I wanted to wait and write about this L.A. court complaint until I had gathered some reaction. First and foremost, Marc Cherry is privately denying Nicollete Sheridan’s claims. In fact, his team is meeting today to discuss the situation surrounding what they say is a “nuisance” suit. Sheridan has sued the creator of Desperate Housewives for assault and battery, gender violence, and wrongful termination, alleging he struck her across the head and face on the set, and, that after she complained, he fired her. But insiders tell me that Cherry’s so-called “extremely abusive and aggressive manner” is grossly exaggerated. What happened is there was a scene in which Neal McDonough, who played Nicollette’s husband for the 5th season, was supposed to slap the actress. The way I hear it, during filming on September 24, 2008, Sheridan wasn’t reacting the right way. So Cherry was on the set supervising and in that context only he struck her. “He was showing her on set how it should be played. Ninety people on the set know what happened,” one insider explains to me.
According to the lawsuit, Cherry went to her trailer to “beg forgiveness” for “forcefully hit her with his hand across her face and head”. Sheridan says she immediately reported the incident to ABC, which failed to take action, and she was killed off the show unfairly. A Cherry insider tells me, “It’s sad that she can’t accept the fact that her contract was fulfilled.” Here is ABC’s official reaction: “While we have yet to see the actual complaint, we investigated similar claims made by Ms. Sheridan last year and found them to be without merit.”
In addition, I hear that Teri Hatcher has phoned ABC assuring them that a conversation she is alleged in the lawsuit to have had never happened. She also offered to make herself available to the network to help fight Nicollete’s lawsuit, which alleges that Hatcher complained about Cherry to ABC high-ups.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Cherry is a big diva one of the biggest, all this sudden success went to his head. Nicollette can be a bitch but Marc is the bigger bitch. This will never go to court it’s way too embarrassing. They will give her two million to drop it.
In typical male chavinistic hollywood fashion, Nicolette is being hung out to dry as a mature female. Men can slap or do anything they want to do, regardless of a contract. Marc Cherry is a drama queen, with the inflated head, pumped up by backing from ABC. They will probably say that they have the power to end Nicolette’s career, etc etc, and will. Hollywood has never treated any mature woman with any respect, and never will. Have a baby or grow old, and you will be forgotten. Farah Fawcett was a great actress, and did not even get billing for movies she made in her later years. They pair up fat men or older men with beautiful thin young women, and the public buys it?? I don’t think so.
I was stunned when I read about Nicolette’s suit against Marc. I question her reasoning abilities. The only “hail Mary” lawsuit I ever remember working out was when Hunter Tylo sued Aaron Spelling and won.
I can’t see how this is a good move for Sheriden. I’m thinking what I thought was quirky is crazy as far as Nic Nic goes.
Edie Britt always seems to be causing some kind of trouble on Wisteria Lane.
Good riddance honey…
If there is no basis for the lawsuit, why file? Any actor or actress suing a show creator faces huge downsides, that are obvious.
Of course Cherry will deny it. But evidence will quite likely be presented in open court. It is highly likely that the evidence will not be flattering to Cherry, or ABC, for that matter. I find it unlikely any lawyer would waste valuable time and money in a nuisance lawsuit against deep pocketed ABC/Disney and Cherry. These folks have the best legal counsel on speed dial.
I find it far more likely that Cherry, by virtue of being openly gay, in the protected, PC culture of Disney and ABC (the former known for having numerous openly gay execs such as Rich Ross) got away with behavior that would not have been tolerated from a straight White guy.
The “nuisance” suit being ugly, unflattering actions disclosed under sworn testimony by Cherry, and ABC/Disney’s efforts to ignore said actions or cover them up.
After all, Sheridan presumably still wants to work. The only way she does that is by proving in the court of public opinion that the conduct of Cherry was outrageous and a “shock to the conscience” of most other producers.
The only comparable lawsuit I can think of was the pregnant Soap star who was canned, for being pregnant.
Let me add, with the show being defined among its older female fans as fairly abusive to women, particularly older women who resemble the audience, expect the ratings and value of that show (and any deals with Cherry) to substantially decline. That is the risk ABC/Cherry run. I am shocked that this was not settled. It’s only money, right?
Either Sheridan wants to go forward (rejecting settlements) or Cherry does (blocking any deal). Either way, this is unlikely to turn out well for Cherry. My guess is his audience sides with Sheridan. Slapping her onset “directing” or not is not going to look good.
Counsel: “Did you strike Ms. Sheridan in the face?”
Answer: “Yes.”
That’s your Entertainment Tonight, and Local News headline, right there.
It’s hard to imagine Marc Cheery needing physical contact to make any point: I’ve seen him at functions for the WGA, and he defines the phrase “rapier wit.”
On a panel of gay and lesbian writers, a woman was confused they’d asked her to participate because she’d never formally outed herself. Marc’s voice from down the panel simply said “They saw your shoes.”
ROTFLMAO. Thank you for this sanity
“They saw your shoes.”
