From: Westin, David L.
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:40 PM
To: #ABCTV News ALL
Cc: Sweeney, Anne X.
Subject: ABC News TransformationOver the past several years, we’ve seen a lot of changes — changes at ABC News and in the news industry overall. I’m proud of the way we’ve responded both to unexpected transitions in our programs and to the economic realities of our business. We’ve adapted quickly and effectively and – above all – put our audiences first. Our programs are stronger today than they were ten years ago. This is a credit first and foremost to the men and women at ABC News.
But all of us are good reporters. We can see that our entire society is in the middle of a revolution — a revolution in the ways that people get their news and information. The digital age makes our business more competitive than ever before. It also presents us with opportunities we couldn’t have imagined to gather, produce, and distribute the news. We can have great success in the new world – but only if we embrace what is new, rather than being overwhelmed by it.
The time has come to anticipate change, rather than respond to it. We have a rare opportunity to get in front of what’s coming, to ensure that ABC News has a sound journalistic and financial footing for many years to come, and to serve our audiences even better. But we must move boldly and promptly. In the past, we’ve sought out less expensive ways to replicate what we’ve always done. The time has come to re-think how we do what we are doing.
To that end, we anticipate that between now and the end of the year ABC News will undergo a fundamental transformation that will ultimately affect every corner of the enterprise. We will be guided by one central principle: In everything, we will ensure that we put our audiences first – providing them with first-rate journalism covering the things that matter the most to them in ways no one else does. And, we will do it with a business model that ensures we will be here for our audiences for many years to come.
The transformation will have six basic components:
1. In newsgathering, we intend to dramatically expand our use of digital journalists. We have proven that this model works at various locations around the world. We believe we can take it much further;
2. In production, we will take the example set by Nightline of editorial staff who shoot and edit their own material and follow it throughout all of our programs, while recognizing that we will continue to rely upon our ENG crews and editors for most of our work;
3. In structure, we will combine our weekday and weekend operations for both Good Morning America and World News;
4. In special events, we will rely upon our program staff through the day and night to cover unexpected events and marshal personnel from across the division to cover scheduled events;
5. In newsmagazines and long-form programming, we will move to a more flexible blend of staff and freelancers so that we can respond to varying demand for hours through the year; and
6. Overall, we will eliminate redundancies wherever possible.
An essential part of this intended transformation will be extensive training in the new technology – whether in the field or in-house. This is an extension of the digital bullpen training we’ve undertaken already, but it will be on a scale that we have not seen before. This training program and changes it will make possible in all of our operations will make ABC News the place to work in the digital age. We won’t just be preparing people for the new world; we will be living in it.
When we are finished, many job descriptions will be different, different skill sets may be required, and, yes, we will likely have substantially fewer people on staff at ABC News. To ease the transition, we are offering a voluntary separation package to all full-time, U.S.-based, non-union, non-contract employees. Information and details of the program will be sent to your home address in the next few days. The response to this voluntary program will determine the extent to which we will need to make further reductions. I encourage everyone to talk with their supervisor if they have any questions.
Any voluntary separation offers for union-represented employees will be in accordance with our obligations under the applicable labor agreement. Whatever changes we make overseas will be done in compliance with local laws and, where required, include management consultation in advance.
Throughout this process, I will keep you informed of where we are and where we are going with the transformation. Tomorrow, I will discuss this on the 9:30 call, and we will be holding meetings with various groups of staff in New York. Kate O’Brian and I will be in Washington next week to explain what we are planning in person and to take questions. Either Kate or David Reiter will be travelling to the bureaus in the coming days to do the same.
I won’t pretend that all of this will be easy. But I do truly believe that it will be good for ABC News. I believe in this institution. I believe in its mission and in its future. As always, I will need your help in making sure that we are as strong as we can be for many years to come.
Thank you.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


…and now let’s get back to that breaking Tiger Woods story!
In other words, they have chosen to squander what little journalistic credibility they had left in favor of a more profitable and entertaining tabloid approach, where half-truths and innuendo packaged in glitzy soundbites masquerade as news. Look out, Hannity!
Cronkite is spinning in his grave.
