their overvexposure.
Since when is Ryan Seacrest LGBT?
That’s what I was wondering. Isn’t he a womaniser?
Anyway, Chris Rock should be given another shot. He was the best host in 20 years.
Ironically, they chose one person from your “on” list, and one from your “off” list. But I think Craig Ferguson is the best pick on your list.
Chris Rock was hilarious and underrated. People misremember him as being disrespectful. He wasn’t.
As for Conan, when he hosted the Emmys a few years back it was epic. I know the Tonight Show’s struggling, but he knows how to put on a show.
Your list made me think that John C. Reilly might make a decent host. He’s got elements of all those suggestions.
Jerry Bruckheimer should do it.
I think we need to worry a lot more about what we’re going to be nominating over the next couple of years. The quality of indie fair was quite terrible over the past five years. Contraction will actually help clear out the bad offerings from the quality ones. As far as the tentpoles go, people in America are feeling the pinch, and they’re beginning to catch on and grow a little sick of what’s being shoveled towards them. Every day, another kid gets an iPhone or discovers that TV is where it’s at. More adults are downloading movies for free. Where are the quality scripts? We need better product.
That’s exactly what the Oscars need- is for Joel Silver to bring his box office bomb touch to make the ratings crash into oblivion.
With all due respect to the brains who analyse television ratings, viewers voting with their remote controls are most likely reacting to what they HAVE seen, not what they have NOT seen.
Ergo, low ratings on the 2009 Academy Awards broadcast can be more logically attributed to the 2008 show, which was rather dismal.
Those who missed Hugh Jackman hosting this year missed an utterly charming host! Unfortunately, I agree with his advisors that he shouldn’t do it again.
and what would Hawk Koch’s qualifications be? That his dad did it so beautifully for years? I suggest Cameron Crowe. Now that would bring it into this century……..
You know… its a class war…people aren’t really interested in the rich and famous as much you would think….they like movies, they just don’t be reminded of how poor and anonymous they are……..
they need pay homage to the movies, not the ’stars’
just sayin…
If Jackman is out, the only option is NPH. Neil Patrick Harris has proven himself to be the best award show host since Johnny Carson after his stints at the Tonys and the Emmys. I think the Oscars are just the logical conclusion to the year. NPH…soon to be king of awards ceremonies.
The low ratings had nothing to do with Jackman. Let’s blame, first and foremost, the fact that the Academy did not throw a nod The Dark Knight’s way, completely turning off a slew of angry fans and the general public alike (Seriously, it was what, the second highest grossing film of all time? And a critic darling? What the hell happened there?). Besides that, the Oscars have been increasingly irrelevant in a world where we see the stars in all their “glory” every day on gossip websites, gossip magazines, gossip shows, and gossip apps for our iPhones (don’t know if these exist, but I can only assume they either do or will). And as someone working in this oh-so lovely industry, I know as well as anyone that this upcoming 10-best-picture-nominations gimmick not only won’t last more than a year or two, but is completely idiotic and actually water downs the show rather than breathes life into it. My only suggestion, at this point, is to get Billy Crystal back. For the baby boomers who still care about the Oscars. Lord knows the current generation taking over Hollywood (*Ahem* myself included) doesn’t.
Why not change the format a bit? I mean it doesn’t always have to hang on one person to sing and dance and keep the show moving. They could easily open with a hot number from a showman/woman and then have multiple comedians of all ages (from Rickles to Seinfeld to Rock to Sacha Baron Cohen, etc) do one offs. Keep the TV audience guessing who is going to come out next and what they will say. That would keep the show moving and interesting … and could deepen the demographic for the national advertisers.
I think they should go with Ricky Gervais !!! I think he would nail it and he is hella funny !!!
Ricky Gervais would be fantastic for anyone watching at home. And they wouldn’t let him host if he was the last man on earth. That’s why the Oscars are so awful.
Gervais is the best choice around–but, of course, that means he hasn’t got a chance…
1) I would actually be VERY interested to see what a Joel Silver-produced Oscars would look like. I say give him the job.
