The reaction from independent film distribution vets to Tribeca Enterprises’ plan to distribute its festival films on Video On Demand (VOD) is most politely described as skeptical. The biggest hurdle facing Robert De Niro, Jane Rosenthal, and Geoff Gilmore? Erasing the lingering perception that when a movie bypasses theatrical distribution for VOD, it’s DOA. Tribeca has secured VOD distribution on such cable providers as Comcast, Cablevision, and Verizon FIOS, but naysayers feel these cable giants often treat VOD as an after-thought, and don’t provide the promotional care and feeding that traditional distributors feel is vital to specialty film releases.
Tribeca’s chief creative officer Geoff Gilmore told me that he and the Tribeca team have carefully considered the pitfalls and have smoothed out a distribution road that has been as bumpy as the cobblestone streets that surround Tribeca’s downtown headquarters. Gilmore believes the festival’s growing momentum creates a high awareness level among specialty film lovers for a dedicated Tribeca VOD channel. That effort will be helped by promotional clout provided by longtime festival sponsor American Express, which signed on to become Founding Partner of Tribeca’s VOD distribution program, as well as a separate online venture that will show short films and broadcast filmmaker panels during the fest’s run from April 21-May 2.
While it’s not exactly clear yet how much promotional might Amex will bring, one thing is for sure: promotional spends won’t be deducted from the film’s revenues the way traditional P&A costs are. Because of this, Gilmore feels that filmmakers might actually make some money beyond the minimum guarantees Tribeca Film is paying for titles. Tribeca Film has acquired 10 features that will start their VOD runs during the festival. 7 bow on VOD the same time they make festival premieres. Each film gets a minimum 60 day VOD run before expanding to DVD, airline and hotel distribution. The occasional breakout title could get a limited theatrical release, though it’s not immediately clear who’ll book the theaters.
Initial films include the Participant Media documentary Climate of Change; Birth of Big Air, the ESPN documentary on extreme sports athlete Mat Hoffman that’s produced by Jackass collaborators Spike Jonze and Johnny Knoxville; sex & drugs & rock & roll, a drama about punk rock pioneer Ian Dury that stars Andy Serkis and makes its North American debut at Tribeca; Road, Movie, which makes its U.S. debut at the festival; and Timer, which played at last year’s fest.
Those titles are a far cry from Shrek Forever After, which opens the festival before a massive global rollout. The Tribeca program is an attempt to solve the problem that haunts festivals. Films debut, thrill sophisticated fest audiences, and walk away without distribution because specialty executives are unconvinced the star-less titles won’t even recoup small P&A outlays. Gilmore believes the VOD program will grow into a viable option for those films.
“We don’t have the resources to buy titles that would go down a major route,” Gilmore told me. “What we’re trying to do is elevate the potential of films that might not otherwise have the opportunity to be discovered by a larger audience. We believe in transactional VOD, and that without those advertising costs that have to be recouped before filmmakers see any money, this can generate real revenue for them. We’ve got a handcrafted deal with MSOs, with a Tribeca button you’ll push on VOD. The ballgame is changing in independent distribution, and we’ve got a package of marketing strategies that begin with the sponsorship of American Express to give visibility to these titles. Do I think we’ve got all of this figured out? I’m not that arrogant, but I do think we’ve made a good start.”






Until real advertising dollars and wide marketing campaigns are being spent, any VOD release shall remain the digital equivalent of four-walling your movie across the country.
Happy to see they are trying something to help ou the indie world. If they succeed great and if not at least it provides a point to work from
the reality is that it’s great that they and others are expending so much time and energy in an effort to figure out a way to get films seen AND monetized (it is a business after all).
that said, i think the wise course is to be a follower in this game. 3 – 5 years from now there will be some clear leaders in the space, and most of them will be built on the learnings (and failings) of all the current players.
I’m so happy to read this. As a young filmmaker myself, the only “prestige” a festival title could get from an immediate theatrical release is from those “sophisticated audiences”. No one else really cares. They’re seeing Avatar for the hundredth time instead.
Today, (young) people want to have unlimited access to all product, and with VOD – even though it is less “glamorous” than theatrical – those films that may not ever see the light of day post-festival will now have a chance to reach anyone and everyone. One cannot expect that having a film screen at a festival will lead to instant and wide success, especially if it’s a first or second project. Let the buzz grow naturally through the internet, let some money be made, and be happy you got that exposure in the first place.
It’s better than uploading it to YouTube yourself.
Its good to experiment. Right now there are new film-makers with something interesting to say that can’t get seen by people who would like to see them. Even worse, they can’t make money at it.
Roger Corman at least got people started in movies by allowing them to earn some minimal amount. A lot of these films won’t make money, but for some to succeed, and start that learning process of what audiences want and respond to, is good. It’s a lot better to “fail” at a film that doesn’t cost much and covers most of its cost by VOD or something, than to be a wunderkind and handed the reins of a big-budget movie.
We don’t have B movies, Roger Corman, and Republic Serials for folks to learn their craft and move upwards. Something has to happen.
A festival, self distributing titles that are premiering at it’s film festival. Now I know that the film fest world is hardly a democratic environment but does this seem like a conflict of interest to anyone else?
No – it seems smart. Perhaps all festivals should do this. At $3.99 to $5.99 per film X millions of viewers all over the world – quite a bit of money to be made. Also, it seems more democratic because the viewers will decide what they want to see, and more democratic because of easy access. Many people can’t afford babysitters and popcorn now. The paradigm has shifted. It is also a boon to independent filmmakers to get their work seen.
