UPDATES Lionsgate Board Rejects Icahn’s $6/Share
UPDATES Carl Icahn Moves On Lionsgate
This just issued press release is now officially a declaration of war by corporate raider/shareholder activist Carl Icahn against Lionsgate management:
NEW YORK, March 19 — Carl C. Icahn announced today that the offer (the “Offer”) by certain of his affiliated entities (the “Icahn Group”) to purchase up to 13,164,420 common shares of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (“Lions Gate”) has been amended to provide that the Icahn Group is now offering to purchase UP TO ALL of Lions Gate’s outstanding common shares. In addition, the expiration date of the Offer has been extended to April 30, 2010.
The amended Offer is conditioned on, among other things, there having been validly tendered and not withdrawn a number of Lions Gate common shares which, together with the common shares already owned by the Icahn Group, would constitute at least 50.1% of Lions Gate’s common shares (taking into consideration options and restricted stock). The Icahn Group has the right to waive this condition and any other condition, subject to applicable law. In addition, the amended Offer is conditioned on: (i) all rights issued or issuable under the poison pill adopted by Lions Gate’s board of directors on March 11, 2010 having been cease-traded, found to be illegal or unenforceable, redeemed by the board, or otherwise eliminated; and (ii) the receipt by the Icahn Group of all government or regulatory approvals necessary to complete the amended Offer (including Investment Canada Act approval) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Icahn Group in its reasonable judgment.
The Icahn Group has determined not to increase the previously announced Offer price of $6.00 per share in cash. The Offer price is $1.15 higher than the $4.85 closing price of the common shares on February 4, 2010 (the last trading day prior to the first date in 2010 that the Icahn Group resumed purchasing Lions Gate common shares), representing a premium of more than 23%. The amended Offer will not be subject to financing.
Mr. Icahn also announced that the Icahn Group intends to pursue legal proceedings to set aside the poison pill adopted by Lions Gate, which restricts the rights of Lions Gate shareholders to accept the Offer. The adoption of the poison pill represented a failure of certain conditions to the Offer. The Icahn Group waived the breached conditions in this particular instance so as to proceed with the amended Offer.
Mr. Icahn stated:
“Due to management’s recent actions, I am now convinced that Lions Gate shareholders will never have the right to make important decisions. I am dismayed that Lions Gate’s board of directors chose to implement a poison pill and thus deny their shareholders the opportunity to participate in our Offer. I believe these tactics serve only to strip shareholders of an opportunity and entrench management. Lions Gate previously criticized our tender offer for being partial. That is no longer the case.
I believe that Lions Gate’s management should not further leverage up the company to purchase a film library without allowing shareholders the opportunity to decide whether increasing exposure to this segment is wise. I believe library values are currently declining due to, in part, weak DVD sales. Lions Gate already has a major investment in a library – its own. It should be up to the shareholders to determine if they wish to more than “double down” on another library, especially in light of the company’s admitted “substantial degree of leverage”.(1) Lions Gate’s latest actions convince me that the current management and board will never allow shareholders to make their own determination on this extremely important decision.
We therefore intend, if our offer is successful, to replace Lions Gate’s board of directors with our nominees, several of whom would be Canadian citizens. I believe that the best course for Lions Gate is to pursue a strategy aimed more at the consolidation of film and television distributors, as opposed to the acquisition of library assets. Once in place, we are hopeful that our nominees would guide Lions Gate in that strategic direction. I also believe that it may be desirable to replace top management with several individuals who more closely share our vision for the future of the company. In addition, we expect to propose that the new board form a committee to oversee the retention of a third party consultant tasked with dramatically reducing Lions Gate’s overhead.
I understand that such a dramatic shift in management and growth strategy may thrust Lions Gate into a potentially volatile period of transition, but I believe the company will emerge much stronger on the other end.”
The Icahn Group looks forward to working productively with the Canadian authorities to obtain approval for the amended Offer. To that end, the Icahn Group intends to discuss with the Minister of Canadian Heritage various commitments it would be prepared to make in order to ensure that any acquisition of control of Lions Gate as a result of the amended Offer would be of net benefit to Canada, which may include the divestiture of Lions Gate’s shares of Maple Pictures Corp.