2) We’re already catering to the masses by expanding to 10 nominees just to get more popular films and bring in viewers (though why bother – it will be OBVIOUS which ones were the also-rans, and they will have NO chance of winning). So what makes you think they won’t further pander to the audience?
3) Multiple hosts (or NO host) never works. Stop suggesting it.
3) To those pining for Crystal and Goldberg – there’s a REASON you don’t see them in movies anymore. We all got tired of their schtick. let’s move forward, not backwards.
4) Sandler?? Really?? Are you people insane?
5) I love NPH, and would love for him to do it eventually, but not this year. Too much, too soon.
6) Jackman was GREAT. Bring him back.
7) My vote for an unconventional selection: EDDIE IZZARD. But it’ll never happen because many people aren’t familiar with him.
Tina Fey seems like such an obvious choice that they’ll probably never consider her.
I suppose the show is relevant if you’re nominated, but last year’s show was so bad, despite Hugh Jackman’s valiant efforts, that I’d reconsider going even if I was nominated. Besides, it’s not the hosts, it’s the movies. Now, there will be even more questionable nominees. Ricky Gervais would be cute and get me to watch but I bet his bs detecting humor wouldn’t go over too well. It would be a gas to see the looks on some faces, though.
Craig Ferguson would be fantastic. Then again, they’d probably have to give him some space to perform the way he performs, and that’s not what the Oscars are known for.
I keep going back to Billy Crystal in ‘98, a wonderful host for what I consider one of the best Oscar shows of all times.
If the advisors are telling Hugh not to do it…then I am sure he will do it. He is always doing what he wants, he is listening instincts, not advisors.
I would be happy to see him do that – and if there won´t be any dance number in the middle like last year, then he could do that even during shooting of the movie.
I hope he will do that.
They need to get rid of all the song and dance numbers. The Golden Globes is fast paced and never boring. The Oscares needs to be streamlined.
I completely agree with omitting the song and dance numbers. Those are what drag the awards out, and I never find them entertaining. A song and dance during the monologue is fine, but it’s the Oscars, not the Grammys.
It will be out of Steve Carrell, Tine Fey and Ricky Gervais. I can almost guarantee it.
if not hugh, yep. agreed those are good choices. seems like agents are tossing their clients’ names on here (anonymously, of course). nph, what a joke!
The obvious choice (so obvious he isn’t mentioned on anyones list.
He signs. He dances. He is funny. He is tough. A family man. A boxoffice winner.
Ladies and gentlemen……. Mr. Will Smith.
Lets’ spice it up a little and give him a partner in hosting.
And Ms.Jada Pinkert.
Agree w Tara. If Hugh wants to do it (and can schedule it) he will. He’ll never be pegged as a ’song and dance man’ by anyone that has ever seen some of his other works (A Steady Rain now on broadway, The Fountain – award winning performance totally overlooked b/c the movie was barely seen by anyone, The Prestige – and of course, Wolverine. He needs one non-musical, non-Wolverine movie to hit it big so the world can see his depth and range of talent.
Hugh – JUST DO IT!!
Hugh Jackman is also a brilliant actor and a very VERY funny guy. Those who have seen him in some shows know that he has a great comical timing and can tell incredible stories. He can improvize (2004 Tonys) and can say: “Half of you even doesn´t deserve to be nominated but you are because Academy is a bunch of idiots.” and they´ll forgive him because he is so damn charming. That is his important device – he is very charismatic and charming, and with his theater background has also an amazing stage presence. That´s something many actors (movie actors) don´t have. And he is also universally loved by his colleagues, and appeals a large audience. I have to admit I watched last year´s Oscars only because of him and I don´t think I will watch it if he isn´t doing it again.
They can change a format again, it doesn´t have to be a song number – he is an actor and can do a lots of things.
The problem is that he is making a movie from January so there might be a scheduling conflict.
Stephen Colbert could be this generation’s Billy Crystal. I mean that in a good “What being Crystal meant in 92″ way, not in a bad “What being Crystal means in 09″ way.
