I’m still traveling (through Sunday). But I wanted to at least quickly update you on the MGM sale situation. First, the embattled studio is looking even more beat up this week now that MGM’s Hot Tub Time Machine is tracking just mediocre despite earmarking $45 million on domestic P&A. Ugh, another MGM loser. Anyway, as you know, final bids are due on Friday. After a lot of hemming and hawing, 5 parties have been in the mix considering 2nd-round bids for MGM which put itself up for sale last year after it couldn’t keep making payments on $3.7 billion of debt. But who’s in and who’s out?
As I’ve been saying all along, the only bid that will come in for certain is Time Warner’s and everybody that I talk to says that bid will be well below $2 billion. That’s too low to satisfy anyone among MGM’s big creditors. My understanding, too, is that John Malone’s Liberty Media will not be making a final bid (which Bloomberg reported this morning quoting sources as saying that “Liberty’s assessment of MGM’s value fell below a price company executives believed would be acceptable to the Los Angeles-based studio’s creditors”). I also hear that private equity firm Elliott Capital, which invests in producer Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity Media, won’t be making a compelling bid, or maybe won’t bid at all. *UPDATE: Yep, they’ve dropped out…*
Nobody knows what Lionsgate is going to do and whether it can even raise the capital to pull off this deal. Right now, Lionsgate has about $600 million in debt, and they would need to take on a lot more debt to pull off a MGM deal. And that’s not even factoring in the Carl Icahn situation. As for billionaire Len Blavatnik (aka “The Russian”, though his flack Mike Sitrick hates it when I refer to the Harvard-educated American citizen as such), word is he is probably going to make a recapitalization/restructuring offer, meaning that it won’t be an all-cash offer as requested by the investment bankers. There are already other and probably better offers like that out there.
In fact, I’ve learned that many of the large MGM creditors increasingly have initiated direct discussions with the companies behind those offers to keep the studio independent and upright, like media investment firm Qualia Capital. (“So why have a dialogue with them if big bids are supposedly coming in on Friday?” one of my experts asks rhetorically.) Qualia offered $500 million to fund operations as part of a plan that also seeks to convert some debt to equity. In return, Qualia would receive an equity stake in MGM. At one point, News Corp sent a letter to MGM with a non-binding offer of cash and debt assistance. Sony said as recently as this week it still wants some role in the James Bond movies once there’s a sale or restructuring — but may have to fight off Fox. And Warner Bros probably will go after The Hobbit franchise if its $2B bid is rejected. And god knows who else is out there, waiting with a check in hand if things go south on Friday.
Look, almost everyone believes — and has for some time – that this is going to be a busted auction at the end of the day. If so, the bet is that, among those sitting on the sidelines, Qualia Capital is first in line to conclude a restructuring deal since it brings capital as well as management expertise to the table. Right now, the situation is very fluid. Or, as one of my sources today quoted Warren Buffet as saying, “only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Did MGM truly think something called Hot Tub Time Machine would be a successful film? The person responsible for greenlighting a piece of crap like that should be fired.
Jimmy Jimmy Jimmy have you seen the movie? Didn’t think so. Many people across the country have and are raving. Read a review, Google the movie, get a twitter account, and swallow your words when the Hangover B.O. is broken. Crazy Vegas trip on a bachelor party, that never happens…..captain original.
And one way or another MGM will survive.
Jimmy,
No one movie sinks a studio. Obviously MGM thought and still does think the movie will do well.
There are no comps in the movie business. It is not like building an office park. These decisions
are equal part art, science and luck.
MGMs problems stem from over enthusiastic speculators who have piled on debt to MGM for over
a quarter century.
The realist
Jimmy said something CALLED Hot Tub, etc. This is an important point that no one in movies or publishing seems to address!! The Title is what draws people in. The TITLE. How many times have I seen a great movie, or read a great book, but the TITLE is so weak that the general population has no interest in it? Oh, yes, it may have rave reviews, or increased revenue…but if the TITLE sounds weak, dumb, or fails to attract attention, then the movie or book will fail!!
I heard HOT TUB was tracking well…is that a mistake?
I saw it last week, thought it was one of the funniest movies I’ve seen in years.
HOT TUB is tracking just below HOW TO TAME YOUR DRAGON (and is polling/playing significantly better than tripe like SHE’S OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE). If anyone should be worried it’s DreamWorks. HTTM is going to be immensely profitable.
DreamWorks isn’t worried — SHE’S OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE isn’t really their movie. Paramount actually is producing and distributing — it just gets the DW logo because (a) it was originally developed there, and (b) that qualifies it for DW’s old HBO deal, which Paramount covets.
He’s talking about How To Tame Your Dragon. THAT’s a DW movie.
Too bad about the mediocre tracking on Hot Tub. It is actually a really funny movie, and everyone I know who saw it (ton of pre-screenings) found it funnier than Hangover. I suspect it will overperform the tracking.
