
EXCLUSIVE: Oscarcast executive producers Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic have dropped a bombshell, telling artists nominated for Best Original Song that they won’t be invited to perform the usual big production number. The decision has hit a sour note for the nominated performers. Instead of the Academy Awards’ long-held tradition of staged musical performances of the five nominated songs, the music from those songs will be interspersed with footage from each movie to provide more context. I’m told that some of the nominees and filmmakers are outraged, feeling that the Oscar producers are tossing aside tradition and costing musical artists their well-deserved moment of global TV glory. What the Academy Awards telecast producers will certainly do is shave time that can be spent doting on twice as many Best Picture nominees as in years past. And this year in particular, that is a big priority. Never mind that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences already decided this year to limit the number of Original Song nominees to speed up the Oscar broadcast.
Mechanic’s and Shankman’s more recent decision appears equally pragmatic. Explanations include that the songs never delivered ratings, and that is what this Oscarcast is all about. That not having the big production numbers will move the show along. That it will save money for distributors, who eat most of the costs (up to 7 figures) of schlepping singers in. That unless a song by Bruce Springsteen, Celine Dion, Sting or U2 were nominated, most of the worldwide audience is hearing the tune for the first time when it is sung. I mean, can anybody besides Tom Bernard or Michael Barker from Sony Pictures Classics hum a few bars of “Loin de Paname” from Paris 36? Other of this year’s 5 nominated Best Original Songs are: “Almost There” and “Down In New Orleans”, two tunes penned by Randy Newman for The Princess And The Frog; ”Take it All”, the Maury Yestin number sung by Marion Cotillard in Nine; and “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)”, the Ryan Bingham/T Bone Burnett song performed by Bingham.
I’m also hearing about other Oscars spoilers which Shankman and Mechanic are contemplating – and changing their minds about just as quickly. (Even though the entire staff involved in the Oscarcast were made to sign a confidentiality agreement!):
– They have placed an emphasis on drawing young stars like Taylor Lautner and Channing Tatum, hoping that translates to a younger viewing audience. But at the same time they’re torn about how to keep storied stars in the mix. I’m told they decided at first to abandon last year’s innovation of having 5 former winners of all ages introduce the Best Actor and Best Actress categories. But that now they are leaning toward keeping what I thought was a very classy innovation by Bill Condon and Laurence Mark.
– Insiders are also buzzing about what Shankman, an accomplished choreographer, has in mind for dance numbers. One thing I’ve heard: don’t be surprised if some of his dancers are culled from past contestants on So You Think You Can Dance?, the Fox show where Shankman serves as a judge and choreographer. (Hmm, how is ABC going to feel about that?)


Thank goodness. Those numbers were always a fun sponge, normally provoking a rush to the bathroom or the snack table.
I feel like I’ve read this story every Oscar season for the last few years. Then, after a few angry letters and phone calls, they concede and invite whomever they planned on cutting back into the Kodak for the big show.
Something tells me this invention, while practical and probably a GOOD IDEA, will be scrapped as soon as Bob Iger and Harvey get on the phone to make sure their pics get some stage time.
I, for one, am glad that this is happening. These are the Oscars, not the Grammy’s.
I can barely believe it. I don’t have to sit through another performance by that tiresome, out of touch, overworked LA “treasure” Randy Newman during the Oscars this year. Hallelujah, there is a God!
Wasn’t one of the biggest complaints about last year’s broadcast the shortening of Best Original Song nominees, which prevented an Oscar-night performance by Bruce Springsteen?
Last year’s telecast was full of song-and-dance numbers, so obviously they believe that’s what people want to see.
If they’re worried about time, cut the tedious ‘previous Oscar winners fellate each nominee onstage’ that everyone hated from last year. Song performances (even from unknowns… look how much exposure the team from ‘Once’ got after their performance) are one of the few things that keep the mainstream viewers (the ones who STILL don’t know what ‘The Hurt Locker’ is) watching.
This category was – and continues to be – a joke. The love the academy continues to show the dire and dull Randy Newman astounds me.
Where is the nom for Sir Paul’s great song for Everybody’s Fine? Where is the nom for the sublime You’ve Got Me Wrapped Around Your Little Finger by Beth Rowley for An Education??
Terrible omissions.
Ah, the Oscar cheapening continues.
What next, American Idol losers singing all of the nominated songs?
I have to disagree with the five presenters thing. That was easily the worst “innovation,” with the reading of the nominees turned into some sort of wishy-washy group therapy session, complete with syrupy delivery and ridiculous life affirmations straight out of a Stuart Smalley skit.
10 nominees and no songs performed?
The Oscars are now a very boring clip show.
Moving on….
