UPDATES Agreement Reached: No Fox Blackout On Time Warner Cable
Jeez, my cable bill is more and more resembling the national debt. So anything that anyone can do to hold down what we have to pay has to be commended. But despite the war of words, commercials, and print ad campaigns waged for the past couple of weeks, Time Warner Cable and News Corp in the end reached an agreement That's good for them, not us. The settlement covered the Fox network and many Fox cable networks (including F/X and the Fox Regional sports networks) without a programming blackout.
The question now is who won? Though the terms are hush-hush, Pali Research analyst Rich Greenfield knows neither company got what they wanted. But I know that subscribers lost because programming is now more expensive than ever and the cable/satellite companies will pass the increased costs onto the consumer like they always do. And creatives lost because there's no fucking way that a cheap company like Fox is going to share this windfall with Hollywood talent. On the other hand, Disney can look forward to a raise when its retransmission fee negotiations come due at the end of 2010:
Fox was looking for a $1/sub/month and TWC was looking to pay dramatically less. While much will be written on this topic over the coming weeks, with both sides tied to confidentiality agreements and a vast number of moving pieces beyond simply what the broadcast network is getting paid per sub per month (lots of networks, VOD rights and iVOD rights), we suspect both sides compromised.
Our best guess is that Fox was willing to reduce its demands for cable network distribution and sub fee growth at F/X and the RSNs, in return for cash retrans for the FOX network that likely averages out to north of $0.50/sub/month over a 4-6 year term (with fees below $0.50 in 2010). In the end, we doubt NWSA was able to reach its $1.00/sub/month goal without going dark (and pulling its signals from TWC), however, the final year of its deal with TWC may approach $0.75/sub/month.
-- Programming costs will continue to be biased upwards for cable operators such as TWC (high-single digits) thru a combination of cable network renewals and first time broadcast retrans fees.
-- The onset of cash retrans fees will help broadcasts such as FOX, however, the underlying business model remains challenged.
“And creatives lost because there’s no fucking way that a cheap company like Fox is going to share this windfall with Hollywood talent.”
There you have it folks. Actors, have not been responding to these two stories (Cablevision/Scripps, Fox/Time-Warner) and that’s understandable, but the point I’ve been making is it’s the same battle, simply further up the food chain. You see the results: hardball, for as long as it takes to settle.
SAG? Softball, for as long as it takes David White, Ken Howard, Amy Aquino, Richard Masur, James Cromwell, Mike Farrel, Ned Vaughn, Adam Arkin, Amy Brenemann, etc., to insert their heads in the AMPTP’s nether regions.
Harsh, but true, unfortunately for “Hollywood talent.” These battles clearly demonstrate the balls-out push for content providers to get their fees up, in what is increasingly looking like a subscription business model. Did, and is, SAG looking to get its fees up? Nope. 2009? The year SAG settled for the worst contract in its history?”RECORD YEAR!” There went the whole “we can’t fight for a fair contract during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression!” argument. The old adage proved true: “tough times economically? Opportunity for entertainment industry.” And, boy, did they make the most of it, while the moderate leadership of SAG made the least of it.
This cancer must be cut out of the body politic of SAG. It is KILLING THE UNION. Go ask 50 actors how it’s going. “IT SUCKS!” will be the answer of 90% of them.
Now, Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, George Clooney, Matt Damon, Alec Baldwin and the rest of the A-list of multi-millionaires? Couldn’t care less. Then, or now. “”Out of the way of my gravy train – YEE-HA!!!!!!!!”
The other 98-99% of the union? “What happened to residuals?” “Look at this f-ing breakdown?!” “They’re offering me WHAT to do WHAT?!”
The chickens (how appropriate) are coming home to roost.
WalMart workers UNITE!!
I’m kidding.
I’m not kidding.
Well said. I never thought it thru like that. But you’re rite. Just hold-out.
Oh wah! Cable/Satellite is optional not mandatory. I dumped my satellite, went to local broadcast and never looked back. People watch/pay to much TV anyway. Let go of your square headed significant other
FOX wants to give themselves a raise off subscribers who are forced to live on a tight budget? Corporate upper echelon is overpaid, greedy, bloated and trying to squeeze more from us for themselves? A word to FOX: Back-off!
“WAKE UP BIG SHOT CORPORATIONS!”
$.50 OR $2.OO MAY BE PEANUTS TO YOU BUT EXPLAIN THAT TO PARENTS
WHO ARE UNEMPLOYED (NO JOB WAITING IN THE NEAR FUTURE THANKS TO OBAMA AND DEMOCRATS RUNNING THE CIRCUS.)