The man is capable of sharp comedy, song, dance with a light snarl. But this would only work if he hosted as himself, not the alter ego from his show.
Still, Colbert would be fantastic is he hosted (but i reiterate, it must be out of character.)
They should go with someone like Don Mischer who just produced this years’ Emmys and nailed it out of the park. He’s done the Superbowl Halftime Shows over the past few years, the Olympics and Obama’s Inauguration concert. Clearly he knows how to put on a damn good show. Producing a live event is entirely different and unique, just because someone produces big budget movies doesn’t mean they have any idea how to put on a live show. Maybe Don could partner with somebody like Dan Jinks & Bruce Cohen, who bring Oscar cred and impeccable taste to the table?
The Oscars has never honored movies that put butts in the seats. It honors the art of filmaking. The artier the better. 3 hours of watching scenes of movies I never saw in the theater seems to turn people off. That’s why the popularity contest we call the Golden Globes and People’s Choice Awards do better in the ratings.
They should either reduce it to no more than 2 hours and limit it to the major arts and craft segments (actors, writers, music etc..) or just move it to a cable channel like TBS or USA.
As for a host NPH would be good so would Craig Ferguson, Ricky Gervais, or even past BAFTA host Stephen Fry.
u gotta take a look at what george stevens, jr. does with son mike.they know film (4 generations back to the silents) – george really created the tribute show with the first 26 afi life achievement shows (he created afi and ran it, too) and the kennedy center honors (32 years and 8 emmys, including one in sept.) – and the son directs and produces and writes, too. these guys are show men. they conceived, orchestrated, wrote and produced obama’s lincoln memorial concert on hbo in somethin’ like two weeks. produced the thin red line, and george stevens, sr (giant, gunga din, shane) was a past academy president, or dga prez, or both. and george is a longtime acad member as well. these guys have taste.they’re old n’new school. most importantly the guys can put on a show ‘bout FILM! and keep it tight – no 4 hr silliness with these guys. event tv producers who are filmmakers? – hmm. . . is the that THE job description or what?
ABC had the board jump through the hoop on 10-nominees-10, and they’ll be picking the host, too.
The reason, IMO, the Oscar ratings were in the sewer was that the Academy had an acute attack of insanity by not including The Dark Knight in the picture, acting and technical races. Why watch to see winner after winner from Slumdog Millionaire? A TDK-SM showdown would’ve popped a huge Nielsen number. TDK earned over a half-billion dollars domestically and was the most serious challenger yet to Titanic’s $601m. And it was a damn good movie. That’s why this is the wrong year to have 10 BP nominees. There aren’t 10 worthy ones. I’d consider Star Trek and The Hangover to tip the hat to popular opinion, then have the other 3 nominees pictures that are seen by less people than went to watch La Vie En Rose.
Paul, in the sewer ? Didn’t they get like 30 something million viewers ? That’s low by Oscar standards but great compared to normal shows.
Why the hate on Billy C?
http://www.starpulse.com/Actors/Crystal,_Billy/
He still has a pulse. I’m tired of this Hollywood mentality that pushes anyone over the age of 25 to the curb.
Who spends money, young people?
Where do they usually get their money from?
People over 25.
I still like animation, cartoons and fun movies like Zombieland but I also like movies that move you like Schindler’s List, Michael Clayton etc.
Will Smith sounds great as suggested from above. But it would never happen and if it did it could be the kiss of death like Halle B winning her Oscar. To note an article from the guardian.co.uk, Ms. Halle’s career hasn’t blossomed since her Oscar win. Whoopi’s movie career vanished after her performance of the Queen in 1999. I like Will Smith, so please stay away from anything to do with Oscar, hint Hugh Jack man. After all this is the year of downsizing and Oscar will be back to five nominated films next year. Don’t become a quiz show question. What was the 7th film nominated for an Oscar in 2009 and who was the host?
A TV star should be the sacrificial lamb just pick one from the pen, someone from ABC.
I know who should host.
