It was just announced that 17 major television networks and studios and 7 talent agencies today settled 19 of the 23 class action lawsuits filed in 2002 alleging intentional and unintentional age discrimination in the selection and representation of older television writers. The amount of the settlement is $70 million — the largest-ever settlement in the history of age discrimination litigation. (Today’s settlement, along with the 2 cases that were settled earlier this year for $4.5 millioncluding interest.) All but one of the cases now ends for the Television Writers Age Discrimination Litigation, which named 51 defendants, including the major TV networks, production companies and eleven talent agencies. The lone holdout is the litigation still against Creative Artists Agency (CAA).
The announcement is being made jointly by the defendants and Paul Sprenger of Washington DC’s Sprenger + Lang, who was lead counsel for the 165 named plaintiffs and the settlement classes. Here’s more:
The settlement is subject to final approval by the California Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles.
The defendants strongly deny the plaintiffs’ allegations and state that their hiring and/or representation practices fully comply with the law and reflect their commitment to equal employment opportunity. They also note that they all have long-standing anti-discrimination policies and regularly employ or represent substantial numbers of writers over the age of forty.
The parties have been litigating these claims for almost ten years, including several appeals to the California Court of Appeal and the California Supreme Court. The defendant networks and production companies (including ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, The WB, UPN, Columbia TriStar Television, Inc., DW SKG TV L.L.C., Universal Media Studios, Regency Television, Spelling Television, The Carsey-Werner Company LLC, Touchstone Television, Twentieth Century Fox Television, and Warner Bros. Television) and the defendant talent agencies (APA, The Endeavor Agency, The Gersh Agency, Paradigm Talent & Literary Agency, Shapiro-Lichtman, UTA, and the William Morris Agency LLC) have agreed, subject to court approval, collectively to pay a total of $70 million to settle all claims against them and their affiliated companies, including class members’ alleged damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. Approximately $2.5 million of this total settlement amount will be used to create a Fund for the Future, which will issue grants and loans to settlement class members to further their writing careers and study ways to supplement their pensions and improve access to medical insurance.
Approximately two-thirds of the $70 million settlement payment will be paid by insurance carriers.
The settlement provides a process for settlement class members to apply for an allocated cash distribution from the settlement fund. The Fund for the Future, which will be governed by a board composed of settlement class members, will issue grants and loans for approved projects on a competitive basis.
“I speak for all class counsel in recommending that all settlement class members accept the settlement. We are honored to represent a distinguished and talented group of clients and class members,” stated Sprenger. Plaintiffs and the settlement classes were also represented by, among others, the law firms of Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Kator Parks & Weiser, PLLC, Law Office of Daniel Wolf, Schwartz, Steinsapir, Dohrmann & Sommers LLP, the AARP Foundation Litigation, Katz, Marshall & Banks, and Blecher & Collins.
“We were fully prepared to oppose class certification and would have prevailed at trial if necessary,” said Seth E. Pierce, of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Defendants’ Liaison Counsel. “But with years of disruptive litigation remaining, and all networks and major television studios and talent agencies participating in the settlement, it made sense to bring these protracted cases to a close.” For more information about this settlement, please visit the Claims Administrator website at www.TVWritersSettlementAdmin.com or Plaintiffs’ litigation website www.TVWritersCounsel.com.
The AARP Foundation Litigation issued this statement (edited):
Today’s settlement vindicates the tireless efforts of AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) attorneys who have labored for eight years since signing on as co-counsel for the plaintiffs in the then one year old litigation. Along with the work of their co-counsel, the litigation work of AARP attorneys also is validated by the size of this settlement. AFL will continue to participate in the case against Creative Artists.
And the settlement is a bright spot at a time when older workers are being buffeted by negative cross-currents of a sort they have not faced in many years. The importance of the settlement cannot be overestimated, given the fact that television shows – even in this era of multiple entertainment platforms – remain crucial in shaping our culture. Television greatly influences the public’s perceptions and, yes, sometimes feeds unfortunate stereotypes about different groups in society. Writers obviously play a key role in developing themes for those programs; age — and other forms of diversity — obviously are a real plus in the hiring of those writers.
