
EXCLUSIVE: Judging by the J.D. Salinger obituaries and tributes, there is just as much interest in the Catcher in the Rye author after his death as there was during his life when he shunned the spotlight for reclusion in Cornish, New Hampshire. Now I can report that Shane Salerno, a 37-year-old screenwriter who’s currently writing Fantastic Voyage for Fox and James Cameron, has directed and produced Salinger, a 2-hour documentary locked late last year after 5 years in the making.
Salerno financed the film out of his pocket, interviewed 150 sources, and accumulated so much information that he collaborated on a 700-page companion book with bestselling author David Shields.
The 150 sources interviewed in the film either worked with Salinger at The New Yorker or had contact with him otherwise, or were greatly influenced by him. The famous names include Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton, John Cusack, Danny DeVito, John Guare, Martin Sheen, David Milch, Robert Towne, Tom Wolfe, E.L. Doctorow, A. Scott Berg, Elizabeth Frank, Gore Vidal, and many other fans, journalists, filmmakers, playwrights, and artists inspired by Salinger’s work.
The film — kept under the radar until now — wasn’t done in time for consideration at this year’s Sundance Film Festival. As a result, the filmmaker hoped to present it at a spring film festival, like Cannes. It will be shopped shortly.
I first learned about the project last year from some sources who’d been interviewed for it. After I approached Salerno for an interview, I saw a nearly completed cut of the documentary on December 9, 2009, in Technicolor’s post-production screening room in Hollywood. I was shown it on condition I waited to write until the film was ready to be unveiled, and that I not divulge all the reveals. Yesterday, after Salinger died, I contacted Salerno and told him I was going to write about the documentary now. He expressed concern that it would seem opportunistic. But by day’s end it was clear to both of us that the secret would not keep.
I found the film, which doesn’t have narration, to be exhaustively researched and arrestingly powerful. Most importantly, it answers a lot of questions I and everyone have had about the author. There is previously unseen footage and photos, and a rich depiction of that unfathomable period in Salinger’s career when The New Yorker magazine was able to publish a new “J.D. Salinger” story fairly regularly.
There also are details of: his WWII soldiering in Normandy and interrogation of Nazi prisoners; his love affair with Eugene O’Neill’s daughter Oona, and the crushing disappointment of losing her to Charlie Chaplin while Salinger fought in Europe; Salinger’s habit of locking himself away in his New Hampshire cinderblock bunker for weeks at a time to write; his penchant for taking a week to craft a single sentence; the damage his silences caused his family; the futile efforts of friends to re-introduce him to the world; Salinger’s protectiveness towards his work; his refusal to sell anything to Hollywood, turning down 8-figure offers and first-class filmmakers like Billy Wilder and Steven Spielberg; his determination to maintain total control over his prose (so that when a New Yorker editor once added a comma, Salinger never spoke to him again).
Even more intriguing, Salerno’s documentary also reports on what J.D. Salinger literary works might be in the famed secret vault, where 45 years of unpublished writings are rumored to be kept.
Salerno told me the project began when he purchased the rights to Paul Alexander’s book Salinger: A Biography and tried to turn it into a feature. He realized during interviews with Salinger’s peers that these 80+-year-old men wouldn’t be around much longer. That’s when he switched focus to the documentary, which was still based on Alexander’s book. Salerno succeeded in getting to many sources just before they died, though sadly didn’t get there in time for others.
A feature would have been a challenge anyway, since Salinger was so litigious and protective of his privacy. (He sued successfully to stop a book that contained his unpublished letters, and halted a Catcher in the Rye sequel novel by another author.) Salinger never sued over Alexander’s book, however.
But other attempts to put Salinger on the big screen have been unsuccessful. W.P Kinsella’s book Shoeless Joe incorporated Salinger as a kidnapped character. When it was adapted for the screen into Field of Dreams in 1989, Salinger was turned into a fictionalized reclusive author “Terry Mann” played by James Earl Jones. In another project, Sean Connery acknowledged that the inspiration for his role in 2000′s Finding Forrester was Salinger, yet that character was fictionalized as “William Forrester”.
