UPDATE: MGM Claims Forbearance Until January 31
BREAKING NEWS! 5PM UPDATE: I’ve tracked down the source of that Lionsgate-wants-MGM report: Lionsgate Vice Chairman Michael Burns who was making the rounds of financial media outlets today, including Bloomberg and CNBC’s Fast Money. If I take all his comments together, he said: “It’s all about price… They have an enormous film library, as well as fantastic franchises such as James Bond. Of course it would be interesting to us.” When asked to put a value on the deal or whether Lionsgate would buy the entire company or just pieces of MGM, he said, “It’s too soon to know.”
4:30 PM UPDATE & WRITETHRU: Considering all the lies that MGM Studios has told me and everyone else about its financial condition, it’s amazing anyone even takes calls from that company seriously anymore. But expect to see a lot of unsettling news alerts about MGM from Deadline Hollywood and others in the next few days and weeks. Ron Grover’s Business Week article that came out while I was ill is a good wrapup of what happened after a November 4th meeting between MGM CEO Stephen Cooper and the $3.7 billion debt-hobbled film company’s 140-member creditor committee, which said no to MGM’s proposal to convert the debt into equity as part of a restructuring plan to keep the studio out of bankruptcy. (Variety‘s Peter Bart should have given him credit today in that “MGM headed to sale” article but churlishly didn’t, as usual.) But I can tell you not to believe MGM’s claims that it’s business as usual there despite the auction beginning. Because I’m receiving information that vendors with MGM are already extremely uncomfortable doing business with that studio, to the point that I’ve received word that outside workers are being told to stop what they’re doing on at least one MGM film today – and more are about to be told that for other MGM pics. That’s because vendors don’t think they’re ever going to get paid.
The fact is this run-up to the MGM auction is going to make it hard for the studio to conduct business as usual because of it, especially when intensified by the bondholders’ refusal to get realistic. As one of my film financing sources just told me by way of explanation about the committee charged with selling MGM, “They basically are saying, ‘Make an offer on anything. The company, assets, whatever.’ The bondholders aren’t going to take it unless some huge offer comes in, and I don’t believe that’s going to happen. I would be verysurprised if anything but offers that go nowhere happen.” Which means weeks and probably months of uncertainty as the process drags on. No one’s even begun to do due diligence yet, for crissakes. And all the while there’ll be the dangling question in Hollywood and on Wall Street whether the studio will stay intact or be broken up?
That is tantamount to murder in moviemaking.
I’m told that MGM’s Stephen Cooper, the specialist in restructuring companies who was brought in to clean up Harry Sloan’s mess, is preparing non-disclosure agreements for all prospective buyers and those will go out in the next few days. Meanwhile, Moelis and Co is getting a data room with information together. Houlihan Lokey, who is advising the creditors committee, is expected to work closely with Moelis and Cooper on the M&A process.
I can forsee at least a rumor a day about possible buyers. So far, the only serious potential bidders are thought to be Time Warner, Fox, Lionsgate, and Qualia Capital LLC. The price tag for keeping the studio intact could range from a lowball of $1.5B to in excess of $2B. The thinking is this: Lionsgate may want MGM and its 4,000-title film library but does not have the capital to do this deal because its market cap is only about $550 mil. So Lionsgate needs to find a partner, and it’s talking to GTCR (a Chicago-based private equity fund) to do this together. But GTCR has a reputation as a tire kicker. Meanwhile, it’s been rumored for seemingly forever that Warner Bros might be willing to pony up $2B, or bid just piecemeal for all of The Hobbit for example. And Fox, like Sony, primarily wants to get its hands on the James Bond franchise. But no bidder has a better handle right now of MGM numbers than Fox since it distributes MGM product on DVD on a worldwide basis and release theatrically internationally.
The expectation is that Warner, Fox, Lionsgate, and any other strategic would just liquidate MGM and keep the main assets. But Qualia Capital has been touted as the only potential bidder that would “save jobs” at MGM by keeping it as a going concern. Also, expect more prominent names beyond Peter Chernin’s and Terry Semel’s to surface. But I find it hard to imagine those guys writing huge checks out of their net worth to attract other potential investors/private equity firms to finance the transaction. The bids will be taken over the next two weeks or longer.
3:45 PM UPDATE: I’m receiving reports that people working on MGM studio films today have been instructed to stop work because they’ve been told “the company is being liquidated starting today”.
3:30 PM: There’s a CNBC alert that Lionsgate has expressed interest in buying MGM studios. I’m checking it out.






