UPDATE: Sony sources tell me that the studio expects Major League Baseball to be on board with the version that will go into production. (MLB previously had approved the Steven Soderbergh version.) It will be formally submitted to MLB in the next week or two. The big hope is that MLB plays ball because it will be difficult to make the film without them. The league gets a fat licensing fee, but it is the gatekeeper to using logos on uniforms and making stadiums available for location shooting. Optimism is high because the film doesn’t paint the sport in a disparaging fashion, which is MLB’s main concern.
EXCLUSIVE: Columbia Pictures is locking in a July start date for the Bennett Miller-directed Moneyball. The picture is close to getting a green light after the above the line participants adjusted their deals to bring the film’s budget down from near $60 million to somewhere in the vicinity of $47 million. The budget gyrations have played out over the last month, and the effort was helped by the delivery of the latest rewrite by Aaron Sorkin that has everybody excited about making the film. The participants seemed to take to heart the message of the Michael Lewis Moneyball book, which was about how Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane hurt his playing career becoming a bonus baby phenom who signed for the money, and then remade himself as a baseball executive who fielded winning A’s teams with a fraction of the payroll that rivals were spending. Considering how Universal killed the drama Cartel last week over budget and script concerns, the flexibility of the Moneyball participants probably salvaged a film that had been a question mark in recent weeks. I’m told everybody took deal haircuts, including Brad Pitt, who is certainly getting less than the $15 million he signed on for when he originally agreed to play Beane. Pitt obviously is committed to seeing this through. Many felt he would jump after Sony execs halted production on the Steven Soderbergh version of Moneyball, days before shooting was supposed to get underway last summer. That version had a $58 million price tag, and a docu-drama visual style that didn’t match the down-the-middle drama that was written by Stan Chervin and Steve Zaillian. Presumably, Pitt will be rewarded with a stronger back-end definition that gives him a bigger payday if the film succeeds, but rumors racing around Hollywood included one that Pitt would make back some of what he surrendered on Moneyball by signing on to another Columbia film, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Both the studio and Pitt’s reps denied that, noting there is no Tattoo script to even ponder. That script is being written by Zaillian, based on the Stieg Larsson novel that was already turned into a Swedish film.
Certainly, the argument for Pitt to bet on himself is made easier by the success of the other recent Lewis book adaptation, The Blind Side. Sandra Bullock worked for an upfront salary of around $2.5 million, but will make tens of millions of dollars through a rich back-end definition on a film that has so far grossed $287 million worldwide and is still playing overseas. The Blind Side would not have gotten made without her willingness to bet on herself in what became an Oscar-winning performance. While Moneyball is still pricey–baseball pictures don’t traditionally do well overseas–the budget trims allow Columbia to win if the picture hits a double or better.
Miller, who last directed Capote, will begin casting soon. Beyond Pitt, he so far has locked Jonah Hill to play Beane ‘s statistics-savvy assistant Paul De Podesta. Scratched from the lineup card is the entire roster of ex-ballplayers Soderbergh had set to play themselves, including Scott Hatteberg, David Justice, Darryl Strawberry and Lenny Dykstra.






Bah. The movie does not look interesting, but at least it will most likely be better than Soderbergh’s crazy docu-drama movie that he had in mind.
And how many World Series’ did the A’s win?
Yankeefan
David Justice should be played by Jesse Williams. A freaking doppleganger! Love that Jonah Hill looks NOTHING like the real Paul De Podesta.
oh Mike..so many holes…..
where’s the mention that Sony is already into this movie for $18 million before shooting?
So add that to the highly unlikely figure of $48 million budget…Brad cut his fee for Soderbergh..he’s definitely back in at full boat this time around and most likely will be getting 20 against 20 for Dragon Tattoo. And to say people say there’s nothing to the GWDT rumors because there’s no script yet? Well it’s going to be directed by David Fincher..who Brad will follow anywhere…and what other movie does Brad have on the horizon that’s going to pay him in full.
oh, and MLB has never approved the Sorkin or the Zaillian scripts. The film cannot be made without MLB approval.
yeah..Mike..seems pretty easy to confirm…why don’t you call MLB and see if they’ve approved it?
I am a huge baseball fan and loved Moneyball, but I am not so sure how this be translates into a compelling movie story. I’ll be pulling for it, though.
Glad Pitt stuck with it.
“Certainly, the argument for Pitt to bet on himself is made easier by the success of the other recent Lewis book adaptation, The Blind Side.”
I love statements like this. As if “The Blind Side” and “Moneyball” are remotely similar stories. The former is a cornball, sappy, but inspiring story about highschool football. The latter is a super insider-y but fascinating story that revolves around statistics in professional baseball.
The success of one has little correlation to the success of the other.