All I heard is this: “If you’re not in a union or on-contract, you are screwed now; all union people and on-contract people are going down with this sinking ship.”. I am so sick with these idiots trying to hide their terrible management with the whole “we’re growing with a changing market.”. You have failed, and you aren’t changing anything in the business. You are only cutting down on the bottom line and lining your pockets with more money. I can’t wait for these companies to have to downsize completely and close their doors, only being able to blame the big bad internet and people who watch Fox News.
So true. We as workers put the screws and bolts in the same way we do every day. Inept management choose the product they want us to put the screws and bolts in and their decissions at ABC suck. Stock is up and
BOB EIGER HAS TAKEN NEAR 30 MILL THE PAST TWO YEARS, where is the problem??? Unions???? Don’t think so.
ABC is just a bit ahead of the rest of them in its downward plunge to total failure. The best quote on American managers generally is: “Why don’t incompetents know they are incompetents?….Because they are incompetent!
Personally I could care less for the corporate propaganda that masquerades as news these days. The wholesale lying and hysteria that went on during the run-up to the Iraq war was proof positive that those in the mainstream media are nothing but stenographers for their corporate and government masters.
Let them all die off, for all I care. It’s not like you can trust anything they report anyway.
Right on, Troublemaker. It is disturbing that Americans have to resort to Canadian, British – anything but US media – to find scrutiny of its own government.
Forget Red vs Blue, it’s corporate fascism, and hopefully, future generations will see it for the lie machine it is, as subtlety isn’t much of a strong point anymore. The people who profit of it deserve to wake UP, as does everyone else who watches.
Cosign! The “news” media is in trouble because they put style before substance and good reporting. They’ve been terrible for years, and the run up to the Iraq war just highlighted it.
you mean, “you COULDN’T care less”
They should have reported the truth.
That’s okay. Fox News is hiring.
As long as no one fucks with Brian Williams, we ain’t got a problem.
“We are going to do better news and more of it by firing a bunch of people. If that doesn’t work, we’ll then farm the work out to Fox.”
If anything, Fox News shows us that NOT reporting the truth is how to get the big ratings.
Why do these corporate hacks always say that mass firings are “bold”?
Fox News, has higher ratings, than CNN, MSNBC, Headline News, ABC, CBS, and NBC nightly newscasts … combined!
It is so profitable that it produces operating income, of over $1 billion a year for News Corp.
It produced 3 times the revenue of the Fox film division, including AVATAR revenue, this last quarter.
How does it do this? By appealing to about half the country. If you weren’t watching Fox News, you would not have seen that the UN’s IPCC basically made up most of their global warming data, that the research on Global Warming from the Univ. of East Anglia Climate Research Unit has a bad case of “lost all our data” and making stuff up, nor would you have seen the ACORN pimp-sting videos, nor would you have seen embarrassing video statements from Obama officials (like Green Jobs Czar Van Jones endorsing 9/11 “the Jews/CIA did it” theories on video).
Fox is competing on basic news, including scandal after scandal of a poorly vetted, little known Obama administration. ABC and the rest are competing on fashion, celebrity, and political correctness in NOT reporting the news.
There are a lot of problems with Fox News, but against other news outlets they are far better, and have the viewers/cash to prove it.
Great observations, like or hate Fox News, the brand creates passion with viewers and will never be confused with the rest of the MSM.
It would never occur to ABC News leadership or Disney to try anything different than shrink the operation. This is the company that has suppressed the “Road to 9/11″ movie because it is not complementary to the Clinton administration. We suppress so you can’t decide.
The only thing I would say FOX is better at is being business savvy. Hiring Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck? Brilliant marketing strategy, yes. But other than that, they can go straight to hell with their so-called “fair and balanced news”.
Great Move by ABC News. Years ago when television was in its infancy the reporter did everything; with today’s technology there is no reason why it can’t be done now. They just need to work a little harder and get rid of the union workers, which are a drag on profits. With today’s advertisers pulling away from television this is a great move. Disney is on the right track.
I guess the union police and firemen that help protect you ass every day are also a drag on society.
Old media continues to crumble, ABC will be left with “The View” as it’s most recognizable “news” program. Too bad, but predictable with no outlet for news other than the network. The national news cash cow and selected programs can no longer support all the staff and bureaus. NBCABCBSCNN all have the same POV for the NY-DC-LA government-media complex led by the NYT editorial page.
