Washington, D.C. – The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA) has urged the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to make the protection of creative content online a core and guiding principal of the National Broadband Plan. In a filing late Friday with the FCC, the MPAA wrote:
“If the National Broadband Plan is to serve as a successful road map for ubiquitous broadband for all Americans, the government must recognize the vital role that high quality, high value content plays in driving adoption of new technologies. Compelling content is an essential ingredient in the consumer Internet experience and a key driver of broadband adoption. Inadequate respect for creative rights online will impede the rollout of creative new content offerings, undermining the Commission’s, Congress’ and the Administration’s goal of ubiquitous national broadband. For this reason, MPAA urges the Commission to make respect for creative content online a core and guiding principle of the National Broadband Plan.”
“Indeed, if it is to become national policy that the Internet serve as the center of modern society – a digital intersection of Main Street, a town square and a mega-shopping and entertainment complex all-rolled-into-one – it must be a place governed by laws, standards and rules, just like the real streets and communities inhabited all across America. Anarchy and disrespect for the rule of law online are no less pernicious to society than the flouting of our laws would be anywhere else. The government cannot let the anonymity of the Internet become a cloak behind which people think that unlawful conduct can continue unabated.”
MPAA Urges FCC Protect Creative Content Online In National Broadband Plan
Comments (8)
|
Post a Comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, don't get your facts wrong, and don't bore me.
Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
So, the FCC will probably end up forcing taxpayers to subsidize broadband access for all, but then it will turn around and make broadband virtually useless by caving to the demands of the MPAA. Pretty much your typical government program.
MPAA says Content is King and he needs a Royal Guard.
Interesting… the very organization put together to keep the government out of Hollywood is now pleading with the government to make up for the lack of effort by Hollywood to protect its own content.
Broadband for all sounds great, but I’d rather have no internet than internet controlled by the government. The recent events in Iran should prove to everyone how important it is to keep the internet free of as much governmental control as possible.
“…the center of modern society – a digital intersection of Main Street, a town square and a mega-shopping and entertainment complex all-rolled-into-one –…” Through arrogance and self-absorption the movie companies leave out of the description educational uses, public safety uses, communication for businesses providing services and materials to all industries, scientific uses, world wide exchanges of all human knowledge, political discourse, the core monitoring and management device for the electrical grid and for all measurements of natural phenomena among other key infrastructure applications and the pathway to freedom for all peoples of the world. But sure, protect those movies and TV shows first.
As a producer I have a vested interest in the development of an economic model that enables the creative community to derive some benefit and make a return from digital/internet distribution but the reality is the copyright legislation will have to evolve to reflect the changes in technology that have already occured and are still to come. Right now the MPAA sounds just like the music industry – trying to put the genie back in the bottle.
This is a poorly disguised plea for the elimination of Net Neutrality, meaning that content providers (i.e. communications conglomerates) would own the means of distribution (i.e., broadband networks) as well as the product they carry. What it would allow them to do is not only charge more for faster downloads, which is understandable, but — and this is where we need Net Neutrality — to decide which other content providers have access, and at what speed, and at what cost to them. It’s similar to a theatre chain that only allows independent films onto its screens at stiffer terms and conditions than it offers mainstream filmmakers, or who demand ownership of the film as a condition to exhibit it. While control of ownership should remain with the creator, let’s not construct a safeguard that hands content providers control of the whole medium.
It seems that this entire argument is based on the very shaky view of the internet as the “center” of society – with society reduced to the occupants in a giant shopping mall from hell.
Offensive as that is, the real evidence of criminal idiocy is in reference to the Internet as a ‘place’.
Hey MPAA! Which way to English? Yes, I’m trying to get to English? Can you tell me which way from here? No, you can’t? Oh, okay. Then how about Blue? Or Green? I don’t actually care which – as long as I can get to Blue or Green by five p.m. I can catch the bus to Verb.
Seriously, how do you discuss anything at all with people who can’t separate metaphor from reality?