Brian, if you read the Blindside you would know the tone of the book was a world apart from the movie and Leigh Anne Tuohy was one of many central characters as well. Saying the Moneyball will fail because the book was nothing like a Disney movie is disingenuous
Can’t see the mass appeal. Pitt is likely to get the same amount on the backend as I am… Zero. No chance Moneyball does anywhere near $50M in Box Office and really can’t imagine it doing 1/2 that. Cornball or not the Blindside had a happy ending. Billy Beane has won one playoff series and never sniffed the World Series. The point of any professional sports franchise is to win championships. Who wants to watch a movie about a team who had a low payroll but won a lot of regular season games? Not to mention your core audience is going to be too busy watching baseball and playing fantasy baseball to bother buying a ticket. This should be a $15M indie.
“No chance Moneyball does anywhere near $50M in Box Office and really can’t imagine it doing 1/2 that.”
How does that crow taste?
Not gonna lie, my favorite part of the article was the image I got from “Pitt will be rewarded with a stronger back-end definition.” I don’t care what it really means, I enjoyed the image.
Loved the book and the A’s were fantastically successful given their monetary constraints, but I just don’t see how this translates into a movie. I read the version of the script that was floating around a few years ago and it was a train wreck (and so deviant from the real story) that I can’t imagine it translating into financial success. One never knows though.
Can someone explain what the article meant by “rumors racing around Hollywood included one that Pitt would make back some of what he surrendered on Moneyball by signing on to another Columbia film, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo?” Isn’t the Dragon Tattoo movie already made and in release?
They’re talking about the English language version of GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO, which Steve Zaillian is writing now at Sony for Fincher to direct. The Swedish language film has already been released and the same Swedish producers are attached to the new one.
Hope Miller can actually direct another feature ( not just commercials) and is not a one hit wonder…been a long time since Capote.
A’s lost to the Yanks by 1 game in 2000 and 2001 playoffs. Yankees payroll was 70 million more. Then they go steal Giambi. I’d rather be a lamppost in Oakland than a Yankee Fan.
Go A’s.
If the A’s had a bigger payroll they would have kept Giambi, Tejada, Damon, the big three pitchers, etc and would have dominated baseball at the beginning of the 21st century. Unfortunately they develop talent that is stolen. I’d feel dirty being a Yankee fan.
Much like baseball players need steroids to compete in the major leagues, this film will need them to get anyone to see it.
This sure seems like a revisionist version of what really went down with Moneyball when Amy Pascal shitcanned it. She knew what Soderberg’s vision was and went along with it until she found out he’d re-written Zaillian’s script because Soderbergh knew there was no way MLB or Beane would approve the script with Beane written as skirt-chasing ladies man fond of casual one-nighters and wrecking the locker room in the nude. That Zaillian script wasn’t approved by Pitt either and he could have put the kibbosh on the Zaillian script even if Pascal liked it. It certainly wouldn’t be the first – or last – time that Pitt walked away from a movie because a studio played fast-and-loose with his contractual script approval.
I was one of the 150 + crew members that was on this movie and then lost my gig 3 days before shooting. After the word came down and the production offices started to clear out and be broken down there was a single email left pinned to a bulletin board.
It was from Amy Pascal to Steven Soderbergh dated 4 days before the plug was pulled.
Soderbergh had delivered her his final draft of the screenplay and a teaser trailer he had cut utilizing the various interviews he’d done (15 days of shooting with the real people) and footage of Brad and Demitri Martin as Billy Beene and Paul dePodesta.
Amy’s email read—
“I want to see this movie RIGHT NOW”
everyone knew Amy knew what the script was and what the movie was.
If Soderbergh would want to bury her and Matt Tolmach he could..there is a very clear
email trail that they were aware of exactly what the movie was and were onboard.
it was BRAD..everybody. He betrayed his friend and got him fired.
that’s the story.
I’m not surprised Brad stuck it to the Soderberg version. That script was a mess. A “trust me” template for some chilly godawful audience-unfriendly docudrama in the manner of such Soderjerk wrist-jobs as Solaris, Girlfriend Experience, etc.
Amy was just being polite with that email, bro. It’s called studio bullshit.
That said, I thought the Zaillian draft was solid but dense with all the stats and it missed one crucial conceptual point — this project is essentially an underdog sports comedy. For anyone who isn’t a baseball geek, it’s funny! A classic story of a coach with no money and a nerd with the laptop who outwit the system, so they lose-but-win-really in the grand Bad News Bears tradition.
If we have to take it more seriously than that, it’s a bore.
Isn’t baseball the game where a bunch a guys stand around in a field waiting for something to happen? How could a movie about that possibly be interesting? Let’s have “Mamma Mia 2″! Pronto!!
What place has beanes A’s finished in the past few yrs?
That photo of Brad is the distant past. I don’t want to see him in any movies now. Sorry.
pitt photo-cannes 2008
pitt is a great actor,good project
Didn’t Moneyball produce the A’s passing on Todd Helton to draft Ariel Prito? Enjoyed the book as a baseball geek but can’t see this as a must see movie.
HHMMMMM ,Bennett Miller is and alway’s will be a great director !!! WHAT HAVE YOU DIRECTED LATELY ??????
So finally is this movie script by Steve Zaillian or Aaron Sorkin? I am a huge Sorkin fan