THIS IS FOOD MONEY TO PUT ON THEIR TABLE AND HOPEFULLY WILL KEEP A ROOF OVER THEIR HEADS!
“THE TIMES ARE A CHANGING!!!!
Of course Time Warner in New York just upped basic cable package prices by $2.50 yesterday. So they have to pay out $.50 more and get to pocket an additional $2. I knew all their “we’re fighting for you” was BS but I didn’t expect them to be SO blatant about it.
fuck cable. cut the cord…
Agreed, and simply put. Cable was supposed to be ad free TV…and Broadcast TV is going because of the lying b/a/s/t/a/r/d/s that run these cable companies.
I am dropping cable as soon as I can get out of the contract.
Buy or rent DVDs if you have to watch TV.
Read a newspaper for the news…at least in a paper you KNOW what is news, and what is opinion.
Faux news needs NO audience!
Fuck cable…and all of the companies attached!
I DID BETTER/I CANCELLED HBO, CINEMAX, ENCORE ETC.
HIT THEIR POCKETS A BIT AT A TIME!!!!!
Time Warner Cable is worse than Adelphia! First, they slit their subscribers’ throats by abandoning HDNET. Now they gouge us for some crappy Fox channels. They don’t deserve to be in the cable business. Time Warner sucks!
Nikki’s right, the losers here are the cable customers. My Time-Warner bill is already huge (multiple outlets; all the bells and whistles), for service that absolutely blows (constant pixilation and audio outages, etc). Now if they try to jack up my bill even higher to cover this FOX deal, guess what–I not only won’t pay MORE, I’ll start paying LESS….by cutting back on outlets, maybe even cutting off the service entirely. Read some fucking books.
So that’s my customer side talking. Here’s my WGA side: Shame on Patrick Verrone, John Bowman, and David Young. This is the additional revenue we were talking about during the strike, the additional revenue we will never see. Morons.
…so essentially fox threw fx under the bus to get a higher rate card on the network?
THAT is interesting, is it not? Is that the future of the network? Subscriber fees, not ad rev?
Maybe Apple is onto something…
-RnsW
I can’t believe Time Warner. Here’s this huge publicly-traded giant whining because their suppliers are charging more. WTF? My suppliers charge me more all the time, only in the cable industry do they have the balls to bellyache to their subscribers, as if we care about their problems. I’m getting rabbit ears, screw cable.
With almost 1 million subscribers in a Florida division, Brighthouse would be expected to pay out that much money a MONTH to Fox Networks under that $1/sub/month model. That would set a rough precedent which would be used by other negotiators when the time came.
The long-term question is not where subscription fees will go; it’s where subscribers will go. The music business knows all about what happens when you assume there is little price sensitivity for your product, and telephone companies know all about customers’ willingness to cut the cord. There are many ways to deliver content into homes, and many kinds of devices on which to watch it. There’s nothing like well-done fresh technology and interface (Apple to the rescue?) to remind consumers that the old business model consists of bad pricing, bad user interface, and bad service.
I, for one, would happily accept a reduction in my cable bill (longtime TWC subscriber, er, hostage) to not have Fox or any of its incarnations show up on my channel selection. On the rare occasion that I want to watch a football game, I’ll switch to OTA. Done and done.
I’m one of the fortunate ones who can get standard broadcast with rabbit ears. So yeah.
Thousands of people said no Fox demands. A few hundred people said yes to the demands. For years it was the majorly ruled. Now it is the minority that rules.
A few years ago there was talk of cable prices and subscriptions changing. If I remember correctly they said that there would be many more subscription programs. they made it sound like we would be able to pick and choose what programs we wanted. Nothing ever came of it. I haven’t watched the Fox channel in years. I would be perfectly happy if it wasn’t on my cable line up. I only watch about 10 channels out of 150. I don’t want to pay for those other 140 channels
It’s called Hulu, people.
I’m not the first to say it (I think Donahue did) but WTF we pay to watch a lot of commercials and TV stations we’ll never watch and they want more. It’s about time we renegotiated the cost of their cable traversing our streets, we own the streets don’t we, perhaps we should charge them rent for that or up it if they are already paying. Where is our negotiating power?
Technology is advancing that will take the cable companies stranglehold on Internet, I refer to wireless bridging in neighborhoods and a new Australian cheap alternative of beaming internet through laser from neighborhood to neighborhood.
I am no longer a TW subscriber they suck. But I do care that all these people will no longer have a channel that was free untill digital TV got started. This is just another way these freaking multi million company are greedy and don’t care about anything but the all mighty dollar.