EXCLUSIVE: Even before The Hangover opened, executives at Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures had commissioned a script for another installment. Who knew it would take six months of headache-inducing negotiations to make it happen?
Finally, the participants have completed talks and are ready to sign deals to reprise. I’m told that Zach Galifianakis, Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms will each be paid in the vicinity of $5 million against 4% of first dollar gross. Director/producer Todd Phillips will be paid around $10 million against 10%. For Phillips, there are also escalators and bonuses that insure if the sequel does anywhere close to the original’s $467 million worldwide gross, Phillips will not make less than his income on the original. That meter is still running, and it has passed the $50 million mark.
Why was The Hangover 2 such a difficult deal to put together? It was a perfect storm of leverage: the three stars made less than $1 million collectively on a film that became Hollywood’s biggest grossing R rated comedy ever. Those stars did not have options locking them into a sequel. What they did have were teams of managers, agents and attorneys who negotiated together, determined about one thing: Warners and Legendary weren’t getting another Hangover unless the trio got paid well.
Warners didn’t make option deals with the cast because the studio never envisioned a raunchy comedy would become a juggernaut that begged for an encore. In fact, Warners’ uncertainty over Phillips’ casting choices were the reason the filmmaker gambled his upfront fee in exchange for slightly more than 15% of the film’s overall revenue that allowed him to make the movie for the $34 million budget ceiling that the studio established for that cast. At the time, only Cooper had any feature name recognition.
Cooper made slightly more than Helms and Galifianakis, but none made more than $300,000 to star in the original, I’m told. While Warners eventually cut each actor a $1 million bonus check right before sequel negotiations began, the cast was a bargain the first time around. So reps of the thesps were dug in for a long battle when the studio initially came to the table offering each actor $3 million against 1% of the gross, with a deadline attached. That deadline passed, and I heard that twice during the talks, Warner Bros chief Jeff Robinov walked away from the table and pronounced that the sequel was off.
Finally, the deal-making got done. The sequel’s still being honed, but an October start is considered likely if Helms can work things out with his NBC series The Office. The sequel will be considerably more expensive than the first film—upfront salary alone for the trio and Phillips is around $25 million, and the original costs $34 million all in. But even if the original budget doubled and Warners is paying over 20% of first dollar gross, I think this is a good bet on a film with an established audience that wants more. A studio that wanted to establish itself in comedy has a beachhead franchise, and most likely its big comedy for Memorial Day weekend, 2011.
UPDATE: Since many commenters asked, Justin Bartha, who played the missing groom in the original, will be back for the sequel. I have no idea what he will be paid. As for the writers, I believe the script is currently being worked on by Todd Phillips and Scot Armstrong, but there might be others contributing.





Can I plz be the first to say lightning don’t strike twice?
Agreed. The Hangover was one of those movies that caught on with the audience but I find myself wondering if they can recreate what made the film so much fun to watch. If they’re not careful it could turn into Evan Almighty.
You are not the only one. Other ELITIST SNOBS like yourself also CHOSE to dislike the movie even before seeing it, if you did in fact see it…
My thoughts exactly.
Even if it only retain half the audience of the first film it’ll still gross 250 mill, subtract the cost im sure the studio still comes out 50-75 mill in profit. Easy decision to say yes to this project if you ask me.
I am going to mark your words…..they should have seen this coming but noooo..This is Lala Land for you
Or once for that matter.
Silly thing to say. Many sequels do well. The sequel to Meet the Parents out-grossed the original by 200 million dollars.
Seriously – am I the only one who though the Hangover sucked? The coda was the only remotely amusing part. And half of that was relief, because the frat boy tedium was nearing an end.
Yes. You have bad taste.
I thought it was pretty good, nowhere near a comedy classic though. It became a phenomenon because of a simple concept and a perfect storm of luck — every other comedy last summer flopped. (Land of the Lost, Year One, Funny People…)
Yeah but those other movies either sucked or they were just ehh o.k. I can’t believe you mentioned Land of the Lost, that is perhaps the worst movie I have ever seen along with stepbrothers. I did not laugh through either movie.
I actually thought it was the funniest movie I’ve seen in a long time.
Course, I’ve seen ZOOLANDER a half dozen times. I think it’s necessary to admit that. I’m seeking help…
And as far as lightning striking twice…you never know. Odds are against them but the writers are strong. Some genius in a suit will suggest they tweak it with 3D in mind and add a Taylor Lautner co-starring role…
Most overrated movie of the last decade. I did enjoy it the first time I saw it…when it was called DUDE, WHERE’S MY CAR?
