UPDATE: The nephew of Walt Disney died at age 79 after a bout with cancer.
It wouldn’t have mattered so much if Roy E. Disney had not been the son of Roy O. Disney who’d founded the Walt Disney Company with his brother. Or if Roy had not looked so eerily like a mirror image of his late uncle. Because he did, it seemed Walt Disney himself came back from the grave in 2003/2004 to rid the Mouse House of Michael Eisner, the man Roy had famously hired back in 1984. Few men lead two coups, much less on the same company.
And that will be Roy’s legacy.
Most of the time, Roy was more likely found at his Irish castle or on his 70-foot sailboat than leading a boardroom brawl. In both cases, the reaction was surprise, followed by headlines, followed by “What took so long?” Of course, Roy was helped by his financial guru Stanley Gold. Each time Roy used as his reasoning that the Walt Disney Co had grown creatively stagnant.
The great irony, of course, was that Roy Disney beginning in 1984 waged war against Walt’s son-in-law Ron Miller, and found the billionaire Bass Brothers of Ft. Worth to help bankroll his battle. Then Roy brought in Michael Eisner. The two men had met back in 1980 when Eisner joined Roy on the board of the California Institute of Arts, which was founded by Walt as a training ground for animators. Roy made the first approach to Eisner in a phone call in the spring of 1984. (It was Gold who pinched Frank Wells.) Technically, Roy worked under Eisner, but realistically, Roy was Eisner’s boss. That was clearly defined when, in his autobiography, Eisner recalls sitting drenched in flop sweat next to Roy during that first public screening of the expletive-laced Down And Out In Beverly Hills, which cemented Disney’s new image as a studio for all ages. “We’d explained in advance why we’d made the film and won their support,” Eisner exulted.
It was Roy who was the first at the company to want to show Jeffrey Katzenberg the door. Roy was titularly the head of Disney animation, but everyone knew it was Katzenberg who did all the work. At the same time, Eisner heaped fuel onto the fire by constantly flattering Roy that he, Walt’s nephew, more than Jeffrey, “had a keener sense of what a Disney movie ought to be than any of the rest of us,” as Eisner postured in his autobiography. Roy felt ignored by Katzenberg, and his complaints to Eisner reached a crescendo after Frank Wells’ accidental death in 1994: Not only would Katzenberg not be promoted into Wells’ job, but for all Roy cared, Jeffrey could exit the company now that Joe Roth was on the lot. To this day, conventional wisdom has it that Eisner might never have had the guts to dare get rid of Katzenberg, and all that implied, if Roy had not been behind it. Even after Katzenberg resigned, Roy re-cut a “making of” documentary on The Lion King, removing all but a few frames of Katzenberg’s fingerprints on the hit project.
By the time Disney bought ABC in August of 1995, though, Roy was being treated almost as an afterthought by Eisner. Same thing, again, when Eisner brought in Michael Ovitz as president. But Roy clearly delineated from the outset that Disney animation would never, and he meant never, be part of Ovitz’s purview. Roy by all accounts was by then withdrawing deeper and deeper into isolation at the company, in part by throwing himself into only that turf he felt was particularly his because of Walt’s legacy. Roy had helped produce the True Life Adventures nature film series, and so helped push through the idea for the new Animal Kingdom theme park because Walt had had a lifelong love of animals. For the same reasons, Roy also threw himself into the supervision of Fantasia 2000 — so much so that Eisner even had difficulty convincing Roy to use certain music in the movie.
Years from now, business schools will still be arguing if Roy did the right thing leaving Disney’s boardroom in 2003 to air his grievances against Eisner and wage a very public war on the company. Disney’s stock price fell 2.6% in one day from the fallout. Roy was a pivotal director because he not only had a large financial stake in the company but also was willing to be a shareholder activist. (In an interview with Fortune magazine, he described how he summoned his four children to a family meeting where they sat together, holding hands, and agreed he should challenge Eisner.)
In fact, he had no choice. Eisner was both shutting him up and “aging” him off the board. Roy and Stanley were pressuring Disney to release the lot of letters and memos they had written criticizing Eisner over the years. And hanging over everyone was a Delaware-based shareholder lawsuit against Disney, Eisner, Ovitz and the various members of the board of directors for paying a ridiculously oversized severance to the onetime CAA head. Roy and Stanley also sided with Pixar’s Steve Jobs against Eisner, whose relationship with Jobs was so damaged that Disney No. 2 Bob Iger became point man in the long-lagging but all-important Pixar negotiations for a renewed distribution deal.
