As you know, the James Bond filmmaker EON Productions operates with great autonomy and secrecy. I’ve just learned that producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson are in final negotiations with CAA for director Sam Mendes to come on as a consultant to the 23rd James Bond film (as yet untitled). That’s right — not as the director, yet.
This is for the film now in pre-production for release in 2011 whose story begins after Quantum Of Solace and again stars Daniel Craig. The actor has been telling folks that filming begins in late 2010. I hear Craig is “insisting” on Mendes’ hiring because the actor was stung by criticism of the last Bond film. (And Sam directed Daniel in Road To Perdition.) Oscar-winner Peter Morgan with Quantum Of Solace and Casino Royale alumni Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, is writing the script for the latest film. Here’s what sources are telling me: once EON hires a director on their Bond films, it triggers a first payment from MGM. Well, given that MGM is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, and EON may have the right to take Bond elsewhere, it stands to reason that the producers wouldn’t want to do anything right away that further complicates ownership of Bond #23.
“The producers are working on a deal to bring Sam on as consultant with an eye to direct,” one of my insiders says. “Once they put him on as the director, something happens to the contract in terms of ownership. But let me emphasize there’s not any deal done.” Said one insider about the choice of Mendes: “Barbara thinks he’s smart, which he is. But you don’t need such a fancy director. You need someone who can do an action movie.” (Hmm, does Road To Perdition count? I loved it.)
This is for the film now in pre-production for release in 2011 whose story begins after Quantum Of Solace and again stars Daniel Craig. The actor has been telling folks that filming begins in late 2010. I hear Craig is “insisting” on Mendes’ hiring because the actor was stung by criticism of the last Bond film. (And Sam directed Daniel in Road To Perdition.) Oscar-winner Peter Morgan with Quantum Of Solace and Casino Royale alumni Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, is writing the script for the latest film. Here’s what sources are telling me: once EON hires a director on their Bond films, it triggers a first payment from MGM. Well, given that MGM is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, and EON may have the right to take Bond elsewhere, it stands to reason that the producers wouldn’t want to do anything right away that further complicates ownership of Bond #23.
“The producers are working on a deal to bring Sam on as consultant with an eye to direct,” one of my insiders says. “Once they put him on as the director, something happens to the contract in terms of ownership. But let me emphasize there’s not any deal done.” Said one insider about the choice of Mendes: “Barbara thinks he’s smart, which he is. But you don’t need such a fancy director. You need someone who can do an action movie.” (Hmm, does Road To Perdition count? I loved it.)Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Road to Perdition was terrible!
Boo!
Snowden, do yourself a favor and stop talking. Sam Mendes’ 2nd film (and Connie Hall’s last masterpiece) would’ve easily taken best pic if the academy didn’t get jittery about awarding it to the same guy for his first two movies. Storyelling, Cinematography, performance, it’s all there. Road to Predition is to movies what you clearly aren’t: necessary and brilliant. Back me up anyone? That said, I agree the mendes’ only claim to comedy fame is the touching, but comedically paltry Away We Go , and a touch of humor is one of my favorite staples of the Bond canon. But that doesn’t mean mendes couldn’t do it. And action scenes could provide him a shot of creativity that I’ll always be willing to see from him. He could strike an interestingly tempered balance between the action, humor and kick-ass-ness and thereby add a lot to this franchise.
Give him a shot!
Bond needs more style and substance, and Mendes can bring that. Road to Perdition and Revolutionary Road are dark, edgy and beautifully made. And Away We Go is a charmer.
Give american beauty type movies to Mendes not bond. Although i would be curious how that movie will turn out?
They need to hire Martin Campbell as a REAL consultant on the movie, no matter who the director is.
They should hire Kathryn Bigelow! She can make an action movie!
Sam Mendes? Brilliant, look at Road to Perdition. And who played Connor Rooney in that (and quite well,too)?
Craig needs to lighten up. The last Bond was cold and humorless, and utterly forgettable. Sam Mendes is the LAST guy I would want to bring onboard in order to bring more of the traditional Bond elements back into the fold.
Kathryn Bigelow would be a great choice – certainly better than poor Marc Foster, the action sequences were a major weakness of QofS.
Bigelow and action…hmmmm…POINT BREAK is one of the all-time greatest films ever.
‘Back off Warchild. Seriously.’ –Bodhi
I have to agree the insider: Bond doesn’t need a fancy director. The current producers have attempted this before (Michael Apted; Marc Forster) and it’s never been a good fit for Bond.
