This notice sent to subscribers made me laugh out loud.
First, Variety tries to liken your forking over money for the trade to membership in a club, complete with a “velvet rope”. Then it proclaims its “continued commitment to criticism” even after laying off its highly regarded staff film critic Todd McCarthy. And that it’s “adding more reporters” without mentioning all the ones fired in recent months and years. But I also sigh audibly that Variety (and The Hollywood Reporter and the Los Angeles Times and EW.com and the little read and irrelevant TheCrap to name just a few content thieves) continue to steal Deadline’s original content without attribution. (For instance, it’s not ethical for the trades to phone up publicists and ask “Is [Mike or Nikki] right?” and then rewrite our scoops word for word and slap someone else’s byline on our stories without any additional reporting. Other media don’t even make the PR call…)
Greetings.
As every aspect of the industry changes, we are continuing our promise to give all of our subscribers quarterly updates on what’s new at Variety.
The biggest change is upcoming: Soon, Variety.com will be a fully paid-access site, meaning the paywall will be up for everyone. No worries: There is no added charge, and as a subscriber you already have been provided a usemame and password to get behind the paywall. In the next few weeks, we will offer increased assistance about easily accessing Variety.com. In the meantime, if you need to be reminded of your login information, please call 1-866-MY-VARIETY or +1 515-247-2993 (outside the U.S.) or send an email to VTCCustserv@cds-global.com
The reason for the switch is simple: There has been a boom in showbiz coverage, but much of it is hearsay and spin, making it hard for readers to separate rumors from truth. A lot of the “reporting” has become more sensational as many of our online peers have been lured by the notion of bringing in more consumer eyeballs (and, they hope, more ad money). At Variety, we are unapologctically focused on people in the industry. Think of the paywall as a velvet rope, allowing you access to stories that have been confirmed by impartial sources and stories that will better inform you about the world you’re working in. Denied access behind the rope are items based on gossip, half-truths and anonymous rants. Variety subscribers will pay a single price allowing access to all of our news, data and reviews in multiple distribution platforms. We know you readers are an active bunch and may want our offerings in print form at home this morning, but may want it online at the office this afternoon or via mobile device while at the airport tomorrow.
As the entire business evolves, so docs our content. We’re sticking to our fundamentals, so some readers may not even notice the fact that Variety is covering a wider range of topics than before (technology, legal, animation, videogames, etc.) and covering some in new ways (music, below the line, etc.) We’re also renewing our role as a community touchstone, with more profiles of the newsmakers behind the deals, while we revive long-dormant features like Hitched, Births, Exec Shuflle, etc.
In the past few months, we have hired Leo Wolinsky as editor of Daily Variety and Chris Krewson as Variety.com editor, with Kirstin Wilder promoted to managing editor, all to help us maintain our traditions as we cover changes in the industry. In the next few months we will be adding more reporters, including one in New York and one in London, an editor in L.A., a correspondent in the Mideast, etc.
All this is in addition to our continued coverage of film, TV, international business, guilds, agencies, theater and our continued commitment to criticism (including more than 1,200 film reviews annually, far more than any other publication), while we stick with our trademark slanguage and headlines.
This year we are increasing our conferences, scheduling panel sessions and events that will help the community to meet and exchange ideas about new opportunities in the industry. Anchor events for this year include the 3D Gaming Summit, the Future of Film Summit, the Entertainment & Technology Summit and the 3D Entertainment Summit. In terms of philanthropy, Variety’s “Power of series will also expand. Over the past three years, the “Power of effort has generated more than SI.8 million dollars in contributions to more than 10 non-profit organizations. In addition to Power of Women and Power of Youth, the roster this year will also include Power of Comedy.
Like everything else we do, these panels, conferences and charity events arc only possible because of the people in the industry. Though Hollywood folks have a reputation as heartless heathens, you have proven yourselves, again and again, to be generous and thoughtful. Thank you for that.
Our main goal at Variety is to keep you informed about everything you need that will make you better at your job. And we will continue to keep you informed on the things you should know about Variety. You are an important part of our business, and we recognize that our connections with all of you are the most important relationships we have. Thank you for your support and let us know what else we can do to keep all of you “members of the club.”
Thank you and all our best,
NEIL STILES, President - BRIAN GOTT, Publisher - TIM GRAY, Editor
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Nikki, don’t let other media junkies get into your success. For sure the competition to share news content is high in Hollywood. However some news junkies are willing to go the extra mile of stealing news content and information.
To that effect, I will say: Stay ahead of the game and I will always be a fan of your news and information company.
May success be with you and your company.
A velvet rope to a metaphorical nightclub that makes you pay big money for cheap liquor, and only plays what the record companies told them to play last year over and over again.
agreed. the red velvet rope is possibly hollywood’s most vile (and dated) icon.
If I bring two girls with me, can I get in for free?
**Dismissive wanking motion**
What a complete crock of shit. Variety has been firing their senior, respected journalists for the simple reason of bringing down average salaries. Why? They are getting clobbered by New Media and its trends, including Deadline. Variety’s product is becoming more and more irrelevant. And Deadline is killing them. One of the reasons for that is the sharp POV of the reporting and the brilliant ease of the comment section after each Deadline piece. The comments foster a web community; and the “piling on” by commentators when comes to the bad guys is just too delicious for words. With the trade news providers these days, the winning source of information and gossip will have a certain edginess to it. And in this vein, Variety is Barry Manilow, while Deadline is Bob Dylan. Who’d you rather listen to?
