EXCLUSIVE: Judging by the J.D. Salinger obituaries and tributes, there is just as much interest in the Catcher in the Rye author after his death as there was during his life when he shunned the spotlight for reclusion in Cornish, New Hampshire. Now I can report that Shane Salerno, a 37-year-old screenwriter who’s currently writing Fantastic Voyage for Fox and James Cameron, has directed and produced Salinger, a 2-hour documentary locked late last year after 5 years in the making.
Salerno financed the film out of his pocket, interviewed 150 sources, and accumulated so much information that he collaborated on a 700-page companion book with bestselling author David Shields.
The 150 sources interviewed in the film either worked with Salinger at The New Yorker or had contact with him otherwise, or were greatly influenced by him. The famous names include Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton, John Cusack, Danny DeVito, John Guare, Martin Sheen, David Milch, Robert Towne, Tom Wolfe, E.L. Doctorow, A. Scott Berg, Elizabeth Frank, Gore Vidal, and many other fans, journalists, filmmakers, playwrights, and artists inspired by Salinger's work.
The film -- kept under the radar until now -- wasn’t done in time for consideration at this year's Sundance Film Festival. As a result, the filmmaker hoped to present it at a spring film festival, like Cannes. It will be shopped shortly by WME Entertainment and Robert Offer for distribution and remake. The book, also complete, will be shopped by IPG’s Brian Lipson and literary agent Richard Pine.
I first learned about the project last year from some sources who'd been interviewed for it. After I approached Salerno for an interview, I saw a nearly completed cut of the documentary on December 9, 2009, in Technicolor's post-production screening room in Hollywood. I was shown it on condition I waited to write until the film was ready to be unveiled, and that I not divulge all the reveals. Yesterday, after Salinger died, I contacted Salerno and told him I was going to write about the documentary now. He expressed concern that it would seem opportunistic. But by day's end it was clear to both of us that the secret would not keep.
I found the film, which doesn't have narration, to be exhaustively researched and arrestingly powerful. Most importantly, it answers a lot of questions I and everyone have had about the author. There is previously unseen footage and photos, and a rich depiction of that unfathomable period in Salinger's career when The New Yorker magazine was able to publish a new "J.D. Salinger" story fairly regularly.
There also are details of: his WWII soldiering in Normandy and interrogation of Nazi prisoners; his love affair with Eugene O’Neill’s daughter Oona, and the crushing disappointment of losing her to Charlie Chaplin while Salinger fought in Europe; Salinger's habit of locking himself away in his New Hampshire cinderblock bunker for weeks at a time to write; his penchant for taking a week to craft a single sentence; the damage his silences caused his family; the futile efforts of friends to re-introduce him to the world; Salinger's protectiveness towards his work; his refusal to sell anything to Hollywood, turning down 8-figure offers and first-class filmmakers like Billy Wilder and Steven Spielberg; his determination to maintain total control over his prose (so that when a New Yorker editor once added a comma, Salinger never spoke to him again).
Even more intriguing, Salerno's documentary also reports on what J.D. Salinger literary works might be in the famed secret vault, where 45 years of unpublished writings are rumored to be kept.
Salerno told me the project began when he purchased the rights to Paul Alexander's book Salinger: A Biography and tried to turn it into a feature. He realized during interviews with Salinger’s peers that these 80+-year-old men wouldn’t be around much longer. That's when he switched focus to the documentary, which was still based on Alexander's book. Salerno succeeded in getting to many sources just before they died, though sadly didn't get there in time for others.
A feature would have been a challenge anyway, since Salinger was so litigious and protective of his privacy. (He sued successfully to stop a book that contained his unpublished letters, and halted a Catcher in the Rye sequel novel by another author.) Salinger never sued over Alexander’s book, however.
But other attempts to put Salinger on the big screen have been unsuccessful. W.P Kinsella’s book Shoeless Joe incorporated Salinger as a kidnapped character. When it was adapted for the screen into Field of Dreams in 1989, Salinger was turned into a fictionalized reclusive author "Terry Mann" played by James Earl Jones. In another project, Sean Connery acknowledged that the inspiration for his role in 2000's Finding Forrester was Salinger, yet that character was fictionalized as "William Forrester".
Salerno went into the documentary expecting it to be a 6-month project. But it grew into a five-year obsession. During that time, the screenwriter made several 7-figure deals for such projects as the Fox sci-fi fantasy Doomsday Protocol, and the Paramount/Skydance action-comedy License to Steal. So Salerno plowed several million dollars of that money into the documentary, working nights and weekends, and hiring the likes of Buddy Squires, the cinematographer for every Ken Burns documentary.
