Marc Webb, the (500) Days Of Summer director, has climbed to the top of the Sony Pictures’ list to rebirth the Spider-Man franchise. While the studio has a wish list of star directors like James Cameron, David Fincher, and Wes Anderson, the emergence of Webb as director comes as a huge surprise. But Mike Fleming‘s sources tell him Webb met about the Spidey reboot with the pic’s producers and executives looking to get the picture into production later this year for a Summer 2012 release. Why will the pic take so long? Because it’s likely to be shot in 3-D, and Sony Pictures plans to make an announcement about that “at the appropriate time”.
Though he has the perfect name for the job, Webb has no prior superhero experience. (Hey, I saw Darkman and that was more of a science experiment that a superhero.) Then again, neither did Sam Raimi. And Chris Nolan was the director of Memento when he signed on for Batman Begins. Webb is also a newbie if Sony greenlights 3-D. But among directors, almost all would be.
What has Sony execs excited is the fact that (500) Days of Summer introduced a director with a grasp of how to depict the way young people think and feel. This is critical because the Jamie Vanderbilt script covers the formative years of a high school-aged Peter Parker, and that POV is as important as the action sequences. Especially after Sony and Sam Raimi retired the original Spidey franchise because they realized the film would have been same old/same old at a huge budget. Injecting new blood with an up-and-coming director is a bold stroke. Too bad Webb’s (500) Days star Joseph Gordon-Levitt is too old to play the high school-aged wall crawler. He’d be perfect.







As talented as Webb may be and as good as 500 Days of Summer was, it is not comparable to what would be required of him in a Spiderman movie. He would need to learn how to make a big budget Hollywood movie with producers looking over his shoulder and constantly second-guessing him. He’d need to learn how to shoot action scenes and incorporate believable special effects into the film. And, if rumor is correct, he’d also need to learn 3D filmmaking techniques. That’s a whole lot to put on a guy who’d never made a feature film before 500 Days (videos and shorts don’t count here). Either this is a false lead or Sony has lost their minds.
This reminds me of another respected, critically lauded, newcomer filmmaker given his first superhero picture at an overly controlling studio. Wolverine, anyone? And how did that turn out?
Isn’t that exactly what they’re doing with Pierre Morel and the Dune remake? He knows how to shoot (crappy) action scenes, but he’s never handled a huge budget before or visual effects and they handed him the reigns to Dune. What it comes down to is vision, and Sony creating a team to help him focus that vision.
Mary Elizabeth Winstead for MJ…& the thought of it being in 3D is pretty lame on the studio’s part.
I think Whiskey’s post hit the nail on the head.
Personally I think Webb COULD be a terrific choice. Instead of some pre-established Michael Bay clone, they’d be going with someone who, for me, did an excellent job with a movie like 500 DAYS OF SUMMER, utilizing some visual flair, good use of widescreen, etc., in what could have been a conventional looking film if nothing else. How he handled the story and the characters with honesty and insight — framing it through Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s eyes — would be adaptable to a Spider-Man film. (BTW whoever said the “female lead was undercooked” in 500 DAYS OF SUMMER completely missed the point of the film).
I also liked Maguire, but didn’t think he was completely right for the part — Raimi didn’t seem to completely nail the humor of Spider-Man’s character in any of the movies. As Whiskey point out, he’s not Batman — this is a young man with responsibilities not entirely out of whack with any of his peers, but he doesn’t go around brooding and sulking about having his powers either. He DOES learn great responsibility come from his actions, but it’s not the same as Batman having a psychological complex!
Raimi also completely MISSED the Mary Jane role IMO. Kristen Dunst could have been good — but instead of a fun-loving, upbeat, spunky female character who, in the comics, is the one that breaks Peter out of his shell and makes him fall totally in love after a period of time, we got a miserable, weepy, WEAK heroine (with a bad family) that just needed rescuing over and over. Raimi got her completely, totally wrong, to the point where I think fans had more than enough of her by the third movie.
Although Erica Durance (Lois Lane on SMALLVILLE) is too old for MJ, if she had been younger, she’d be perfect. How Lois is portrayed on SMALLVILLE is how the character of MJ ought to be — and that’s something else they need to think about when making the new movie.
Casting, again, is going to be key. I don’t want to see them “rethink” Spidey, and I don’t want them doing a “Twilight” flavored adaptation — but I doubt they will. Even with its flaws SPIDEY 3 made huge amounts of money around the world — I would think they’d go after that general appeal again. Hopefully they have the right guy and the right concept…but time will tell.
For the director chair there´s an pack of filmakers with strong visual style and sense of storytelling, just to name some: Timur Bekmambetov, Zack Snyder, Robert Rodriguez, Len Wiseman, Gore Verbisnky and Brad Bird. Anyways in a perfect world i would love to see Quentin Tarantino doing any Superhero flick.Why not dream of.
Marc Webb’s music videos.
Watch before you’re too quick to judge this fella.
Well, keep in mind that Raimi was melting down during the Spider-Man 3 shoot and post production, and he put out there that he was sick of Spider-Man. The studio was interfering a lot too. They wanted Venom added to the film because they wanted a Topher spin-off.
The Spider-man movies literally kept the studio gates open, but, hey, that means more Evil Dead movies!
While Mike Webb’s high gloss style would make a film visually consistent with Raimi’s, I’d prefer a more balanced choice for Director.
-Edgar Wright is, in my opinion, the best choice to helm this film. He’s directed 2 visually stunning, heartfelt, and comedic genre films so far. SCOTT PILGRIM, his indie comic adaptation, has also received amazing buzz.
-Ruben Fleischer also has the action/comedy chops and has delivered a monster hit for Sony already.
-Paul Greengrass is also out there right now. Somebody will be smart to enough to nab the guy who reinvented the spy movie for their superhero feature. Do it now Sony, before Disney or Warner’s beat you to it.
Here’s another reason Sony may reportedly be interested in Marc Webb: he knows how to make a fast-paced, great-looking movie with many different set-ups on a low budget!
(500) DAYS cost only $7.5 million – remarkable considering the film’s great production value (including a fantasy sequence with dozens of dancers in downtown l.a.) – and it looked better than most studio-driven romantic comedies which often cost $40 million or more…
I disagree with Terry, (500) Days was an AMAZING movie. It is in the top 250 IMDB films and has a 87% tomato rating. It also managed to get an extended release when starting on a limited release (1000 theaters topped). Its per theater earnings were nearly equal to that of Spidey 3 from the 5th week on (which didn’t even bring in as much as Spiderman 1).
Money,money,money, thats why sony is doing this. Thats why there is a reboot. They dont care about a qaulity movie they care about making more money, even if that means CRAP.
Except that I thought 500 Days of Summer was a God awful, cutesy movie – why on earth this makes him a good choice for Spiderman is going to have to remain a mystery to me. If they are using the “we need the kids” logic, then why don’t they hire the Twlight writer to pen the script and hire whatever dopes directed those movies? If you’re lowering your sites just for ticket sales, why not go whole hog? Maybe they should add a brooding teenage vampire too.
Well Jon Favreau wasn’t exactly Mr. Superhero Movie when he directed IRON MAN, and that turned out pretty well. The reason it succeeded on such a level (and women went to see it) is because there was a great, charismatic character at the heart of all the action and special effects. And that’s exactly what Marc Webb will bring to the movie.