That is not rapier wit. It’s childish humor and not all that funny. Not to mention insulting to the other person.
You’re right. Aside from causing a room full of predominately gay and lesbian professional writers, including the writer at whom it was directed, to erupt into loud, long laughter, it wasn’t funny at all.
I thought the exact same thing Jimmy – thank you. That little misogynistic anecdotal piece doesn’t exactly help Cherry, it just shows that he has no problem humiliating a woman in public – like Sheridan is alledging.
This is truly NUTS. All of it. Even if it’s not true, even if it is true. What kind of animals are these people? He hit her, he didn’t — CRAZY. People behave so badly, they should all be sent to their rooms. No dinner, no emmys. Nothing.
first of all, does marc cherry look like he could hit anything besides the craft service table one too many times? Plus, he is too busy writing Emmy speeches for awards he’ll never win. No time for assaulting Nikki sher.
What? Someone off their meds…
Lily, you make no sense.
I’ve heard that he can get quite carried away and that was not above a very crass dressing down of anyone who disagreed with him but I’ve never heard anything about him being violent.
Previously on Desperate Housewives…
it seems that all Mark Cherry has to prove is that he had planned this character’s exit BEFORE the alleged slapping.
I’ve known Nicolette for years and this is honestly the first time I’ve heard this story. I know she hated Cherry with a passion and felt he singled her out for verbal abuse but knowing Nic if someone physically hit her, she would murder his ass. Wallpaper, she’s not.
“Cherry could make it happen for Teri Hatcher to get hit by a car and die. Fictionally speaking of course. Possibly in real life too.”
Oh, here we go again. Another television actor who thinks that he/she is entitled to creative control over a series.
It’s not yours. Your contract is up. Your not guaranteed a job for life–no one is–in any job. Spoiled brat. She needs a spanking and not a slap. Create your own show. You read lines and act them out. Your not bigger than a multi million dollar production…decisions need to be made creatively in order to maximize things–it’s not about you (actors) all the time!! Go home, sit in Beverly Hills and look out your window and be happy for once! All of you! Your not “victims”. Please stop. The average person makes 35,000 per year and get’s treated MUCH worse–I can promise you this.
Cherry’s people are not helping his cause. Sounds like he slapped her pretty hard on set.
You go, Nicollette! Take ABC to the cleaners, you deserve it.
I believe Cherry is a bully and retaliated against Nichollette. It’s obvious he had it in for her. ABC is a pack of liars, I hope she wins a ton of dough from the creeps. BTW, Teri Hatcher is a whore.
Come on. No one has a right to hit another person. If he struck her, he struck her. This crap about being on set is a nice cover. Why would he need to actually hit her.\? Sheridan has been on how many soaps and movies? How many cat fights or other kinds of fights has she acted in over the years?
Let’s be real about this, there is no reason why Cherry would have to hit this woman. None. Zip. Zilch. When is the last time you’ve heard of a director smacking an actress to help her understand how to be hit??
ABC lies all the time.
she should thank him, that show has jumped the shark few years ago, hurricanes, plane crashes it’s a soap! i doubt this really happened, gossip on set would have leaked a year ago!
So this guy who has written/produced a hundred plus hours of a highly soapy primetime show needed to HIT a veteran actress to get his point across? Something’s up. Something’s always up when the “team” needs to get together to respond.
They both sound like kind of awful people. Talent aside.
okay, Hollywood has made me a cynic
okay, maybe Hollywood has made me a cynic, so I’m just gonna call it for what it smells like: Publicity stunt?
“They saw your shoes.”
Birkenstock?
sounds odd.. yes… but you have to admit that her departure from the show was quick and strange… made no sense why they got rid of her… story-wise it added absolutely nothing… she brought something special to the show and her demise was insignificant. they claimed it was money but then went on and added a bunch more people. then this whole season has been mostly bland poop. i mean is abc watching this stuff? they spent a good part of the last new episode covering two of the housewives battling each other selling cookies for a ritzy school to raise money. it was stupid. and had no connection to any storyline on the show. do abc execs read the scripts anymore?
I’d like to be in a position where I could sue someone for $20M for having slapped me in the face.
As for Teri Hatcher, you forgot to mention that besides working for ABC on Desperate Housewives, Hatcher has a new web site project Disney/ABC. Hatcher has a financial reason to protect her relationship with Disney. Not too long ago, Hatcher was a desperate actress wondering how she would feed her kid before she got this role.
Let’s go back to this thing about being on set and supervising. This is supposed to be an excuse for Cherry? It’s documented that Sheridan went to ABC to complain immediately after the incident. Right? So, if this were a normal thing, why would she head to HR?
ABC said that they investigated this. There should be a paper trail of HR reports, emails, etc. at ABC.
Sheridan should file a criminal complaint. Have the police department conduct a criminal investigation into an assault and battery.
Sheridan personally has major attitude, as evidenced by the way she sneers at younger female extras, etc. Diva…
I had always wondered why he never had other shows set up at ABC after the success of Housewives.