Anyway, other sites are reporting that Mendes is not only set to direct but that the production is being fast-tracked. However, this version sounds a lot more realistic, especially given MGM’s current state.
Criticism?! Quantum was amazing. Anyone who didn’t like it doesn’t know the character Ian Fleming created and should pop in their well-worn VHS of Octopussy or some other Roger Moore toss and STFU on all matters Bond.
yeah who doesn’t love a rip roaring thriller about Bond going toe to toe with some guy scheming to control…60% of a third world country’s water supply
for fuck’s sake
Right! If there’s no hollowed-out volcano or invisible cars, why am I even watching? Character? Story? pshaw
wonderful pause and placement of punchline there. made me bark with laughter.
+ 1 Any true Bond fan really liked Quantum – the scene at the opera was priceless. And the introduction of the Quantum organization into the plot (and future plots) is a return to the TRUE Bond films of the Connery era.
Bigelow would be a great choice but I wonder if one main constraint of any Bond director choice is his citizenship : all past directors are either European or citizens from members of the British Commonwealth (Campbell, like Lee Tamahori, is from New Zealand).
I hope they start fliming in June. I was glad they just 2 year rest. I hope Sam Mendes directing is offical. Well I hope they start castin soon. Also Q & Miss Moneypenny to come back,who ever play them.
Sam Mendes would simply bring in finance. It’s a lousy shot and a bad move. Three directors who should be up for the job: 1) Kathryn Bigelow as she knows action without a doubt and there’s never been a female Bond director. 2) Peter Pedrero who handled so many of the stunt sequences for the Bond movies and is doing a female Bourne type in Vauxhall Crossed and 3) Vic Armstrong, the legend that is.
The problem with the last Bond was it didn’t seem like a Bond film, it was too BOURNEish; shaky-cam, erratically edited, missing many of the ‘trademarks’ of a Bond film, such as the opening gunbarrel sequence, recuring Bond anthem, a strong central villain, Bond supporting players such as ‘Q’ and ‘Moneypenny,’ and so forth.
The pre-credits action sequence wasn’t all that impressive either, the movie also was the shortest of all the Bond films, around 90 minutes or so, so it seemed less a sequel to CASINO ROYALE than an extended climax.
As a dark revenge thriller, I thought LICENCE TO KILL was much more effective at highlighting the Bond-out-for-revenge motif – Robert Davi was also an excellent villain.
I welcome Sam Mendes and am a big fan of AMERICAN BEAUTY but the next Bond film needs to be ‘re-aligned’ to make up for the BOURNEish excesses and lack of conventional plotting of QUANTUM OF SOLACE.
I find the possibilty of Eon Productions leaving MGM for another distrubtor more inteteresting.
No, there is no citizenship requirement, only a requirement to be totally and utterly controlled by EON. This is why we’ve never seen any auteurs or A-listers at the helm before, and why Tarantino and Spielberg were rebuffed.
Hey Bigelow fans! Just to know: her action sequences were built up (planned, edited) by non other than Jim Cameron. Point Blank, Stranger Days all had Cameron’s hands in them.
Sam will be great. He just need a good second unit director and editor.
The last 2 Bond’s have been very solid entertaining movies. They make the previous Bond’s look silly excluding the early Connery films.
Are they a bit forgettable in terms of plot? Absolutely. But the set pieces and moments stick with you and Craig’s performance is perfect for the films.
How Sam Mendes fits into this I don’t know. Perhaps he knows he needs him name attached to a commercial hit again since his recent films, while well made, were under performers at the box office.
I don’t really see the chops to stage the action set pieces from Sam, but he did come from the theater world so perhaps I’m selling him short.
The good news is an intelligent filmmaker is on board with this project (although what capacity remains to be seen) and the right actor is in the role.
the road to perdition blew big chunks. the problem with the last bond film was that it got rid of all the stuff that bond fans love: Q, the gadgets, the dialoge (bond, james bond). it’s all cheese whiz, but the real fans love that stuff. and that was the biggest gripe about the last film.
i’m still underwhelmed with daniel craig.
Michael Apted is not a “fancy” director – just a very solid one. (Thunderheart!) And his Bond was the best of the Pierce Brosnan interregnum, despite a not-threatening-at-all villain.
The best Brosnan Bond was Goldeneye. The only part of the Apted version that was memorable was the Christmas “coming” one a year line.
