EXCLUSIVE: Even before The Hangover opened, executives at Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures had commissioned a script for another installment. Who knew it would take six months of headache-inducing negotiations to make it happen?
Finally, the participants have completed talks and are ready to sign deals to reprise. I’m told that Zach Galifianakis, Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms will each be paid in the vicinity of $5 million against 4% of first dollar gross. Director/producer Todd Phillips will be paid around $10 million against 10%. For Phillips, there are also escalators and bonuses that insure if the sequel does anywhere close to the original’s $467 million worldwide gross, Phillips will not make less than his income on the original. That meter is still running, and it has passed the $50 million mark.
Why was The Hangover 2 such a difficult deal to put together? It was a perfect storm of leverage: the three stars made less than $1 million collectively on a film that became Hollywood’s biggest grossing R rated comedy ever. Those stars did not have options locking them into a sequel. What they did have were teams of managers, agents and attorneys who negotiated together, determined about one thing: Warners and Legendary weren’t getting another Hangover unless the trio got paid well.
Warners didn’t make option deals with the cast because the studio never envisioned a raunchy comedy would become a juggernaut that begged for an encore. In fact, Warners’ uncertainty over Phillips’ casting choices were the reason the filmmaker gambled his upfront fee in exchange for slightly more than 15% of the film’s overall revenue that allowed him to make the movie for the $34 million budget ceiling that the studio established for that cast. At the time, only Cooper had any feature name recognition.
Cooper made slightly more than Helms and Galifianakis, but none made more than $300,000 to star in the original, I’m told. While Warners eventually cut each actor a $1 million bonus check right before sequel negotiations began, the cast was a bargain the first time around. So reps of the thesps were dug in for a long battle when the studio initially came to the table offering each actor $3 million against 1% of the gross, with a deadline attached. That deadline passed, and I heard that twice during the talks, Warner Bros chief Jeff Robinov walked away from the table and pronounced that the sequel was off.
Finally, the deal-making got done. The sequel’s still being honed, but an October start is considered likely if Helms can work things out with his NBC series The Office. The sequel will be considerably more expensive than the first film—upfront salary alone for the trio and Phillips is around $25 million, and the original costs $34 million all in. But even if the original budget doubled and Warners is paying over 20% of first dollar gross, I think this is a good bet on a film with an established audience that wants more. A studio that wanted to establish itself in comedy has a beachhead franchise, and most likely its big comedy for Memorial Day weekend, 2011.
UPDATE: Since many commenters asked, Justin Bartha, who played the missing groom in the original, will be back for the sequel. I have no idea what he will be paid. As for the writers, I believe the script is currently being worked on by Todd Phillips and Scot Armstrong, but there might be others contributing.




Sure, it was lightning in a bottle but the writing was there. The characters worked and those three guys were absolutely charming together. People laughed their asses off and promptly told all their friends it was a “must see.” The sequel is gonna have a HUGE opening and the drop-off will hinge on how good the script/story is. If it’s any good, “they will come.” If is sucks, it’ll drop like a hot rock. Either way, Galifianakis and Helms will always be the biggest winners. Bradley Cooper was bound to become a movie star with our without “The Hangover” and Philips was already a winner. I’m already anticipating the chants of “please don’t suck!” when the trailer first hits theaters.
I heard the baby is holding out for $1.5 mil, 2% of the gross and wants to be able to keep the blublockers once shooting is done…a deal is likely if they can figure out a way to shoot around his naptime/feeding schedules and figure out a way to keep Bradly Cooper from hitting on his mom.
I thought it was pretty overrated but had it’s moments. I thought Old School is still his best movie. Straight comedies are so few and far between and Phillips keeps turning out good ones. How can a studio not trust a director who had so many films under his belt already?
Kudos to Phillips for gambling on the cast he wanted. I wish more studios would follow this plan instead of over-analyzing and over-paying. New talent is not the end of the world. It’s refreshing and lets the story speak for itself.
what about the baby? what’s his piece?
I will always have a passion for the movies, but it’s getting stupidly expensive. I think I dropped close to $20 for the ticket to see this. I’d be willing to shell out cash to see a sequel, but I think i’ll check screamincoupons first and see if i can get some tickets there.
HANGOVER 2 OMG i have to see it ! sounds FABULOUS !