And here’s fingers crossed to restructuring. I’d hate to see everyone there out of a job…
Saw HTTM as well, the movie is HYSTERICAL!! Many of the comments I have read all over the net, people who also have gone to one of the many screenings around the country, the majority of the people loved it and are talking it up. Older female friends of mine on FB have also seen it and loved it. Sure there are some that didn’t like it, but that happens for every film. You think everyone loved “Airplane”, “Caddyshack” or “The Hangover”? Once people get passed the title, they will be ROTFLTAO!! And what’s wrong with the title anyway? Sure it’s silly, it is MEANT to be that way!
I also heard that the movie is tracking well and those numbers have been consistently moving in a positive direction. This could very well surprise to the upside.
Saw it last week, it was hilarious. Much funnier than “She’s Out of My League.”
Given all the interest in the various individual elements, wouldn’t the most sense make to break the studio into pieces? Sell Bond to Sony (or Fox), Hobbit to Warner, and the library to Lionsgate. Several “smaller” sales might be worth more than 1 “big” one, in this circumstance.
I won’t be surprised if Time-Warner buys MGM… because they own almost all of their film library already
Maybe MGM should be sold into pieces. Bond, Hobbit, Stargate series, library, and let others pick over the rest (Panther redux?).
Hot Tub Time Machine is funnier than The Hangover?
Hot Tub Time Machine needs to be about 3.7 Billion Dollars funnier that The Hangover for MGM to be worth anything other than a small cash infusion and a promise from its creditors to allow a restructuring of their debt into equity. The market wouldn’t give 55 cents on the dollar for MGM debt, why would anyone pay more than a buck for the whole mess?
The idea that anyone would want buy MGM to keep it open is almost as laughable as the idea that Hot Tub Time Machine is funnier than The Hangover.
No One of Consequence (such a fitting name, I have never heard). Why are you so hell bent on MGM’s demise? Do you have a financial stake in Song, WB or Lionsgate? From what I understand, Lionsgate couldn’t afford to buy the Miramax library, forget about anything as large as MGM’s.
And the sum is ALWAYS more then the sum of it’s parts.
HTTM could KICK SOME PAST in so many ways.
I actually have no vested interest in seeing MGM (or any other studio) fail. I just see MGM as the ultimate example of something that could be “right” being done “wrong”. Frankly, I find it sad that such a storied brand name has been drudged through the mud for so long> I remember reading an article in Premiere Magazine in 1990 talking about the “years of turmoil”. Here we are, 20 years later, MGM in the same situation (or worse).
Talk about years of wasted opportunities. Those opportunities could have gone to any number of other people/projects/businesses who could have done something with them.
Beware of Qualia and the speculative headfake. Malin, has never worked at a company he didn’t suck all the value out of and subsequently destroy.
It’s always amusing – and a little sad – when the jokers who made a movie post on Nikki Finke to pimp it. You’re gonna beat “The Hangover?” Really? You think that many young filmgoers wanna go get crazy with a middle-aged Johnny Cusack? Whoo-hoo! He’s old enough to be their Dad.
The real star of “The Hangover” was a guy named Todd Phillips. You, sir, are no Todd Phillips.
I saw Hot Tub Time Machine at an early screening. I thought it was very, very funny. I also thought it was better than The Hangover. I don’t, however, think that means it’s a slam-dunk that Hot Tub will beat Hangover’s box office. There’s no way to know whether or not people will buy in. I was terribly disappointed in The Hangover and sorry I spent my money on it. If I hadn’t been able to score a seat to a free early showing of Hot Tub, I might not have spent money on a ticket and opted instead for Netflix after the run simply because of the comparisons to Hangover.
That being said, I surely hope MGM gets a new lease on life. The production team they have in place right now is a good one. Mary Parent has had less that 2-years in the ‘big chair’ and about half of that time has been spent dealing with red tape and corporate drama trying to get movies on the ground. I cross my fingers that MGM remains a stand-alone house, Mary gets to do her ‘thing’ and some of the clueless leftovers from the previous regime are shown the door.
Amend, brutha! ROAR!
Leeroy,
I also enjoyed the movie when I saw it, not believing I would. But isn’t that a part of the magic of movies? The unexpected response we get from any movie, not just a comedy.
Don’t know why people think HTTM is in a competition with Hangover. Hangover set a bar, which is great. Doesn’t mean movies that follow that don’t attain those numbers are either a failure or a bad movie. Has every drama met the lofty numbers of Titanic? Does that mean they were bad? No certainly not!! Does every “animated” 3D movie have to surpass “Avatar” to be good? Again NO!
Yes MGM needs a good solid showing to help them survive, no doubt. Also agree with you about seeing what Mary Parent and her team can do with a relatively clean slate. HTTM is their first movie, not Valkryrie or even Fame. She has a solid track record, think she can have great success once she can focus on what she does, make movies, not unravel nearly a decade of bad business decisions made by previous management and THE BANKS that took on massive debt. If the banks were smarter, they would have insured all that bad debt like was done in the mortgage industry.
Err, I meant, AMEN!
Good or bad, movies like HTTM live and die on opening Friday thanks to twitter. This one is going to blow everyone’s expectations away. Like the Great White Buffalo says…get a twitter account Jimmy and check out the chatter!
