That napalm smell surrounding Hollywood is even more pungent this afternoon. I’ve just confirmed that Lionsgate management’s attempt to lowball MGM didn’t work. The studio has now dropped out of the auction after bidding between $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion. (For the record, the Wall Street Journal got to this first.) But what’s most interesting to me is that Lionsgate defied Carl Icahn’s warning not to do any major deals and did bid for MGM after all. (Yesterday, LG vice chairman Michael Burns wouldn’t admit to a bid when interviewed by CNBC.) This is entertaining indeed — until somebody gets hurt. And, inevitably, that’ll be the Lionsgate staff. Management needs to settle with Icahn, and quick.
- LIVE TV MUDSLINGING! Lionsgate vs Icahn
- Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
- Lionsgate Board Rejects Icahn’s $6/Share
- Carl Icahn Moves On Lionsgate — Again
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


I’m confused settle with Carl why because he is big bad Carl. Is blackmail legal. Bullying without a plan is stuff for 3rd grade. Carl is either acting dumb or he is just shaking the tree to see if something comes out.
Is it just me, or does the main philosophy of Liongate’s management is WWCID, or What Won’t Carl Icahn Do?
They do need to make some sort of accommodation with Icahn, or they’ll only succeed in hurting the company with their poison pills and billion+ dollar MGM bids with their own $600 million in debt.
Icahn refuses to deal with the realities of the business he invested in. Lionsgate has navigated insanely choppy indie waters for 10 years and is still around, having successful releases and great tv shows, which makes them, along with Summit, unique in the business. Replacing management will send his shares from $6.00 to $3.00 within a year. I’m sure putting his son Brett at the helm, with no film experience, which is his endgame here, will bring up the stock price and make the company wildly successful (not).
And Nikki that’s a typo above -should be ” before the raises his hostile bid for Lionsgate” not MGM (which would be interesting, though)
I just don’t see MGM getting nearly as much as they want for the studio. Their number of releases have been free falling for 10 years now