Today’s settlement comes in the midst of tough economic conditions for workers of all age groups, but the fact is that older workers face special obstacles. On the general employment front, the unemployment rate for persons aged 55 and over is now well above what it has been for most of the past six decades. As of November, average duration of unemployment for those 55 and over was about four months longer than it was when the recession started in 2007.
At the same time, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has reported a significant uptick in the number of age discrimination complaints. The latest figures show that for the 2008 fiscal year, 24,582 charges of age discrimination were filed with the agency, almost a 29 per cent increase over the 19,103 age discrimination charges filed in the 2007 fiscal year and by far the largest number of such charges filed over the past ten years.
And the general pervasiveness of age discrimination was shown by an AARP national study within the past year that found that 60 percent of those surveyed aged 45 to 74 said that they had personally faced or observed age discrimination in the workplace.
While AARP is gratified by the settlement announced today, these numbers serve to underscore the need for continued vigilance and advocacy for the rights of older workers. AARP remains dedicated to ending age discrimination in all its forms.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






The black writers’ suit is coming.
And it’s gonna be a mutha!
What about the white writers lawsuit? Can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told you can’t get staffed on this or that show because you’re not a minority. I know many many people have heard this. But the larger point is that while discrimination certainly exits, for old people, fat people, short people, ugly people, and on and on and on, the truth is that when you’re a writer, you’re always not getting hired for something, and desperate to know why. Discrimination, while real to a certain extend, provides an easy and ironically satisfying answer. It’s not me, it’s them.
I’m all for meritocracies and cream rising to the top. I know I got it lucky in life but I have no in’s in this business beyond the assistant class. The Assistant Track is back-breaking and the lack of regard writers pay us is insulting – did you think everybody has student loan debt to order you lunch? I don’t stay up late at night worrying about somebody with Producer credits because they don’t care about me. WGA members could fix the “diversity” and “ageist” problem, among others in this town, by actually attacking it at the root rather than suing for it later. Lend a helping hand – sponsor a kid in high school to learn the craft the right way. Open your door and encourage your colleagues to do the same.
As an actor, New York, not Hollywood, I have read these comments with great interest. I have nothing but respect for the writers who are actually the most creative of all of us. They take a blank piece of paper (or today open up Final Draft on their computers) and create something where nothing was before. I have never understood this idea of cutting out the most experienced writers. If I’m in a room with creative people, I usually try to get to talk to the most senior creator there. I can learn the most from the most seasoned, experienced person. This seems logical to me.
I remember as a young man touring with Elizabeth Allen (Donovan’s Reef, Broadway, and on and on). I got my nerve up one day and asked her if I could take her to lunch. When we went out, she told me no one in the company had ever asked her to lunch before. I couldn’t believe it. Why wouldn’t actors be falling over each other to talk to someone who’d worked with John Ford and Richard Rogers?!
In any case, I’m one actor who realizes we depend on the writers for what we say. More power to you seasoned artisans.
steve luker
Bravo, EKW!
Quote: Writer “EKW”
I received an e-mailed form I can fill out to request a share of the settlement. It looks like I technically qualify, even though I’ve never sold a script; I simply entered one in a Fox TV competition. I won’t be applying, because I’ve no reason to think my loss had anything to do with age; they simply picked a script they liked better.
But there must be thousands of writers like me who would qualify under the wording I received; I wonder how many pieces the settlement will be split into.
I too wrote scripts and tried to get them accepted by Hollywood; only to be turned away.
The scripts were registered with WGA.
Can anyone tell me how much I can expect?
Yes, $ 340.00
I’m very blown away that this suit got this far – let alone a final settlement. And does anyone think it will change anything? This is not a case of corporate culture — it’s a case of “I’ll do as I please as I’ve always done.” If the Hollywood Cabal was ever investigated in total by every governmental agency in existence it would still change nothing. So what do they care, they are making so much money in this lousy economy the IRS would choke if they knew the truth and the ringleader is CAA — that’s why they opted out of the settlement. You cross them once and your dead in this town forever. This is all one big joke. 73Mill is chump change in Hollywood Town.