Salerno went into the documentary expecting it to be a 6-month project. But it grew into a five-year obsession. During that time, the screenwriter made several 7-figure deals for such projects as the Fox sci-fi fantasy Doomsday Protocol, and the Paramount/Skydance action-comedy License to Steal. So Salerno plowed several million dollars of that money into the documentary, working nights and weekends, and hiring the likes of Buddy Squires, the cinematographer for every Ken Burns documentary.
Why spend all that time and money to reveal information on an author who hated fame? Salerno makes clear his own personal obsession with Salinger, and told me he felt more connected to the writer than any other author’s work. Like Catcher in the Rye’s Holden Caulfield, Salerno said he was booted from two schools while trying to find his way. But his connection with Salinger was deeper than that. “I loved his work, and how he had the world at his doorstep, and said no thanks,” Salerno told me. “He somehow understood in 1951 the corrosive effect that fame and money could have on his writing. He was singular, and in this Internet age where people pursue their 15 minutes of fame, nobody did what Salinger did: living in the woods in New Hampshire, writing to please only himself. The biggest challenge was, how far do you pull back the curtain on a mythic figure while preserving his legacy? We answered some questions, but other Salinger mysteries will remain unsolved.”
The obvious question is: did Salerno get Salinger on camera? He would not tell me. But I’ve learned there’s a 5-minute section of the film that was held out of early screenings for security reasons.


Can’t wait to see this! I hope that elusive 5 minutes is Salinger footage.
Geez, the guy isn’t even cold yet and already the docu’s are coming out. They couldn’t profit from him when he was alive so they waited till he was dead. Pretty damn sad.
“He expressed concern that it would seem opportunistic. But by day’s end it was clear to both of us that the secret would not keep.” Salerno not making money yet, the story about the documentary was bound to leak and, whether Salinger would approve or not, I think a well done documentary would do him honor.
Can’t wait to see the documentary and read the book. The Catcher in the Rye and Nine Stories (particularly The Laughing Man) among my favorite. I’ve always imagined Nine Stories would make a great movie. I could never get my arms around how The Catcher in the Rye could be pulled off.
RIP JD Salinger.
Dear Holden My Own,
If you think someone putting together a documentary is their attempt to cash in on that doc’s subject matter, you clearly don’t know much about the profitability of the genre.
Unlike features, documentaries are most often labors of love that are born out of a need and desire to document someone or something worthy of the format. Budgets are minuscule, shooting schedules are tight, as well as irregular, and the chances of getting distribution are slim at best. The fact that the genre has proven capable of achieving commercial success via the efforts of documentary directors like Michael Moore doesn’t change that basic fact.
So, with all due respect, I think your thought that Mr. Salerno was somehow cannibalizing Mr. Salinger posthumously is without any basis in reality.
Had J.D. Salinger married Eugene O’Neill’s daughter, their children could have written some of the darkest, most compelling books and plays of all time…if only.
oh, man that kicker — what’s in those five minutes!!? meantime, this is a great way to get psyched for the flick:
http://www.amazon.com/You-Really-Want-Hear-About/dp/1560258802
Nikki:
Thanks for giving this fascinating scoop the inches it deserves. Salinger looms large over all our lives. The real mystery is: will his children, estate, agents, pubs, etc., have the power to haul out, edit and publish the words Salinger wrote since 1965? Or did it all go up in smoke with his corpus? According to his girlfriend Joyce Maynard who spent a year with him in Cornish NH, Salinger wrote daily and obsessively in the ’70s, locking each and every page into an old-fashioned fire-proof safe in his concrete bunker, showing them to no one.
Can’t wait for a taste of that.
What’s hiding in Salinger’s vault? Perhaps this could be the author’s final say and Geraldo Rivera moment.
It is not Nikki it is Mike Fleming, the new guy!