How can the town let this landmark of Hollywood just fall apart. Any why are so very many people happy to see that happen… this saddens me. Without Old Hollywood, there would be no current Hollywood.
The “powers-that-be” oftentimes forget this. All the money in town and instead of trying to save the studio, everyone seems eager to distance themselves, even seemingly wishing to sink this glorious and classic ship…
Assuming that many who post here are either writers or directors or development people or agents and their assistants, how can any of you think that breaking MGM apart is a good thing? Not only does it put those working at the studio on the street, but it also puts those of you in the business of writing, directing, developing, representing or soon to be representing talent further away from getting gigs because there are less gigs. Nothing in a break up of MGM will have to do with making anything new other than Bond every other year and those Hobbit movies. There are only a handful of these “studios” out there and when one dies there is no way it will ever be replaced. So we all lose. What the Studio needs is a modernity that no one is talking about. A point of view for filmmaking that has a 21st Century fiscal discipline. It can’t be a Mary Parent Studio. It has to be the original incarnation of New Line; lean, mean, genre driven in its broad appeal movies (HTTM for half the price) and smart, thoughtful and provocotive in its niche movies (Hurt Locker). In truth, they should relegate the Lion to global branding, leave the logo on Bond and Hobbit and Thomas Crown and what should be an animated Panther (how ridiculous to have never made a animated theatrical) and focus on United Artists done right. Not Tom and Paula done wrong. UA should be making 5 pictures a year with budgets no more than 20M that invigorate independent filmmaking and launch new talent. No one is in this business and filling the gap would not only present opportunity, but make UA must have for the creative community. Seems so simple and yet the ghost of Kirkorian and those of his ilk over the years, have done the kind of damage that may be irreversible unless independent money, strung together by someone smart and from the outside, steps in and does a 180 on the philosophy for making movies. It may be too late.
AC,
I can’t speak for others, but I can say for myself that breaking apart MGM is a bad thing: an inevitable thing, but a bad thing. I take no pleasure in saying that Kirk Kerkorian used MGM as a big ATM to finance his resort and casino building business, and Giancarlo Parretti used it as a big ATM to finance his sex life, but it is true. It is sad that we made it legal for people to use companies as big ATM machines, but we did. That said, MGM has too much debt to stay open.
Now, I have to know; because it was just so great, but what in the hell is “21st Century fiscal discipline”? I read the newspaper every day, and this is the first time I’ve heard the phrase; so I just need to know if it is your creation or is it something I haven’t seen yet. It’s so awesome.
Please let me know. I also would love a real life example of 21st Century fiscal discipline.
Thanks so much for this.
AC,
I agree with pretty much everything you have said. Pretty much. But there’s no reason MGM can’t be a Mary Parent Studio. Fiscal responsibility will absolutely be critical, but so is passion. And Mary, unlike so many other studio execs, actually has passion for film making. With so many lawyers and accountants running the show in Hollywood, I’m crossing my fingers for the survival of the Lion with Mary as the tamer.
Gotta take a bath in the HOT TUB TIME MACHINE next Friday… it’ll take me through a trip to the 1980s. I will “Kick Some Past” when
the science fiction comedy opens March 26th.
MGM has lost its Mojo, the ghosts of Thomas Ince and Thalberg are haunting and crying at what this studio has fallen into… Follow the Yellow Brick Road back to success – as the Wizard knows – MGM has always had everything it needs – drop the ignorance and stop the arrogance and the Magic will return…
Speaking as someone who spent many years working beneath the MGM Lion, AC is pretty on the money with his suggestions. But its unlikely that anyone will have the sense to do the right thing. People are still way too in awe of the MGM Legacy. Time and time again people come in thinking they have to restore the studio to its former, impossible to redo, glory rather than just make the studio profitable. And of course everyone who comes in is so blinded and certainly misled about the funds they will have at their disposal(which ultimately seem to not be there…or not for long anyway) and next thing you know there’s no slate, the money’s gone and the studio is for sale AGAIN for a way too high price and the seller tries pathetically to hype the studio’s value with absurd projections for an upcoming film like HTTM. Hot Tub Time Machine is being unfairly singled out here just cuz its next in line but really.
In one earlier version of this scenario, MGM had a prospectus that claimed that RUSSIA HOUSE, QUIGLEY DOWN UNDER and FIRES WITHIN(yeah I only remember it cuz I was there) would generate 500-600 box office gross(I shit you not)and that buyers should value the studio accordingly. 20 years on and its the same old shit. Shut this fucker down and let the studios be reborn as brands under a more stable and competently run company which is Kerkorian and Icahn free. MGM for the high end stuff, and UA for the foreign, indie, horror and lowbrow(and why is JEEPERS CREEPERS 3 still not greenlit? Trust me it’ll do better than Lions for Lambs). Good luck buyers. You’ll need it.
I am keeping my fingers crossed for Leo, there are some amazing people there who have a lot of passion.
Never say never
Because no one has yet mentioned them (and I think it’s only fitting): Louis B. Mayer and Irving Thalberg.
They must be doing 1200 RPM about now…
Sony… Too Little Too Late