Robert Pattinson Clueless About ‘Twilight’ 3D

COMMENTS (14)

• MTV needs to get ride of Josh Horowitz and his stupid “Rough Cut.” What’s with this “personal preference” crap about 3D. If you didn’t get the message yet from James Cameron, and Robert Pattinson, here it is again–A film is a good film because of the story, not because it’s 3D or not. Artists don’t care. MTV and Horowitz, piece of advice…cancel your show. You ask stupid questions that, in the end, make you look stupid. Teenie-boppers are not going to care about Robert Pattinson’s preference about 3D, they are going to care about him. Ask good, thought out questions.

  Comment by Anonymous — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 4:04pm PST  Reply to this post

• Heck, they can barely manage TWO dimensions…

  Comment by cst — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 4:24pm PST  Reply to this post

  • LOL, this man (or woman) speaks the truth.

    Comment by JohnDoe — Sunday February 28, 2010 @ 3:25am PST  Reply to this post

  • Agreed.

    Comment by Anonymous — Thursday June 10, 2010 @ 9:51am PDT  Reply to this post

• i love robert pattinson he is my 2nd hero (behind k-stew)

  Comment by caitlin montanari — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 4:29pm PST  Reply to this post

• Hey Josh, if you want to keep your little cheesy show, quite asking stupid questions. If you haven’t gotten the whole picture yet, a film isn’t a film without a good story. No artist cares if it is in 3D or not.

  Comment by Anonymous — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 4:45pm PST  Reply to this post

• There is no story here…

  Now, it Taylor Lautner didn’t want 3D… Now THAT would be a story!

  Comment by Indrid Cold — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 5:09pm PST  Reply to this post

• good. no reason for EVERY movie to be 3d. its should be looked at to be used where it makes sense. it should be one of many tools and not a tool that the entire movie revolves around.

  for Twilight it doesnt make sense. the “big set pieces” arent in need of 3d to “flesh them out.”

  the same for many of the superheroe movies, at least for the current Batman series. Green Lantern, or Iron man, sure. Maybe Thor maybe Spidy or Superman but even then…

  Cap America no.

  and if you dont like Twilight well then you wont mind it not being in 3d.

  cheers

  Comment by lu-E — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 5:25pm PST  Reply to this post

• “It all depends on the script”…….Well Rob that didn’t stop you on the first two Twilight flicks (and possibly the third), so why should it stop you now. Unless of course he’s using the “script” angle to increase his paycheck. How much you wanna bet that now Summit has The Three Musketeers, we’ll be seeing Mr. Pattionson in that flick to help justify his big payday in New Moon. Oh Rob, that film will be in 3D, and you’ll be working with Paul W.S. Anderson. Oh Joy, a hack actor and director.

  Comment by Darkhawk — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 6:26pm PST  Reply to this post

• They need to go back and digitally rewire all of the Russ Meyer flicks for big honkin’ IMAX 3D. (I could have typed 36DDD, but that would have been lame.)

  Comment by John — Saturday February 27, 2010 @ 11:40pm PST  Reply to this post

• Is it just me or does Robert Pattinson sound like he’s just one big ball of boring? And not in the celebrities-are-just-like-us-way, but in the annoyingly sopping wet blanket way.

  Comment by S. — Sunday February 28, 2010 @ 11:51am PST  Reply to this post

• Robert is BOTHERED by 3D!

  Comment by Ez Ryder — Sunday February 28, 2010 @ 1:29pm PST  Reply to this post

• I love how he acts like he has control over the studio, and that he ISN’T tied up to the series no matter what.

  Comment by njames — Monday March 1, 2010 @ 8:03am PST  Reply to this post

• Robert the best actor of our time.

  Comment by ????????? ?????? ???? — Sunday May 2, 2010 @ 4:15am PDT  Reply to this post