To that end, the Icahn Group intends to discuss with the Minister of Canadian Heritage various commitments it would be prepared to make in order to ensure that any acquisition of control of Lions Gate as a result of the amended Offer would be of net benefit to Canada, which may include the divestiture of Lions Gate’s shares of Maple Pictures Corp. (“Maple”) to one or more Canadians such that the film distribution business currently carried on by Maple in Canada will be operated independently from Lions Gate (as was similarly undertaken by Lions Gate in 2005).
Lions Gate disclosed in SEC filings made prior to the Offer that: (i) there is a risk that the Minister of Canadian Heritage could determine that Lions Gate is out of compliance with the Investment Canada Act, or that events beyond Lions Gate’s control could result in its ceasing to be Canadian-controlled pursuant to the Investment Canada Act; (ii) if Lions Gate ceases to be Canadian-controlled under the Investment Canada Act, it and Maple may no longer qualify for or be entitled to access refundable tax credits and other Canadian government and private motion picture industry incentives that are restricted to Canadian-controlled corporations; and (iii) such a change in status could also cause Lions Gate to be required to repay certain tax credits and other government incentives previously received and default on certain distribution obligations, thereby adversely affecting its financial results.
The Icahn Group believes that these risks could be substantially reduced or eliminated through the agreements it will seek to reach with the Minister of Canadian Heritage in connection with any acquisition of control of Lions Gate as a result of the amended Offer. In addition, if the amended Offer is successful, the Icahn Group intends to cause Lions Gate to remain a Canadian incorporated entity for a period of not less than five years.
Lions Gate stated in its Schedule 14D-9 filed with the SEC on March 12, 2010 that the Offer could result in the acceleration of approximately $516 million of its indebtedness if lenders were to elect to declare events of default relating to certain “change in control” provisions contained in its debt documents. If such acceleration occurs (which will not be a condition allowing the Icahn Group to withdraw the amended Offer), the Icahn Group believes that Lions Gate should seek a replacement source of funding in order to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course. The Icahn Group is prepared to begin discussions with Lions Gate immediately regarding a bridge facility that the Icahn Group would be willing to provide – without a commitment fee – at the expiration of the amended Offer, should these “change of control” provisions be triggered as a result of the Icahn Group’s purchase of Lions Gate shares in the amended Offer. The Icahn Group expects that such bridge facility would be required to be repaid through a combination of new debt and the proceeds of the sale of Lions Gate equity through a rights offering in which all Lions Gate shareholders would be invited to participate, thus de-levering the company. The Icahn Group would be willing to backstop any such rights offering.
The terms and conditions of the amended Offer are set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated March 1, 2010, as amended by the Notice of Variation and Extension dated March 19, 2010, to be distributed to holders of Lions Gate’s common shares and filed with the SEC as exhibits to the Icahn Group’s amended Schedule TO and with the Canadian securities authorities on SEDAR.
NEW YORK, March 19 — Carl C. Icahn announced today that the offer (the “Offer”) by certain of his affiliated entities (the “Icahn Group”) to purchase up to 13,164,420 common shares of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (“Lions Gate”) has been amended to provide that the Icahn Group is now offering to purchase UP TO ALL of Lions Gate’s outstanding common shares. In addition, the expiration date of the Offer has been extended to April 30, 2010.




Well, Lionsgate is currently trading at $6.04 according to the Yahoo Finance report I’m looking at right next to this article which is up 1.17%. I hope if he gains control he stops with the foolish moves that Lionsgate has made recently. I used to love Lionsgate as an innovative independent developer who delivered some of the best horror movies of the 2000′s until Saw hit and they decided to run that franchise into the ground with yearly installments that made no coherent sense. I loved Saw I and II and with a little more creativity and time they could have really made that franchise shine, but they decided for the quick cash-in instead of the creative route.
I can see where Carl Icahn is coming from. Based on Lions Gate performance of the past years in the stocks, holding on to their unfavorable weak DVD library sales and poor discussion making at the board of directors, it is time that Lions Gate take a fresh look at what is at hand and what are their objectives in the foreseeable future.