Think about it. We KNOW the Academy is desperatelt seeking viewers, especially younger viewers, since they stacked last year’s show with young popular people.
We want someone who is charismatic, funny, talented, and – for a good opening number – musically inclined. Someone who has proven himself to be a good host. So ladies and gentlemen, I submit for your consideration…
JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE
Now many of you will turn your nose at this just because you hate young and popular. But the guy is TALENTED. He hosted the ESPY’s to great acclaim, and has shown his comedic chops repeatedly on SNL (and won an Emmy). He’s the man for the job.
Unfortunately the show is not very relevant. The popular culture has moved on. Films most assuredly will be with us forever but their position in the cultural food chain has been moved down a peg or two. There is no host nor producer on earth who can fix that.
Mel Gibson – the whole world would watch.
My vote is for John Waters. When he hosted the Independent Spirit Awards, it was always entertaining. But they probably won’t choose him because he’s too much of independent maverick. He might offend some Hollywood egos.
hey what about Liza Minelli hosting with her best
friends producing those darling dusty fellas Zadan and
Meron.
Gerry Butler can sing, act, and is well-known. He should host.
There is only one option that would be really good.
STEVE MARTIN!!!
arthur.i, it’s relevant to the artists, the actors and writers and producers, the people who the awards are meant for. Obviously people who are bitter at Hollywood will not watch. Movies have gotten us through many tough times, they will always be beloved by most.
Unless the Oscars start nominating transformers and GI joe certain people will not tune in.
one name that has never come up
on these blogs (nor on possible
host lists) is one that should
be obvious.
BETTE MIDLER.
has anyone seen her in concert?
been to vegas lately?
the lady can work a room, crack
up an audience, sing, dance, adlib
and be more professional than
50 Cameron Diaz’s.
forget Whoppi. give Bette a chance.
Vanessa Williams last hosting job was funny and she can dance.
If they can’t get Hugh back I am for her.
As far as Ryan Seacrest if they want to pay him a lot of money
to bore everyone that is a good choice.
Kevin Spacey would be perfect!
It will probably be Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin together.
But, let’s be honest, the most entertaining host would be Kathy Griffin.
How come no one has said
BEN STILLER
?
Some great ideas for hosts here. I hope someone who has a hand in the Oscar show decision-making will be reading.
I love the idea of either Justin Timberlake, Craig Ferguson, Stephen Colbert, or Tina Fey hosting this. All of them are fresh faces, witty, and charming. I have a feeling they are also too controversial for the staid old Academy, but maybe they will surprise me. I personally thought Jon Stewart did just fine when he hosted, but they haven’t asked him back. I also think NPH was great hosting the Emmys and would do a great job on the Oscars, but he is a lightweight when it comes to movies and I doubt he will get the gig.
I also thought Hugh Jackman was charming last year, and that the problem was with the mostly awful (and yes, I saw all of them) movies that were nominated. And instead of the stupid idea of having ten nominees, why on earth didn’t the Academy do the logical thing and have two categories of winners like every other awards show does, one for comedy and one for drama? That’s the change that was really needed. FWIW, of course.
Here’s the truth. The award ceremonary is not about the host. Its about the shows. So why do they advertise the host instead of attracting the viewers with finding out if their show will win. And 10 nominations is ridiculois. Not everybody can be great, so why thin out the votes just to make the winner meaninless. Just quit trying to nominate losers in favor of the movie goers’ preferences. The movie goers really decide if you are the best actor or actress. The academy is the only group that constantly rewards unpopular and unsupported movies. IT IS ABOUT THE MOVIES. Two host is like the contest where everyone comes in first place.
The old timers like Hope and Martin, Johnny Carson and others were great MC’s was becasue the were naturally funny and did it with grace and poise. They let the awards be about the movies and the popular stars. Cut out the extra songs and dances, its about the movies. Get rid of the politics and causes, its about the movies and the stars. Maybe not him, but a Ben Stiller might be just the ticket. Ten nominess!,they will need a run off election to make the winner meaningful.