It’s very hard to eject a sitting chairman/CEO from outside the boardroom. Eisner had become the most rancid corporate chief in Hollywood, the “Louse In The Mouse House” as Slate described him at the time, or the FrankenEisner, as I dubbed him. Yet Roy Disney and Stanley Gold waged a sophisticated campaign against him. Their Web site, SaveDisney.com, kept track of every attack on the company and, seemingly, every shareholder as well, with an eye to the annual meeting on March 3rd in Philadelphia. They instructed Eisner’s unfaithful how to “vote no” against the CEO and even provided the required forms. They arranged for special discount travel arrangements. And they hosted a briefing and reception there a day before the official company conclave. They also lobbied institutional investors for their cause. And Institutional Shareholders Services recommended that Disney stockholders not re-elect Eisner to the board because, when it comes to the company’s troubles, ISS complained “all roads lead back to Eisner.”
Roy and Stanley had to convince at least 20% of Disney proxy holders to vote no on 4 of the 11 directors up for election to the Disney board, including Eisner. To circumvent the dissident incursion, Eisner plotted various counter-measures. Disney’s proxy ballots arrived very late or not at all for many investors. For a company known for clockwork precision on investor matters, sending ballots two weeks late and by third-class mail (the slowest possible) was more than coincidence. Eisner sent his own letter to shareholders attacking Roy’s and Stanley’s “propaganda” campaign and accusing the pair of approving many of the decisions they now sharply criticize. And for a Sunday profile of Roy Disney in The New York Times Magazine, where Roy denigrated himself as “Walt’s idiot nephew” and the model for Goofy, Eisner’s spokeswoman e-mailed the reporter some 20-odd articles chronicling Roy’s shortfalls.
In the end, Eisner received a shockingly large 45.3% no-confidence vote. He stepped down as chairman. By the end of the year, he announced he would resign as CEO when his contract was over. Roy’s victory over Eisner was complete. Then he started on Eisner’s successor as CEO, Bob Iger.
Iger was tapped by the Walt Disney Co’s board of directors after what was basically a non-search. And as Eisner’s No. 2, Iger had been responsible for as many recent wrong-headed decisions as his boss. Both those truths made Roy Disney apoplectic. He and Stanley Gold filed a lawsuit in May 2005 in Delaware Chancery Court alleging the Walt Disney Co board made false statements to shareholders about its CEO search “and used Company resources to promote Iger’s candidacy and did not in good faith seriously consider any other candidate”. It was not how Iger wanted to start his tenure.
So Iger began working around the clock mending fences broken by Eisner, and attempts were made to reopen a dialog with Roy Disney. Some thought that could be accomplished by involving Roy in the coming 50th anniversary of Disneyland. One idea called for Roy, because of his resemblance to his uncle, to reenact Walt Disney’s original dedication of the park. (At precisely the same moment that the elder Disney first read Disneyland’s dedication, Roy would have stepped up to a microphone in Town Square, exactly as his uncle did on July 17, 1955, and repeated those now famous words, “For all who come to this happy place: Welcome. Disneyland is your land…”) It didn’t happen.
Finally, after Iger’s persistent courtship and their own realization that further proxy fighting would be prohibitively expensive, Roy Disney and Stanley Gold agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. Roy was returned to the fold. He was given the honorary position of director emeritus and made consultant to the company and handed an office on the lot. The Disney War was finally over. From that point on, Roy stayed out of the limelight until his death. A turbulent chapter of Hollywood history now closes.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


My sentiments too, Nicki. He fought the good fight to bring quality back to the Disney brand. Hopefully, what he started will be advanced for years to come.
I’m very sad about this. I was worried when he didn’t show up at the WDFM dedication, or D23, or in any of the Princess & the Frog publicity… In fact, I was just thinking about him earlier today before I saw the news. A real loss…
Roy Disney always fought to keep the Disney brand at its highest level honoring Walt Disney.