Without mentioning any numbers, stock quotes and names. I urge Lions Gate to revisit Mr. Carl Icahn’s offer and carefully study it before making any hasty decision.
Exactly how many movie has Carl Icahn made? Before you serve him Lionsgate on a platter shouldn’t you make sure he has a clue as to how to run an independent movie studio? Lionsgate isn’t a giant media pot like Time Warner and Blockbuster. What’s next, putting Ben Silverman in charge of Lionsgate’s TV division?
No surprise here that he’s looking to give his son Brett a viable company – and the focus on distribution is smart (for now). But as always, each step of his reveals shades of an unfolding strategy. If this results in a 5 year ticking clock on the Investment Canada Act, I wonder what other Canadian assets he’s eyeing (5 years being sufficient for the Loonie to normalize)….
Do you think Carl is up for adopting any new heirs? Brett has wanted a big role in Lionsgate for a long time.
Lionsgate had the opportunity to do this as a partnership and they passed.
Now the battle lines are drawn with Mr. Icahn, and he is one fierce competitor.
I am betting on Mr. Icahn, but he will probably have to pay off the’ poison pill’ payments to the executives
This may not be as much fun as the Frank and Jaime divorce battle over the Dodgers, but it should be one hell of a warm up act.
Lionsgate is probably the largest and most successful independent studio in the world and for good reason. It has been developed and assembled over the years by people who’s interest was in doing just that and because it it was a studio thinking like an independent. Leaner meaner and competitive. The board have done everything possible to protect long term value for the shareholders and invest in long term assets and efficient asset management. There are some very valuable assets within the company. I have no doubt stripping the company back will suit Mr Ichan but it is not the direction the industry is going. In the 1970s, before video, libraries were worth nothing other than useful balance sheet smoke and mirrors. After video sell through had consumed all the titles DVD arrived and value on the balance sheet and in turnover was revitalised. Now we are on the cusp ( this is not the end its only the beginning) of the digital download and video on demand era when for the first time the distribution chain will become shorter and the library owner can be dealing more directly with the consumer. In this model rental or viewing costs will drop and library volume will the key to long term value and return. You need to acquire library and output production of television and internet programming to sustain market share. The stock is at a value in the market because the market is down. Mr Ichan would have you believe he knows something that no one else does. I imagine it is simply that this is a cheap buy if not a steal at this price.
As a longterm shareholder of Lionsgate, I find Icahn’s $6.00 a share hostile takeover offer as not only laughable but embarrasing. His hubris is stunning as he basically wants to buy the company for chump change. I’m wholeheartedly staying on-board with Felthiemer, Burns, Drake, and the rest of management and urge them to fight this guy with whatever it takes.
Well, I will give Icahn points for determination. He wants that company, and it looks like he’s going to fight for it.
Let the battle begin.
I too am a long time shareholder of Lionsgate. I know many members of the management team. Jon Feltheimer and Michael Burns are visionaries, strong leaders, and just plain smart entertainment executives who know how to continue to build this business. $6.00 a share is insulting.
I say, find out what his intentions are. Then make a decision. Mr. Icahn, If you are looking for a company for your son to run, start fresh… Or buy MGM/Miramax or Overture… (Especially overture, UK, AUS companies, are quite profitable) So much you can do with Overture. Lionsgate, what can you do to turn the company around… Think about it.
Icahn is just a spoiled rich old man used to getting his way with his wallet. These latest antics are just a sign of his phenomenally giant — and bruised — ego. Stop whipping out your dicks and wallets and let Lionsgate do what it does well. I’d rather wait for September and pay my 13.50 to see Gordon Gekko be more charismatic than cranky curmudgeon Carl.
Carl, Brett or a street bum will do a better job and I’m a share holder.
Everything happens for a reason, live and learn.
$6 a share is insulting and he knows it. What is his real goal?
…..and his son is a “lox”. Daddy needs to find something simple for him to do.
Curious, Lionsgate is one of the few studios making good money in TV, films and actually winning awards. Why go after one of the last independent movie makers? Corporate hijinks have decimated the indies. What the frank does Louis Icahn know about making movies? Movies are an art form, not a can of Spam. Even the crappiest film requires creative people. He must be confusing that with creative capital.