Thanks for not hitting us with a paywall, Nikki. We know what’s yours and recognize it on other sites. No fair to you. But your faithful know and appreciate! Believe me!
Maybe they want to put up a pay wall (I liken it more to a fence, than a velvet rope actually) so some of the various smaller entertainment reporting sites don’t see when they’re content has been snagged and not properly credited.
Eh, they have had quite the history of scooping up the scoops and taking credit, as you’ve indicated.
Well, at least that will be one less feed to worry about reviewing every day… and I can stop waffling on whether to properly or generically source them anymore… it should save be a bit of time each day.
That’s kind of nice of them!
Variety is exactly like a velvet roped-club: It looks cool and mysterious from the outside, promises an unforgettable experience, and then once you’re finally in you realize it’s all horse shit.
Paying for “news” that can be found elsewhere (here, other blogs, heck even IMDB lol)? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Buh-bye Variety, twas nice knowing you.
ditto…….
Variety’s ‘pay wall’ is a joke. If you simply hit the ‘stop loading’ button on your browser in that split second after following a variety link when the story pops but and before the pay wall pops up… well… so much for the vaulted pay wall… go ahead, try it… AMAZING HOW INEPT THEY ARE!
Tick tock…tick tock…tick tock…
The clock is running out of time for the trades. Neither the studios (advertisers) nor the readership is willing to pay the outrageous price for the once ‘exclusive’ access to the industry which is no longer in the grasp of either Variety or THR.
How long will it be before Nikki has a ‘door’ charge? Let’s be real. Nikki is not doing this just for the fun of it, but I hope Deadline figures out other ways to create revenue.
We shall see.
Nikki, You should have included the Variety article in your subsequent “More RIPs” article. They’ve had a good century or so run; it’s time now for others who really understand how the media work in the 21st cenrury. Maybe they can just become a conference management company to squeeze out their remaining brand equity.
Wait…they’re reviving long-dormant features like Hitched, Births, and Executive Shuffle (a.k.a. you’ve known about this for weeks but we’re reporting it as news)? Holy shit!
Thank you Variety for your courage in being so “unapologetically focused on people in the industry.” That’s the kind of bold journalism that we need in these uncertain times.
Now if you’ll excuse me. I’m going to go hang myself with this velvet rope.
Viva Deadline!
Those idiots haven’t realized that if you hit the “stop loading” button then their beautiful “velvet rope” doesn’t block you from reading the article. It’s been fun sneaking my way into their exclusive club.
They’ll realize it now.
It will be interesting to see if the pay plan works. I don’t pay for it now, have never registered and as a web site it’s all over the place. Some days I can’t open a single story and on other days I can access the whole site.
I can’t help but think of the paywall as a paywall.
Some people have no imagination.
Hopefully Variety will learn to proofread their material before publishing it if they have the gall to charge for their material. Look at that release – it has misspellings in it!
HOW PROFESSIONAL!
“Though Hollywood folks have a reputation as heartless heathens..” That’s priceless! Just which “Hollywood folks” fired long-time, respected journalists from their staff? And their boasts about “wider coverage” rings as hollow as Mike Ovitz’s sense of morality.*
Everybody knows they could give a rat’s ass about “below the line” folks…er, heathens.For the latest on Hollywood, it’s DH and Smoking Gun for me. Wa-hoo!
*(Yeah, cheap shot @ MO, but WTF, lotsa shots on the guy elsewhere today on DH, just too much fun.)
That’s really more of a suicide note.
Variety has hung themselves with their velvet rope.
Variety shot themselves in the head when they took down the free access online! I pulled them off my favorites immediately. This is exactly the kind of panic reaction that makes new markets soar while the old traditions die a slow death. Say good night Variety.
can someone let me know the official date the paywall starts? i am having the headstone carved.
Nikki, I love your style and attitude and I always credit you.
Journalism actually COSTS MONEY. It is a risky move to kill the free internet, but on the long run it is the right thing. We all should pay for the work of journalists because otherwise journalism is going to die.
I dunno. I still think V’s a worthwhile read. The paywall sucks, laying off Todd et. al. was a doofus move, and reprinting your scoops without attribution is unconscionable.
But, every industry’s gotta have a flagship, even a lame & listing, draggletailed one. The WSJ’s got a paywall, and I guarantee you Wall Street jackasses read it as much as they do the finance blogs. I would too if I was a Wall Street jackass — only I’m sure those blogs would be more readable if they displayed the Finke touch.
Variety: the worst industry paper, except for all the others.
A 13-point instruction manual to bypass a paywall for an irrelevant Variety site? Sounds like a lotta work for no payoff. Think I’ll stick to Deadline for my news.
Illogical to say the least….
In a world where information can be found gushing at the seams of the internet, Variety, decides to (over)charge for their content.
I love reading Variety.com, however, Hollywood Reporter is very similar and usually breaks the same news… No Peter Bart, but that’s not worth paying Variety’s weird $248 fee.
Between Deadline, Movieline, /Film, Hollywood Reporter, Empire, and the abundant articles posted on IMDBpro, Variety’s rogue plan will most likely fail miserably.
Variety, “what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”