EXCLUSIVE: Oscarcast executive producers Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic have dropped a bombshell, telling artists nominated for Best Original Song that they won’t be invited to perform the usual big production number. The decision has hit a sour note for the nominated performers. Instead of the Academy Awards’ long-held tradition of staged musical performances of the five nominated songs, the music from those songs will be interspersed with footage from each movie to provide more context. I’m told that some of the nominees and filmmakers are outraged, feeling that the Oscar producers are tossing aside tradition and costing musical artists their well-deserved moment of global TV glory. What the Academy Awards telecast producers will certainly do is shave time that can be spent doting on twice as many Best Picture nominees as in years past. And this year in particular, that is a big priority. Never mind that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences already decided this year to limit the number of Original Song nominees to speed up the Oscar broadcast.
Mechanic’s and Shankman’s more recent decision appears equally pragmatic. Explanations include that the songs never delivered ratings, and that is what this Oscarcast is all about. That not having the big production numbers will move the show along. That it will save money for distributors, who eat most of the costs (up to 7 figures) of schlepping singers in. That unless a song by Bruce Springsteen, Celine Dion, Sting or U2 were nominated, most of the worldwide audience is hearing the tune for the first time when it is sung. I mean, can anybody besides Tom Bernard or Michael Barker from Sony Pictures Classics hum a few bars of “Loin de Paname” from Paris 36? Other of this year’s 5 nominated Best Original Songs are: “Almost There” and “Down In New Orleans”, two tunes penned by Randy Newman for The Princess And The Frog; ”Take it All”, the Maury Yestin number sung by Marion Cotillard in Nine; and “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)”, the Ryan Bingham/T Bone Burnett song performed by Bingham.
I’m also hearing about other Oscars spoilers which Shankman and Mechanic are contemplating – and changing their minds about just as quickly. (Even though the entire staff involved in the Oscarcast were made to sign a confidentiality agreement!):
– They have placed an emphasis on drawing young stars like Taylor Lautner and Channing Tatum, hoping that translates to a younger viewing audience. But at the same time they’re torn about how to keep storied stars in the mix. I’m told they decided at first to abandon last year’s innovation of having 5 former winners of all ages introduce the Best Actor and Best Actress categories. But that now they are leaning toward keeping what I thought was a very classy innovation by Bill Condon and Laurence Mark.
– Insiders are also buzzing about what Shankman, an accomplished choreographer, has in mind for dance numbers. One thing I’ve heard: don’t be surprised if some of his dancers are culled from past contestants on So You Think You Can Dance?, the Fox show where Shankman serves as a judge and choreographer. (Hmm, how is ABC going to feel about that?)







Why aren’t Springsteen and U2 even nominated this year? The Oscars new process of picking songs has ruined this whole category. They should just drop it, no one knows the songs or cares anymore. Who ever changed the selection process is an idiot.
BARF! This makes me want to throw up an oscar! They will single-handedly ruin the oscar telecast forever with this choices!
BARF I SAY!
NOOOOOOOO, please don’t bring back the previous oscar winners to praise the actors nominated — I would much rather see why an actor is nominated — and longer scenes, not just 10 second clips, this builds more suspense. It was nice last year, but it didn’t show why an actor got nominated. Please Academy — i want the scenes of the nominated actors — who else agrees???
You don’t need to be an insider to know that So You Think You Can Dance contestants will be on the show. Shankman has been tweeting about that for weeks, including when all dancers had to audition for the show.
We all know what the real time wasters are and I don’t understand why everyone is so willing to go after the song category when the fastest way to shave the show down is to drop the short subject awards into another show. No one cares and yet the powers that be at the Oscars always back down. Those are four awards taking up about five minutes a piece. Boom — 20 minutes saved. End of issue.
Cutting the live song performances is the best decision they’ve made yet. I’ve loved film all my life and am proud to work in the industry but when the uber-pretentious, uber-boring song productions come on I can’t help but reach for the mute button, if not temporarily change the channel. More focus on film, less on Broadway.
That’s a damn shame. Some of the best Oscar moments are the performances… And it would’ve been great for the great Ryan Bingham to get that kind of exposure.
Why change tradition now….what is really going on? Ummmm???
I must say that this is absolutely absurd not to have the oscar nominated songs performed by the artists that sang them. Let me just say this. SOOOOO, you think I will watch the oscars now that this is the case? Think again!!!!
It’s ridiculous. The song performances are a highlight. I have a hard time believing that the ratings DROP because of it.
Instead of spreading them out through the telecast, lump up the performances during one segment and trot them out one after another in different areas of the stage. It was done one year and worked beautifully. THAT saves time.
Save time by NOT introducing what we already know are the best picture nominees. Save time by NOT adding unnecessary packages. SAVE time by having ONE big production number at the BEGINNING of the show before the host’s monologue. Save time by grouping similar awards together as was done last year.
