Once again, Big Media shows that it doesn’t want to share its profits with anyone else. Today’s action by the MPAA representing the major movie studios undercuts the entire process of theatrical release. It would put the struggling theater chains virtually out of business.
Washington, D.C. – In a filing today with the Federal Communications Commission, the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA) reinforced the benefits of allowing studios the option of sending movies fresh from the box office to tens of millions of American households.
“Many of us love movies, but we just can’t make it to the theater as often as we’d like. That is especially true for parents of young children, rural Americans who live far from the multiplex and people with disabilities that keep them close to home,” MPAA Chairman and CEO Dan Glickman said. “Having the added option to enjoy movies in a more timely fashion at home would be a liberating new choice.”
In its filing, which was in response to letters of opposition filed by the group Public Knowledge, the MPAA said: “grant of the waiver would for the first time allow millions of consumers to view high-value, high-definition theatrical films during an early release window that is not available today. MPAA has explained that release of this high-value content as part of an earlier window, especially with respect to movies released for home viewing close to or even during their initial theatrical run, necessarily requires the highest level of protection possible through use of SOC.”
SOC, or selectable output control technology, would allow televisions with digitally secure interfaces to receive first-run, high-definition content from a cable or satellite provider. Using SOC protects content because it essentially disables non-secure, analog outputs to avoid illegal circumvention and distribution of copyrighted material. These outputs would be disabled ONLY with respect to the proposed new content, and this technology would NOT have any impact whatsoever on the ability of existing devices to receive all of the content that they get today. Consumers will continue to have access to everything they have today, including DVDs, Netflix, etc.
The MPAA filing noted: “By Public Knowledge’s odd reckoning, however, no consumer-oriented technological breakthrough ever could be introduced to American homes unless and until every single American home had access to the same opportunity at the same moment in time. That is a recipe for holding every innovation hostage until the last consumer adopts a new technology.
“Under Public Knowledge’s approach, the Commission would have taken decades to permit television stations to broadcast in color, since millions of American homes already had purchased black-and-white sets when color broadcasts were introduced in the 1950s. Indeed, whenever innovative technologies bring consumers new and better opportunities to media content, there is always a lag between when early adopters take advantage of these opportunities and when they become ubiquitous.”
Glickman added: “I, like most movie-goers believe the best way to enjoy a movie is to go to the theater with friends and share a communal laugh or adventure together. But I also believe there is ample room for additional choices that satisfy consumer demand to enjoy movies in diverse new ways. If allowed by the FCC, I believe this new choice will be just one of many exciting innovations to come that benefit consumers and sustain the future of this unique creative medium.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







This is an idea that is way past its time. For some movies, I would have paid $25 bucks to see it at home the first night I could.
The Studios must have looked at the record companies and said ” I don’t want to end up like them!” It’s about time and should be the day of release it’s available at home for a premium. This will only kill The DVD business. This all should be on demand. This kills piracy and adds a lot more revenue for the studios.
I do remember the labels being worried about the chains , Tower Records and Musicland, if they went and embraced digital downloads – guess what – they went bankrupt anyways.
About time someone listened to the consumer.
Cool idea. Now all I have to do is point my video camera at the tv and shoot the screen. no digital security lock out and no analog problem here. the people who will download it won’t care either.
I absolutely guarantee you that SOC will be cracked before the first TV with SOC hits the stores!
He who stands in the way of change only has himself to blame for being left behind…
Interesting.
The implications are unclear without more information on contracts studios have with movie-houses. Discount movie chains would be severely hurt by such a proposition in the long term.
Unless there were geographical restrictions (unlikely they’d give small chains such consideration) — the studios have every reason to ride the wave of their PR machine and release to consumers bypassing as many as people as possible.
It’s a story because the content-protection is part of an obvious studio-system power grab from current channels.
RIP DVDs and movie theaters. The music business has already shown that digital delivery is the future. It’s the only way to beat the pirates and Redboxes.
Can’t this industry simply not compete and be quiet about it!? Why this need to treat customers like criminals. They assume we share their lack of respect for copyright.
Make the film and release it worldwide on all platforms at once. You get VOD, PPV, cinema, DVD, download, etc. while a particular property is most heavily promoted. Stop trying to put scarcity to a medium that isn’t!
I can’t tell you how often I leave a theater wanting a DVD release to take home. Their inability to change saves me money because by the time the industry decides to make it available – I either don’t care or have forgotten about it!
It’s hard to be surprised at this but it’s depressing nonetheless. Movie fans will definitely invest in best possible home viewing experiences but the whole notion of what has been cinema is dying on the vine. I agree that theatre-going is starkly more unpleasant than it was even just 15-20 years ago but I attribute that more to the complete breakdown in civility in our society and a generation empowered to believe that that is always a virtue.
Oh gullible MPAA. Whatever protection methods they think they have will be cracked. You think business is bad for movies now? If this goes through, anybody with basic computer knowledge can download illegal high def versions of the films rather than pay for them at all. I can’t believe we’re looking at a future where I will have to tell my kids what seeing a movie in a “theater” was like. Brilliant idea MPAA.
Hey, we eat our young. And our old.
Question is now could the major cinema chains like Regel,Cinemark,AMC file a complaint against this rule twelve? Becouse this affects thier earnings. What was the MPAA thinking? They should be helping and encouraging the cinemas not destroying the enterprise.