I’m 41. Today I got something in the mail from the TV Writer’s Settlement Administrator. I would be shocked if I qualify for the class b/c I never was able to sell anything to anyone. I do not know how they got my name and address, maybe from a script I registered with the WGA in 1997 the subject of which I kind of remember. I wrote for a long time, neglected having a decent career so I could stay focused on my real work. After lots of never hearing anything (TV/Film writing) and lots of “You’re talented, you have a good ear for dialogue; I just cannot see a market for this,” (novel writing), I threw in the towel and went to law school. Now I am a misdemeanor prosecutor and I can say three things about it: 1) When you file a pleading you don’t have much opportunity for clever, but someone reads every word of it. 2) They pay me every week. 3) Thanks to the management of the universe for allowing folks in their thirties to go to law school. Good luck everyone, sincerely. I never knew I was so lucky.
Hey, where are you prosecuting? I had a similar path, but did the law stuff first and then the writing and now back to law.
Hi,
I would like to know if HerbyN’s comment and math is accurate.
Are there really only 165 plaintiffs. Is it based upon the number of writers or the number of scripts each person has submitted?
thanks
CPSM
I have a question; how the heck did these lawyers go about finding plaintiffs? Got my notice for the lawsuit, but I never filed anything and didn’t even know the lawsuit was going on. Are they pulling from agency lists? And I’m not sure if it’s worth tossing my name into this hat if it’s only going to get me bitten in the ass later. Sure, the lawyers claims the settlement is confidential, but they pretty much had to dig into my WGA info to find my in the first place. Creepy and weird. To file or not file?
Friday’s court hearing went according to plan. Does anyone know how much each claimant will receive?
Last update on settlemnt site was April 28. Why no new news?
Some of the best writing I’ve seen in years are in the above comments. Comedy, sadness,; It’s all right here.
Hi, this is my first time making a comment about this age TV Writers, 40 and over discrimination settlement. But i must confest, it’s a great opportunity for older writers such as myself to reap benefits form years of hard work, whereas in any cases others overlook your talents as you begain the golden age process. No matter what line of work you’re involved in today, the day will come when you will face age discrimination…so learn from this lawsuit!!!
Thanks
3 months later, I’m not sure anyone will be seeing this anymore, but, I read all of the comments and must say that I haven’t seen such a combination of mature insights, humor and catfighting since the days of the old Beyond Our Control message board back in the early 00′s. Warmed my heart, it did.
I read New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The New York Times… Reading these comments was more thought-provoking, funny, informative and enlightening then a month’s worth of those magazines and newspapers.
It’s January 6th, 2011. The last message from the lawyers is that the W2 forms for the settlement will be mailed January 10th, with checks mailed mid January. If there are no further complications…
As a screenwriter who has actually had some TV scripts put into production and aired on cable, I filled out the forms reluctantly, at first. But, I fit the demographic. I’m over 50, I’m also African American. When you talk about walking into an agent’s office and getting a cold response because you are “older” — try being “older” and “Black.” To the white guy who says he can’t get a job because he is not a minority — have you ever seen the writing staff for Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show walk on stage to pick up their Emmy Award? All white. All male (though I think last year they added one female). And in Jon Stewart’s words, not mine, “I met them all at a bar mitzvah.” That’s code language for I want to work with people like me, not you. And if the most liberal news show in the country has that attitude, how the hell do you think I will ever get another writing job — and I have gray hsir!
As a direct response copywriter with 30 years experience, I know that when you do a direct mailing you are lucky if you get a response of 3%. The settlement mailing sent to writers, required people to fill out a complicated form and mail in some official papers. They way I figured it, who the hell is going to go through this much trouble? I asked several friends who are writers if they got the mailing, they said they did. But none were willing to go through the motions and reply.
My direct marketing brain took over and I thought to myself, if the lawyers get 1% to reply I would be surprised. So I filled out the papers, sent in the back-up information they wanted, and now I wait. After several delays, I still wait.
