Multichannel News is reporting that Time Warner and other cable operators want the FCC to enact retrans reform. This follows all those recent retrans battles which consumers have to keep enduring. But why the cable providers think the FCC will be on their side is a mystery to me. On the other hand, there's no guarantee that the FCC will be on the side of the Big Media programmers, either. I've said it before and I'll say it again: only the consumers reliably lose in these battles as their cable bills keep soaring no matter who blinks first.
"Time Warner Cable is expected to file a petition at the FCC atop a coalition of cable operators and others asking the FCC to reform the retransmission consent process. According to sources, the petition is asking for independent arbitration during retrans disputes and interim carriage during that arbitration... The American Cable Association, which represents small and mid-sized operators, confirmed that it had signed on to the petition." Also said to either be considering signing on to the petition or already on it are Dish Network, DirecTV, Verizon, Mediacom, Charter and Public Knowledge.
A Time Warner spokesperson would not discuss the substance of the petition, but did confirm that it is filing the document this week. The suggested remedies in the petition raise some of the ideas the FCC should consider.
Didn’t the networks force the cable companies to rebroadcast their signals like 15 years ago? Don’t the networks get free airwaves, and pay for their services with advertising? I consider Cablevision to be the second most evil company in America, but I don’t get the networks’ position on this at all. They’re lucky to get the space. There’s a zillion channels that would gladly jump into their position.
There is a simple solution, give users a la carte menuing….
“But why the cable providers think the FCC will be on their side is a mystery to me.”
I’ll tell you why, Nikki. Because the people in government want to watch their TV shows as much as anyone else. And they don’t care if the problem is the Big Media companies or the cable and satellite providers. They just want to watch their shows.
And the solution is to tell Big Media and the cable and satellite providers how much retransmission can cost. End of story.
All the parties involved have proven repeatedly that they CANNOT resolve this on their own. Enough is enough. They had their chance to show that this could work. It doesn’t. It won’t. And it’s time to bring some common sense back to retransmission costs.
I’m sure the cable and satellite operators would love for broadcast TV to just go away so everyone would have to pay a monthly fee, but would consumers be better off if that happened? Be careful what you wish for…
The FCC needs to swat this down. If cable companies want to have broadcast channels on their programming, they need to pay for it.
So the cable companies want the FCC to regulate what the broadcasters can charge them, but doesn’t want the FCC to regulate what they can charge consumers.
Methinks there is irony at work here & an insane argument from the cablers.
Do they really want to open up that can of worms?