Don’t save time by telling the deserving winners to cut their speeches short. Don’t save time by eliminating the strongest aspects of the telecast such as the nominated songs.
I say two thumbs up on Taylor and Tatum. They made a lot of money for Hollywood in the past year and should be there to represent crowd pleasing movies that aren’t nominated. Hugh Jackman hosted last year and Wolverine wasn’t nominated so come on. I also think that the best song performances are a waste of time. Unless it’s someone popular, it does end up being boring and sucking up too much time.
Seeing Channing in Dear John was WAY too much time – he was modeling not ‘acting’. when and IF he is nominated for an Oscar, THEN have him there. No one is ‘wasting time’ if they are NOMINATED for an OSCAR- they have WON higher accolades already. not wannabes.
Oscars nominees deserve to SING their songs and we deserve to hear them perform it. Save money on the other things and give us the OSCAR NOMINEES – this is not American Idol or dance competition, it is
the OSCARS!!! poor business decision.
This is great news. No offense Randy Newman, but I’ve had enough.
And while we’re at it, let’s keep the dance numbers to a minimum. This is about film dammit!
No Best Original Song Performances? The Oscars just added me as a viewer.
This show is going to blow. The more they aim for the lowest common denominator the worse it’s going to get. I feel bad for artists like Ryan Bingham who would benefit greatly from having a huge platform on which to perform. His song from Crazy Heart is the best movie song since Falling Slowly from Once. They’re really going to trot Taylor Lautner out on stage and they can’t figure out what to do with actual actors? This show is going to suck.
The purpose of this gathering is for the members of AMPAS to hand out awards of excellence to those who made contributions to the form over the past year. When the rationalizations for what makes for good TV start getting in the way of this primary function, something is wrong. Viewers are there to watch, not to dictate how the awards are given. The show has been wildly popular over the years, but it does not exist to be a ratings champ. Let the damn nominees take their moment in the sun — they earned it, and they are the reason there is a show at all.
They’re starting to make the Globes look credible.
If it weren’t for Elliot Smith’s performance of “Ms. Misery” on the Oscars telecast then he would have remained even more obscure than he was at the time.
Not that every performance is a gem. I can live without ANY Celine Dion, but it disrespects the work of the Artists to just trapse over them with Zac Efron’s dimples and Taylor Lautner’s Abs… Come on guys.
People don’t want to watch the crap you’re handing them, we want a reason to like the show and that means QUALITY CONTENT! Not, flash in the pan nonsense.
Huh. I think the best songs is one of the better parts of the show. It is a show, right? Music and dance and all that. Not just a bunch of people thanking their agents after an okay opening.
And in keeping with it being a show, how about finally dropping the short films from the telecast? NOBODY out there in the wider viewing audience has seen these films (best short live action, doc, and animated) and it makes no sense to waste a half hour of the show on these awards. If you feel they really deserve recognition do it in a separate dinner on another night. Send a hot actress or actor to give them out, but don’t don’t don’t bore us all to tears by presenting these awards during the telecast.
Launter and Tatum are D grade actors at best. It’s embarrassing that they are at the oscars at all.
I hope they go back to the traditional way of handing out the acting awards. The way did it last year was too luvy.
I was looking forward to watching the Oscars this year just to see Anika Noni Rose perform one of her Oscar nominated songs from The Princess And The Frog. Looks like you have lost a viewer that night! This is ridiculous that you are not having these performers showcase these amazing songs.
While realizing that the Oscars are a big television show, they are, first and foremost, a celebration of the year’s accomplishments in film. I wish producers would remember that.
I thought the five presenters format last year was an astounding improvement. It really shows how much the nomination matters.
I thought the production number between Hugh Jackman and Beyonce was soul-suckingly dreadful. I don’t see why they insist on shoe-horning in a production number. Why don’t they drop in more film montages and clips instead. It is, after all, about film.
To that end, the Original Song nominees – which should be heard – could be presented with montages from their films. They would be nice musical breaks and would, again, give us more film to look at.
And, each year, we hear about shortening the speeches. The problem isn’t so much the length of the speeches. In fact, we really tune in to see the winners in their moment of triumph. But, each nominee should be encouraged to cut out the laundry list of agents, publicists, and managers, and say something about their art and about the moment.
Now you know what to expect when I win mine!
Oh God, not the former winners again. Please, no.
I don’t care if they show up to announce the nominees, but please, please, please do not let them drone on again about how incredible the nominees performances’ were. They were spewing absurd adjectives left and right last year. You’d think the nominees were curing cancer, the way they described them.
When will Oscar producers learn that VIEWERS HATE THE DANCE SEGMENTS
Last year’s Oscars were the classiest and best arranged of any year since I started watching in the 1950′s. I love the musical numbers because they are a break from the poorly thought out acceptance speeches. Some great bloopers have come out of the musical breaks. Shankman better be careful. Debbie Allen ended her association with the Academy after the outrageous tap dance to Shindler’s List. Come on, that was great tv!