I often watch theatrical quality features on my large home screen via HBO, Showtime, etc. Some of these direct to the home films are fantastic, yet I seldom hear friends discussing them at parties or coffee shops. What makes a spectacular a production a movie, as opposed to a TV show, is simply the fact that they opened in a movie theatre first. Take that step out of the equation and all you have left is another made for television film. Goodbye Panavision, Cinerama and Imax – you’ll be missed.
Not sure if I agree with the MPAA’s decision. I remember a line from “The Majestic” …
“…I mean, this television thing. Why would you want to stay at home and watch a little box? Because it’s convenient? Because you don’t have to get dressed up, because you could just sit there? I mean, how can you call that entertainment, alone in your living room? Where’s the other people? Where’s the audience? Where’s the magic? I’ll tell you, in a place like this, the magic is all around you. The trick is to see it.”
Hurray! Sure skip the theatres and see what happens to the movie business. What makes a film a “movie” is simply the fact that it’s been exhibited in theatres first. Take that step out of the equation and all you have left is another product produced for HBO, Showtime or an On Demand cable system. I strongly doubt that Star Wars, Ben-Hur or The Dark Knight would have astonished or thrilled anyone if the only place they’d ever viewed these spectacular productions was at home with the phone ringing, the dog barking and the kids screaming.
Goodbye Cinerama, Imax and Panavision. You’ll be missed.
Releasing it straight to consumers will not stop piracy. Whoever wants it free now, will want it free then.
Unfortunately, I agree with the state of theaters. They have to up their game to compete with home entertainment systems.
Not everyone has a Grove, or Arclight.
home entertainment is getting the ax with the straight-to-the-viewer-screenings
It’s called progress folks. At a time when theaters are already embracing impossible to duplicate at home 3D technology, this shouldn’t come as a surprise.
There will always be a market for celluloid. And theaters. The options will always grow, like they are here.
Atom bombs are also an example of progress,but we dont need those either.
The nice part is the studios won’t be weighed down by paying actors any meaningful residuals with the new delivery platform under the SAG contract handed to them by Ken Howard and Kate Walsh and Neddy Ned Ned.
Of course this is something no one could have seen coming–unless they were paying attention, I mean. Although professional actors may not even notice since we’re are so swamped now that we’re all “back to work.”
Elvis has left the building.
So long Hollywood…
If the release window is collapsed, gone are the movie stars and excitement of the big screen. All film actors will be relegated to being television stars. The allure of Hollywood will be killed.
I have a top notch home theatre system but, first and foremost, I’m a fan of movies and movie theatres. That’s why I installed the entertainment system to begin with and was moved to work in this industry.
Glickman, you are truly a low class individual. I certainly hope you do not plan on showing your face at any conventions or functions that honor and celebrate film, and the business of showing movies.
The theaters have been “dead man walking” ever since the digital age began. It’s a matter of time. The TV manufacturers are already working on getting 3D going on home sets. Yes, to some degree it is a pity as there is a useful social role for them, and it is going to cause a huge commercial real estate bust when they go out of business, but it is going to happen. Probably still about 10 years out tho.
I’ve got a 60″ TV in this house I paid less than $1,000 for. Yeah, it won’t work with this, but the point is the price trend for “theater size” TVs is going to continue to make this kind of thing more attractive (even if it can’t replace the “first date” experience or “night out for the parents” experience).
Notafanofdan said:
“Dan Glickman just sold his soul to save his job. You see Dan is not his own man- he’s just a puppet for the studios. Dan does whatever it is that the studios want so he can keep his ultra cush-cush job.
Oh Dan, say it ain’t so- but you can’t because it is so. Tisk Tisk Dan on ya.”
How is this in an way a critique? Or ‘soul-selling’? And why wouldn’t he say it’s ‘so’?
Dan’s “cush-cush” job *is* the head lobbyist on behalf of the studios. That’s his job description – to maximixe studio’s profits and freedoms under federal legisislation. I don’t think that ou understand this basic fact.
Frank I agree with u on that. With home theatres now u virtual have the cinema in your den. Now the cinema chains need to ramp up the quality ante too.
If people in this industry want to show that they have some real integrity, then members of the Producers Guild, WGA, DGA, SAG, and every other union connected to the film biz ought to unite and take action against the MPAA. Weather it’s a “boots on the ground” style protest, harsh and public open letters decrying this action, or just plain old public statements that give the MPAA a proper tongue lashing. As most people will tell you, it’s not the studio heads and movie stars that will be affected by this. It’s the “little people” who count on big box office numbers to continue to fund the studios that give them gainful employment.
Sadly, I believe this event is unescapable. That’s the way progress progresses. So, my suggestion is to implement pricing the cost of watching movies through any delivery system as a floating price, similar to shopping for merchandise. What the market will bear, you know? When the distributor first releases a movie let them charge as much for it as they want. If they think they can get $100 for a certain type of experience, let them get it. But if no one is willing to pay that price, they will need to lower it until they get the expected crowds who are willing to pay the price to view. Avatar might bring in $25 a pop for two months, then average out around $7 for the rest of the year. “This Is It” could get $200 for the first couple days, then it’s deposited in the Dollar Bin.