Why spend all that time and money to reveal information on an author who hated fame? Salerno makes clear his own personal obsession with Salinger, and told me he felt more connected to the writer than any other author's work. Like Catcher in the Rye’s Holden Caulfield, Salerno said he was booted from two schools while trying to find his way. But his connection with Salinger was deeper than that. “I loved his work, and how he had the world at his doorstep, and said no thanks,” Salerno told me. “He somehow understood in 1951 the corrosive effect that fame and money could have on his writing. He was singular, and in this Internet age where people pursue their 15 minutes of fame, nobody did what Salinger did: living in the woods in New Hampshire, writing to please only himself. The biggest challenge was, how far do you pull back the curtain on a mythic figure while preserving his legacy? We answered some questions, but other Salinger mysteries will remain unsolved.”
The obvious question is: did Salerno get Salinger on camera? He would not tell me. But I've learned there's a 5-minute section of the film that was held out of early screenings for security reasons.
Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
Can’t wait to see this! I hope that elusive 5 minutes is Salinger footage.
Geez, the guy isn’t even cold yet and already the docu’s are coming out. They couldn’t profit from him when he was alive so they waited till he was dead. Pretty damn sad.
“He expressed concern that it would seem opportunistic. But by day’s end it was clear to both of us that the secret would not keep.” Salerno not making money yet, the story about the documentary was bound to leak and, whether Salinger would approve or not, I think a well done documentary would do him honor.
Can’t wait to see the documentary and read the book. The Catcher in the Rye and Nine Stories (particularly The Laughing Man) among my favorite. I’ve always imagined Nine Stories would make a great movie. I could never get my arms around how The Catcher in the Rye could be pulled off.
RIP JD Salinger.
Dear Holden My Own,
If you think someone putting together a documentary is their attempt to cash in on that doc’s subject matter, you clearly don’t know much about the profitability of the genre.
Unlike features, documentaries are most often labors of love that are born out of a need and desire to document someone or something worthy of the format. Budgets are minuscule, shooting schedules are tight, as well as irregular, and the chances of getting distribution are slim at best. The fact that the genre has proven capable of achieving commercial success via the efforts of documentary directors like Michael Moore doesn’t change that basic fact.
So, with all due respect, I think your thought that Mr. Salerno was somehow cannibalizing Mr. Salinger posthumously is without any basis in reality.
Had J.D. Salinger married Eugene O’Neill’s daughter, their children could have written some of the darkest, most compelling books and plays of all time…if only.
oh, man that kicker — what’s in those five minutes!!? meantime, this is a great way to get psyched for the flick:
http://www.amazon.com/You-Really-Want-Hear-About/dp/1560258802
Nikki:
Thanks for giving this fascinating scoop the inches it deserves. Salinger looms large over all our lives. The real mystery is: will his children, estate, agents, pubs, etc., have the power to haul out, edit and publish the words Salinger wrote since 1965? Or did it all go up in smoke with his corpus? According to his girlfriend Joyce Maynard who spent a year with him in Cornish NH, Salinger wrote daily and obsessively in the ’70s, locking each and every page into an old-fashioned fire-proof safe in his concrete bunker, showing them to no one.
Can’t wait for a taste of that.
What’s hiding in Salinger’s vault? Perhaps this could be the author’s final say and Geraldo Rivera moment.
It is not Nikki it is Mike Fleming, the new guy!
Yes. The best way to honor and respect a man who inspired you is to completely invade his privacy by asking questions about him to anyone and everyone you can. Unless those five minutes are Salinger saying, “I’m totes psyched for this little docudoc,” you, Shane, are a complete piece of garbage.
Einstein, you are not living up to your name.
A person who truely does not want anyone reading his writing does not lock them up in a fireproff safe and make sure others know about it. They read them to pieces and then burn them, and tell no one… or at least leave instructions for their destruction. He knew EXACTLY what would happen upon his death.
This film is a testament to his life and genius, and if you think something is wrong with that, don’t go see it. No one went through the man’s garbage to get their info. They spoke to people who knew and loved him, so they could learn more about a man whose writing they loved themselves.
Wow!
Just finished Catcher on audio (I’ve read it three times) and it’s just as compelling, confusing and wonder as the first time. Can’t wait to see this!
Bravo Shane!!!!!!
Phonies…
I love that JD did this, just withheld everything until his death and now we’re all waiting with spittle on our chins to see what he left us…a master storyteller indeed
I can’t wait to see that documentary! Hats off to Mr. Salerno for putting his own money on the line to record this piece of literacy history!
AMEN to this comment!
God…
I hate to say it… but this is just what Salinger tried to prevent throughout his storied cxareer of self-imposed ‘hermitage.’