I have to agree with Gilmore: they are making a good start. Industry skepticism should be the last thing to stop anyone from using their smarts. If they’ve run the numbers and can help defeat the P&A boogeyman for indie film distribution, then they should go forward, and hard, with this thing. I just hope someone over there is thinking just as creatively about promotional possibilities. There certainly are brand new ways – and cheaper if online – of generating awareness about their VOD channel and its offerings.
I also can’t help but think that it would be very nice indeed if this VOD option was also accessible through Netflix Instant Watch. It seems on that service, branding and offering films on a kind of “channel” works very well for [mostly indie] distributors. The biggest and most obvious of those distributors is Starz Play, but I’ve often wondered why there isn’t more of that going on there. Where are the Hammer House of Horror, Asylum, Anchor Bay, etc. “channels”? Hardly anyone is going out to Best Buy and stocking up DVD collections anymore.
Likely for Tribeca, the revenue model isn’t the same as if they get a cable channel. But from what I read at the time of the deal, Starz didn’t cut Netflix any special discounts to get access to Starz’s library; Netflix took the loss now against the bet that they’ve backed the right horse for how auds will want to view their content in the future (Netflix Instant Watch comes through TVs now).
Just some thoughts on this very interesting article and the tantalizing future of distribution. Thanks Nikkie!
I think this service would be really helpful to makers of micro-budget festival films. Right now, there are VOD services out there making offers to filmmakers, with no money at all up front, and the filmmakers have no way of knowing whether putting a film on the VOD service is any better than just posting it on You Tube. If people like Gilmore were involved in a VOD service, then filmmakers would have a faint hope of not being jerked around.
It sounds like a nice idea, but who would pay for a movie on demand if it has no press, and no stars? I might tune in to an indie on cable, but I sure am not going to buy it on demand when I have no reason to.
Reviews and buzz.
The future and savior of indie film is to have great review search engines — like the Netflix thing, but better. So good movies can can rise to the top as people see and recommend them and get passed around from person to person…
Only way it will work….
This is a great step in the right direction. The goal for any festival film is to find an audience beyond the festival itself. Gilmore understands this, and is willing to take risks. The “DOA perception” will quickly fade as VOD becomes a more viable distribution option for indie filmmakers. Cowabunga!
Great idea. Can’t hurt. Worth a shot. It’s a start at least, and I think the more consumers accept VOD the more they will take a chance on films distributed this way. I think it will require an initial pool of films to be released via subscription perhaps with a minimum amount paid to all films and then a pro rate amount on top to the films that are viewed the most. Just think of it as another form of P&A and if it generates buzz than perhaps the film can be rereleased through other avenues.
How exciting?!? So many distribution venues are opening up to people who don’t have major studios behind them! I was looking forward to watching ANTICHRIST, which I thought was going to take more effort to see, but I found it flipping through the VOD stuff on my TV. This is really exciting. I think the future will be very bright! Congratulations, Tribeca! Another great move!
Ok- so we all acknowledge digital platforms are “of the future” for small minded indies to see life beyond festivals…but the bottom line is that that tribeca productions – jane and bobs prod co – are bigger studio fare with the occasional indie film (but is it really an indie if a budget surpasses $20m?).
the question is, are they only chipping away at the traditional studio pipeline that their own films rely on for distribution? we have to preserve the theater experience for audiences or we’re all going down on a sinking ship.
The problem with VOD is that when you turn on the TV, it’s tuned to the last station you were watching — unlike a computer or a billboard sign, it’s very difficult to put a message (like “watch this Tribeca Festival movie”) in front of a television viewer’s eyeballs when it’s most important — the moment the set is turned on.
There will be a huge paradigm shift once this problem is solved, once somebody implements a method for allowing some kind of introductory or “splash” screen to appear on television. Then publicity and advertising for all kinds of non-traditional programming will be possible, and films such as Tribeca’s will get the initial exposure they need. Until then — a difficult road.
Very positive step.
If you’ve watched the Tribeca line up over the past few years a lot of their films have recognizable names (Alec Baldwin, Jason Patric, Sara Michelle Geller, Carrie Anne Moss etc…) in them but darker indie plots– in other words, not that easy to land wide distribution. NOR SHOULD THEY, given the subject matter.
But, this gives those films a much wider outlet to be seen by kids in the flyovers who are serious film buffs and will, I believe, pay to see them, if the price is right (3-5 dollars) and they can see it the first weekend it’s released, rather than having to wait.
If they try and charge 10-12 bucks, good luck.
Truth is, if budgets are kept in the 5-7 million range, these films can and will make money as long as they land big enough names to justify a small, but targeted P&A on sites like AICN and IMDB where you are reaching those hardcore film kids. You still can get some foreign pre-sale money with these names to cover a good portion of the budget.
I think the way to go to establish a dedicated Tribeca theater in NY, LA, Chicago and SF, maybe Miami. Just one or two screens tops and do a limited theatrical for all these films, playing them for 3 weeks tops, starting right after the fest ends, simultaneous to the VOD release date, so you’re more likely to have your stars do some talk show press for them. You’ll reach way more eyeballs and the film don’t have the stigma of VOD.
These theaters would then establish themselves as a very specific brand of art house theater that, yes, only showed Tribeca films, but still appealed to that core audience that never wants to see Avatar.
I agree that the theatrical release concept needs to be re-invented. Today, most circuits outside the Landmark chain will not play any content that doesn’t respect the 4 month DVD window. Digital theatres, for example, provide a fantastic new opportunity to reach a sophisticated audience in theatres around the country – not just LA and NY. Exhibs need to participate in the process, making going to the theatre an experience that can’t be replicated by watching a download on your laptop.
I don’t see the perception that VOD is any different than direct-to-video changing any time soon.
People who read the trades will know what’s creating a buzz at Tribeca. No one else will. No one else even knows what a “Tribeca” is!