Roy was correct ‘outing’ Eisner. All know that once the wonderful Frank Wells passed in such an untimely manner that the Mouse house was no longer in good hands under Eisner as evidenced by the “Mouseschwitz” name given by the employees.
Roy Disney was a smart business man who always understood the value of the Disney name, and he continued throughout his life fighting to maintain the highest standards possible.
RIP…Roy.
No matter what you think about the Disney Corporation, Roy was one hell of a boardroom warrior, and someone who had considerations beyond his next bonus check when it came to the company’s fate and legacy.
He reminded me of the real Disney.
The lesson here is, “don’t fuck with Roy”.
Roy was a nice, decent man among a pit of vipers. I’m sure Harvey Sweinstein is gloating “some wishes do come true”.
Well, at least now I know who to blame for personally making “Fantasia 2000″ one of the worst animated movies of all time! Thanks, Roy
“Well, at least now I know who to blame for personally making “Fantasia 2000? one of the worst animated movies of all time! Thanks, Roy”
Clearly you’re forgetting about a little film called “Shark Tale.”
Roy will be missed, and my condolences to the Disney family.
I recently saw a documentary about Disney’s animation division titled Waking Sleeping Beauty. The film really chronicles the studio’s attempt to re-energize the division after such failures as The Black Cauldron and a number of other stale titles. It is a truly fantastic documentary that shows the rebirth of the animation division with hits like The Little Mermaid, Lion King, and Aladdin, but is most instructive and interesting when it focuses a harsh light on the infighting between Eisner, Katzenberg and Roy Disney. I think the film will get a theatrical release next year and it is well worth watching if you have any interest in the real characters at Disney and I am not talking about Mickey and Goofy — I am referring to the former studio executives and their egos.
Indeed a great boardroom warrior who fought for the legacy of his uncle at all costs. So few people account for the history of a company and the legacy of its brand. The question will always be whether or not his efforts helped the company to evolve in a better way, or were in service of preserving the status quo which had become stagnant. The fact that Bob Iger still exists, when indeed he was right there with Michael Eisner in those last horrible years of Eisner’s run, is indicative of the fact that he lands someplace inbetween. He was a guy with vast resources and the name clout to be taken seriously, yet he was not the guy to step in and follow through, correcting the many wrongs he saw in the way the company was managed. RIP Roy Disney but more for the fact that his loss reminds of how there are no more giants in the industry… and I give him that knowing he was nowhere near the visionary his Uncle was.
I met Roy once in the Old Animation Building on the lot. He was nice enough.
What Roy did to Eisner definately pleased the Disney fans. I think once Frank Wells died, there was noone to counter Eisner’s boneheaded decisions such as making Paul Pressler the head of Disneyland, and afterward Disney Parks. Paul and his replacement Cynthia damaged to Disneyland brand.
Roy was unique and new the value of his position.
No ceo in Hollywood history created as much shareholder value as Michael Eisner. I’m one of the people who thinks Roy’s campaign against ME was nothing short of character asassination. Eisner was a bigger thinker than Roy (or even Iger) and took big risks to grow the company over a twenty year period. Even Nikki’s piece suggests that there was some kind of personal ego trip quietly motivating Roy’s mission.
He was a class act.
I worked on a number of projects for Roy Disney, and I thought he was a pretty interesting guy. Some were strictly in-house and some were DVD extras, etc. He had a pretty clear understanding of what Disney represented, and what the Disney audience expected–more than Eisner, certainly.
I had the pleasure of interviewing Roy several years ago both about revitalizing the animation department and Shamrock Holdings’ then-rumored acquisition of Polaroid. He was enthusiastic about the former, cagey about the latter, and a charming combination of wide-eyed kid and confident businessman. In other words, he was a fine blend of his uncle and his father. Not enough is said about Roy O. Disney, who was more than the money behind the Mouse. He built the system by which Walt could function, and it fell to Roy E to pull it all out of the fire not once but twice. Say what you will about what the Disney organization has become, but for half a century it was a personal vision, and now that DNA is gone. My condolences.
Mr. Disney (what a great name to have!!) was one of the great men of Hollywood. Not many left with his integrity. God bless him.