$20 per lion!
Mike Vollman to Disney for cash and a character breakfast to be named later
so what happens to their TV network “THIS”? Granted the show a lot of Z-list movies and old TV shows but sometimes they have a few gems on.
Please explain what this means for Tom Cruise/UA?
It means that UA will continue to not make movies. So nothing much changes.
Damn! It’s so great to have you back and firin’ on all engines, Nikki!
Nikke, I’m curious what it is that you think Harry Sloan did to incur this outcome? Or was it passed down to him? It seems he wasn’t an effective captain of an already sinking ship, but I’d be curious to hear more. And what will Mary Parent do now, anyone know?
What did Harry do, you ask? I can answer that in part but only in part because it is never only one thing alone. I know Harry. I worked with Harry at one time. I like Harry, to socialize with. He is a good time guy. But I would not do business with Harry. His version of the truth is, shall we say, rosy to the Nth degree. He could and would sell the Brooklyn Bridge to his dying grandmother then buy drinks for his friends. Like I said, a good time guy and fun to be with. Just not fun to do business with as all his creditors, vendors and investors eventually find out. Harry, likes so many in this business has a problem with one word…truth. They seem to do well for themselves but invariably leave others holding the bag. Sad. Very sad for this once great and often pillaged company.
the mouse that roared
Dealing with the albatross of debt that has become MGM is too much for Comcast (20% owner) plus Tom Cruise is a pain in the A$$. Goodbye MGM, hello Universal!!
Someone should step in already and call a TKO on MGM. Enough of this is enough.
All this chazarai couldn’t be happening to a more deserving studio.
do you know what “nada” means?
Wouldn’t it be great if just like the original United Artists, five or ten heavyweight stars (it costs a little more now) formed a syndicate put up the chump change (Seriously, $2 billion?) to buy the studio and keep it out of the hands of yet another conglomerate, then installed actual creative types in the key positions? You know, have writers or producers actually buying material and producing it, then actual creative marketing people market the films? No more lawyers and bean counters holding the green light. Let the creatives create the product and the business people run the business. Doesn’t that seem like the way show business should run? This is probably the last chance to build a major studio that works the way a studio should work.
Were the “Cash for Clunkers” program still in place, MGM might’ve at least been worth $4500 toward a new Chevy, or other fine vehicle.
As it is, this tired, toothless old Lion’s done chasing impalas.
Duh! Break it up and sell off the pieces: Hobbit to Warners. Bond to Fox. The rest to Lionsgate.
There is no way Warner Brothers is letting someone like Lionsgate or Fox buy MGM’s rights to THE HOBBIT. I foresee Warner Brothers buying up the Hobbit rights, Sony buying the Bond franchise, and then Fox or Lionsgate picking up the rest of the library.
United Artists is irrelevent. No output, a net loss on what it’s released so far. And I’m pretty sure their financing deal had a production flow covenant that they’re not close to meeting.
And it’s obvious that this auction situation means anything MGM is working on is dead. No one wants their projects; they just want the library.
Looks like the only thing to do now is rush Fame 2 into production.
Lionsgate wants the library.but the real asset is the TV biz and thats what they really want!!!
Don’t quite understand the notion of BREAKING up MGM and selling off the pieces. There are no pieces other than the film library…..PERIOD. There are no basic cable networks w/value……no Television Stations…….Broadcast Networks……Just some joint ventures where MGM % comes from the contribution they make with films from their library. Yes there is James Bond, The Pink Panther, The Outer Limits and Stargate’s three television series but if you break them out of the library the total value of the company falls apart.
Bottom line…Great content that will throw off nice cash flow but that’s it. The investors are going to take a beating on this deal.
Are they going to auction off Mary Parent ??
OK, another thought. Not only will Warner Bros. pick up full rights to The Hobbit from all of this but it will also gain access to the three of the four Stanley Kubrick films that they don’t have in their library; Killer’s Kiss, The Killing, and Paths of Glory.
What I’m trying to figure out is will we ever see the rest of MGM’s film library out on DVD or blu-ray. If the library is sold, will we ever see the rest of the American Intenational/Orion, United Artists and Cannon titles that have never been released? MGM has hardly released any catalog titles since 2007, but is this Fox’s (as their distributor) fault?
Leo was chosen by MGM as the fifth lion to roar at the beginning of
the studio’s films in 1957 and continues to this day. Previously at
http://www.wikipedia.org, the MGM roaring lion trademark featured a number of names for this animal, including Tanner, Jackie and Slats – enought said.