Ugh, they already went artsy director for Solace and that was one unwatchable Bond. Do whatever you can to get Martin Campbell back on board.
Well, I think it would be hard to make the next one worse than QoS, but maybe I hated it because my expectations were raised by CR.
And by the way Stephen, I was around when Dr No played in theaters for the first time and I’ve read the books (albeit not before the movies started; I’m not that old). So I do know something about
the Bond character. Not sure what Bond you’re familiar with if you thought QoS was in the upper tier of the series.
All QoS did was try to put me to sleep, beginning with the title theme (oh yeah, The White Stripes. Right?) and continuing, as “Waiting” pointed out, with the plot, which, among other things, had to stoop to include the cliche of the CIA being in league with the bad guys while managing to almost eliminate sex as a plot element.
and oh, the poster was so good. i was really looking forward to solace. it just felt thematically pompous, sexless and sort of pointlessly, dryly driven. and there was no humour. none. casino was littered with good one liners – and i mean jesus, the chemistry between craig and eva green, kerrist.
the only, only moment i really remember from the whole of solace is where he does that cat like little run along the first floor balcony in the hotel when mi6 go to get him. its a good moment in an irritatingly dour film. And finishing on the frigging algerian love knot – god but they dragged that thing well past its ability to dramatically sustain.
the whole point is that vesper dies at the end to allow bond to become the emotional amalgam that he is. that’s why the final payoff is so satisfying: he is the forged bond. – but oh no, bloody forster has him sexlessly moping around for another entire film, reminiscing with peripheral characters from the first film, drinking vespers til he barfs, and hugging the french guy in a dumpster in mexico, while he dies. what? he better be bond by three.
I had to think hard to remember if I had seen Quantum and I am for real. Nuff said.
QoS is best viewed as the climax of Casino Royale, since it pretty much picks up at the end of the CR and keeps on trucking. I wasn’t expecting Citizen Kane so it was fine by me. A bit hokey? Sure, but most Bonds typically are (CR actually being one of the exceptions).
I like the “I was around when Dr. No played in theaters for the first time…but didn’t read the books before the movies started because I’m not that old.” comment frpm LPB.
Wait a minute: the first book came out in 1953, and Dr. No in 1962. So if you remember Dr No in the theater, let’s assume it’s your first memory and you’re 5 years old. So, yes, you ARE that old, since you were born when only 4 books had been published.
Technically, of course, you are correct. By definition, in this case, the book(s) did precede the movie Dr. No.
My Dad took me to see the movie when I was six, but he didn’t give any of the books to read then.
After I wrote that (thanks for the good humor) I realized you were probably saying you were too young to read the books when you saw Dr No.
I was 7 when my Dad took me to Goldfinger at a revival theater back in the 70′s. Great stuff for a kid of that age. Those first ones hold up very well – even the gypsy fight in FRWL. As I get older, it gets better.
HOW DOES EON SPELL DISASTER? S-A-M-M-E-N-D-E-S!
Dear EON, Thanks for floating this “Sam as Bond23 Director” rumor, and with great luck maybe Sam will simply be brought on as a consultant and STAY there in that capacity. But speaking of floating, do you think that Sam Mendes will be able to steer EON and the James Bond Franchise up ***** creek without a paddle? You bet he will!
Just cross Sammy off of your ‘directors’ short list and CALL MARTIN CAMPBELL ASAP, make him the Sweetest deal he cannot refuse!
Sam may be a nice guy and a decent director, but he is not an appropriate ‘director’ choice for a Bond film, by any means. Does Sam even know WHAT an action seqeunce is, let alone ever directed one? What a waste, and a shame because with Daniel Craig now onboard the Eon train, the last two Bond films were BEYOND AMAZING, especially Casino Royale! But now, with “Mellow-Man Mendes” possibly directing, there is no doubt anywhere that the next Bond 23 will be an absolute Snoring Snooze-fest! Don’t forget to bring your pillows!
Sam Mendes is as bad a chice as Marc Forster was. Mendes makes stunningly pretentious, slow movies and would be in over his head with Bond, as Forster was. Mendes doesn’t deserve Bond. Martin Campbell, with CASINO ROYALE, gave us the most dramatic, poignant Bond film since OHMSS in ’69, and Campbell is a better director than Mendes. Forster does very well with a certain kind of movie, and it ain’t Bond. Mendes doesn’t really do well with anything.