Thanks Nicki for this beautiful, informative and somewhat poetic overview.
no one does it like nikki can, including those two newspapers. while scooping every scoop to be had, she also a fine sense, and instinct, for our people, present and forgotten. she knows modern entertainment history better than anyone i can find out there.
well done obituary remembering roy disney. it was actually rather fascinating.
i’m anticipating a big-time book, a kind of “summing up” from nikki finke, one day.
Roy did alot for the company he keep the Disney feeling and was a good representative of the Disney family and did the right thing with Eisner he shoul have done it many years before
Roy never wanted credit for rescuing the Animation Department…as much as he wanted the folks who did the work (far more than little Jeffery Katzemburg) to have the spotlight shone on them. John Musker, Ron Clements, Mike Gabriel, Glen Keane, Rob Minkoff, Ed Gombert, Joe Ranft, John Lasseter, Roger Allers, Joe Grant—only a handful of the people TRULY responsible for rescuing the studio with their hard work in the Animation Department. Roy enjoyed their hard work and their company. He was sincere in his love for the medium, unlike Jeffery, who only wanted to steal credit.
Unbelievable that he’s gone. Who will protect the Disney brand now? Under Eisner, Comcast was rumored to be considering buying the company. Those were sad times.
In [1958] my parents moved from the Bay Area to Garden Grove, CA. – five minutes from Disneyland. It was truly a magical time. My brother John McEuen (Nitty Gritty Dirt Band) and his friend Steve M. both worked at D-land selling magic tricks. Years later, my beautiful 21-year-old wife, Alice M. McEuen, landed a job at Disney Studios meeting the great Walt Disney himself. She dearly loved ‘WALT’ and the kind way in which he dealt with his many employees.
In 1978, after we helped launch comedian Steve Martin’s Hollywood recording/acting careers, we purchased Mr. Roy Disney’s huge lakefront home on Toluca Lake Ave. Some Hollywood dreams do come true; they did for all of us.
My father’s $20,000 9th Street house in G.G. is still there, who knows what it’s worth today? Steve Martin hosts the Academy Awards; the Dirt Band earned platinum records.
Alice and I now live on Maui. Magic happens in America…
thanks to the wonderful Walt & Roy Disney and company.
Oh, and we own a world class 77′ Rhodes ketch named M/S d’Artagnan, which can be viewed on the website above.
That’s $howbiz! Man, would I love to do it ALL over again.
Aloha!
Best to remember the same Walt — er, Roy Disney who who presumably waxed ecstatic over “the expletive-laced Down And Out In Beverly Hills” ultimately brought Michael Eisner down by proclaiming the company had strayed from its “family values” — or as Roy put it on SaveDisney.com, “to provide lasting and wholesome entertainment to people around the world.” One could say Roy had a change of heart. One could also say he was a Machiavellian. I won’t say for myself but given his investment-banker friends I’m inclined toward the latter.
In any case Roy unleashed Michael Eisner on Disney, one of the true CEO villains of a time filled with them. One might also point out that Disney stock has gone virtually nowhere in the fourteen years since the CapCities deal. If Roy protested it he never let on. He must share some of the “credit” there too.
I’m not even so sure how much Roy brought down Eisner. I am convinced his downfall began when an excerpt from one of Disney’s — pardon, Miramax’ Scream movies aired in a Congressional hearing on movie violence and youth, I’m thinking around the time of Columbine — you remember, when the sainted Jack Valenti thought it top-quality PR for movie executives to boycott such hearings en masse. Disney’s name was mentioned quite prominently. It exposed for all time that this was no longer “the world’s leading family entertainment company” but just another giant money-sucking media leech; arguably the damage from years of “adult” movies like Bad Santa will never be undone. It may also explain why after Roy’s campaign Disney decided it had to buy Pixar; its rep with the wholesome crowd was so ruined it needed an outside contractor. (And that deal might explain the equally absurd purchase of Marvel Entertainment; clearly Disney can’t make movies on its own.) The company really should rename itself ESPNCORP anyway, which at least would be accurate. Roy must take some credit here also.
Tiger Woods’s destruction exposes the problem with mounting people on a pedestal. I suggest we apply the same standard to Roy Disney.
These corporate battles are tiresomely all the same whether in Hollywood or at HP. It’s the same cast of corporate clones just in different clothes.
It reminds me of the last line in the novel and film of Barry Lyndon: “It was in the reign of George III that the above-named personages lived and quarreled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor, they are all equal now.”