Not sure when I will ever get a check. But considering the recession, and that my unemployment checks ran out long ago, and that I haven’t been able to sell another script to the snotty twentysomethings and thirtysomethings who wouldn’t now a good screenplay if it sat on their face and moaned, I’m hoping there will be a payoff for my efforts that will help me bridge the gap between now and social security.
I will let you know if the check comes mid-January. I may not tell you how much it is, if it comes. But I will go to the nearest bar and buy a stranger a free drink. I will toast AARP, the lawyers, senior citizens. I will plot ways to spend the money. I will give the finger to the next self-important, self-entitled young asswipe who thanks he (she) knows how to write a screenplay better than me. They don’t.
I’m keeping my fingers crossed…
Last spring I rec’d the letter about the settlement and decided to apply. I’m a deaf guy in upstate NY who at one time was a TV writer wannabe. My application came to more than 100 pages. I had done many of the things they were looking for (taken a class, entered contests, sought representation) and I had had some of the bad things happen to me that they were looking for (bankruptcy, foreclosure).
When they announced their formula for the points system, I went over my application and calculated that I would be getting 620 points.
Imagine my surprise when I finally get the awards letter yesterday and the award was only a few hundred dollars and they said it was because I had earned ZERO points.
WTF?
There is something rotten in Denmark. I emailed the lawyer and am awaiting a response, but expect I will be told to follow the instructions to contest the award.
Maybe they will blame a clerical or computer error.
But here’s the thing. I will have gone from being one of about 4,300 people sharing in $43 million (about $10,000 each) to one of who-knows-how-many people sharing in $175,000, the maximum amount budgeted for appeals.
This really sucks. I had made my peace with the whole Hollywood thing and then these people come along and got my hopes up and then they say I earned ZERO points after I submit 100 pages of proof.
WTF?
I also received the ridiculous $250 from these shark lawyers. There is no question they merely used the “aspiring” writers to up the ante so the lawyers could get what is it 30 million? They completely shafted and misrepresented the aspiring writers. I filled out things like proof of website, medical forms and other forms of proof from studios and I get $250. Can we sue these lawyers for misrepresentation?
I could not agree more with your comments or those of screenwriter. The original questionnaire asked for things like medical, any websites founded and used to inform those against the studios and others possibly intended to make aspiring writers believe they would receive more. I think there is a case for misrepresentation. How about class action suing this law firm. These lawyers have shown the studios how to really screw aspiring writers. I suggest we all get together and sue. They can keep their measly 250. Let’s do it. bestdomain4u@hotmail.com
Clearly, the aspiring writer plaintiffs never had a chance of any significant payouts. We are now being told by claims administrator Garden City Group that “Under the approved claim distribution formula, aspiring writers (writers who have never been paid to write for TV) can receive points only if they had talent agency representation.” This information was never on the original Television Writers Settlement Fund Claim Form. If agency representation was a prerequisite and zero points would be added to the eventual award unless this requirement was met, what was the purpose in mandating a stack of support documents? I sent script samples, WGA registration forms, proof and cost of classes taken, classes taught as an instructor, rejection letters, contests entered, and filled out an ambiguous, often contradictory 28 page claim form. Any TV writing aspirant ever tried submitting a script without an agent? Good luck. I have absolutely no problem with the professionals getting a larger settlement in this case. But with an average $10K payout for each of the 2200 professionals and 2100 aspirant claimants, a $250 award to an aspirant is an insult. The defendants in this case must laughing their butts off at how cheap the aspirant claimants were bought off. They can keep their check. We’ve been had, folks. Again.
after being unemployed since 2008 because of all the republican war-pigs, i am most grateful to get a check for almost $ 400.00 that will buy me a month of rent somewhere, sure beats sleeping in my car like i have been for three years
looking very forward to 2012 and the end of the world
there won’t be any kind of monetary system in the afterlife truly that is heaven / nirvana / valhalla
——Todd
Ohio Univ college of Film
I got my award notification too late to appeal. Repeated calls were ignored. $250 is a slap in the face. The lawyers received a huge cut, maybe there was nothing left for the writers.