As a small city entertainment reporter myself, I was jokingly saying to people after last year’s event I’ll be drinking to get through it from now on. Now It doesn’t seem like a joke. I’m definitely drinking!
I thought the 5 presenters were a great, great touch as well. I think anyone who appreciates movie history should favor it.
I agree that the production numbers are a big waste of time and rarely due justice to the songs. Perhaps this year is the first year in a long time where all the songs appear in the context of the story and not in the end credits. At least this year,people will understand why these songs were nominated. They contribute to the story of the film and play an integral role in its plot. That would be the reason why they were supposed to be nominated in the first place.
I am glad this year we avoided big name pop icons from the song category. No song should be nominated if it appears in the closing credits regardless of the performer. The story is over when the credits appear.
ARG! What a joke they have become! Why can’t they just let the artists sing their songs on a simple stage? Why does it always have to be about ratings?
If we were forced to sit through Phil Collin’s bland Tarzan song, they should still let the musical artists perform each year.
Granted, I may have been ok with this change if Miley Cyrus’s song “The Climb” had been up for the award…
Good for them. And they should keep the innovation of last year, having previous winners introduce the nominees. Now if we can just get rid of those silly dance numbers and get on with the show…!
Most of this I don’t particularly care about, but I do hope this year’s telecast keeps the five former winners introducing the Best Acting nominees. I agree with totally with Nikki, Very classy. Nice touch. heartfelt and gives all five nominees their moment in the sun.
As classy as the five past nominees may have been, they slowed the show to a crawl much more than the musical numbers did.
But aside from that — why would they can the Best Song performances but bring in dancers for other musical numbers?
Its almost as if Shankman got up one morning and decided “How can we destroy any momentum made by the Box Office heavy nominees and turn this back into a show for Gay Men.
I am the manager for the artist Dr John who sings the song Down In New Orleans which was written by Randy Newman from The Princess and The Frog. Although Dr John is not perhaps U2 or Bruce Springsteen he is a 6 time Grammy award winner and has done numerous songs for film and Tv including “Making Woopee” from Sleepless In Seattle.
I know Mechanic and Shankman are Broadway people but I am sure they could have pulled off a bigger production using New Orleans music and having all the pretty people doing a “second line” down the aisle of the Kodak. Now that would have been something to watch rather then having dancers doing the same tired routines that would be better off at the TONYS.
Oh didn’t we just have the most watched show on TV called the SUPERBOWL. Go New Orleans Saints!!!!
we already have the globes for young actors, now we have amateur dancers. aren’t the oscars about movies, the best of the best, the recognized and acclaimed actors and films, can we stop with making it E! Entertainment!
If they want a surefire way to get younger viewers, they need to coerse Robert Pattinson into being a presenter by offering him whatever it takes.
This follows the Academy’s tradition of de-emphasizing movie songs over the last decade or so. When is the last time an Oscar-winning song was a real hit? I guarantee you if Celine Dion had sung “I See You” from Avatar it would have been nominated. Since no one has even heard of these nominated songs, I’m sure the Academy figures no one will care if the artists don’t get to sing them. It’s a sad trend.
Agreed, no songs is best. Adds 25+ minutes to show and it’s usually just Randy Newman or Phil Collins grabbing the spotlight one last time.
Marion Cotillard could have brought the house down with “Take It All.” Too bad. A.R. Rahman’s performance of his music from “Slumdog Millionaire” was a high point of last year’s broadcast, and the live performances sometimes give artists like Rahman a well deserved global exposure. No one will miss the Disney extravaganzas, though.
The five past winners making the presentations didn’t come off well in execution, I thought. A lot of time was wasted while the actors onstage burbled advertising copy about the nominees, and I was embarrassed for all parties involved although I suspect they love it. The show is self-congratulatory enough as it is.
No one knows who the So You Think You Can Dance dancers are so as long as they don’t introduce them as so – or highlight them, then they are just dances, so who cares.
As for not performing the current songs? BRAVO! Who cares? They are all forgettable, not-hits, performed by not ‘major’ people. They’re better off saluting the best movie love songs (or something) with some BIG stars. If film companies are going to place lacluster songs in their films with no chance of being a radio hit, then they have no right to be on the Oscars. Sorry, but if you want your song on the Oscars, you hire POP (i.e. POPULAR) acts to pen & perform them.
And I hope they don’t emphisize the young people too much. Why watch Taylor Lautner when he goes to the openning of an envelope and is on “ET” every night. Nothing special there. Give us some classic pairings: Streisand & Redford, MacLaine & Nicholson, Hoffman & Lange etc…
Dance numbers? After numerous interpretive dance debacles in the past, I never thought they’d go there ever again.
Silly me.