And while I’m in the mood to bitchslap The New York Times, here’s more: In October, Sunday’s Business section ran a puff piece on Michael Lynton and Amy Pascal headlined “Sony’s Version of Tracy and Hepburn”. But Tim Arango failed to report that Lynton’s and Pascal’s 6-year “leadership display operating in sync” hit a big snag over the summer that’s still not entirely smoothed out. As a result, the mogul duo are little like Tracy & Hepburn and a lot more like Martin & Lewis.
In the article, the two moguls tried to portray themselves as “checking their egos” at the door in order to work well together. But the truth is their rift began in mid-July when Peter Bart penned a Variety love letter to Amy Pascal — headlined “Sony’s Free Spirit Shows Steady Hand” — and mentioned Michael Lynton only in passing. That, and the fact that Pascal gave an interview to Variety that was all “I, I, I” (and not “we, we, we”), did not sit well with Lynton. He accused her of engineering a professional slight. Amy proclaimed her innocence.
Fast forward to later in the summer when it was Pascal’s turn to feel hurt. The Hollywood rumor mill was churning about all the top studio execs who might get axed (and ultimately did exit: Dick Cook, Oren Aviv, Marc Shmuger, David Linde, Kevin McCormick) and Amy’s name found its way onto the list. When Lynton was asked whether Pascal was in trouble, he was noncommittal. And when he was asked why Pascal had no fresh franchises for Sony Pictures, he agreed it was a problem for the studio. This time, Pascal accused Lynton of engineering a professional slight. Lynton proclaimed his innocence.
Now you see why I liken their relationship to Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis whose professional partnership lived and eventually died on the basis of perceived slights. (Dean resented Jerry for hogging the spotlight. Jerry resented Dean for behind-the-scenes betrayals.)
To cool things down, the Sony Pictures PR machine began working overtime this fall to generate press for Lynton/Pascal. Variety started stressing Lynton’s role, and also cooperated with a story about Sony franchises. The Producers Guild Of America announced it would honor Pascal and Lynton. And then came Arango’s article.
By the way, the latest PR blitz from Sony Pictures is to pump up the volume for Columbia presidents Doug Belgrad and Matt Tolmach because they don’t get enough credit for shepherding the major’s box office hits. Belgrad oversaw Mall Cop and Ugly Truth as well as Will Smith and Adam Sandler pics like Hancock, Big Daddy, and Click; Tolmach was in charge of Zombieland, the Spider-Man and Da Vinci Code franchises, and Will Farrell and Judd Apatow pics including Superbad, Pineapple Express, Talledega Nights, and Step Brothers.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Gee, I always thought that a good picture was the best publicity for producers.
Why can’t these executives just go to work and do their jobs. Jesus, they get paid a boat load of money to live in a fantasy world and get to make movies with real stars and huge budgets. At the same time, the mother ship in Japan can’t get out of the way of itself, failing over and over, thus allowing the children in hollywood an awful lot of room to play in their sand boxes. What ever happened to the days when the film makers were the ones that got all the credit for working on locations all over the world, being away from their families, grinding out 18 hr days and then having to worry about their next job once their last. These two get to drive home to their expensive west side homes every night, have people working for them tripping all over themselves to make sure their happy, dinner made for them, their children taken care 24 hours a day and the most they have to worry about is which one of them is getting the better press. It’s all rather pathetic.
I agree.
it’s an integral part of the fantasy world, pal.
Because Hollywood, especially execs., have huge egos and most with something to prove – duh. It’s been said before, it’s like high school but with money. And all the nerds in high school are suddenly the cool crowd and running everything. LOL.
How’s your licensing with Marvel/Disney? Yup, just what I thought. Nothing to see hear, move along.
Nikki, just call that paper the Old York Times, just like Michael Savage.
Doesn’t seem that long ago when Amy worked under Mark and Lisa, and Doug was a creative exec. I always thought she was great (even though she turned down everything I ever gave them, geez). But there was still an open door, and Doug is the same today. They’re good people, and more talented than many of the schmoes that wear suits in this biz. ‘Reminds me of another time she was seriously under the gun, during STUART LITTLE, which was an incredibly ballsy move that paid off. Sure, they’ve made some big-time clunkers (who hasn’t?!), but this last go ’round with the re-boot of SPIDER-MAN will be telling to say the least. My bet’s on her.
It’s a dysfunctional place. Behind Lynton’s back Amy’s been known to whisper how he’s not creative. But to his face it’s all smiles. Behind his back, she’s been known to question his expansion into the international market place, but to his face she says she supports it. Back in the early days when it was rumored that Stringer would put Roth in for Amy, Lynton was brought in to stabalize and SUPERVISE the still newish studio. Amy made him her his bff, but the question is, did she resent having to run to him for permission?
She doth protest…
Kasaja – your post above is spot on.
Wow, Kasaja, I couldn’t agree more! Well said
Michael Lynton was a rich, spoiled, bore failing upward when he was playing at running Disney Publishing and ultimately Hollywood Pictures (for five minutes), as he is a trust fund baby from the Levelor Blind family, and never really had too work to survive like the rest of us do.
How surprising that he has turned out to be just as unexciting in his next role as SPE Chairman?/President?/Grand Poobah?
Amy Pascal seems good of kind, considering that it takes an ego bigger than any room they stand in, to play that game and do that kind of job, but I would take her any day over Michael Lynton, who has as much of a creative tin ear as Michael Eisner who hired him at Disney in the first place…Sound familiar?
In assessing the relative worth of the teams Lynton & Pascal are compared to in the above article, at least between Martin & Lewis, one of them could sing.
The one that could sing was also the goofball that everyone laughed at. Which one is it at Sony?
Have to say, I met Amy out-of-state a few years ago, during a small cocktail party at someone’s home, when she was visiting to receive an award. I was a college student and sooooo interested in the “biz.” She was gracious, kind, and very genuine about revealing her own experience coming up. She’s a keeper.
I am a big Fan of Amy. She is gracious, nice, creative, and has the goods. She has worked hard to be where she is and deserves it!
Lynton let Amy make the decision to fire Soderbergh…”moneyball” will be her downfall. they’ve spent 17 million so far and now they are apparently firing Bennett Miller and going to eat the whole thing.
For everyone who moans for the Hollywood of yesteryear — Amy is a yesteryear player. She hates franchises, hates the global marketplace, wants to make good, weird, fun films. Look at this fall — Cloudy and Zombieland, both first-time directors, both surprise hits. Lynton is new, Bob Iger Hollywood. Amy loves movies. Michael sees them as another Revenue Stream. Sony is the only place whose development list doesn’t make you want to kill yourself.
I thinks so