Wow!
Just finished Catcher on audio (I’ve read it three times) and it’s just as compelling, confusing and wonder as the first time. Can’t wait to see this!
Bravo Shane!!!!!!
Phonies…
I love that JD did this, just withheld everything until his death and now we’re all waiting with spittle on our chins to see what he left us…a master storyteller indeed
I can’t wait to see that documentary! Hats off to Mr. Salerno for putting his own money on the line to record this piece of literacy history!
AMEN to this comment!
God…
I hate to say it… but this is just what Salinger tried to prevent throughout his storied cxareer of self-imposed ‘hermitage.’
Inevitably, people are interviewed who had absolutely nothing to do with this man but who might have read his articles and books and these ‘quasi or real celebrities’ are asked to comment by a film maker or author and an entirely ‘new perception’ of the subject is created, which is skewed, if only by the normal course of writing. An enduring representation is generated… that people unfamiliar with the man or how this man related to the times in which he lived, will now be taken as the reality… And there you have it.
Salinger is rolling and he isn’t even cold…
Nothing like seeing a film before forming strong opinions about it, huh? @@
Now this is one film that I must see!
You’re the man now, dogg!!!
Apologies to Mike!
Great story – well done.
Cheers,
Ash Perry
idiots – this was not Nikki, but Mike Flemming who is responsible for this article. give him props and props to Nikki for stealing him away from Variety
What whining. Who ever said documentaries ever tell the truth? You can have two people talking to each other and not know the truth behind what they’re doing. Grave robbing? Because it’s on film instead of paper?
What about the movie “The Stone Reader,” done by a fan of an obscure author. Was that an invasion of privacy or a labor of love?
This sounds like a labor of love. And all of you know you’ll see it. Even if you try to cleanse your consciences by pirating it instead of paying.
Well,I guess we all just don’t know. He was called a hermit and a recluse maybe just because he hated the limelight and did what he could to prevent it and tried to live like 98% of the country does. So, the autopsy and dissection begins.
That Shane photo is at least 20 years old.
This.
Great job of reporting, Mike. Thanks for sharing. Sounds fascinating – can’t wait to see it. And to those of you who don’t like it – do you honestly think you’d never see a documentary on Salinger created by anyboday?! Were you hoping perhaps for a shabbily done relying on information already out there, much of it probably incorrect?! Get over yourselves! With the cast of characters the filmmaker has been able to interview, this will be informative, not exploitive.
THIS IS IT starring J.D. Salinger.
The critics of this documentary, based on its premise and the very fact that it exists, are wrong. Anyone is capable of weighing in their opinions about an artist and his work, the artist in this case the very private Salinger. Just because he wanted his “life” to be private, his work was not private. I’ll bet his cashed his royalty checks for his books that were sold in the bright light of public bookstores. And his life is now, sadly, over. It is completely appropriate for anyone who wants to express their opinions about this artist and his work – this documentary will be only a collection of opinions and perspectives – as are all documentaries. No one can claim to truly know the man or be the definitive word on the artist, but expressing one’s opinions on camera regarding an important artist can hardly be considered invasive. As much as he might have hated the thought of it, certain aspects of JD Salinger did belong to the public at large, and he made that bargain when he offered his work for public sale.
KUDOS to Shane Salerno. Salinger was a bitter old man. Read the book edited by Catherine Crawford. It contains articles about JDS and his work.
This probably happens with a lot of celebs who live outside of Hollywood and who aren’t often in the public eye. Or possibly it’s just authors?
Residents of Cornish have stated (and have done so over the years) that they take great delight in misdirecting anyone who comes to their town looking for Mr. Salinger – to the point where anyone following their directions ended up several towns away, totally lost in the back woods. I understand that Stephen King supporters (where he lives) are the same way.
I don’t think Salinger would have liked ANY of Shane Salerno’s films….including this one.
I’m glad it’s made by someone who loves his work, at least it might be kinder then all the drivel that has, is, and will be written about him.