Fox coins money with an alternative view and no competition. Why not shut down CBS and ABC news and roll them into a JV with CNN, at least they will be left with a bureaus in Beijing and London and will still reflect a liberal worldview. CNN can push content over multiple platforms and offer an alternative to Fox. A few more people could keep their jobs.
NBC news needs to decide if it is still a serious organization or the press office for the DNC. Obermann and Mathews have all the credibility of the old Iraqi information minister, further damage to the NBC brand will be hard to reverse.
I think that almost every news organization is doing something like this, because the ad market stinks and, in theory, technology eliminates the need for a layer or two of people.
One problem is that, in practice, the people who can handle the technology usually aren’t great writers, and the good writers have a hard time figuring out the technology.
In television, a related problem is that the people who developed the editing systems haven’t adapted very well to the shift to civilian editors. The systems are too hard for regular to learn on the fly.
Corporate greed will destroy this country, not a bomb and
Disney is as greedy as they get.
Agreed. THE worst.
This is coming from the network news that is #2 in the ratings week-after-week. They are using the “tough economy” to trim the fat (aka lower costs to raise profits). There’s even talk about ABC and CBS outsourcing their news. On NPR they were talking about how average people can use current inexpensive technology to get great footage of events/news, which to me sound like they want a youtube type approach. Regardless, I think this might blow up in their face, making their product look rough, unprofessional, and cheap.
ABC is just rehashing the news that we already know about. They are Obama’s mouthpiece. Why have so many journalists who are really stenographers? Don’t let the door hit their backs on their way out.
Coming soon: Massive cuts to newsgathering capabilities.
Coming a little later: More puff pieces. Even fewer stories that question the conventional (and often wrong) wisdom.
Coming right now: Even more of Diane Sawyer cocking her head at America, pretending she’s actually got a clue.
While big media focuses on Tiger Woods, Sarah Palin and John Edwards the big stories are being ignored (in any substantive way)–the frightening rise in long-term unemployment for millions of Americans, for example, or the cancerous influence of corporate money on our democracy.
Journalism, at its best, is supposed to afflict the comfortable: To challenge the distortions and self-fulfilling prophecies of the ruling class. Mainline American journalism has basically stopped doing that. Witness the cheerleading of ABC and other big media outlets in the run-up to the outbreak of the Iraq War.
Journalism is the fourth pillar of democracy. As it becomes more and more undermined by corporate groupthink and celebrity so too does the health of our government and our democracy.
ABC news’ cuts? Bad news all round.
Obviously, they and other networks don’t really feel like it’s their obligation or duty to bring news to the public. They just want to earn profit, where the profit exists. It’s their company, and they can do what they want. Things are changing. That’s for sure.
…. and just what is “digital journalism?’ No doubt television news does best when the broadcasters are covering vivid images of news as it happens. Today, when TV news broadcasters stray over to trying to cover news in depth, we seem to always end up with propaganda as practiced by Fox or otherwise barely noticiable events that are passed on as “news.” In this world we desparately need journalists, and the private companies willing to pay them, to bring intelligent presentations and interpretation of news to the public.
We also need intelligent TV viewers who will watch good news broadcasting rather than spending hours viewing Charlie Sheen imitating his life or multi-million dollar atheletes do their tricks.
The very last thing we need is a news hack in a bar telling us the latest on the Curling Events in the Olympics or the most recent murder of a child in Florida, while genocide in an African country goes nearly unnoticed, or fanatics are able to throw out all science to tell us how terribly wrong are those trying to bring environmental catastrophies to our attention.
Really folks, please pick up some newspapers, magazines (both also going broke) or books, go to the public library, take classes at your local community college; anything that will make you smarter and less dependent on television for your entertainment aka as news. When the United States population begins to take its own educational levels seriously, our nation will grow and prosper. No longer do we enjoy a world where we can be lazy, uninformed, and downright stupid.
Assuming you do this, you will not be easily satisfied with the “news” you have been receiving on TV. Perhaps a show, such as the Today Show, could do a great job combining the illumination of more difficult concepts we all face in life, with the fun of watching kids scrambling around in the ice and snow for four hours every morning. Combining news and entertainment is not per se bad, but we need to have the genre’s labeled and be given more real news than entertainment.
Thank God for CNN!!!