Will Smith's and James Lassiter’s Overbrook Entertainment, and Jada Pinkett-Smith’s 100 Percent Womon Film Investments filed a complaint in California Superior Court this week. I'm told the filing is meant to head off a threatened lawsuit by an investor in Human Contract, a film Pinkett-Smith wrote and directed which went straight to video and apparently lost money. Lawyers filed the complaint for declaratory relief against David Grasso, described in the filing as a Philadelphia real estate mogul who invested in Pinkett-Smith’s film through his Tycoon Entertainment banner. I'm told the complaint was a proactive legal move by Pinkett-Smith and Overbrook after Grasso sent a letter threatening to sue for fraud unless he got his money back. Overbrook is involved because the company manages Pinkett-Smith.
The complaint argues that Grasso is a seasoned real estate investor who had ICM as his counsel and should have understood the speculative nature of investing in film. According to the complaint, Grasso claimed in his letter that he was told his investment was risk-free. Plaintiffs deny making such an assertion, and claim Grass acknowledged in writing that he understood the risks.
I couldn’t immediately reach Grasso. But Pinkett-Smith’s attorney Ken Hertz said in a statement, "Although we normally shun this type of controversy, we felt compelled to respond to the baseless threats and absurd allegations put forth by Mr. Grasso’s counsel. Mr. Grasso is a very experienced investor and he approached our clients — eager to invest in this film… We sincerely wish this film had reached a larger audience, and we share Mr. Grasso’s disappointment that it did not.”
Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
Uh-huh. Nothing like a pre-emptive legal filing to indicate your innocence, Jada.
There would seem to be a real credibility problem here. I don’t know how anybody with an IQ above the freezing point of water (even on the Celsius scale) could possibly juxtapose the words “investment”, “film” and “risk free” in the same sentence. And this guy is a sophisticated businessman no less? Wow. Just wow. Maybe I could interest him in the perpetual motion machine I have…solve the energy crisis…a sure winner…just need a few million to get it off the ground.
I read this script–horrible. It was embarrassing. Never, ever should have been made.
It’s unfortunate. When you’re a star with clout or rather a global movie star husband, you can do whatever crap that comes into your head because you have the means to. Still love them both!
Amazing – all that money that Will and Jada have made… and they go to these lengths over a small film investment. Not saying the investor is right, but man…
I hope the man loses his shirt or wife beater or whatever he wears around the house. He knows nothing about the movie business. Investing in a project starring Jada Pinkett-Smith directed by Steven Spielberg and written by James Cameron? Now that’s what I’d call-Oh I’m sorry…directed by Jada Pinkett-Smith. Oops i did it again…written by Jada Too! Wow way to go…LOSER.
I agree with Walt (above). Will’s wife, an actress, wants to become a director. Cool. Go for it. Just pick a reasonable first film and keep the risk low. But, instead of financing a small film with his ginormous resources (and thereby taking the pressure off of his wife), Will finds Other People’s Money! But, he didn’t protect OPM, because the film is non-commercial which Will should have said “no” to in the first place (he has the best commercial instincts of anyone maybe in the history of this industry!). He knew this film was not going to work creatively or financially. But if you do bring in outside investors, do everything you can to protect them. Do not allow them to get hurt. Sadly, as in most any endeavor, nepotism invariably leads to corruption.
Can they BOTH please lose this law suit? One for the con job, the other for buying it. Not sure who’s more deserving.
Written and directed by Jada Smith? Nah, that ain’t risky.
ok here’s what probably happened.
icm found a sucker, sent the script to sales agents (i read and passed).
the sales agent gave non-binding, non-guaranteed sales estimates which probably covered the budget which gave the investor comfort.
the estimates were not realized (rarely are).
now the investor is going after the big wallets.
wondering where icm is in all of this since they investor was seemingly their client. smith / pinkett = much more important to icm than one time investor, so icm’s probably and rightfully staying very quiet..
This is pretty regular it seems. An investor jumps into a film investment thinking it runs like a regular business, doesn’t like the end result or the film doesn’t do well, and they cry fraud. If no film was made or nothing was shot at all then they’d have a case.
These types always make it harder for good filmmakers to get funding for good films.
“Declaratory Relief” is simply a judgement of the court for the purpose of establishing the rights of the parties or to express the opinion of the court on a question of law without ordering anything to be done.
This was probably a wise, business, decision on Will’s part to nip the, alleged, “fraud” charge in the bud.
%he judge who hears this will probably laugh out loud when he hears the words “risk free” in the same sentence as the words “film investment.”
ra
Who in their right mind would invest in a film written and directed by such a talentless person?
Fraud is extremely tough to prove in normal circumstances and nearly impossible to glean from the normal puffery that goes on in raising money for independent films.
This is just another case of a guy who made a fortune in real estate/coat hanger sales/whatever and wanted to tell his buddies he was a film producer. He thought anything that had Will Smith’s name within 1,000 miles of it was pure gold and then learned a harsh reality. I wouldn’t be surprised if the declaratory judgment was granted.
Anyone in their right mind, especially someone who’s supposedly savvy in investment, should know film, like any other risky venture, is a roll of the dice. Regardless of who the writer, director, actor is.
Now, I don’t know about you, but, if this Grasso didn’t do his homework by researching the financial aspects of the ‘property’, then all the fault is on him. What did he think, this was a credit default swap or something? This is the film industry. Not AIG.
Simply put, he invested in a ‘property’ and it turned into a swamp. Take the loss, write it off, and move on. You live, you learn.
Considering nobody has heard of this movie, perhaps the investor is pissed because it was expected that Jada and Will would actually promote the film up to and upon its release. I’d never heard of this movie until I happened to stumble upon it on DVD at Blockbuster. No idea also that Jada wrote and directed it until I read the back cover in my attempt to see if there were any decent name actors in the cast (there aren’t). A day after not renting this flick, I saw a trailer for it on some other DVD and it looked God awful.
Sounds like Jada just wanted something to do and Will hooked her up with a naive investor. A producer should try to eliminate as much risk as possible on a film by casting name actors etc. Jada did none of that. Add that to the fact nobody shilled the movie, it’s no wonder it didn’t make a dime.
Next time maybe Will should pay for his little wife’s follies then maybe she (and he) will spend wisely and give a damn about the result.