
WriteThru: So here is the latest on 20th Century Fox’s efforts to lock in a director for X-Men: First Class, which will begin production late summer or early fall. I’m told that Samuel Bayer, who directed the weekend’s top grossing film A Nightmare On Elm Street, will meet with the studio tomorrow, and joins a list of filmmakers that includes Timur Bekmambetov, Louis Leterrier, David Slade, Daniel Espinosa and Carl Erick Rinsch. A decision will be made in the next week or so on the director who’ll start production late summer or early fall. The studio became receptive to making a directing star when Bryan Singer moved from director to producer, and Espinosa and Rinsch fit that bill. Espinosa directed Snabba Cash, Rinsch was in line for the Alien prequel job until Ridley Scott decided he himself wanted to direct it. The other three have solid hitmaking credentials: Bekmambetov needs to make a film while the Wanted sequel sorts itself out after Angelina Jolie declined to reprise, Letterier has stepped off returning for a sequel to Clash of the Titans, and then there’s Slade, who followed the thrilling 30 Days of Night with the upcoming The Twilight Saga: Eclipse.
Last week, things were looking good with Matthew Vaughn, the Kick-Ass director who previously had gone far down the road with Fox before dropping out of X-Men: Last Stand, the film that Brett Ratner ultimately directed. Vaughn dropped out of contention last Thursday–his camp said he passed, but studio insiders denied there was an offer because the studio was so wary of going through a repeat of the last X-Men go-around. Bryan Singer, who’s producing with Lauren Shuler Donner and Simon Kinberg, hatched the idea for the film. Fox feels it has the potential for a filmmaker that Star Trek provided JJ Abrams, by taking a storied franchise back to the beginning. That’s why it’s a job to die for.


great choice,he nearly directed thor and x3,hope he does it
I feel like First Class is a waste. Does anyone really care about going backwards? I mean really, Hugh and Halle and Rebecca sure aren’t doing much right now so they’d probably jump at a sequel, Ian isn’t getting any younger, and Anna Paquin is on fire because of True Blood. How dumb is FOX not to be moving forward full speed on a X MEN 4??? I LOVE the X films, but I don’t care one bit about seeing First Class. Somehow I get the feeling it’s going to be a lot like Wolverine, except with a far smaller box office.
FORGET FIRST CLASS, MAKE X4!!!!!
I agree. I would much rather watch X-Men 4 than X-Men: First Class
I guess he finally realized he shouldn’t be stuck making small-time geek crap.
Yeah, those X-men movies sure were money pits.
You sound like my grandpa.
Is anyone going to note the irony if Vaughn directed the latest X-Men for Fox? After walking away from X3, he’s been expressing (during press for Kick-Ass) how such a said job is thankless. As a relatively new director, you are either blamed if the film is not a success or in the event of a success the studio collects all the accolades for the taking a chance on new talent.
remind me again why Vaughn fell off of X-Men 3 and we got stuck with Brett Ratner? It would be funny if they fired him off it, he became hotter than shit and they came crawling back to him.
Wasn’t he fired from the x-men thàt brett ratner ended up directing
Everything Vaughn does is “imaginative and watchable.” Really? I mean REALLY??? Because Stardust was such a snoozy and dastardly pile of ass-biscuit and Kick-Ass was just, well, more ass than any real kicks if you ask me…
But Bryan is notorious for undercutting his own brilliance as a director and his producing genius by hiring the worst screenwriters out there too, so why stop at the page? Chris McQuarrie is excused from this, it should be noted…
There’s almost no way that Vaughn could do this, after his interview last week with Elvis Mitchell on KCRW’s The Treatment. In it, he said that for X-Men 3, he felt that the director was almost irrelevant to the production, and that he didn’t want to work on movies like that. Check out the podcast.
Other than Vaughan non of those names are worth a damn. Just a bunch of hacks who will do whatever the studio tells them. Agents will convince these “directors” that it is a “great opportunity”, then they’ll get cranked through the Fox sausage factory and wind up micromanaged to death like so many other NewsCorp directors before them. If they were smart they’d let Cameron, Favreau, or JJ Abrams take over but that would mean giving up control, even if it means a better film. Singer = irrelevant. Fox is using him to convince geeks this next entry will have integrity like the first two flicks. It won’t. The studio is in full control of this rushed shitshow while Singer collects some cash. That’s the Fox way.
“Just a bunch of hacks who will do whatever the studio tells them.”
Don’t quite get that comment. Leterrier maybe. But Timur Bekmambetov did an amzing job with Wanted, not too mention Night Watch and Day Watch. Some of the most unique action filmmaking seen in a very long time. And I didn’t even like 30 Days of Night but I recognized that David Slade had some original vision. And taking a chance on two directors that have made some visually stand-out short films — not quite a hack list there.
Now naming directors who have all done similar big films just beacause they have done them — that feels way more hacky in thought.
Stardust was a good movie very fun along the lines of the Princess Bride. With the proper marketing it could have been much bigger.
I agree. I found it to be quite entertaining. Kick Ass was ‘interesting’.
An X-men sequal or prequal is always going to bring in a little dough for Fox regardless of who’s going to direct it. The only question is whether those Fox execs still want to convince themselves that they are really, somewhere at heart, “creative” people.
Totally agree – “Stardust” really got overlooked.
I hope its not Timor because he has to direct WANTED 2!!!!!
I have to agree with you guys. Stardust was an under rated film. Despite being targeted at a very young audience, I found myself enjoying it along with the kids.
And as for Kick Ass – well that was just the neatest film I’ve seen in years. It was a film with heart – instead of relying on brainwashing style marketing to the masses – for example, Avatar.
Vaughn’s film are aimed at connecting with an audience on an intellectual and emotional level – rather than stuff like Transformers which is just BOOM, BASH, SMASH and other loud noises.
I suspect he would make a pretty decent “first class”.
Stardust wouldve done better with better marketing? Please. They marketed the shit out of that movie. I remember complaining about having to see the bizzaro Michelle Phieffer billboards for months. That film is absolute drivel. The lead boy was the only redeeming quality. A Happy Meal at McDonalds has more substance. Vaughn is a complete hack.
Heard the script sucks ass. Most of the interesting or notable filmmakers they’ve gone to are passing because they have a locked release date and a script they’re married to in spite of it sucking. They should develop this and push the release date a year.