Inevitably, people are interviewed who had absolutely nothing to do with this man but who might have read his articles and books and these ‘quasi or real celebrities’ are asked to comment by a film maker or author and an entirely ‘new perception’ of the subject is created, which is skewed, if only by the normal course of writing. An enduring representation is generated… that people unfamiliar with the man or how this man related to the times in which he lived, will now be taken as the reality… And there you have it.
Salinger is rolling and he isn’t even cold…
Nothing like seeing a film before forming strong opinions about it, huh? @@
Now this is one film that I must see!
You’re the man now, dogg!!!
Apologies to Mike!
Great story – well done.
Cheers,
Ash Perry
idiots – this was not Nikki, but Mike Flemming who is responsible for this article. give him props and props to Nikki for stealing him away from Variety
What whining. Who ever said documentaries ever tell the truth? You can have two people talking to each other and not know the truth behind what they’re doing. Grave robbing? Because it’s on film instead of paper?
What about the movie “The Stone Reader,” done by a fan of an obscure author. Was that an invasion of privacy or a labor of love?
This sounds like a labor of love. And all of you know you’ll see it. Even if you try to cleanse your consciences by pirating it instead of paying.
Well,I guess we all just don’t know. He was called a hermit and a recluse maybe just because he hated the limelight and did what he could to prevent it and tried to live like 98% of the country does. So, the autopsy and dissection begins.
That Shane photo is at least 20 years old.
This.
Great job of reporting, Mike. Thanks for sharing. Sounds fascinating – can’t wait to see it. And to those of you who don’t like it – do you honestly think you’d never see a documentary on Salinger created by anyboday?! Were you hoping perhaps for a shabbily done relying on information already out there, much of it probably incorrect?! Get over yourselves! With the cast of characters the filmmaker has been able to interview, this will be informative, not exploitive.
THIS IS IT starring J.D. Salinger.
The critics of this documentary, based on its premise and the very fact that it exists, are wrong. Anyone is capable of weighing in their opinions about an artist and his work, the artist in this case the very private Salinger. Just because he wanted his “life” to be private, his work was not private. I’ll bet his cashed his royalty checks for his books that were sold in the bright light of public bookstores. And his life is now, sadly, over. It is completely appropriate for anyone who wants to express their opinions about this artist and his work – this documentary will be only a collection of opinions and perspectives – as are all documentaries. No one can claim to truly know the man or be the definitive word on the artist, but expressing one’s opinions on camera regarding an important artist can hardly be considered invasive. As much as he might have hated the thought of it, certain aspects of JD Salinger did belong to the public at large, and he made that bargain when he offered his work for public sale.
KUDOS to Shane Salerno. Salinger was a bitter old man. Read the book edited by Catherine Crawford. It contains articles about JDS and his work.
This probably happens with a lot of celebs who live outside of Hollywood and who aren’t often in the public eye. Or possibly it’s just authors?
Residents of Cornish have stated (and have done so over the years) that they take great delight in misdirecting anyone who comes to their town looking for Mr. Salinger – to the point where anyone following their directions ended up several towns away, totally lost in the back woods. I understand that Stephen King supporters (where he lives) are the same way.
Let JD Salinger himself respond as his character does: ”’Our gusto for the lurid or the partly lurid (which, of course, includes both low and superior gossip) is probably the last of our fleshy appetites to be sated or effectively curbed.” And, “a good many people . . . respond with a special impetus, a zing, even, in some cases, to artists and poets who as well as having a reputation for producing great or fine art have something garishly Wrong with them as persons: a spectacular flaw. . . . God have mercy on the lonely bastards.”
We are now the lonely bastards missing a conceptually great writer of meaningful literature in our current time — even attempting to write life-changing literature is almost laughable now that we live in the post Sven Birkerts ‘An Artificial Wilderness’ era turned into a multimedia mosh pit of half sentences and un-agreed-upon argot caught in a tug of war between the generations of text and the texting generation. And all these readers now de facto writers for free (i.e.; texting, tweeting) while being charged for sharing some marketer’s idea of inner life as revealed by microblog.
Which is why we’ll miss Salinger’s take on the sophisticated suite of Tweeter-y social media product placements of the mind and how they are reshaping our lives, families and communication — not to mention the definition of Reader and Writer. He had the ability to see more, glass, gloss…
I don’t think Salinger would have liked ANY of Shane Salerno’s films….including this one.
I’m glad it’s made by someone who loves his work, at least it might be kinder then all the drivel that has, is, and will be written about him.