What about Justin Bartha and Heather Graham? And any chance Mike Tyson will reprise his role?
==
Steve
As long as it starts with another Glen Danzig song, I’m there.
DO NOT LIKE BRADLEY COOPER AT ALL! Sorry for the CAPS but I had to express the uselessness of heir Cooper. Zack and Ed are great, don’t need Cooper at all. He is very unappealing and not likable.
Please stop YELLING, BOB.
Thank you AMITHEONLYONE! yes, “The Hangover” was mediocre at best. What saved the movie was the end credits which were hysterical. But all throughout the movie, i’m thinking “what the hell is so great about this”? Perfect timing for this kind of comedy in the summertime without competition for other similar comedies made this into such a huge hit. And these actors are SO replaceable! Does anyone really think that audiences went to see this film because of Zach or Bradley? Can they be replaced? yes!!! Good luck WB!
@youareright I can honestly say that I saw this movie SPECIFICALLY because of Zach Galifianakis. I had been a fan of his stand up for years.
I find it odd that people are failing to realize that there is a difference between a “good movie” and a “funny movie”. Was The Hangover a good movie? No. It was a little on the slow side and the premise was just plain stupid. Was it a funny movie? No doubt. The 3 leads carried the movie which was packed with enough one liners and gags to fill 2 comedies. If you didn’t find it funny, I’m surprised you watched it at all, as the type of movie it would be was CLEARLY laid out in the previews. But to each his own.
Loved the first one. I am a frat boy. I love the fact that I’m a frat boy. I don’t care what you think. I loved the movie. Looking forward to the second one, even though I doubt it tops the first one either.
I got a hangover just watching it. Terrible film on any level.
I SEE! You’ve worked the TITLE of the film into a pointed and clever CRITICISM of the film. Brilliant!
Have to agree with both Right Coast and AmI, movie wasn’t all that great.
They deserve everything they get. Good for them, for their representatives and their families. The movie made tons of money. That said, god damn, three mediocre actors. Each one. Imagine being in the biggest R rated film of all time and you walk down the street and nobody recognizes you. I was recently sitting down to a meeting with three entertainment professional and one of the “stars” was sitting near us. None knew who it was. A couple of close guesses but guesses they were.
Thank you.
I have NEVER commented on any board, but I must say I felt exactly as you do about the movie being unfunny. It doesn’t need a defense except it’s money-making history, so it doesn’t matter if we didn’t like it or get it. LOTS of people did… even thought that still doesn’t make it a good movie. LOL.
This movie completely sucked! Why anyone would spend another dime producing a sequel is beyond me. Seriously, the All-time worst movie ever!
The original was funny I’ll give it that but it was completely overhyped and people let their humor guards down. The sequel will make more money than the original only because people are still in stupid love with it. Good for these guys for wanting to get paid.
Wow that Robinov sure is a tough negotiator. He showed them who’s boss didn’t he? Next time Jeff walk away from the table three times or thrice as they say then you’ll see them beg for mercy!
The first was great … not sure what I think about a sequel. I feel like it ended very well. I’ll eventually Netflix it, I’m sure. But a trip to the theater where it’ll cost $15 for a ticket, candy and a drink? I doubt it.
I wholeheartedly agree. There were maybe 2 lol moments in the entire movie but the pictures in the end tricked peoples brains into thinking it was funny. Was no Swingers that for damn sure. Shouldn’t try so hard to be funny in the sequel (how to we outdo Mike Tyson??) but I’m sure all that hollyhood money will poison the well and it will suck.
yeah. you are the only one.
I’ve heard the sequel won’t be shot in Vegas. Even more so than the actors, Vegas really was the star of the original, with this film basically a blown out version of those cool and iconic ‘What happens in Vegas’ commercials.
Todd Philips is a complete genius for aping something that worked as well as those commercials did (as opposed to Tim Vaughan and Ashton’s middling interpretation of the marketing campaign). Be interesting to see what he does with the sequel.
Am I the only one wondering why Justin Bartha isn’t mentioned? Although he was gone for most of the movie, he was quite funny and surely they’re not going to get rid of him as he’s the one who brought the 4 friends together.
Am I the only one? probably. Now go watch The Matrix ‘Neo’
Only a top 10 comedy all-time. If you didn’t like the original, just kill yourself.