Count it! Vote Bob Weaver 2010
I thought it sucked, too. I have no idea what people are raving about. Zero genuine laughs. Storywise, it felt like one big narrative gimmick. Throw incongruous crap at the audience and then tediously weave them into a narrative whose implausibility we are supposed to accept because, man, those guys were wasted.
And, oh my god, there’s a naked chinaman in the trunk!! Stop, you’re killing me.
actually, i believe the guy was japanese.
Tigers and Tyson and roofies, oh my! That movie threw in everything but the laughs.
Agreed. I had a hard time finding anything worth laughing about in the film (that wasn’t already shown in the previews, and even then wasn’t all that funny).
I thought it was horrible and not funny. Ed and Zach are hillarous though in other ventures.
As an overall movie, yeah it did kind of suck — but it had some really great, fun components: Helms, Cooper and ZG are all worth paying big bucks to bring back.
And Todd Phillips’ deal on the first one? Whoever the agent was who made that for him needs to be given some kind of award.
Todd Feldman. Dude’s a shrimp but a monster negotiator.
Yes you are the only one
You are not the only one. Other ELITIST SNOBS like yourself also CHOSE to dislike the movie even before seeing it, if you did in fact see it.
So Johns, you going for a meme here, or what?
I agree, I thought it sucked too!!
The film made almost a half a billion dollars. So yes, you are the only one.
So did “Wild Wild West”
Yeah, but WIll Smith can brutally stomp a baby to death onscreen for 90 minutes and still make serious money.
Yeah, you are the only one.
Yes, you’re the only one.
No, you are not the only one. But then again, US humor is kind a strange kettle of fish to many other parts of the world.
No, my friend. There are many of us. It was slow and not that funny. Maybe late night on a cable channel you catch a scene or two. But then again, they make these movies because they know that is where it will end up and play forever. Nobody guessed it would be box office gold. But why not. Congrats to all.
Thank you.
i think ur a bell head with no sense of humor.secondly this is a movie that a guy can really laugh at, a movie full of surprises and creative characters.anyone who does’nt like this move is a stuck up snob!
you mean SURPRISES like when the nerdy guy finally stands up to his bitchy wife at the end and she storms off all flustered in the face of this changed man? you’re right, that was very surprising. nobody saw that coming (the moment her character was introduced).
Yes, you are the only one.
My husband and I thought it sucked too.
Your husband only said that to agree with you. He was cracking up inside. He is wipped. I know from experience.
[x] sweet truth
Yes you are the only fing one who thought it sucked.
Yes, you are the only one.
No, but the only one pretentious enough to throw around ‘coda’ and ‘tedium’ to demonstrate that this movie is SO beneath you
Since when is the word ‘coda’ pretentious?
Read a book, dude, or even a script.
Yes, you’re the only one. I hope your contrarian-ness keeps you warm at night, or maybe pays the bills.
It made 467 million. But, its probably your old or have no sense og humor. Probably some of column a and column b.
Yes, you are the only one.
I disagree. I am a snobby, hate-everything, bitter actor (especially bad comedies, which is most), and I thought the Hangover worked. Very funny from start to finish. I thoroughly enjoyed it. But to each his own.
You are not the only one
Seriously, you are the only one.
nope, AmITheOnlyOne?…you are not alone. but money rules.
Agreed. My girlfriend and I felt like we were the only ones not laughing in the theater. And we love comedies. Maybe we’re comedy snobs, but this movie was not it was all cracked up to be. Old school was waaaaaayyy better.
Terrible movie, but I completely laughed my ass of during the whole thing. I have no idea why, except it was goddamn funny. Go figure.
The three leads deserve every penny they can wring out of a sequel. I suspect the reason I laughed has less to do with the script (which honestly blew on paper) and more to do with the actors (and I’m pro-writer to a painful degree.)
You’re not alone.
I failed to see anything funny in that movie.
Yes, it was pretty weak/wildly overpraised.
However lucrative in our Jersey Shore world, at the end of the day, it’s Porky’s and Police Academy territory, nowhere near Animal House or Caddyshack.
Mike Fleming, you are kicking ass sir. I was wondering why this deal took so long.