People are dummies if they think the creator of this doc is being a mere “opportunist” after he took 5 years and his own money to make it. Alright, already – Salinger GOT the sweet seclusion he so desperately sought. It’s been more than long enough – any longer and most of the witnesses to who the heck he was couldn’t even be interviewed because they’d all be dead. He made the public wait until he was 91 years old, for cripes sake!
Can’t wait to read all the stuff that he wrote since the 60’s, if there is indeed a lot of material that will be published after his death. I’m guessing its all really weird, Kurt Vonnegut-esque stuff like Slaughterhouse Five or something.
WOW. Salinger is still warm and the vultures are already picking at his caracass. I wish this man nothing but complete failure.
Yes. He ran out and made a documentary in 48 hours, just to cash in on the man’s death.
Why are people so fast to comment on that which they know nothing about?
I hope the film does well, and can’t wait to see it.
The real mystery is: will his children, estate agents… continue to keep ALL his work private and Unpublished as he would have wished? Or perhaps even destroy it? (does anyone really think Salinger wanted his work of the last several decades published?)
Or – will his children & estate agents suddenly, instead, make a mad dash to cash in Big Time? Selling all his work for filming? Publishing every last manuscript & writings by the man? (think of record companies releasing old studio work- not finished- of deceased rock stars in recent years to make a buck).
Many questions, for sure. And I think Salinger will wind up going 10,000 RPM in his grave.
A writer who’s written total garbage films makes a documentary on a hero of his, Salinger, by getting famous people that had no contact at all with Salinger. Looks like Salerno has learned nothing from his hero and is just following his Jackal like instincts for opportunism and fame.
The question s not if Salerno got the man on film but why, if he did? I guarantee you the footage if he has it is Salinger going about his normal day while being filmed from a car, secretly, from the paparazzi mentality of Salerno. Do you actually think the footage is of Salinger greeting our opportunistic filmmaker with open hands? Nothing to see here. Move on.
Why do you not reserve your trash talk about Salerno until you have actually seen the documentary? Seems only fair to me!
Isn’t all this attention exactly what he wouldn’t want?
I think it’ll be great. All obsessions are. It’ll be dense, rich, nuanced. And I don’t think Salinger would mind a bit. After all … he’s no longer Salinger. He’s just a bit of energy on a plane.
I think this doc is a timely farewell to a great artistic presence. These things are almost scripted. This *is*, “This is it,” or Johnny Cash’s “Hurt.” It’s almost like some of the greats attract that final whiz-bang fireworks bonanza, like clock-work, to hail their exit from the plane.
Salinger’s path was very symmetrical, in my view. He published the works that informed us of his existence. Then he labored in self-induced obscurity until the day he died. He knew the secret … that fame is like acid on genius. The earlier masters didn’t have to worry about fame’s corrosive effects. The snail-paced spread of renown allowed many artists to experience fame only after they were safely tucked away into the grave.
Hopefully, Salinger’s wishes will be respected … and the work the public inherits will be published *exactly* as he left it, down to the comma. And if he didn’t want any more of his work published, for whatever reason, we can believe that it won’t be found.
But I think he left a treasure trove of material to carve out his legacy, more fully. After all, that’s the only physical remnant that survives him, here. But we shall see if, in the end, one masterpiece shall suffice.
When I was a feature writer at the late Washington (DC) Star, I tracked him down in Cornish NH in the late 1970. I encounted him as he drove up the driveway to his home, and we exchanged a few words. The “interview” lasted about 10 seconds, the result of which was the longest story I ever wrote for The Star during my nearly 20 years there — 1962-1980.
John Jack) Sherwood
Severna Park MD
Grand. Just grand.
i saw this film. i know shane. i expected it to be great. and honestly — it is… what i didn’t expect was to be profoundly moved. and i was. i think other people, particularly artists of all stripes, will feel the same…
While the vast majority of the comments are positive, I don’t understand how some people are misreading this fascinating article that Michael Fleming wrote.
1.The guy began the project 5 years ago so forget the whole cashing in vulture stuff. That’s absurd! Fleming himself said the picture was locked in December and he said it was good… and I quote, “arrestingly powerful and exhaustively researched.”
2. Salinger’s wife and colleagues have spoken on the record 24 hours after his death. Are you going to call them opportunists? I mean my God, Lillian Ross, published excerpts from her letters with Salinger and private photos of him from her home. Is she a vulture?
3. The guy spent his own money. Enough said!
The real question I want to know is how the hell did he keep it a secret for 5 years. I bet that’s one helluva story.
I am SURE this “secret five minutes” will whet the appetites of all of you out there with a gusto for the lurid.
Doubt this documentary will be seen by many anyway, and will be forgotten about soon enough. Unlike Salinger, seen by few but remembered forever as the Great One.