Um, depend on lightning striking twice — regardless of whether the movie was lackluster (which it was). It may make slightly less, but it’ll still do ridiculous business. I’d say that’s a sure thing. I saw the movie the second weekend. People went wild for it. I can’t imagine those people going, “Nah, I think I’m going to skip out on this round.”
I need to decide now to see it right away or avoid it altogether because I missed it in theatres and by the time I caught up with it the marketing of it diminished unviewed portions of the film to roughly 5 minutes.
What about Justin Bartha?
Someone has to say it.
Warner Brother’s business affairs dept. is in the toilet.
They are the worst in town at this moment.
Deals take forever to finish.
Their people never get back to you with or without the information or response.
Warner’s is the last studio in town anyone I know wants to do business with right now because of this.
They are making the Fox business affair dept. look professional in comparison.
That’s a huge budget for a slideshow. The sequel IS going to be all photos, right?
AmITheOnlyOne probably is the only one. When I covered The Hangover two years ago it was the first comedy that I gave a 100 out of a 100. For what it was, a Vegas frat-boy movie it was perfect. I give the movie a 95. There was a storyline in the script where Cooper’s character wakes up with a sore ass and throughout the day he believes that someone took advantage of him. Warner’s probably didn’t want to stray into this territory so alas this was removed. They created a comedy franchise out of thin air. Give them their due.
I read the Lucas Moore version of the script as well and it was far from a 100. I was amazed by how nimble and fun the finished product was. Phillips/Garelick and the cast saved it.
I second that, Hangover bored the hell out of me. I couldn’t see what all the hype was for.
Yes, you were the only one.
Mike:
Nikki exposed the writing scandal last year.
Jeremy Garelick and Philips were apparently responsible for anything truly side splitting in the original. So, who wrote/is writing the sequel?
What’s become of the
Lightning never strikes twice, you’re right. I mean, the cast was locked in for a while now. Question is, who is brave enough to write/direct a sequel that will never live up to the first?
That’s all great, but what about the writers? Who is writing this?
Yeah sure this will open but it will sink and probably stink. What a stupid idea to make this into a sequel. Robinov is an idiot.
Most people who loved the HANGOVER that aren’t future/current/or former frat boys are just trying to say they loved it to seem “with it” and “current.”
The movie was bad. Played to lowest common denominator, but because it made money, everyone is forced to pretend like it was more than it was.
Most people who hated the HANGOVER that aren’t future/current/or former snobs are just trying to say they hated it to seem “cultured” and “superior.”
The movie was funny. Played to silliness and absurdity, but because it made money, snobs have to go out of their way to pretend that they’re smarter than everyone else.
The thrill is gone. The first movie had plot twists and a mysterious ending. Not sure if it can be replicated.
is the fact not relevant that all 3 actors have the same agent at caa?
The Right Coast, ‘Lightning Strike’ successes are a thing of luck in this business, The Hangover was a success because it had great hold throughout the summer thanks to a brilliant script and an even more superb cast. People loved this movie and will be lining up in the streets to see a sequel.
Yes AmITheOnlyOne, you are the only one.
Poor Justin Bartha. I hope he got something approaching the other three’s salaries. He was fantastic, too.
No he wasn’t. He was the odd one out. But luckily on the roof… best supporting was the technically escort…
re: AmITheOnlyOne
Yes you are.
Snark all you want to about the future of H2. Yes,I know rest stops on the highway to salary bloated sequel success are littered with the remains of overnight sensations who failed to read the script. Be Still! Can we just relax for a moment & bask in the current reflected glory of a creative (Todd Phillips) who gambled his upfront fee to hold out for his acting choices & won & still wins… on the first one. $51 mil, $52 mil, $5-5-5-3 mil, .
The fact that casting hilarious guys like ZG and EH was considered “risky” by the studio shows how out of touch they are with what makes comedy work.
How many times can the suits keep going back to the same “list” of pre-approved alleged B.O. draws and keep coming back empty handed before they start giving more casting freedom to the people who actually have their fingers on the pulse of who’s actually FUNNY.
No, I agree, it wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. Not sure why it was so successful other than the right movie at the right time. But I live in Las Vegas, so maybe that’s why I didn’t like it.
More detailed numbers on deals!! Great reporting.
And no point in debating Hangover’s merits or chances, it’s money in the bank for at least 2 more pics. That’s the great thing about mediocre pics that do extremely well (madagascar, ice age, xmen…)